Care Levels Sample Clauses

Care Levels. Complex Care (Unstable) Complex Care (unstable) patients are patients who are either elective or emergency admissions to any CHSA facility and who are assessed as critically ill and/or haemodynamically unstable. These patients will require active review and consideration of transfer to a facility with an Intensive Care Unit (ICU) or High Dependency Unit (HDU). This relocation will be achieved either through retrieval or transfer. Where these patients are being stabilised at the presenting hospital and awaiting transfer/retrieval, the patient must be managed in a monitored bed and nursed as 1:1 or 1:2 ratio based on the transfer sought (to ICU or HDU respectively). Patients who are either elective or emergency admissions to any CHSA facility who are assessed as haemodynamically or otherwise clinically unstable, must be transferred to a more appropriate facility with a High Dependency Unit (HDU). This relocation will be achieved either through retrieval or transfer. Where these patients are being stabilised at the presenting hospital and awaiting transfer/retrieval, the patient must be managed in a monitored bed and nursed as 1:2 ratio. If it is not possible to achieve transfer of the client to a hospital with an ICU or HDU following request, the presenting hospital will continue to provide care with the staffing resources detailed above. Complex Care (Stable) Complex Care (stable) patients are patients who are admitted to any CHSA facility and are assessed with co- morbidities that require short term close monitoring without other complex care needs or associated nursing interventions, but not HDU or ICU. These patients are managed in a monitored bed for a period of no more than 24 hour stay prior to further transfer to a general xxxx. Whilst monitored, patients are provided care as a 1:4 ratio. Where patient care requirements may exceed 1:4 ratio (6HPPD), clinical assessment is required by the registered nurse in charge. They will determine any changes that are appropriate to existing staffing requirements, and where necessary, engage for the required period of time additional nursing/midwifery staff. APPENDIX 4SKILL MIX IN COUNTRY INPATIENT UNITS Ratio RN/M:EN/AIN/M ANGASTON DISTRICT HOSPITAL 60:40 BALAKLAVA SOL MEM HOSPITAL 60:40 BORDERTOWN MEMORIAL HOSPITAL 70:30 BURRA BURRA HOSPITAL 60:40 CEDUNA HOSPITAL INC 70:30 CLARE DISTRICT HOSPITAL 70:30 XXXXX DISTRICT HOSPITAL 50:50 COOBER PEDY HOSPITAL 60:40 COWELL DISTRICT HOSPITAL 60:40 CUMMINS & DISTRICT ...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Care Levels 

Related to Care Levels

  • Performance Levels (a) The Performance Levels which apply to the performance by the respective Parties of their obligations under this Agreement are set out in Part 1 of Schedule 5. A failure by either Party to achieve the relevant Performance Level will not constitute a breach of this Agreement and the only consequences of such failure as between the Parties shall be the consequences set out in this Clause 5.6.

  • Service Levels Annex 1 to this Part A of this Call Off Schedule sets out the Service Levels the performance of which the Parties have agreed to measure. The Supplier shall monitor its performance of this Call Off Contract by reference to the relevant performance criteria for achieving the Service Levels shown in Annex 1 to this Part A of this Call Off Schedule (the Service Level Performance Criteria) and shall send the Customer a Performance Monitoring Report detailing the level of service which was achieved in accordance with the provisions of Part B (Performance Monitoring) of this Call Off Schedule. The Supplier shall, at all times, provide the Services in such a manner that the Service Levels Performance Measures are achieved. If the level of performance of the Supplier of any element of the provision by it of the Services during the Call Off Contract Period: is likely to or fails to meet any Service Level Performance Measure or is likely to cause or causes a Critical Service Failure to occur, the Supplier shall immediately notify the Customer in writing and the Customer, in its absolute discretion and without prejudice to any other of its rights howsoever arising including under Clause 12 of this Call Off Contract (Service Levels and Service Credits), may: require the Supplier to immediately take all remedial action that is reasonable to mitigate the impact on the Customer and to rectify or prevent a Service Level Failure or Critical Service Level Failure from taking place or recurring; and if the action taken under paragraph (a) above has not already prevented or remedied the Service Level Failure or Critical Service Level Failure, the Customer shall be entitled to instruct the Supplier to comply with the Rectification Plan Process; or if a Service Level Failure has occurred, deduct from the Call Off Contract Charges the applicable Service Level Credits payable by the Supplier to the Customer in accordance with the calculation formula set out in Annex 1 of this Part A of this Call Off Schedule; or if a Critical Service Level Failure has occurred, exercise its right to Compensation for Critical Service Level Failure in accordance with Clause 13 of this Call Off Contract (Critical Service Level Failure) (including subject, for the avoidance of doubt, the proviso in Clause 13.1.2 of this Call Off Contract in relation to Material Breach). Approval and implementation by the Customer of any Rectification Plan shall not relieve the Supplier of any continuing responsibility to achieve the Service Levels, or remedy any failure to do so, and no estoppels or waiver shall arise from any such Approval and/or implementation by the Customer. SERVICE CREDITS Annex 1 to this Part A of this Call Off Schedule sets out the formula used to calculate a Service Credit payable to the Customer as a result of a Service Level Failure in a given service period which, for the purpose of this Call Off Schedule, shall be a recurrent period of [one Month] during the Call Off Contract Period (the Service Period).

  • Service Level In the event that League InfoSight discovers or is notified by you of the existence of Non-Scheduled Downtime, we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine the source of the problem and attempt to resolve it as quickly as possible.

  • Staffing Levels To the extent legislative appropriations and PIN authorizations allow, safe staffing levels will be maintained in all institutions where employees have patient, client, inmate or student care responsibilities. In July of each year, the Secretary or Deputy Secretary of each agency will, upon request, meet with the Union, to hear the employees’ views regarding staffing levels. In August of each year, the Secretary or Deputy Secretary of Budget and Management will, upon request, meet with the Union to hear the employees’ views regarding the Governor’s budget request.

  • Grievance Levels Level One. If not resolved on an informal discussion basis, the grievance shall be reduced to writing, outlining:

  • Service Level Expectations Without limiting any other requirements of the Agreement, the Service Provider shall meet or exceed the following standards, policies, and guidelines:

  • Characteristics of the level (a) A person employed as a Social and community services employee level 6 will operate under limited direction from senior employees or management and undertake a range of functions for which operational policies, practices and guidelines may need to be developed.

  • STATEWIDE ACHIEVEMENT TESTING When CONTRACTOR is an NPS, per implementation of Senate Bill 484, CONTRACTOR shall administer all Statewide assessments within the California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (“CAASP”), Desired Results Developmental Profile (“DRDP”), California Alternative Assessment (“CAA”), achievement and abilities tests (using LEA-authorized assessment instruments), the Fitness Gram with the exception of the English Language Proficiency Assessments for California (“ELPAC”) to be completed by the LEA, and as appropriate to the student, and mandated by XXX xxxxxxxx to LEA and state and federal guidelines. CONTRACTOR is subject to the alternative accountability system developed pursuant to Education Code section 52052, in the same manner as public schools. Each LEA student placed with CONTRACTOR by the LEA shall be tested by qualified staff of CONTRACTOR in accordance with that accountability program. XXX shall provide test administration training to CONTRACTOR’S qualified staff. CONTRACTOR shall attend LEA test training and comply with completion of all coding requirements as required by XXX.

  • Performance Targets Threshold, target and maximum performance levels for each performance measure of the performance period are contained in Appendix B.

  • Formal Levels 14.3.1 Step 1.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!