REMEDIATION PROCESS. If the evaluator determines that performance concerns exist, the principal or site administrator will contact the Office of Human Resources to ascertain what steps will be taken to address the issue. With the agreement of the Office of Human Resources, the principal or site administrator may develop a Directed Improvement Plan for the teacher. This plan will specifically address those areas of concern, and include correlating support resources and a timeline for implementation. At the end of the timeline specified, if the principal or site administrator does not observe improved performance in targeted elements, the teacher will be moved to Remediation. If the principal or site administrator determines that performance in the targeted areas has improved, the teacher will be removed from the Directed Improvement Plan. Removal from the Directed Improvement Plan does not necessarily render the teacher’s performance effective.
REMEDIATION PROCESS. If at any time an Employee’s performance evaluation is deemed unsatisfactory by the evaluator, a written remediation plan shall be put in place no later than the start of the next school year. The District shall notify the Association President of the decision to initiate a remediation plan. The Employee shall be notified of the right to have the Association President or Vice-President present to support them in the development of the plan and throughout the remediation process. This will typically involve the following:
1. Identification of specific areas of concern.
2. A description of the expectations to improve job performance or areas of concern. A reasonable timeline not to exceed eight (8) weeks will be established and discussed with the Employee.
3. Periodic feedback will be given during the remediation period from the evaluator in the form of evaluations, memoranda, conferences, etc., as the evaluator determines appropriate under the particular circumstances.
4. A post-remediation meeting will be held with the Employee to discuss the remediation results. The Employee shall show sustained proficiency in the identified areas to have successfully completed the remediation plan.
5. Failure to successfully complete the remediation plan shall result in subsequent employment action that may include, but not be limited to extending the remediation time, adjusting the remediation plan, and/or termination.
6. If a recommendation for termination of employment due to performance concerns is made, an employee may file a written appeal within five (5) work days to the Executive Director of Human Resources, who shall issue a final decision which is not subject to the grievance procedure. The affected employee shall have the right to have the Association representation available throughout the appeal process.
REMEDIATION PROCESS. The following process will replace the remediation process in the pre-PERA Teacher Evaluation Plan. The remediation process will be consistent with Section 105 ILSC 5/24A-5 of the Illinois School Code and other applicable statutory and regulatory provisions including SB315 Performance Evaluation Reform Act of 2010 and SB7 School Reform Act of 2011.
REMEDIATION PROCESS. If a Non-Teaching Bargaining Unit Member is deemed to be performing at unsatisfactory levels during an evaluation, the evaluator will activate an Improvement Action Plan (IAP) for a period of forty-five (45) calendar days, unless extended by Namaste. The goal of the remediation plan is intended to be corrective and supportive, rather than punitive. During the remediation period, the evaluator will work with the Non-Teaching Bargaining Unit Member to develop this plan which will specifically identify in writing the areas for improvement with targeted outcomes and or activities that must be completed in order to address each area. Coaching and support will be provided by Xxxxxxx to the Non-Teaching Bargaining Unit Member in remediation. If at the end of the IAP period, the Non-Teaching Bargaining Unit Member does not meet the objectives set forth in the IAP, the Non-Teaching Bargaining Unit Member shall be deemed to have not remediated. At that point, Xxxxxxx may choose to: (1) terminate the Bargaining Unit Member or (2) extend the IAP period for the purpose of providing the Non-Teaching Bargaining Unit Member further opportunity to remediate prior to recommendation for termination. Non-Teaching Bargaining Unit Members may grieve, as appropriate, concerns relating to the process or procedure for remediation, pursue to Article VI herein. Substantive decisions relating to remediation are not subject to the grievance procedure.
REMEDIATION PROCESS. Nothing contained in this process shall be interpreted to preclude a voluntary attempt by the parties to informally resolve potential remediation, either prior to the notice of pending action or at any other time.
REMEDIATION PROCESS. 1. IDENTIFICATION
a. A Teacher shall be placed upon remediation status under the following conditions:
(1) The evaluator determines, as a result of performance observations, that a teacher is rated “Unsatisfactory” on the Evaluation Report.
(2) The Board of Education deems the deficiency to be remedial.
REMEDIATION PROCESS. 10.9.1 The Remediation Team members will review written documented evidence of the employee’s less than effective performance, and will confer with the employee.
