Workload Review Process. (a) Stage 1 - Manager Where an Employee or group of Employees is concerned they cannot meet their direct supervisor’s workload expectations and believe their workloads are excessive as per Article 54.01(c), the Employee or group of Employees may raise the concern to the Manager, equivalent position, or designate in writing. The Manager, equivalent position, or designate shall meet with the Employee or group of Employees within fourteen (14) days of the concern being raised to discuss and resolve the concern. The Manager shall provide a reply in writing.
Workload Review Process. Step 1 Where an employee, Manager or the Workload Committee identifies that workload is becoming unmanageable they may request a workload review by their immediate manager. Workload review will include: Assessment of workload included but not limited to the factors under 27.07 (1). A consideration of exceptional workload incurred through temporary coverage of another worker’s caseload. Identifying and initiating the necessary steps to minimize the likelihood that the individual worker’s workload will become unreasonable.
Workload Review Process. Where an employee covered by this Agreement has cause to believe that they are being asked to perform more work than is consistent with proper care, they must first give their immediate Supervisor or Designate an opportunity to resolve the issue by reassessing the needs of the team to determine whether realignment of work assignments is required. If the employee is dissatisfied with the resolution, they may:
Workload Review Process. Where an Employee or group of Employees are concerned their workloads are excessive, as defined in this letter of understanding, the Employee or group of Employees may raise the concern to the Manager, equivalent position, or designate in writing. The Manager, equivalent position, or designate shall meet with the Employee or group of Employees within ten (10) workdays of the concern being raised to discuss and resolve the concern. The Manager shall provide a response in writing. The time limits in the Workload Review Process may be adjusted by mutual agreement of the Parties. A representative of the Union may assist an Employee or group of Employees during the Workload Review Process. The Workload Review Process is not subject to the Grievance Procedure set out in Article 25. SIGNED THIS _______ DAY OF _______________, 2020. ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF ON BEHALF OF LOCAL 039 OF THE GOVERNORS OF THE SOUTHERN ALBERTA UNION OF PROVINCIAL ALBERTA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY EMLPOYEES _________________________________ ___________________________________ Chair - Xxxxx Xxxx President – Xxx Xxxxx LETTER OF UNDERSTANDING #8 BETWEEN THE SOUTHERN ALBERTA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY AND LOCAL 039 OF THE ALBERTA UNION OF PROVINCIAL EMPLOYEES RE: Use of Agency Staff for Administrative Assistant I and II The Employer agrees that when it engages Agency Staff for the classification of Administrative Assistant I and Administrative Assistant II it will limit such engagement to 60 calendar days. In the event that the Employer determines that position abolishment(s) are required in accordance with Article 12 of the Collective Agreement, any Agency Staff engaged as Administrative Assistant I and II shall be included in the group of individuals referred to in Step I of 12B.03 (a). SIGNED THIS _______ DAY OF _______________, 2020. ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF ON BEHALF OF LOCAL 039 OF THE GOVERNORS OF THE SOUTHERN ALBERTA UNION OF PROVINCIAL ALBERTA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY EMLPOYEES _________________________________ ___________________________________ Chair - Xxxxx XxxxxxxxXxxxx Thon President – Xxx Xxxxx LETTER OF UNDERSTANDING #9 BETWEEN THE SOUTHERN ALBERTA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY AND LOCAL 039 OF THE ALBERTA UNION OF PROVINCIAL EMPLOYEES
Workload Review Process. (a) Stage 1 - Manager Where an Employee or group of Employees is concerned they cannot meet their direct supervisor’s workload expectations and believe their workloads are excessive as per Article 54.01(c), the Employee or group of Employees may raise the concern to the Manager, equivalent position, or designate in writing. The Manager, equivalent position, or designate shall meet with the Employee or group of Employees within fourteen (14) days of the concern being raised to discuss and resolve the concern. The Manager shall provide a reply in writing. Where the Manager is satisfied that the concern meets the definition of an excessive workload in Article 54.01(c) and establishes a plan to address the workload concern, an assessment period of at least six (6) months shall occur to assess the effectiveness of the plan. During an assessment period, the workload concern shall not be advanced to Stage 2 of the Workload Review Process.
Workload Review Process. Where an Employee or group of Employees are concerned their workloads are excessive, as defined in this letter of understanding, the Employee or group of Employees may raise the concern to the Manager, equivalent position, or designate in writing. The Manager, equivalent position, or designate shall meet with the Employee or group of Employees within ten (10) workdays of the concern being raised to discuss and resolve the concern. The Manager shall provide a response in writing. The time limits in the Workload Review Process may be adjusted by mutual agreement of the Parties. A representative of the Union may assist an Employee or group of Employees during the Workload Review Process. The Workload Review Process is not subject to the Grievance Procedure set out in Article 25. SIGNED THIS DAY OF _ , 2019. ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF ON BEHALF OF LOCAL 039 OF THE GOVERNORS OF THE SOUTHERN ALBERTA UNION OF PROVINCIAL ALBERTA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY EMLPOYEES Chair – Xxxxx Xxxx President – Xxx Xxxxx LETTER OF UNDERSTANDING #8 BETWEEN THE SOUTHERN ALBERTA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY AND LOCAL 039 OF THE ALBERTA UNION OF PROVINCIAL EMPLOYEES RE: Use of Agency Staff for Administrative Assistant I and II
Workload Review Process. An academic staff member who is dissatisfied with any aspect of their workload shall have recourse to a review process. The review process is designed to seek early resolution, without the need for escalation to a formal dispute process. The academic staff member and the supervisor, Head of School / Xxxx (or nominee) has the right to be represented by a person of their choice (other than a practising barrister or solicitor) and to seek the assistance of an employee from Human Resources.
