Monitoring and evaluation requirements. (a) A recipient will be responsible for designing a performance monitoring plan for the project, obtaining written approval of the plan from FAS before putting it into effect, and managing and implementing the plan, unless oth- erwise specified in the agreement.
(b) A recipient must establish base- line values, annual targets, and life of activity targets for each performance indicator included in the recipient’s approved performance monitoring plan, unless otherwise specified in the agree- ment.
(c) A recipient must inform XXX, in the manner and within the time period specified in the agreement, of any problems, delays, or adverse conditions that materially impair the recipient’s ability to meet the objectives of the agreement. This notification must in- clude a statement of any corrective ac- tions taken or contemplated by the re- cipient, and any additional assistance requested from FAS to resolve the situ- ation.
(d) A recipient will be responsible for designing an evaluation plan for the project, obtaining written approval of the plan from FAS before putting it into effect, and arranging for an inde- pendent third party to implement the evaluation, unless otherwise specified in the agreement. This evaluation plan will detail the evaluation purpose and scope, key evaluation questions, eval- uation methodology, time frame, eval- uation management, and cost. This plan will generally be based upon the evaluation plan that the recipient sub- mitted to FAS as part of its applica- tion, pursuant to § 1599.4(b)(6), unless the notice of funding opportunity spec- ified that an evaluation plan was not required to be included in the applica- tion. The recipient must ensure that the evaluation plan:
(1) Is designed using the most rig- orous methodology that is appropriate and feasible, taking into account avail- able resources, strategy, current knowledge and evaluation practices in the sector, and the implementing envi- ronment;
(2) Is designed to inform manage- ment, activity implementation, and strategic decision-making;
(3) Utilizes analytical approaches and methodologies, based on the questions to be addressed, project design, budg- etary resources available, and level of rigor and evidence required, which may be implemented through methods such as case studies, surveys, quasi-experi- mental designs, randomized field ex- periments, cost-effectiveness analyses, implementation reviews, or a combina- tion of methods;
(4) Adheres to generally accepted evaluation ...
Monitoring and evaluation requirements a. WAPI shall cooperate fully with MHNW and King County in scheduled monitoring to determine contract compliance.
b. WAPI shall participate as requested in MHNW and King County evaluation activities.
Monitoring and evaluation requirements. A recipient will be responsible for designing a performance monitoring plan for the project, obtaining written approval of the plan from CCC before putting it into effect, and managing and implementing the plan, unless oth- erwise specified in the agreement.
Monitoring and evaluation requirements. A. The Contractor shall cooperate fully with the County in scheduled monitoring to determine Contract compliance.
B. The Contractor shall participate as requested in DCHS performance measurement and evaluation activities.
C. Providers with funding through HtH shall participate in performance measurement and evaluation activities as detailed in Performance Measurement and Evaluation (PME) Plan and Implementation Plan. Providers collaborate with the PME Evaluation Team and DCHS program managers to identify the program-specific data elements, performance targets and metrics, and data transmission methods which will be detailed in PME Plans. Providers will also comply with other performance measurement and evaluation activities associate with other fund sources as applicable. PSHA: City of Kirkland and King County Final Audit Report 2023-07-03 Created: 2023-06-28 By: Status: Transaction ID: Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx (xxxxxxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx) Signed CBJCHBCAABAAp2uqDCqxQ9_snDek_icqsMYO1zhuvP3a
Monitoring and evaluation requirements. The monitoring requirements for this Program address a) the degree to which performance indicators for each Intermediate Result and their related data accurately reflect the process they are being used to measure and b) the level of comparability of performance indicators and data from year to year. For each year of this Agreement, the revenue stream (and therefore the Financial Plan and Budget) will be determined by rolling up the contributions made by each USAID Field Mission, Regional Support Mission, or regional and/or technical support Bureau supporting the Program in Participating Peace Corps Posts. Incremental funding will be provided in yearly amendments to this Agreement, and a Financial Plan and Budget will be prepared consistent with each amendment. Budget Categories and line items for this Agreement will include: 2 full-time staff $ 170, 000 Travel $ 0 Lodging and per diem $ 0 Travel $ 0 Lodging and per diem $ 0 Overhead (15% of above) $ 25, 500 Subtotal $ 195,500,
