Evaluation and Basis for Award Sample Clauses

Evaluation and Basis for Award. The award will be made to a responsible offeror whose offer follows the RFQ instructions, meets the eligibility requirements, and meets or exceeds the minimum required technical specifications, as laid out in Section 2 – Scope of Work and below. This RFQ will use reasonable and technically acceptable price source selection process to determine best value as set forth in FAR 13: Simplified Acquisition Procedures. That means that each offer will be evaluated on whether it meets or exceeds the minimum required technical specifications and is judged to be the best value for Shejeh Salam activity. Please note that if there are significant deficiencies regarding responsiveness to the requirements of this RFQ, an offer may be deemed “non-responsive” and thereby disqualified from consideration. DT Global reserves the right to waive immaterial deficiencies at its discretion. Best-offer quotations are requested. It is anticipated that award will be made solely based on these original quotations. However, DT Global reserves the right to conduct any of the following: • Negotiations with and/or request clarifications from any offeror prior to issuance of a BPA; • DT Global may conduct site visit to Offeror’ office or facility for inspection or request items proposed for verification; • While preference will be given to offerors who can address the full technical requirements of this RFQ, DT Global may issue a partial BPA award or split the award among various Vendors, if in the best interest of the Shejeh Salam Activity; • DT Global may cancel this RFQ at any time; and • DT Global may reject any and all offers, if such action is considered to be in the best interest of DT Global.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Evaluation and Basis for Award. The Government will evaluate all proposals received against Technical Capability (Factor 1), Subfactor 1,
Evaluation and Basis for Award. The award will be made to a responsible offeror whose offer follows the RFQ instructions, meets the eligibility requirements, and is determined via a trade-off analysis to be the best value based on application of the following evaluation criteria. Points will not be awarded for cost which will be primarily evaluated for realism and reasonableness. For overall evaluation purposes of this RFQ, technical evaluation factors other than cost, when combined, are considered approximately equal to cost factors. If technical scores are determined to be equal or nearly equal, cost will become the determining factor. The relative importance of each individual criterion is indicated by the number of points below:
Evaluation and Basis for Award. The award will be made to a responsible offeror whose offer follows the RFQ instructions, meets the eligibility requirements, and is determined via a trade-off analysis to be the best value based on application of the following evaluation criteria. Points will not be awarded for cost which will be primarily evaluated for realism and reasonableness. For overall evaluation purposes of this RFQ, technical evaluation factors other than cost, when combined, are considered approximately equal to cost factors. If technical scores are determined to be equal or nearly equal, cost will become the determining factor. The relative importance of each individual criterion is indicated by the number of points below: призупинено або взагалі заборонено отримання фінансування або допомоги Уряду США. Кімонікс не укладає угод з фірмами, яким тимчасово заборонено, тимчасово призупинено або взагалі заборонено отримання фінансування або допомоги Уряду США.
Evaluation and Basis for Award. The award will be made to a responsible offeror whose offer follows the RFQ instructions, meets the eligibility requirements, and is determined via a trade-off analysis to be the best value based on application of the following evaluation criteria. Points will not be awarded for cost which will be primarily evaluated for realism and reasonableness. For overall evaluation purposes of this RFQ, technical evaluation factors other than cost, when combined, are considered approximately equal to cost factors. If technical scores are determined to be equal or nearly equal, cost will become the determining factor. The relative importance of each individual criterion is indicated by the number of points below: • Technical and Personnel – 50 points: Responsiveness to the RFQ Scope of Work (SOW) and technical qualification requirements. Chemonics will evaluate whether the offeror has experience in providing high quality services described заявки, він повинен включити заяву, в якій зазначається його намір зареєструватися для номера DUNS, якщо його виберуть як успішного постачальника або пояснить, чому реєстрація для номера DUNS неможлива. Зв'яжіться з Dun & Bradstreet за допомогою цієї веб-формою, щоб отримати номер: xxxxx://xxxxxx.xxx.xxx/webform. Подальші вказівки щодо отримання номера DUNS будуть надані компанією Кімонікс за запитом. 10. Право брати участь в тендері: Подаючи пропозицію на участь у тендері учасник підтверджує, що він та його основні співробітники не є такими, яким тимчасово заборонено, тимчасово призупинено або взагалі заборонено отримання фінансування або допомоги Уряду США. Кімонікс не укладає угод з фірмами, яким тимчасово заборонено, тимчасово призупинено або взагалі заборонено отримання фінансування або допомоги Уряду США.
