We use cookies on our site to analyze traffic, enhance your experience, and provide you with tailored content.

For more information visit our privacy policy.

Design Review and Recommendations Sample Clauses

Design Review and Recommendations a) The Construction Manager shall familiarize himself thoroughly with the evolving architectural, civil, mechanical, plumbing, electrical and structural plans and specifications and shall follow the development of design through Contract Documents. The Construction Manager shall make recommendations with respect to the selection of systems and materials, and cost reducing alternatives including assistance to the Architect-Engineer and Owner in evaluating alternative comparisons versus long term cost effect. The evaluation shall speak to the benefits of the speed of erection and early completion of the project. The Construction Manager shall furnish pertinent information as to the availability of materials and labor that will be required. The Construction Manager shall submit to the Owner and Architect-Engineer such comments as may be appropriate concerning construction, feasibility, and practicality. The Construction Manager shall bring to the Owner and the Architect-Engineer’s attention any apparent defects in the design, drawing and specifications, or other documents. The Construction Manager shall prepare an estimate of the construction cost at appropriate milestones during the design and shall evaluate such estimate with the project budget. The Construction Manager shall recommend cost saving alternatives, as appropriate, at each design milestone. At each design milestone the Owner, Architect Engineer and Construction Manager shall conduct a value engineering review. b) After receiving the Construction Documents for each phase of the project, the Construction Manager shall perform a specific review thereof. Promptly after completion of the review, the Construction Manager shall submit to the Owner, with a duplicate to the Architect-Engineer, a written report covering suggestions or recommendations previously submitted, additional suggestions or recommendations as the Construction Manager may deem appropriate, and all actions taken by the Architect-Engineer with respect to same, any comments he may deem to be appropriate with respect to separating the work into separate contracts and/or alternative materials. c) At completion of the Construction Manager’s review of the plans and specifications, except only as to specific matters as may be identified by appropriate comments pursuant to this section, the Construction Manager shall warrant, without assuming any architectural or engineering responsibility, that the plans and specifications are consistent, p...
Design Review and Recommendations. 1. The XXXX shall participate in all design review meetings with the Owner that may be scheduled. For each design submittal, the XXXX shall review the design documents for clarity, consistency, constructability, construction feasibility and practicality, and identification of errors, omissions, conflicts and apparent defects and coordination of documentation. 2. The XXXX shall follow the development of design through final Construction Documents, reviewing the in-progress Schematic Design Documents and Design Development Documents, and familiarize itself thoroughly with all construction documents related to the Program, involving all required disciplines, including without limitation the evolving architectural, civil, mechanical, plumbing, electrical, information technology, and structural plans and specifications, as well as all other drawings and data related to the Program prepared by the Architect. The XXXX shall analyze the design for constructability, including construction feasibility and practicality, and alternative materials/methods. 3. The XXXX shall assist and advise the Owner in exploring potential value engineering, alternative approaches, materials and systems to minimize total construction and operation costs, or to enhance the quality of the Project or any Components thereof. 4. The XXXX shall continuously monitor the impact of proposed design on the Program and GMP schedules and recommend adjustments in the design documents or construction bid packaging to ensure completion of the Program and GMPs in the most expeditious manner possible.
Design Review and RecommendationsDeveloper shall supervise, coordinate, and otherwise facilitate and familiarize itself thoroughly with the evolving Preliminary Plans and Specifications and the Plans and Specifications and shall direct and closely follow the development of such documents from preliminary design through working and construction documents. Developer shall make recommendations to Architect and Architect’s Consultants with respect to the selection of systems, materials, and cost reducing alternatives (including assistance to County in evaluating alternative comparisons versus long term cost effects, and value-engineering). Such evaluation shall be directed to the benefits of the speed of erection and early completion of the Project. Developer shall furnish to County pertinent information in connection with the availability of materials and labor that will be required for the Construction Work. County’s failure to notify Developer that such alternative comparisons are not acceptable within thirty (30) days following receipt of such pertinent information from Developer shall be deemed to constitute the County’s approval of such alternative comparisons. Developer shall prepare or cause to be prepared by qualified cost estimators an estimate of the Construction cost utilizing the unit quantity survey method.
Design Review and Recommendations. Without assuming liability for the design of the PROJECT, the XXXX during Phase I – Construction Services for Design Phase, shall familiarize itself thoroughly with the evolving architectural, civil, mechanical, plumbing, electrical and structural plans and specifications and shall follow the development of design from schematic design through Construction Documents. The XXXX shall make recommendations with respect to the PROJECT site, foundations, selection of systems and materials and cost reducing alternatives, including assistance to the ENGINEER and the CITY REPRESENTATIVE in evaluating alternative comparisons versus long‐term cost effects as the PROJECT Team deem appropriate. The XXXX shall furnish pertinent information as to the availability of materials and labor that will be required. The XXXX shall submit to the CITY REPRESENTATIVE, the Permitting Authority and the ENGINEER(S) such comments in writing as the XXXX and the CITY REPRESENTATIVE may deem appropriate concerning construction feasibility and practicality. The XXXX shall call to the CITY REPRESENTATIVE and ENGINEER’s attention any apparent defects in the design, drawings and specifications or other documents that it notes.
Design Review and Recommendations. A. Review and Recommendations and Warranty - The DESIGN-BUILD FIRM's construction personnel shall familiarize themselves thoroughly with the evolving architectural, civil, mechanical, plumbing, electrical, and structural plans and specifications and shall follow the development of design from Phase I through Phase II. They shall make recommendations to the designers with respect to the selection of systems and materials, and cost reducing alternatives including assistance to the OWNER in evaluating alternative comparisons versus long term cost effects. The evaluation shall speak to the benefits of the speed of erection and early completion of the project. They shall furnish pertinent information as to the availability of materials and labor that will be required. They shall call to the DESIGN-BUILD FIRM's designer's attention any apparent defects in the design, drawings and specifications or other documents. They shall prepare an estimate of the construction cost utilizing the unit quantity survey method. B. Long Lead Procurements - The DESIGN-BUILD FIRM's construction personnel shall review the design for the purpose of identifying long lead procurement items (machinery, equipment, materials and supplies). When each item is identified, the DESIGN-BUILD FIRM shall notify the subcontractors and the Project Manager of the required procurement and schedule. Such information shall be included in the bid documents and made a part of all affected sub-contracts. The DESIGN-BUILD FIRM shall keep informed of the progress of the respective subcontractors or suppliers, manufacturing or fabricating such items and advise Project Manager and OWNER of any problems or prospective delay in delivery.
Design Review and Recommendations 

