Clarification of Proposals. Evaluations will be in accordance with the selection criteria set forth in the proposal request. Upon completion of evaluations, the CO will issue a task order to the contractor whose proposal provides the best value to the Government.
Clarification of Proposals. To assist in the examination, evaluation and comparison of Proposals, UNDP may, at its discretion, ask any Proposer for a clarification of its Proposal. UNDP’s request for clarification and the response shall be in writing. Notwithstanding the written communication, no change in the prices or substance of the Proposal shall be sought, offered, or permitted, except to provide clarification, and confirm the correction of any arithmetic errors discovered by UNDP in the evaluation of the Proposals, in accordance with RFP Clause 32. Any unsolicited clarification submitted by a Proposer in respect to its Proposal, which is not a response to a request by UNDP, shall not be considered during the review and evaluation of the Proposals.
Clarification of Proposals. UNAIDS may, at its discretion, ask any bidder for clarification of any part of its proposal to assist in the examination, evaluation and comparison of proposals. The request for clarification and the response shall be in writing. No change in price or substance of the proposal shall be sought, offered or permitted during this exchange.
Clarification of Proposals. To assist in the examination, evaluation and comparison of Proposals, the Purchaser may at its discretion, ask the Offeror for clarification of its Proposal. The request for clarification and the response shall be in writing and no change in price or substance of the Proposal shall be sought, offered or permitted.
Clarification of Proposals. To assist in the examination, evaluation and comparison of Proposals, UNDP may at its discretion, ask the Offeror for clarification of its Proposal. The request for clarification and the response shall be in writing and no change in price or substance of the Proposal shall be sought, offered or permitted.
Clarification of Proposals. WHO may, at its discretion, ask any bidder for clarification of any part of its proposal. The request for clarification and the response shall be in writing. No change in price or substance of the proposal shall be sought, offered or permitted during this exchange.
Clarification of Proposals. The con- tracting committee may elect not to hold any clarifying discussions and rec- ommend awarding the contract to the low responsive bidder. Otherwise, the contracting committee must give at least each of the three apparent lowest evaluated bidders an equal opportunity to participate in discussions for the purpose of resolving questions regard- ing the specification and contract terms and to arrive at a final price. Neither prices of other bids nor rel- ative ranking of any bidder are to be revealed under any circumstances. Such discussions may be held by tele- phone or similar means provided at least each of the three apparent lowest evaluated bidders have an equal oppor- tunity to participate. Upon completion of the clarifying discussions, the con- tracting committee will determine the lowest evaluated responsive bid. If no bids are responsive after the con- tracting committee has completed clarifying discussions, no contract award can be made under the informal bidding procedure.
Clarification of Proposals. WHO may, at its discretion, ask any bidder for clarification of any part of its proposal. The request for clarification and the response shall be in writing. No change in price or substance of the proposal shall be sought, offered or permitted during this exchange. Award of Contracts Contracts shall be awarded based on a combination of criteria including the bidder’s motivation statement, exposure to or experience of, working in the area of evidence synthesis, the content of the proposal in terms of comprehensiveness, and value for money. However, WHO reserves the right to: • Award the contract to a bidder of its choice, even if its bid is not the lowest. • Award separate contracts for parts of the work, components or items, to one or more bidders of its choice, even if their bids are not the lowest. • Accept or reject any proposal, and to annul the solicitation process and reject all proposals at any time prior to award of contract, without thereby incurring any liability to the affected bidder or bidders and without any obligation to inform the affected bidder or bidders of the grounds for WHO’s action. • Award the contract on the basis of the Organization’s particular objectives to a bidder whose proposal is considered to be the most responsive to the Organization’s needs and the activity concerned. • Not award any contract at all. WHO has the right to eliminate bids for technical or other reasons throughout the evaluation/selection process. WHO shall not in any way be obligated to reveal, or discuss with any bidder, how a proposal was assessed, or to provide any other information relative to the evaluation/selection process or to state the reasons for elimination to any bidder. NOTE: WHO is acting in good faith by issuing this call. However, this document does not obligate WHO to contract for the performance of any work, nor for the supply of any products or services. WHO’s Right to enter into negotiations: WHO reserves the right to enter into negotiations with one or more bidders of its choice, including but not limited to negotiation of the terms of the proposal(s), the price quoted in such proposal(s) and/or the deletion of certain parts of the work, components or items called for under this call. Signing of the Contract Within 30 days of receipt of the contract, the successful bidder shall sign and date the contract and return it to WHO according to the instructions provided at that time.
Clarification of Proposals. To assist in the examination, evaluation and comparison of Proposals, UNDP may at its discretion, ask the Offeror for clarification of its Proposal. The request for clarification and the response shall be in writing and no change in price or substance of the Proposal shall be sought, offered or permitted. Preliminary examination UNDP will examine the Proposals to determine whether they are complete, whether any computational errors have been made, whether the documents have been properly signed, and whether the Proposals are generally in order. Arithmetical errors will be rectified on the following basis: If there is a discrepancy between the unit price and the total price that is obtained by multiplying the unit price and quantity, the unit price shall prevail and the total price shall be corrected. If the Offeror does not accept the correction of errors, its Proposal will be rejected. If there is a discrepancy between words and figures the amount in words will prevail. Prior to the detailed evaluation, UNDP will determine the substantial responsiveness of each Proposal to the Request for Proposals (RFP). For purposes of these Clauses, a substantially responsive Proposal is one which conforms to all the terms and conditions of the RFP without material deviations. UNDP’s determination of a Proposal’s responsiveness is based on the contents of the Proposal itself without recourse to extrinsic evidence. A Proposal determined as not substantially responsive will be rejected by UNDP and may not subsequently be made responsive by the Offeror by correction of the non-conformity. Evaluation and comparison of proposals A two-stage procedure is utilised in evaluating the proposals, with evaluation of the technical proposal being completed prior to any financial proposal being opened and compared. In the first stage, the technical evaluation shall be on the basis of responsiveness to the Terms of Reference, applying the evaluation criteria and point system specified below. A Proposal shall be rejected at this stage if it does not respond to important aspects of the Terms of Reference or it fails to achieve the minimum 700 points (70% out of 1000 points) of technical score indicated in evaluation table below. In the Second Stage, only the Financial Proposal of all offerors, who have attained the minimum technical score in the technical evaluation, will be opened. The Financial Proposals of offerors who have not attained the minimum technical score will be returned un...
Clarification of Proposals. 10.1 To assist in the examination, evaluation and comparison of proposals, the Fund may, at its sole discretion, ask the proposer for a clarification of its proposal. The request for clarification and the response shall be in writing and no change in the price or substance of the proposal shall be sought, offered or permitted. The Fund will review minor informalities, errors, clerical mistakes, apparent errors in price and missing documents.