Evaluation and Basis for Award. The award will be made to a responsible offeror whose offer follows the RFQ instructions, meets the eligibility requirements, and meets or exceeds the minimum required technical specifications, as laid out in Section 3 and below.
Evaluation and Basis for Award. The award will be made to a responsible offeror whose offer follows the RFQ instructions, meets the eligibility requirements, and meets or exceeds the minimum required technical specifications. This RFQ will use a tradeoff process to determine best value as set forth in FAR 15.101.1. That means that each offer will be evaluated based on application of the following evaluation criteria. Points will not be awarded for cost which will be primarily evaluated for realism and reasonableness. For overall evaluation purposes of this RFQ, technical evaluation factors other than cost, when combined, are considered approximately equal to cost factors. If technical scores are determined to be equal or nearly equal, cost will become the determining factor. The relative importance of each individual criterion is indicated by the number of points below: • Technical Know How– 40 points: Chemonics will assess whether the proposal explains, understands and responds to the objectives of the project as stated in the Scope of Work. 1. The ability to perform all services listed in the Scope of Work 2. The ability to provide a report certifying that the deliverable has been made Section 508 compliant. 3. The ability to scan and remediate documents in PDF and in Microsoft Office applications, such as Word, Excel, and PowerPoint. 4. The ability to send and receive digital files via email and/or a file sharing system such as Dropbox. • Corporate Capabilities – 20 points: Chemonics will evaluate whether the company’s experience is relevant to the project’s Scope of Work. • Past Performance – 20 points: Offerors must include 3 past performance references of similar work (under contracts or subcontracts) previously implemented as well as contact information for the companies for which such work was completed. Contact information must include at a minimum: name of point of contact who can speak to the offeror’s performance, name and address of the company for which the work was performed, and email and phone number of the point of contact. Chemonics will assess the past performance of the Offerors by contacting three references who may indicate the Offeror's past performance for projects of similar size and scope. • Delivery – 20 points: Chemonics will evaluate the speed of delivery for orders. Please note that if there are significant deficiencies regarding responsiveness to the requirements of this RFQ, an offer may be deemed “non-responsive” and thereby disqualified from considerati...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Evaluation and Basis for Award. The award will be made to a responsible offeror whose offer follows the RFQ instructions, meets the eligibility requirements, meets or exceeds the minimum technical specifications, has positive references, and is judged to be the best value based on a lowest-price, technically acceptable approach. Please note that if there are significant deficiencies regarding responsiveness to the requirements of this RFQ, an offer may be deemed “non- responsive” and thereby disqualified from consideration. Chemonics reserves the right to waive immaterial deficiencies at its discretion. 10. Номер DUNS: компанії чи організації, як комерційні, так і неприбуткові, повинні надати номер Універсальної Системи Нумерації Даних (DUNS), в разі обрання для укладення контракту у відповідь на цей ЗЦП, вартість якого перевищує або дорівнює 30 000 доларів США (або еквівалент в іншій валюті). Якщо учасник тендеру не має номера DUNS і не може отримати його до закінчення терміну подання заявки, він повинен включити заяву, в якій зазначається його намір зареєструватися для отримання номера DUNS, якщо його оберуть як успішного постачальника або пояснить, чому реєстрація для отримання номера DUNS є неможливою. Зв'яжіться з Dun & Xxxxxxxxxx через цю веб-формою, щоб отримати номер: xxxxx://xxxxxx.xxx.xxx/webform. Подальші вказівки щодо отримання номера DUNS будуть надані компанією Кімонікс за запитом. 11. Право брати участь в тендері: Подаючи пропозицію у відповідь на цей ЗЦП, учасник тендеру підтверджує, що він та його основні співробітники не є такими, яких відсторонено, яким тимчасово заборонено, чи які іншим чином не відповідають критеріям для отримання фінансування або допомоги Уряду США. Кімонікс не укладає контракти з фірмами, яких відсторонено, яким тимчасово заборонено, або які вважаються такими, що не відповідають критеріям для отримання фінансування або допомоги Уряду США.