Related to Design Review and Recommendations

  • Design Review ‌ (a) Where so specified in Schedule A (Scope of Goods and Services) or as otherwise instructed by the City, the Supplier shall submit design-related Documentation for review by the City, and shall not proceed with work on the basis of such design Documentation until the City’s approval of such Documentation has been received in writing. (b) None of: (i) the submission of Documentation to the City by the Supplier; (ii) its examination by or on behalf of the City; or (iii) the making of any comment thereon (including any approval thereof) shall in any way relieve the Supplier of any of its obligations under this Agreement or of its duty to take reasonable steps to ensure the accuracy and correctness of such Documentation, and its suitability to the matter to which it relates.

  • Project Review A. Programmatic Allowances 1. If FEMA determines that the entire scope of an Undertaking conforms to one or more allowances in Appendix B of this Agreement, with determinations for Tier II Allowances being made by SOI-qualified staff, FEMA shall complete the Section 106 review process by documenting this determination in the project file, without SHPO review or notification. 2. If the Undertaking involves a National Historic Landmark (NHL), FEMA shall notify the SHPO, participating Tribe(s), and the NPS NHL Program Manager of the NPS Midwest Regional Office that the Undertaking conforms to one or more allowances. FEMA shall provide information about the proposed scope of work for the Undertaking and the allowance(s) enabling FEMA’s determination. 3. If FEMA determines any portion of an Undertaking’s scope of work does not conform to one or more allowances listed in Appendix B, FEMA shall conduct expedited or standard Section 106 review, as appropriate, for the entire Undertaking in accordance with Stipulation II.B, Expedited Review for Emergency Undertakings, or Stipulation II.C, Standard Project Review. 4. Allowances may be revised and new allowances may be added to this Agreement in accordance with Stipulation IV.A.3, Amendments. B. Expedited Review for Emergency Undertakings

