Background & Introduction. The project is 54.9 acres within the approved Village 1 Specific Plan project and is located north of XxXxxx Park Drive/SR 193, south and east of Auburn Ravine, and west of the Turkey Creek Golf Course. The Epick 3 Large-Lot and Small-Lot Subdivision Maps were originally approved by the City on October 27, 2015. The Epick 3 subdivision was found to be consistent with the Village 1 Specific Plan, Village 1 General Development Plan, Village 1 Environmental Impact Report (EIR), and City General Plan. A requirement of the Village 1 Specific Plan is that every development within the V1SPA must enter into a development agreement with the City. This requirement was also included in the Epick 3 conditions of approval (Condition #6), which specifies that the “Project Development Agreement shall include, but not be limited to: Applicant and City obligations; required on-site and off-site public facilities; timing of construction of required infrastructure; funding mechanisms for construction, operation, and maintenance of public facilities; and other obligations as determined by the City.” Condition #7 in the Epick 3 conditions of approval requires that prior to approval of any Final Map within the V1SPA, a Village 1 Infrastructure Master Plan and Financing Plan must be approved by the City Council. The Village 1 Infrastructure Financing Plan was approved by the City Council at its September 13, 2016 regular meeting. The requirement in section 3.2 of the Epick 3 Development Agreement that Epick 3 construct or finance those public infrastructure improvements necessary to serve the Project as set forth in the Infrastructure Financing Plan satisfies Condition of Approval #7.
Background & Introduction. Given the Democratic Republic of Congo’s (DRC) tumultuous economic and violent history, there is currently a lack of adequate health infrastructure particularly in terms of energy access at health facilities. Furthermore, there is a gap in existing literature on the impact and evaluation of improved energy access and its relationship to health service delivery and utilization. Finally, IMA World Health requires an assessment to determine the impact on health-seeking behavior from their investment in solar energy in the DRC through the ASSP Project. Objective: The purpose of this Master’s thesis is to document any changes in utilization of health services at the health center level pre and post solar panel installations in order to measure the health impact of increasing access to solar energy at health facilities in the DRC.
Background & Introduction. This class action settlement will resolve a lawsuit against Mowi USA, LLC, Mowi Ducktrap, LLC, Mowi USA Holding, LLC, and Mowi ASA (collectively, “Mowi”) involving the marketing of Ducktrap River of Maine smoked Atlantic salmon products, including those marketed under the Ducktrap River of Maine, Xxxxxxx Xxxxx, Spruce Point, Marine Harvest, and Nova Lox brand names. The lawsuit contends that these products were inappropriately marketed as sustainably sourced, all natural, and from Maine. The lawsuit seeks to stop such marketing and to refund to customers a portion of the purchase price. Mowi denies these allegations and maintains that its marketing was at all times truthful and accurate. The Court has not made a determination as to whether the allegations against Mowi have merit. Instead, the parties have proposed to enter into a class-action settlement to resolve the claims asserted in the settlement. In connection with this settlement, Mowi will provide each Settlement Class Member who submits a valid and timely claim a cash payment of up to two dollars and fifty cents ($2.50) per package of Ducktrap smoked Atlantic salmon purchased between March 1, 2017 and [the date of entry of the Preliminary Approval Order], up to a maximum of $25.00 per household. The maximum of $25.00 per household does not apply if valid proof of purchases are submitted. In addition, Mowi has agreed to make changes to the labeling of Ducktrap River of Maine smoked Atlantic salmon products. This notice summarizes your rights under the proposed settlement of a class action lawsuit. For the precise terms and conditions of the settlement, please see the settlement agreement available at xxx.xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx. Your legal rights are affected whether you act or don’t act. Read this notice carefully. Any questions? Read below, visit xxx.xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx, or call [#####] for more information. YOUR RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT DEADLINE Submit a Claim The only way to receive a cash payment in connection with this settlement is to submit a timely and valid claim. See Questions 6–8 for more information. [120 days after entry of the Preliminary Approval Order] Exclude Yourself If you exclude yourself from the Settlement Class (also called “opting out”), you will give up your right to receive a settlement payment, but will retain any rights you may have to bring your own lawsuit about the issues in this lawsuit. See Question 10 for more information. [120 days after en...
Background & Introduction. Incyte is part of an integrated global oncology company focused on transforming the lives of cancer patients. Recipient is a Healthcare Organisation which wishes to develop a web and mobile devices application to let physicians and pharmacists check the interactions of the different drugs that CML patients are having for other comorbidities with currently commercialized TKIs as an important factor in order to make the best decision in TKI selection for a certain patient. The project has two parts well defined as one is the IT development one and the other the hours of work of different authors searching the new drugs and new data of old drugs to be incorporated to the platform. The project will start in December 2020 with the IT development and expected to be finalized Q2 2021. This project is a clear benefit for patients as treatment decision is more reliable. Recipient requested a financial support from Incyte (as per the Original Request for Support herein attached in Schedule 1) to fund the Project described below and in Schedule 1 (“Project”). Incyte as part of its commitment to support medical education and quality patient care is willing to provide such support, subject to the terms of this Agreement. Clause 1 –Support Incyte will provide Recipient with Thirty-Four Thousand Twenty-Two EUR and Thirty-Five Cents (34,022.35 EUR) (“Support”) which shall be used by Recipient for the Project.
