Performance Monitoring and Evaluation. 19. Within 6 months of the Effective Date, the Borrower shall establish baseline data for select indicators under the investment program performance monitoring system acceptable to ADB. Thereafter, the Borrower shall conduct annual surveys and shall update ADB on implementation progress against each indicator, in the quarterly progress reports. Without limiting the generality of Section 7.04 of the Loan Regulations, the Borrower shall submit to ADB quarterly progress reports, and a completion report within 3 months of the completion of all subprojects.
Performance Monitoring and Evaluation. 4. The PMU will ensure that an investment program performance monitoring system (PPMS) satisfactory to ADB is established within three months of the effectiveness of the first loan under the Facility. The PPMS will monitor and evaluate the performance of the investment program as well as that of the projects and sub-projects under each loan, including key impact and outcome indicators and associated assumptions with corresponding target dates.
Performance Monitoring and Evaluation. 12.1 The Department will monitor and evaluate the Project against measures including, but not limited to:
Performance Monitoring and Evaluation. Students will follow the evaluation procedures established by the Partner universities he/she attends. Student performance will be assessed in oral and written exams, incl. written reports, oral presentations, practical reports. All activities will be graded according to the national grading scale and the ECTS grading scale. Erasmus grades Turkey Poland Bulgaria Jordan AA Excellent Best 10% 90-100 5,0 (>90%) 6 > 90 BA Very good Next 25% 80-89 4,5 (81-90%) 5 80-89 BB Good Next 30% 70-79 4,0 (71-80%) 4 75-79 CB Fair Good Next 25% 65-69 3,5 (61-70%) 3 70-74 CC Satisfactory Next 10% 60-64 3,0 (51-60%) 65-69 F Fail < 59 2,0 (<50%) 2 <65 Each semester the students will deliver a self-evaluation questionnaire reporting on acquired knowledge and capacities, as well as on his/her satisfaction at academic and personal level. The thesis defense shall be done respecting local regulations and following the joint procedure approved by all consortium universities. The emiSS Board shall define specific thesis defense options subject to the regulations of consortium universities. Upon successful completion of the required 120 ECTS, the student will obtain multiple Degrees (at least from two universities, one of them is a partner country university), including Diploma Supplement, and a Certificate from the emiSS consortium universities according to the agreed mobility track.
Performance Monitoring and Evaluation. Xxxxxxx and Xxxxxx (2005) point out that special attention needs to be paid on monitoring progress and evaluation of VEAs. Xxxxxxxx et al. (2005) identify three factors that ensure successful monitoring. Firstly, there should be a trans- parent reporting procedure. Secondly, a methodology to secure certain standard should be present. Thirdly, there is a need for independent verifier. The im- portance of monitoring is also emphasized by Xxxxxxx and Xxxxxxxx (2011). Their study focuses on the effectiveness of VEAs in the field of energy efficiency and emission reduction in Europe. The authors conclude that rigorous and credible monitoring and evaluation of the outcomes are key factors for VEA’s effective- ness (Xxxxxxx and Xxxxxxxx, 2011). Official evaluation of the achieved results affects positively on the level of compliance and the efficiency of VEAs (Croci, 2003). The terms efficiency and effectiveness are often used for evaluating VEAs performance. Efficiency refers to achieving certain results or targets by avoiding unexpected loss of resource and time, whereas effectiveness refers to the achievement of successful results (Xxxxxxx, 2001). However, the nature of VEAs often creates difficulties in assessing their effectiveness. Not only VEAs have different objectives and employ different approaches but also there is discrepancy in culture, politics, economics, and the environment. For instance, the different characteristics of industry sectors, insti- tutional structures, public-private cooperation, business culture, and the environ- mental awareness influence the effectiveness of VEAs. Thus, it could be con- cluded that the country is the main factor influencing VEA’s effectiveness. (Croci, 2003) The EEA’s framework for the assessment of the environmental effective- ness of VEAs (EEA, 1997) states that the assessment can be done against alterna- tive policy instruments scenario (taxes and regulations), “business as usual”, and the reference situation prior to the agreement. Hence, the following three aspects should be taken into consideration: the net impact of VEAs in comparison with the baseline, the economic characteristics of VEAs, such as incentives and impacts, and the wider outcomes stemming from VEAs. Xxxxxxx and Xxxxxxx (2011) also share the view that the effectiveness can be measured by acknowledging the pos- itive environmental impacts beyond what would have happened without the VEA in place. However, such assessment is often speculative due...
Performance Monitoring and Evaluation. 28. The Borrower shall ensure that a PPMS is established in DENR to be operated by FASPO, and project performance monitoring and evaluation is conducted for each Project Component and Subproject. The PPMS shall cover (a) physical and financial progress as well as the economy and efficiency in achieving major activities; (b) level and adequacy of participation of various stakeholders in planning and implementing Project activities and performance of the Project Executing Agency and the Project Implementing Agencies, (c) collection of gender disaggregated data in benchmark surveys and policy and legal studies,
Performance Monitoring and Evaluation. 14.1 At any point during the Term of this Agreement and until 5 (five) years after the end of the Term in accordance with clause 2.2, where requested, the Organisation must:
Performance Monitoring and Evaluation. All three PVO partners involved have had significant success, documented in external evaluations, in using information systems to inform management decisions and increase health worker motivation. The proposed program’s monitoring and evaluation plan will build on that experience, but also take advantage of new opportunities. The performance monitoring plan will have several major components. The central component will be a Community Health Information System (HIS), which will collect data at the community level and use that data to inform management and public health decisions at community, health center, district, and national level. The program will focus on integrating the community data gathering and analysis process within MOH’s system. Secondly, program managers will use performance indicators, developed as part of a Management Monitoring System (MMS) that was designed to improve human resource management, alongside data from the HIS, from supervision, and from quality assurance investigations, to monitor performance of CHWs and clinic workers. Thirdly, staff and partners will work together to conduct program performance assessments twice a year. These assessments will gather qualitative and quantitative information from household visits to detect problems, as well as strategies that are functioning well, and to perform a quality assurance check on the HIS data. Finally, participants at all levels of the system will participate in comprehensive, periodic collaborative evaluations including coverage surveys and qualitative reviews facilitated by an external evaluator. In addition, program managers and partners will define and follow indicators to measure sustainability; this process is described in the sustainability section of the proposal.
Performance Monitoring and Evaluation a) Performance monitoring Each semester the student needs to obtain 30 ECTS. Which of the optional modules the student has chosen needs to be indicated in the ISLA. The national language courses (module 8) are highly recommended in the 1st, 2nd and 3rd semester. Those activities, although not accredited, and the voluntary participation in other courses in the EIMAS will be incorporated in the Diploma Supplement. Attendance of 75% of the lectures, presentation sessions and seminars is compulsory. The following courses are offered: In order to complete a module, the student needs to take an exam, either in a written form (test or paper) or an oral examination determined by the lecturer at the beginning of the course. If the student does not successfully complete a module due to failure, he/she has the possibility to repeat the exam once on a fixed date in the same semester. If the student fails the Master thesis, he/she has to repeat the module by registering again in the same university without getting any further financial support. In case of disease and missing more than 25% of a module, the repetition of a module or other requirements need to be decided on individual basis.
Performance Monitoring and Evaluation. 3. It is our intention that through working with providers, the performance management framework will implement an approach that:
