Comprehensive Review. Great Rivers may require the Contractor to initiate a comprehensive review of an incident.
15.4.5.1. The Contractor must fully cooperate with any investigation initiated by Great Rivers and provide any information requested by Great Rivers within the timeframes specified within the request.
15.4.5.2. If the Contractor does not respond according to the timeframe in Great Rivers’ request, Great Rivers may obtain information directly from any involved party and request their assistance in the investigation.
15.4.5.3. Great Rivers may also review or may require the Contractor to review incidents that involve Individuals who have received services from the Contractor more than 365 calendar days prior to the incident.
Comprehensive Review. Purpose: Review and update the 2016-2020 Vision Blueprint and Appendices. • Timing: January – June 2020; Adoption of 2021-2026 Vision Blueprint in December 2020 • Tasks: o Solicit public input on items in the existing blueprint (short- and long-term action items and items not considered in 2015) and any new ideas. o Use a similar port meeting approach to collect public input and revise the Vision Blueprint based on stakeholder and Council member input. • December 2016, provide an update to Council and the public on the progress made towards implementing the 2016-2020 Vision Blueprint. Date done .
Comprehensive Review. DSHS may require the Contractor to initiate a comprehensive review of an incident.
13.3.5.1. The Contractor will fully cooperate with any investigation initiated by DSHS and provide any information requested by DSHS within the timeframes specified within the request.
13.3.5.2. If the Contractor does not respond according to the timeframe in DSHS’ request, DSHS may obtain information directly from any involved party and request their assistance in the investigation. 13.3.5.3. DSHS may request medication management information.
Comprehensive Review. Thorough examination of the main agreement, Schedule 1, and Technical Rider, with the opportunity for clarification on any unclear terms.
Comprehensive Review. A. Upon completion of the implementation of the XXX Plan, USACE will analyze the Undertakings holistically to assess cumulative effects upon historic properties. Cumulative effects are those which result from the incremental impacts of an undertaking when added to other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future federal or non-federal undertakings.
B. USACE, in consultation with the Signatory and Invited Signatory Parties, will identify and implement measures, as appropriate, to mitigate adverse cumulative effects on historic properties. If there is a disagreement that cannot be resolved, USACE shall initiate the dispute resolution process set forth in Stipulation IX.
C. Agreed upon measures to resolve adverse cumulative effects will be documented in a report that meets the standards of the Louisiana Division of Historic Preservation and the Division of Archaeology and will be submitted to SHPO and Consulting Tribes for review and comment. The final cumulative report will be distributed to the Signatory, Invited Signatory, and Concurring Parties.
Comprehensive Review. An Adjunct applying for a Multi-Year Appointment pursuant to Article 10 shall request a Comprehensive Review in the year before the Adjunct is eligible for such appointment. The Supervisor has overall responsibility for such Comprehensive Review, and the Comprehensive Review is subject to the review and approval of the Xxxx. This review will include, but is not limited to, the following:
A. Performance Survey.
(1) Review of all student evaluations (or aggregated summaries or ratings), syllabi, and applicable course materials.
Comprehensive Review. The SMPA parties are currently conducting a Comprehensive Review of Suisun Xxxxx monitoring data gathered since the on-site monitoring began in October 1984. The Comprehensive Review Team is currently working on the first draft of the report, which is scheduled for release by mid-1998, and relevant interim findings are included in this document. The purpose of the review of the SMPA, described in Article 4 (a), is to determine if the objectives of the Agreement are being achieved and if any adjustments are needed. The objectives of the SMPA are stated in Article 2 and include assuring that USBR and DWR maintain an adequate supply of good quality water within the Xxxxx; improve Xxxxx wildlife habitat to the extent feasible; define the scope of the obligations of USBR and DWR to provide the water supply, distribution, redistribution and management facilities; and to assure that USBR and DWR recognize that the water users within the Xxxxx have been diverting and will continue to divert water for wildlife habitat management within the Xxxxx. The objectives of the Suisun Xxxxx Monitoring Agreement are to describe a methodology and define the scope of DWR's, USBR's and DFG's obligations to carry out an appropriate monitoring program to meet the objectives of the SMPA. The SMMA has been evaluated in the context of the four stated objectives of the SMPA. In addition to evaluating the above-mentioned objectives, data being analyzed in the Comprehensive Review include the results of water monitoring, vegetation monitoring, wildlife surveys, and fish monitoring. Water monitoring data include channel water salinity, diversion and drain water salinity, managed wetlands water elevation and salinity, and soil water salinity. Vegetation monitoring data include plant survey data collected from the managed wetlands, and Xxxxx-wide triennial vegetation survey data. Wildlife survey data include waterfowl species and numbers, and results of salt xxxxx harvest mouse surveys. Fish monitoring data include abundance of young striped bass and Neomysis in Montezuma Slough, salmon sampling, effects of the SMSCG on predation and migration, and measurements of the distribution and abundance of existing fish resources in the Xxxxx.
