Critical Design Review (CDR Sample Clauses

Critical Design Review (CDR. 10.3.1 After the completion of the manufacturing process and necessary tests the successful bidder shall conduct a CDR with a complete and comprehensive presentation of the entire task involved and shall formally submit the complete test results. Products, system safety, problem areas and security issues shall also be discussed during CDR. The probable venue for the CDR shall be mutually decided.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Critical Design Review (CDR a. The purpose of the CDR is to demonstrate that the maturity of the design is appropriate to support proceeding with full scale fabrication, assembly, integration, and test, and that the technical effort is on track to complete the flight and ground system development and mission operations in order to meet mission performance requirements within the identified cost and schedule constraints.
Critical Design Review (CDR. The contractor shall conduct a critical design review prior to the system verification tests in accordance with SECTION H-4 (b) of this contract. Additional guidance may be provided prior to the review. At the Verification & Delivery, contractors shall deliver a prototype JTAMS that is capable of meeting the system level performance requirements as described in the final System Specification. Prototype system performance testing will be conducted at Verification as described in paragraph 4 of the DRAFT System Specification.
Critical Design Review (CDR. The purpose of a CDR is to allow INTELSAT and the parties responsible for the item under review to agree on the adequacy of the unit, subsystem, and system design, performance, and test plans. INTELSAT shall have the right to approve the review in accordance with 3.2.7 herein. CDRs shall be held for all equipment after completion of development tests, if required for that item. New unit and subsystem designs shall comply with the full requirements of a CDR. The CDR data package shall be submitted in accordance with the CDRL (Appendix 2, Section 2.3.2). A Spacecraft System Critical Design Review shall be held to address specific requirements for each additional Spacecraft, when these requirements are modified from the initial Spacecraft’s requirements. A preliminary version of the Mission Sequence of Events shall be included in the data requirements of the Spacecraft System CDR. Asterisks (“**”) indicate omitted material pursuant to a request for confidential treatment INTEL-2400 EXHIBIT B REVISION 2
Critical Design Review (CDR. The Contractor shall host a Critical Design Review (CDR) at the Contractor’s facility using the Defense Acquisition Guidebook, Paragraph 4.2.13 as guidance. The Contractor shall submit a CDR package IAW ELIN A002. The Contractor shall address requirements specified in the Performance Specification and include updated performance; Size, Weight and Power (SWaP); key system features; future Material Availability (Am); long lead items; estimated life cycle costs for final design and design alternatives; projected cost of the components and systems in production; manufacturing risks; estimated failure modes and rates; logistics management considerations; and the TDP in this review. The review shall include recommended requirements trade-offs based upon an assessment of cost, schedule, and performance risk. The CDR will be 30 days after the Customer Test data delivery is complete. The Contractor shall prepare an agenda and read-ahead package/briefing charts for Government approval IAW ELIN B001. The Contractor shall record and deliver Meeting Minutes IAW ELIN B002.
Critical Design Review (CDR. The purpose of the CDR is for the Contractor to demonstrate to the Government that the integrated baseline of the MK 48 MOD 7 APB6/TI-1 program can proceed into fabrication, demonstration, and test, and can meet stated performance requirements within cost, schedule, and risk. The Government will authorize the Contractor to produce POD units upon Government concurrence of successful completion of CDR. The Contractor shall deliver the Product Baseline TDPs (CDRL B001 through B019) to the Government at least 60 days prior to the CDR. Once all CDR requirements are met, the Contracting Officer will issue a closure letter authorizing the Contractor to assemble and deliver POD units. Upon completion of the CDR, the baseline for all TDPs and factory processes shall be considered established. The Contractor shall schedule the CDR within 10 days of being notified by the COR to proceed with the review. The Contractor shall coordinate with the Government when the review will be held. Starting at CDR, Contractor developed, Government approved System/Subsystem Specifications (SSS), Software Requirements Specifications (SRS), Interface Control Specifications (ICS) and Interface Requirements Specifications (IRS) shall be baselined by the Contractor via the Engineering Change Proposal (ECP) process. After CDR, any follow on changes to these documents shall be submitted via the ECP process. A delta CDR shall be conducted by the Contractor to obtain authorization to assemble and deliver POM units. The delta CDR shall be conducted to review all changes made to the POD baseline. The delta CDR shall be conducted per the requirements stated in this paragraph.
Critical Design Review (CDR. The CDR demonstrates that the detailed design meets Orbital Reef requirements with acceptable cost, schedule, and risk. The program is ready to fabricate, manufacture, code, or otherwise realize the hardware and software. Key products will be distributed for formal feedback around four weeks prior to CDR, with a minimum of two weeks allocated for review of major products. The CDR will summarize each major product and the results of each review. Within three business days after conclusion of the review, the review board will summarize review findings and determine and document any review item discrepancies (RID) or requests for action (RFA). RIDs will require disposition and closeout as approved by the review board. RFAs will be treated as suggestions by the review board that may or may not be reacted to by the program. Entrance: 1. All remaining RIDs from PDR have been resolved or are executing to a closure plan that does not impact progress of development for CDR. 2. A preliminary CDR agenda, success criteria, and instructions to the review board have been agreed to by the technical leads, program manager, and review chair prior to the CDR. 3. All planned lower-level CDRs have been successfully conducted, and all significant findings have been adjudicated and do not impact success criteria of system-level CDR. 4. The Orbital Reef Safety Review Board has reviewed all Phase 2 Hazard Reports. 5. Summary status of Enterprise, Segment, and Element verification Amount: $25M Date: October 2024
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Critical Design Review (CDR

