EDUCATIONAL EVALUATION Sample Clauses

EDUCATIONAL EVALUATION. The DJJ and the School Board agree to the following: 1. Develop an integrated assessment process to ensure that all youth, including students with educational exceptionalities and special needs, are evaluated for the purpose of determining the most appropriate educational, residential, and treatment programs. 2. Collaboratively define assessment protocols for intake, service implementation, and transition planning. 3. Collaboratively define and implement evaluations of treatment and educational services which includes education staff participation in student treatment team meetings (either in person or via written input provided prior to the meeting). 4. Ensure all student assessments as required by The Florida Department of Education are administered within established timelines.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
EDUCATIONAL EVALUATION. The DJJ and the School Board agree to the following: 1. To comply with the district’s special education procedures to ensure that all youth, including students with educational exceptionalities and special needs, are evaluated for the purpose of determining the most appropriate educational, residential, and treatment programs. 2. Collaboratively define and implement evaluations of treatment and educational services.
EDUCATIONAL EVALUATION. The DJJ and the School Board agree to: 1. Develop an integrated assessment process to ensure that all youth, including students with educational exceptionalities and special needs, are evaluated for the purpose of determining the most appropriate educational, residential, and treatment programs. 2. Collaboratively define assessment protocols for intake, service implementation, and transition planning. 3. Collaboratively define and implement evaluations of treatment and educational services. 4. Ensure all student assessments as required by The Florida Department of Education are administered within established timelines.
EDUCATIONAL EVALUATION. Outward Boundagrees to the following: a. Develop and integrate an assessment process to ensure that all youth, including students with educational exceptionalities and special needs, are evaluated for the purpose of determining the most appropriate educational, residential, and treatment programs. b. Define assessment protocols for intake, service implementation, and transition planning. c. Define and implement evaluations of treatment and educational services. d. Receive technical assistance from the "Board" regarding the development and implementation of any rules/policies developed by the FINS Program, pertaining to the provision of educational programs for students at "Outward Bound" consistent with state and federal laws, rules and regulations. e. Receive and utilize information regarding educational best practices for students in programs similar to “Outward Bound” disseminated by the Florida Department of Education, Division of Public Schools and Community Education, Bureau of Instructional Support and Community Services. f. Participate and assist in the monitoring and evaluation of programs for students served at "Outward Bound" to ensure compliance with applicable state and federal laws, rules and regulations. g. Provide registration information of students attending each session within three days of session start date. h. Request student records from current school prior to session start. The records shall include immunizations, transcripts and current course schedule. The “Boar“ agrees to: a. To provide technical assistance in the development and implementation of any rules/policies developed by the FINS Program pertaining to the provision of educational programs. b. To provide general consultation of educational services through: (1) Review of the procedures for providing educational programs to determine compliance with provisions of this agreement and applicable State Board of Education rules. (2) Monitor and evaluate educational programs for students to ensure compliance with Florida statutes, applicable federal and state laws, rules and regulations c. To disseminate information about and assist in the development and adoption of promising educational practices for students in “Outward Bound”. d. To provide technical assistance to “Outward Bound” in the development, coordination and review of personnel training needs for staff responsible for providing education and related services to students in “Outward Bound “. e. Evaluate student tra...
EDUCATIONAL EVALUATION. DJJ and the SCHOOL BOARD agree to 1. Develop an integrated assessment process to ensure that all youth, including students with educational exceptionalities and special needs, (Limited English Proficient) 504 Rehabilitation Act are evaluated for the purpose of determining the most appropriate educational, residential, and treatment programs. 2. Collaboratively define assessment protocols for intake, service implementation, and transition planning. 3. Collaboratively define and implement evaluations of treatment and educational services. 4. Brevard Public Schools referral and evaluation and reevaluation process will be followed. Brevard Public Schools staff will administer appropriate evaluation measures as determined by the Child Study Team. 5. Ensure all student assessments as required by the Florida Department of Education are administered within the established timelines.
EDUCATIONAL EVALUATION. Outward Xxxxx agrees to the following: a. Develop and integrate an assessment process to ensure that all youth, including students with educational exceptionalities and special needs, are evaluated for the purpose of determining the most appropriate educational, residential, and treatment programs. b. Define assessment protocols for intake, service implementation, and transition planning. c. Define and implement evaluations of treatment and educational services. d. Receive technical assistance from the Board regarding the development and implementation of any rules/policies developed by the FINS Program, pertaining to the provision of educational programs for students at Outward Bound consistent with state and federal laws, rules, and regulations. e. Receive and utilize information regarding educational best practices for students in programs similar to Outward Bound disseminated by the Florida Department of Education, Division of Public Schools and Community Education, Bureau of Instructional Support and Community Services. f. Participate and assist in the monitoring and evaluation of programs for students served at g. Provide registration information of students attending each session within three days of session start date. h. Request student records from current school upon enrollment. The records shall include immunizations, transcripts and current course schedule. The Board agrees to: a. To provide technical assistance in the development and implementation of any rules/policies developed by the FINS Program pertaining to the provision of educational programs. b. To provide general consultation of educational services through: (1) Review of the procedures for providing educational programs to determine compliance with provisions of this agreement and applicable State Board of Education rules. (2) Monitor and evaluate educational programs for students to ensure compliance with Florida statutes, applicable federal and state laws, rules and regulations c. To disseminate information about and assist in the development and adoption of promising educational practices for students in Outward Bound.

Related to EDUCATIONAL EVALUATION

  • TEACHER EVALUATION A. The administration will be evaluating the teacher’s performance within the time of formal responsibility. The evaluation process and form will be shared with the Association Building Representatives at the beginning of each school year. (a) Probationary teachers shall be evaluated at least two (2) times a year. The first evaluation will be completed prior to December 1st and the second prior to April 15th. Each evaluation will be based upon announced, unannounced, informal observations, on the performance of other duties and responsibilities and the goals developed in the Individualized Development Plan (IDP). The announced and unannounced observations should be a minimum of thirty (30) minutes in length. The observations may occur at anytime prior to the development of the written evaluation, but at least one of them must be planned in consultation with the probationary teacher. The results of formal observations will be discussed with the teacher in a timely manner. The information gathered during the observations will be used to write the evaluations. (b) Tenured teachers will be evaluated on a rotating schedule, but no less than once every three- (3) years. The administration reserves the right to evaluate a tenured teacher more often. The evaluation will be based upon announced, unannounced, informal observations and on the performance of other duties and responsibilities. The announced and unannounced observations should be a minimum of thirty (30) minutes in length. The observations may occur at any time prior to the development of the written evaluation, but at least one of them must be planned in consultation with the tenured teacher. The results of formal observations will be discussed with the teacher in a timely manner. The information gathered during the observations will be used to write the evaluations. 2. The administrator shall prepare and submit a written evaluation and recommendations to the teacher prior to May 30th of the year they are evaluated. The administrator shall hold a conference with the teacher to discuss the written evaluation and recommendations. 3. Upon receipt of the evaluation the teacher will sign the form indicating his/her receipt of the report. The signature on the form does not constitute his/her approval unless specifically noted. 4. Teachers involved with the instruction of Advanced Placement courses will be evaluated. This evaluation in the first year will be made part of the formal evaluation only at the request of the teacher. B. A teacher who disagrees with the content or procedure of evaluation may submit a written answer which shall be attached to the file copy of the evaluation in question and/or submit any complaints through Level 4 of the grievance procedure. C. If an administrator believes a teacher is doing unacceptable work, the reasons shall be set forth in specific terms. Included will be examples of specific ways in which the teacher is to improve and assistance may be given by the administrator and other staff members. In subsequent conferences it shall be the responsibility of the individual teacher to inquire whether adequate improvement has taken place. D. Monitoring and observation of the work performance of the teacher shall be conducted openly. The public address or audio system or similar types of communications will not be used for the purpose of evaluation. E. The Board and the Association recognize that the ability of pupils to progress and mature academically is a combined result of the school, home, economic and social environment and that teachers alone cannot be held accountable for all aspects of the academic achievement of the pupil in the classroom. Test results of academic progress of students shall not be used as the sole determinant or in isolated instances to evaluate the quality of a teacher's service or fitness for retention. F. All communications, including evaluations by Milan Administrators, commendations, and documented complaints directed toward the teacher which are to be included in the personnel file shall be made available for review of the teacher prior to placement in the file; a copy of any such communication will be provided to the teacher at this time. Pre-placement information such as confidential credentials, letters of reference from universities, individuals, or previous employers are exempt from such review. A written statement for inclusion in the personnel file may then be made by the teacher in regard to materials that were not signed by the teacher. A representative of the Association may accompany the teacher. G. Ordinarily, observations of teachers shall not be for less than a full class period or for the duration of a particular teaching lesson.

  • TECHNICAL EVALUATION (a) Detailed technical evaluation shall be carried out by Purchase Committee pursuant to conditions in the tender document to determine the substantial responsiveness of each tender. For this clause, the substantially responsive bid is one that conforms to all the eligibility and terms and condition of the tender without any material deviation. The Institute’s determination of bid’s responsiveness is to be based on the contents of the bid itself without recourse to extrinsic evidence. The Institute shall evaluate the technical bids also to determine whether they are complete, whether required sureties have been furnished, whether the documents have been properly signed and whether the bids are in order. (b) The technical evaluation committee may call the responsive bidders for discussion or presentation to facilitate and assess their understanding of the scope of work and its execution. However, the committee shall have sole discretion to call for discussion / presentation. (c) Financial bids of only those bidders who qualify the technical criteria will be opened provided all other requirements are fulfilled. (d) AIIMS Jodhpur shall have right to accept or reject any or all tenders without assigning any reasons thereof.

