Evaluate Sample Clauses

Evaluate. The process used to examine and determine the level of quality or the progress toward improvement of quality and/or performance related to Contractor service delivery systems. External Quality Review (EQR): The analysis and evaluation by an external quality review organization of aggregated information on quality, timeliness, and access to the Health Care services that a CMO or its Subcontractors furnish to Members and to DCH. External Quality Review Organization (EQRO): An organization that meets the competence and independence requirements set forth in 42 CFR 438.354 and performs external quality review, and other related activities.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Evaluate. The process used to examine and determine the level of quality or the progress toward improvement of quality and/or performance related to Contractor service delivery systems. External Quality Review (EQR): The analysis and evaluation by an external quality review organization of aggregated information on quality, timeliness, and access to the Health Care services that a CMO or its Subcontractors furnish to Members and to DCH. External Quality Review Organization (EQRO): An organization that meets the competence and independence requirements set forth in 42 CFR 438.354 and performs external quality review, and other related activities. Federal Financial Participation (FFP): The funding contribution that the federal government makes to the Georgia Medicaid and PeachCare for Kids programs. Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC): An entity that provides outpatient health programs pursuant to Section 1905(l) (2) (B) of the Social Security Act. Fee-for-Service (FFS): A method of reimbursement based on payment for specific services rendered to a Member.
Evaluate. Identify pesticides of concern (POC) by evaluating a list of pesticides of interest (pesticides which have potential to threaten local resources) to determine if those pesticides are found at concentration levels locally that are approaching or exceeding reference points and therefore are a threat to local water quality. The base list Required Activities: 06.
Evaluate. Xx. Xxxxxxx Xxxxxx, Senior Consultant, manages the development and delivery of professional learning systems and change efforts. Xx. Xxxxxx is currently serving as advisor for the grades K–5 Chicago Public Schools curriculum development project. She is also serving as client lead for a K–5 literacy audit in Hillsborough County (FL) Public Schools, as well as subject matter expert for the delivery of K–3 professional learning for the Connecticut State Department of Education (DOE). Previously, Xxxxxxx served as Clinical Assistant Professor for the University of Florida, School of Special Education, Psychology, and Early Childhood Studies. In this role, she collaborated with and supported the University of Florida Literacy Initiative and the Xxxxx Xxxxxxxxx Literacy Challenge, including professional learning, collaborating with partnership facilitators, and building capacity of teachers and school leaders as well as teaching all of the courses for the graduate certificate in Dyslexia. Xxxx Xxxxxxxx, Senior Consultant, has over 20 years of experience in the early childhood field working within early care and education, early intervention, infant and early childhood mental health, health and child welfare systems. Prior to joining PCG, Xx. Xxxxxxxx co-directed the Professional Development and Workforce Innovations Department at ZERO TO THREE. In this position she was responsible for advancing ZERO TO THREE’s capacity to offer high quality professional development and technical assistance services to the early childhood field.
Evaluate the validity of data collected by the applicant. - Such data may include but not be limited to: groundwater - flow patterns and velocity; groundwater, seepage, and surface water quality; drill hole and geophysical borehole logs; hydrostratigraphic units; piezcmeter readings; laboratory and in situ permeability data; distribution - and dispersion coefficients. . - i h e. 'we +%< - - , * - iseo s o , 4 - - . . . . m., ,.4 ,,,, , , , . .. . ,% , , _ , . _ _ _ . . _ * - . ' ' ' SCHEDULE - NRC-02-80-083 . Page 5 of 13 u
Evaluate. We will gather feedback to ensure that all stakeholders feel that their voices have been heard and that they have been able to make a difference.
Evaluate. A crucial component of training is evaluation. To guide the development of our evaluation tools, HMA uses the Xxxxxxxxxxx Model, which is among the most widely recognized models for analyzing and evaluating results of training and education programs. We will adapt the model to focus more on process to use in a one-time training or utilize the model in full if there are ongoing training and follow- up with participants. The model includes four evaluation domains that include participant reaction to the training, learning acquisition, application of learning, and results.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Evaluate. At the 9 month mark, the STM and congregational leaders will review the progress made toward the identified goals/priorities, and make adjustments as needed. For example, some of the original goals/priorities might have been accomplished or set aside and new objectives added. In other words, this process is marked by some degree of fluidity, all in the service of deepening the health of the congregation. It also may be that sufficient progress is noted that the contract can be concluded at the 12-month interval. At the 12 month mark (and subsequent 3-month intervals, if further contract extensions are agreed upon), the same will happen.
Evaluate. 7.6.1.5.1. Analyze results and outcomes data to identify successful and unsuccessful strategies. 7.6.1.5.2. At least once per year, make recommendations to the Board regarding action to be taken based on the analysis conducted.
Evaluate. After the RFQ closes, the ordering activity evaluates all responses received using a selected evaluation approach. For example, an ordering activity could select the BPA awardee that represents the best value. Ordering activities determine their own evaluation criteria. See FAR 8.4052 (d) for additional guidance on this topic.
Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!