10.9.2 The Remediation Team members will observe the employee’s performance.
10.9.3 The Remediation Team members will confer with the employee in order to develop strategies for assisting the employee. The Remediation Team will give specific written recommendations for improvement of the employee’s performance to the employee.
10.9.4 The Remediation Team members will work with the employee during the remediation period of sixty (60) days and will provide the employee with a written record of observations made and suggestions offered. Observation reports, conference summaries, the Final Report and other pertinent documents will be placed in the employee’s personnel file after a copy is given to the employee.
10.9.5 A mid-point conference will take place between the employee and the Remediation Team members. Release time may be provided for this conference and for other conferences or occasions when determined to be necessary by the Remediation Team.
10.9.6 The remediation process must be completed within sixty (60) teaching days from the date the team is selected, excluding the last two (2) weeks and first two (2) weeks of any school year.
REMEDIATION PROCESS. Any areas of concern in the summary evaluation report will be reviewed with the faculty member and the tenure committee. When remediation is required, as evidenced in the evaluation report, a remediation plan will be developed by the evaluate and the tenure committee outlining specific performance improvement objectives, timelines, and subsequent classroom observations. Remediation Plan activities may include attending workshops or conferences on academic discipline material or on teaching and learning, observing other faculty member’s classes, additional student observations, working with faculty or administrative mentors, and inviting further observations of his/her classes. Individual remediation activities will not be paid for using District funds or any paid time with the exception of flex time. Administrators may conduct additional, not-routine, evaluation as necessary, particularly to support a faculty member who is implementing a remediation plan.
REMEDIATION PROCESS. Licensor’s failure to provide comments or approval of the Plans and Specifications or Construction Plans within ten (10) business days after Licensee’s submittal of same shall be deemed as disapproval thereof. If the Plans and Specifications or Construction Plans are returned to Licensee with comments, but not bearing approval of Licensor, the Plans and Specifications or Construction Plans, as applicable, shall be immediately revised by Licensee and resubmitted to Licensor for approval within ten (10) business days of their receipt by Licensee. If Licensor disapproves the revised Plans and Specifications or Construction Plans, Licensee shall further revise the Plans and Specifications or Construction Plans, as applicable, to meet Licensor’s objections, if any, and resubmit the further revised Plans and Specifications or Construction Plans to Licensor for its review and approval. The foregoing procedure shall be repeated until the Plans and Specifications are approved in accordance with the terms of this Agreement.
REMEDIATION PROCESS. The Grantee shall be responsible for identifying, issuing directives, and providing a completion certification to Responsible Parties for the remediation of an unauthorized release from USTs. This work includes overseeing the planning (including but not limited to flexible system design consistent with industry standards that is appropriate for the site conditions and addresses Closure Criteria), scheduling, and performance of all work as set forth herein, including but not limited to, the maintenance of site specific records and the preparation of reports as specified in Item 3 (below). The Grantee shall maintain the official site-specific records pertaining to each of its cases and provide for public access to those records for review and copying in compliance with the California Public Records Act. The Grantee may satisfy this requirement by use of paper records, electronic records, or a combination of both. At a minimum during this Grant period, the Grantee shall upload the following documents to GeoTracker for permanent public access: Directive Letters (i.e., letters issued to Responsible Parties regarding the planning, scheduling, and performance of work including but not limited to system performance measures, pounds of hydrocarbons recovered since last report, or other measurable performance criteria), Case Closure Summaries, Remedial Action Completion Certifications, and other pertinent case correspondence as necessary. The Grantee shall require the Responsible Party or Parties to submit information electronically only to GeoTracker in compliance with chapter 30, division 3, title 23 of the California Code of Regulations (e.g., Site Map and Product Thickness). The Grantee shall receive or deny information submitted by a Responsible Party electronically to GeoTracker. In addition to the previously identified foundational requirements for corrective action oversight, the Grantee shall consider methods described in the most recent version of the Leaking Underground Fuel Tank (XXXX) Manual or Regional Water Board corrective action guidelines. The Grantee shall direct responsible parties or their consultants to conform to all applicable State laws, rules, regulations, and local ordinances specifically, including but not limited to, environmental, procurement and safety laws, rules, regulations, and ordinances when performing investigation and remedial work under this agreement. Before performing any oversight activities funded through this agreement at...