  • Program Evaluation The School District and the College will develop a plan for the evaluation of the Dual Credit program to be completed each year. The evaluation will include, but is not limited to, disaggregated attendance and retention rates, GPA of high-school-credit-only courses and college courses, satisfactory progress in college courses, state assessment results, SAT/ACT, as applicable, TSIA readiness by grade level, and adequate progress toward the college-readiness of the students in the program. The School District commits to collecting longitudinal data as specified by the College, and making data and performance outcomes available to the College upon request. HB 1638 and SACSCOC require the collection of data points to be longitudinally captured by the School District, in collaboration with the College, will include, at minimum: student enrollment, GPA, retention, persistence, completion, transfer and scholarships. School District will provide parent contact and demographic information to the College upon request for targeted marketing of degree completion or workforce development information to parents of Students. School District agrees to obtain valid FERPA releases drafted to support the supply of such data if deemed required by counsel to either School District or the College. The College conducts and reports regular and ongoing evaluations of the Dual Credit program effectiveness and uses the results for continuous improvement.

  • Final Evaluation IC must submit a final report and a project evaluation to the Arts Commission within thirty (30) days after the completion of the Services. Any and all unexpended funds from IC must be returned to City no later than sixty (60) days after the completion of the Services.

  • Annual Evaluation The Partnership will be evaluated on an annual basis through the use of the Strategic Partnership Annual Evaluation Format as specified in Appendix C of OSHA Instruction CSP 00-00-000, OSHA Strategic Partnership Program for Worker Safety and Health. The Choate Team will be responsible for gathering required participant data to evaluate and track the overall results and success of the Partnership. This data will be shared with OSHA. OSHA will be responsible for writing and submitting the annual evaluation.

  • Annual Evaluations The purpose of the annual evaluation is to assess and communicate the nature and extent of an employee's performance of assigned duties consistent with the criteria specified below in this Policy. Except for those employees who have received notice of non-reappointment pursuant to the BOT- UFF Policy on Non- reappointment, every employee shall be evaluated at least once annually. Personnel decisions shall take such annual evaluations into account, provided that such decisions need not be based solely on written faculty performance evaluations.

  • FINANCIAL EVALUATION (a) The financial bid shall be opened of only those bidders who have been found to be technically eligible. The financial bids shall be opened in presence of representatives of technically eligible bidders, who may like to be present. The institute shall inform the date, place and time for opening of financial bid. (b) Arithmetical errors shall be rectified on the following basis. If there is a discrepancy between the unit price and total price that is, the unit price shall prevail and the total price shall be corrected by the Institute. If there is a discrepancy between words and figures, the lesser amount shall be considered as valid. If the Supplier does not accept the correction of the errors, his bid shall be rejected. (c) The AIIMS Jodhpur does not bind himself to accept the lowest bid or any bid and reserves the right of accepting the whole or any part of the bid or portion of the job offered; and the bidder shall provide the same at the rates quoted. The AIIMS Jodhpur reserves the right to reject any or all offers received in response to tender or cancel or withdraw the tender notice without assigning any reason, whatsoever.

  • Student Evaluation a. The President of the College or the President’s designee shall be responsible for administering the student evaluation process. b. Student evaluation packets for each class containing instruments and instructions shall be distributed to each faculty member by the first week of December during the fall semester and by the last week in April during the spring semester. c. It is expressly agreed that the faculty member being evaluated shall not be present in the classroom when the student evaluation is being administered and that all instruction to students with regard to such student evaluation shall be included in writing on the instrument, provided further that the designated unit or non-unit professional shall return the student evaluation directly to the President of the College or the President’s designee. The administering of the student evaluation shall be the responsibility of the President of the College or the President’s designee who shall determine who among unit or non-unit professionals shall administer such student evaluation. Student evaluations shall be valid only if signed by the student; provided, however, that faculty members shall not be entitled to the identity of the student responding unless such student evaluation is used as a basis for dismissal or other disciplinary action and such will be communicated to the students. d. The data from the student evaluation shall be tabulated and copies sent to the President of the College or the President’s designee. The raw data shall be retained by the College for a period of one (1) year during which time the faculty member shall have access thereto upon written request. e. The President of the College or the President’s designee shall review the tabulated data and shall forward a data summary to the faculty member by January 23 for the fall semester and by June 15 for the spring semester. f. The faculty member shall have seven (7) working days in which to respond to such data.

  • Formal Evaluation All formal evaluations of personnel shall be conducted openly and with full knowledge of the employee concerned by an administrator or supervisor of the District.

  • Program Monitoring and Evaluation The Recipient shall prepare, or cause to be prepared, and furnish to the Association not later than six months after the Closing Date, a report of such scope and in such detail as the Association shall reasonably request, on the execution of the Program, the performance by the Recipient and the Association of their respective obligations under the Legal Agreements and the accomplishment of the purposes of the Financing.”

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!