  • AUDIT REVIEW PROCEDURES Any dispute concerning a question of fact arising under an interim or post audit of this AGREEMENT that is not disposed of by agreement, shall be reviewed by ALAMEDA CTC’s Deputy Executive Director of Finance and Administration. Not later than thirty (30) calendar days after issuance of the final audit report, CONSULTANT may request a review by ALAMEDA CTC’s Deputy Executive Director of Finance and Administration of unresolved audit issues. The request for review will be submitted in writing. Neither the pendency of a dispute nor its consideration by ALAMEDA CTC will excuse CONSULTANT from full and timely performance, in accordance with the terms of this AGREEMENT. CONSULTANT and subconsultants’ contracts, including cost proposals and ICRs, may be subject to audits or reviews such as, but not limited to, an AGREEMENT Audit, an Incurred Cost Audit, an ICR Audit, or a certified public accountant (“CPA”) ICR Audit Workpaper Review. If selected for audit or review, the AGREEMENT, cost proposal and ICR and related workpapers, if applicable, will be reviewed to verify compliance with 48 CFR, Chapter 1, Part 31 and other related laws and regulations. In the instances of a CPA ICR Audit Workpaper Review it is CONSULTANT’s responsibility to ensure federal, state, or local government officials are allowed full access to the CPA’s workpapers including making copies as necessary. The AGREEMENT, cost proposal, and ICR shall be adjusted by CONSULTANT and approved by ALAMEDA CTC to conform to the audit or review recommendations. CONSULTANT agrees that individual terms of costs identified in the audit report shall be incorporated into the contract by this reference if directed by ALAMEDA CTC at its sole discretion. Refusal by CONSULTANT to incorporate audit or review recommendations, or to ensure that the federal, state, or local governments have access to CPA workpapers, will be considered a breach of contract terms and cause for termination of the AGREEMENT and disallowance of prior reimbursed costs.

  • Review Protocol A narrative description of how the Claims Review was conducted and what was evaluated.

  • Review Systems The Asset Representations Reviewer will maintain and utilize an electronic case management system to manage the Tests and provide systematic control over each step in the Review process and ensure consistency and repeatability among the Tests.

  • Technical Proposal The technical proposal may be presented in free format. It shall not exceed ten pages, not counting the CVs. It shall respect the following page limit and structure: • Technical methodology (max. 7 pages) • Quality management (max. 1 page) • Project management (max. 1 page) • Resource management (proposal (max. 1 page) + CVs of experts)

  • Review of Personnel File Upon written authority from an employee, OC shall permit the President of the Union or their designate to review that employee's personnel file in the office in which the file is normally kept in order to facilitate the proper investigation of a grievance.

  • ADB’s Review of Procurement Decisions 11. All contracts procured under international competitive bidding procedures and contracts for consulting services shall be subject to prior review by ADB, unless otherwise agreed between the Borrower and ADB and set forth in the Procurement Plan.

  • Technical Advisory Committee (TAC The goal of this subtask is to create an advisory committee for this Agreement. The TAC should be composed of diverse professionals. The composition will vary depending on interest, availability, and need. TAC members will serve at the CAM’s discretion. The purpose of the TAC is to: • Provide guidance in project direction. The guidance may include scope and methodologies, timing, and coordination with other projects. The guidance may be based on: o Technical area expertise; o Knowledge of market applications; or o Linkages between the agreement work and other past, present, or future projects (both public and private sectors) that TAC members are aware of in a particular area. • Review products and provide recommendations for needed product adjustments, refinements, or enhancements. • Evaluate the tangible benefits of the project to the state of California, and provide recommendations as needed to enhance the benefits. • Provide recommendations regarding information dissemination, market pathways, or commercialization strategies relevant to the project products. The TAC may be composed of qualified professionals spanning the following types of disciplines: • Researchers knowledgeable about the project subject matter; • Members of trades that will apply the results of the project (e.g., designers, engineers, architects, contractors, and trade representatives); • Public interest market transformation implementers; • Product developers relevant to the project; • U.S. Department of Energy research managers, or experts from other federal or state agencies relevant to the project; • Public interest environmental groups; • Utility representatives; • Air district staff; and • Members of relevant technical society committees. • Prepare a List of Potential TAC Members that includes the names, companies, physical and electronic addresses, and phone numbers of potential members. The list will be discussed at the Kick-off meeting, and a schedule for recruiting members and holding the first TAC meeting will be developed. • Recruit TAC members. Ensure that each individual understands member obligations and the TAC meeting schedule developed in subtask 1.11. • Prepare a List of TAC Members once all TAC members have committed to serving on the TAC. • Submit Documentation of TAC Member Commitment (such as Letters of Acceptance) from each TAC member. • List of Potential TAC Members • List of TAC Members • Documentation of TAC Member Commitment