Evaluation and Basis for Award. The award will be made to a responsible offeror whose offer follows the RFQ instructions, meets the eligibility requirements, meets or exceeds the minimum technical specifications, has positive references, and is judged to be the best value based on a lowest-price, technically acceptable approach. Please note that if there are significant deficiencies regarding responsiveness to the requirements of this RFQ, an offer may be deemed “non- responsive” and thereby disqualified from consideration. Chemonics reserves the right to waive immaterial deficiencies at its discretion. Best-offer quotations are requested. It is anticipated that award will be made solely on the basis of these original quotations. However, учасник тендеру не має номера DUNS і не може отримати його до закінчення терміну подання заявки, він повинен включити заяву, в якій зазначається його намір зареєструватися для отримання номера DUNS, якщо його оберуть як успішного постачальника або пояснить, чому реєстрація для отримання номера DUNS є неможливою. Зв'яжіться з Dun & Xxxxxxxxxx через цю веб-формою, щоб отримати номер: xxxxx://xxxxxx.xxx.xxx/webform. Подальші вказівки щодо отримання номера DUNS будуть надані компанією Кімонікс за запитом. 11. Право брати участь в тендері: Подаючи пропозицію у відповідь на цей ЗЦП, учасник тендеру підтверджує, що він та його основні співробітники не є такими, яких відсторонено, яким тимчасово заборонено, чи які іншим чином не відповідають критеріям для отримання фінансування або допомоги Уряду США. Кімонікс не укладає контракти з фірмами, яких відсторонено, яким тимчасово заборонено, або які вважаються такими, що не відповідають критеріям для отримання фінансування або допомоги Уряду США.
Evaluation and Basis for Award. This RFP will use the tradeoff process to determine best value as set forth in FAR 15.101-1. That means that each proposal will be evaluated and scored against the evaluation criteria and evaluation sub-criteria, which are stated in the table below. Chemonics will award a subcontract to the offeror whose proposal represents the best value to Chemonics and the GHSC-PSM  project. Chemonics may award to a higher priced offeror if a determination is made that the higher technical evaluation of that offeror merits the additional cost/price. Evaluation points will not be awarded for cost, but for overall evaluation purposes of this RFP, technical evaluation factors other than cost, when combined, are considered significantly more important than cost factors. Cost will primarily be evaluated for realism and reasonableness. If technical scores are determined to be nearly equal, cost will become the determining factor. In evaluating proposals, Chemonics will use the following evaluation criteria and sub-criteria: Technical Proposal Table Technical Approach, Methodology, and Detailed Work Plan Technical know-how – Chemonics will assess whether the proposal explains, understands, and responds to the objectives of the project as stated in the Scope of Work __ points Coefficient:10 Sector Knowledge – Chemonics will assess whether the proposal demonstrates the offeror’s knowledge related to technical sectors required by the SOW? - Guide to good Preventive maintenance of Ultra low Panasonic Freezer __ points Coefficient:10 Management, Key Personnel, and Staffing Plan Personnel Qualifications – Chemonics will evaluate the curriculum vitaes (CVs) of the proposed team members and evaluate if the offer has the experience and capabilities carry out the Scope of Work? __ points Coefficient:10 Legal Documents Company with Valid registration (patente), Quitus and Matricule fiscal, Haitian Professional Card __ points Coefficient:10 Corporate Capabilities, Experience, and Past Performance Company Background and Experience – Chemonics will evaluate whether the company experience is relevant to the project Scope of Work? __ points Coefficient:15 Chemonics will assess the past performance of the Offerors for the last 3 years by contacting three references who may indicate the Offeror's past performance for projects of similar size and scope __ points Coefficient:15 Total Points …/70 points Cost Proposal Table Panasonic Twin-Guard Freezer, 1 year services, 1 ea...
Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!