Comprehensive Review. An Adjunct Faculty member applying for two-year appointment pursuant to Article 10 shall request a Comprehensive Review in the year before he or she is eligible for such appointment. The Department Chair, Program/Division Director, or designee has overall responsibility for such Comprehensive Review, and the Comprehensive Review is subject to the review and approval of the Xxxx. This may include, but not be limited to, the following:
a. Reviewing all student evaluations (or aggregated summaries or ratings), syllabi and applicable course materials, examining assessment methods, and observing teaching to evaluate teaching effectiveness. Additionally, the Adjunct Faculty member may choose to submit a written narrative outlining his/her approach to teaching previously assigned courses. The Chair, Director, or designee may also take into consideration any student commendations and complaints, both written and oral, about an Adjunct Faculty member’s performance.
b. In order to assess teaching effectiveness, the Chair, Director, or designee may also visit the classes of, or view content and communications in online courses, for any Adjunct Faculty member under his/her supervision. The date and time of the classroom observation shall be decided in advance by mutual agreement between the Chair, Director or designee and the Adjunct Faculty member. The Chair, Director, or designee shall write a summary of any classroom visit and shall meet with the Adjunct Faculty member in order to provide a copy of the written summary and review his/her observations. The Adjunct Faculty member may request an additional classroom observation by a different member of the core faculty, and such request shall not be unreasonably denied. The Adjunct Faculty member is free to add his/her own comments about the observation summary. Such summary by the Chair, Director, or designee, as well as any comments by the Adjunct Faculty member, shall become part of the Adjunct Faculty member’s personnel file.
c. Adjunct Faculty on two- year appointments will not be reviewed annually but may undergo Comprehensive Reviews at the discretion of the Department Chair, Program/Division Director, or designee. It is anticipated that Adjunct Faculty on two- year appointments who receive multiple re- appointments will be evaluated every few years. However, the Department Chair, Program/Division Director, or designee will still review student evaluations each semester/term for such Adjunct Faculty members per ...
Comprehensive Review. HCA or DSHS may require the Contractor initiate a comprehensive review of an incident.
7.4.2.5.1 The Contractor shall fully cooperate with any investigation initiated by HCA or DSHS and provide any information requested by HCA or DSHS in the timeframe specified within the request.
7.4.2.5.2 If the Contractor does not respond in the timeframe allowed HCA or DSHS may obtain information directly from any involved party and request their assistance in the investigation.
Comprehensive Review. 16
17 A. At the conclusion of all Section 106 coordination activities necessary 18 to address WSLP project actions, the USACE will analyze the 19 undertaking holistically to identify cumulative effects upon historic 20 properties.
22 B. The USACE, in coordination with the signatories to this 23 Agreement, shall identify and shall implement additional 24 mitigation measures to address adverse cumulative effects, as 25 appropriate.
27 C. All Section 106 coordination activities necessary to address WSLP 28 project actions shall be combined into a single Report discussion 29 according to format required by the Louisiana Division of 30 Archaeology, and shall be distributed to the signatories of this 31 Agreement and to other interested parties. 32