Background & Introduction. A settlement has been proposed to end a class action lawsuit against JPMorgan Chase Bank,
Background & Introduction. Xxxxxx Reservoir (fig. 1), located in south-central Kansas, was constructed by the Bureau of Reclamation, U.S. Department of the Interior, between 1962 and 1965. The primary purpose of Xxxxxx Reservoir is to provide the city of Wichita, Kansas, with a reliable municipal water supply, downstream flood control, wildlife habitat, and recreation (Bureau of Reclamation, 2016). Approximately 70 percent of Wichita’s municipal water supply came from Xxxxxx Reservoir during 1995 through 2013 (Xxxxxx and others, 2014). Water-supply needs and reliance on Xxxxxx Reservoir will continue to increase with ongoing population growth and urban development. Source-water protection is essential to preserving water-quality conditions and ensuring safe and reliable drinking-water supplies in the future. Cyanobacterial blooms in Xxxxxx Reservoir during 1990 and 1991 caused severe taste- and-odor events and prompted the formation of the Xxxxxx Reservoir Task Force in 1992. Nutrients and sediments were identified by the task force as the primary pollutants of concern in the Xxxxxx Reservoir watershed because of their effects on water quality and quantity and their relation to cyanobacterial blooms. Stream-water-quality goals for nutrients and sediment were established to improve water-quality conditions in Xxxxxx Reservoir (Xxxxxx Reservoir Task Force, 1994). To achieve these goals, the city of Wichita, along with other state and federal agencies, invests in cost-share programs to encourage best management practice implementation in the Xxxxxx Reservoir watershed. Since 1996, the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), in cooperation with the city of Wichita, has conducted studies in the Xxxxxx Reservoir watershed with the goal of understanding and improving water quality. Occasional taste and odor events continue to occur on Xxxxxx Reservoir (Xxxxxx and others, 2017). Initial studies determined sub-basin sources of contaminants, chemical loading into and out of Xxxxxx Reservoir, changes in reservoir sediment quality over time, and watershed sources of phosphorus (x.x. Xxxxxxxxxxx and Xxxx, 1997; Xxxx and Xxxxxxxx, 2000; Xxxx and others, 2002). Later studies focused on real-time estimation of water-quality constituent concentrations and mass transport from the watershed, trends in water- quality constituent transport in the watershed, and the description of in-reservoir conditions that may result in the occurrence of cyanobacteria and associated compounds (x.x. Xxxxxxxxxxx and others, 2006...
Background & Introduction. 1.1. The vision for Gawler as stated in the Council Community Plan 2017-2027 is to be ‘A liveable, cohesive, active, innovative and sustainable community’. This policy acknowledges the valuable contribution that participation in community development activities and recreation, both active and passive, has on the physical and mental health and overall wellbeing of the community.
Background & Introduction. 1.1 SWFAC is a multi-community collaboration established in 2008 between the Cities of Avondale, Buckeye, Goodyear and Maricopa County (the “Consortium”). The City is the lead administrative agency for the Consortium.
Background & Introduction. Michigan Tech proposes to assemble a team of recognized experts from across Michigan and beyond in subjects including engineering, hydrodynamics, public health, ecology/environmental science, economics, resource management, and social science to perform an independent risk analysis of the Straits section of Enbridge’s Line 5 pipelines for the State of Michigan. This analysis will estimate the total potential liability for a worst-case spill scenario at this site, including the direct costs of containment/cleanup and restoration as well as the total value of economic losses including public health, cultural and natural resources, commercial, and real estate damages. In 2010, Michigan experienced one of the largest inland oil spills in US history when a pipeline known as Line 6B burst and spilled in excess of 1 million gallons of heavy crude into a tributary of the Kalamazoo River. To prevent future accidents of this nature, the State formed a multi- agency task force called the Michigan Petroleum Pipeline Task Force. The task force issued a report in 2015 that made 13 recommendations, including the establishment of the Pipeline Safety Advisory Board (PSAB) and the commissioning of two studies of the Mackinac Straits portion of Enbridge, Inc.’s Line 5 pipelines: a risk analysis and an alternatives analysis. A final report on the alternatives analysis was published on November 20, 2017. The risk analysis, however, was halted in June 2017 when the State of Michigan became aware of a Conflict of Interest with the firm contracted to perform the analysis and consequently terminated its contract. The State subsequently identified Michigan Technological University (Michigan Tech, MTU) as a potential project lead for a multi-institution team to take over the risk analysis. Michigan Tech was identified because of the faculty’s extensive knowledge of the complex flows in the Straits of Mackinac region. The director of Michigan Tech’s Great Lakes Research Center, Xx. Xxx Xxxxxxx, served on the PSAB at that time as the representative of state universities and therefore he recused himself of voting on the matter. The other members of the PSAB voted unanimously to recommend that the State of Michigan contract with Michigan Tech. Xx. Xxxxxxx subsequently resigned from the PSAB to lead the new risk analysis proposal development and avoid any appearance of conflict of interest during the project.
Background & Introduction. 6 This notice summarizes your rights under the proposed settlement of a class action The lawsuit concerns mortgages, for California 1- to 4-family residential properties, that 9 were originated, acquired, or serviced by Bank of America. Some customers for these mortgages 10 paid money in advance to be held by Bank of America in escrow or impound accounts for purposes relating to the property, such as the payment of property taxes or homeowners’