  • Scope of Work The Contractor has overall responsibility for and shall provide and furnish all materials, equipment, tools and labor as necessary or reasonably inferable to complete the Work, or any phase of the Work, in accordance with the Owner’s requirements and the terms of the Contract Documents.

  • Review Systems The Asset Representations Reviewer will maintain and utilize an electronic case management system to manage the Tests and provide systematic control over each step in the Review process and ensure consistency and repeatability among the Tests.

  • Review Scope The parties confirm that the Asset Representations Review is not responsible for (a) reviewing the Receivables for compliance with the representations and warranties under the Transaction Documents, except as described in this Agreement or (b) determining whether noncompliance with the representations and warranties constitutes a breach of the Eligibility Representations. For the avoidance of doubt, the parties confirm that the review is not designed to determine why an Obligor is delinquent or the creditworthiness of the Obligor, either at the time of any Asset Review or at the time of origination of the related Receivable. Further, the Asset Review is not designed to establish cause, materiality or recourse for any Test Fail (as defined in Section 3.05).

  • SERVICE LEVEL DESCRIPTION The Fund Accounting Agreement is hereby amended by deleting the Service Level Description attached thereto and replacing it in its entirety with the Service Level Description attached hereto.

  • Statement of Work The Contractor shall provide the services and staff, and otherwise do all things necessary for or incidental to the performance of work, as set forth below:

  • Development Plan document specifying the work program, schedule, and relevant investments required for the Development and the Production of a Discovery or set of Discoveries of Oil and Gas in the Contract Area, including its abandonment.

  • Maintenance of Review Materials It will maintain copies of any Review Materials, Review Reports and other documents relating to a Review, including internal correspondence and work papers, for a period of at least two years after any termination of this Agreement.

  • Project Plan Development of Project Plan Upon the Authorized User’s request, the Contractor must develop a Project Plan. This Project Plan may include Implementation personnel, installation timeframes, escalation procedures and an acceptance plan as appropriate for the Services requested. Specific requirements of the plan will be defined in the RFQ. In response to the RFQ, the Contractor must agree to furnish all labor and supervision necessary to successfully perform Services procured from this Lot. Project Plan Document The Contractor will provide to the Authorized User, a Project Plan that may contain the following items: • Name of the Project Manager, Contact Phone Numbers and E-Mail Address; • Names of the Project Team Members, Contact Phone Numbers and E-Mail Address; • A list of Implementation milestones based on the Authorized User’s desired installation date; • A list of responsibilities of the Authorized User during system Implementation; • A list of designated Contractor Authorized Personnel; • Escalation procedures including management personnel contact numbers; • Full and complete documentation of all Implementation work; • Samples of knowledge transfer documentation; and • When applicable, a list of all materials and supplies required to complete the Implementation described in the RFQ. Materials and Supplies Required to Complete Implementation In the event that there are items required to complete an Implementation, the Contractor may request the items be added to its Contract if the items meet the scope of the Contract. Negotiation of Final Project Plan If the Authorized User chooses to require a full Project Plan, the State further reserves the right for Authorized Users to negotiate the final Project Plan with the apparent RFQ awardee. Such negotiation must not substantively change the scope of the RFQ plan, but can alter timeframes or other incidental factors of the final Project Plan. The Authorized User will provide the Contractor a minimum of five (5) business days’ notice of the final negotiation date. The Authorized User reserves the right to move to the next responsible and responsive bidder if Contractor negotiations are unsuccessful.

  • Development Schedule The Project shall substantially comply with the specific timetables and triggers for action set forth in Article 5 of this Agreement. The parties acknowledge that, as provided in G.S. 160A-400.25(b), the failure to meet a commencement or completion date shall not, in and of itself, constitute a material breach of this Agreement pursuant to G.S. 160A-400.27 but must be judged based upon the totality of the circumstances.

  • Commercialization Reports Throughout the term of this Agreement and during the Sell-Off Period, and within thirty (30) days of December 31st of each year, Company will deliver to University written reports of Company’s and Sublicensees’ efforts and plans to develop and commercialize the innovations covered by the Licensed Rights and to make and sell Licensed Products. Company will have no obligation to prepare commercialization reports in years where (a) Company delivers to University a written Sales Report with active sales, and (b) Company has fulfilled all Performance Milestones. In relation to each of the Performance Milestones each commercialization report will include sufficient information to demonstrate achievement of those Performance Milestones and will set out timeframes and plans for achieving those Performance Milestones which have not yet been met.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.