Stakeholder Support. ITRE shall provide access to the model and data to the Sponsor through its designated liaison(s). Such access will include electronic copies of the model and data, as well as access by designated staff of the Sponsor to computers and other facilities at ITRE as may be necessary to customize the model to such specific needs of the Sponsor as may arise. The University shall provide services as specifically described in Exhibit A titled “Project Scope of Work and Budget,” which includes a list and detailed description of multiple Tasks, objectives, level of effort (including an estimate of hours per task), work products/deliverables, schedule by task and subtask and is incorporated into this Agreement. The persons, entities, expenses, and general percentage of effort anticipated to be required to successfully perform the Work are as described in Exhibit A.1, “Percentage of Effort Estimate by Task,” which is also attached hereto and incorporated herein. Exhibit A.1 does not limit the effort necessary to perform the Work under this Agreement; however, it does limit the total cost and compensation for each task identified. Although some Work tasks are multi-year, Work identified in the scope and this Agreement shall be for a one year period from July 1, 2014 to June 30, 2015, on approximately the time schedule shown in Exhibit A.2, “Schedule of Effort by Task, Subtask and Timeline.” The Transportation Planning Manager may extend this time period by up to three months, in writing, at his discretion. Any Agreement extension for FY 2015-2016 activities identified in the scope and described in Exhibit A.1 and beyond three months must be approved in writing by the City Manager. University, as a recipient of flow-through Federal funding represents and certifies that it currently is and will remain in compliance with the requirements listed in Exhibit B
Stakeholder Support. ITRE shall provide access to the model and data to the Sponsor through its designated liaison(s). Such access will include electronic copies of the model and data, as well as access by designated staff of the Sponsor to computers and other facilities at ITRE as may be necessary to customize the model to such specific needs of the Sponsor as may arise.
Stakeholder Support. Two methods were used to inform stakeholders of the proceedings of this pilot project and the occurrence of the first public meeting on November 19, 1999. A public notice was published on October 5, 1999 in the Xxxxxx Record Chronicle and individual letters of invitation were mailed to a comprehensive list of 47 stakeholders. Stakeholders included sixteen (16) Industrial Users, two (2) universities, Citizens for Healthy Growth, the Xxxxxx Xxxxxx of the Sierra Club, TNRCC regional office and headquarters, Xxxxxx County Environmental Health, and seventeen (17) national environmentally concerned organizations. Fourteen (14) participants attended the first public meeting. These attendees were represented by staff of EPA, TNRCC, City of Denton, IUs, and UNT. Because of the accelerated schedule required to meet rulemaking and publication deadlines, the second public meeting occurred on December 10, 1999. Stakeholders were invited by direct telephone calls.
Stakeholder Support. Stakeholder involvement is essential for the success of an ecosystem-wide environmental program. The Stakeholder Involvement Plan (SIP) in Appendix A is intended to describe basic community goals. Stakeholder input will also help to further develop the program specifics and evaluate Project performance. Public meetings will be held to inform the general public about the Project and to invite their comments and participation. The first public meeting was held to introduce the public to the Project and the Agreement development process. Other public meetings may be held during implementation of the Agreement based on public interest or as decided by the direct participants. Public meeting locations will be chosen to provide adequate size and accessibility to all who wish to attend.
Stakeholder Support. The USPS has provided additional compensation in the aggregate amount of approximately $4,000,000 in respect of freight to be carried by the Loan Parties, which additional compensation is not recoverable from any of the Xxxxxx Companies or the Xxxxxx Companies by set-off or otherwise regardless of the identity of the Loan Party that received such compensation, but may be recovered against other Loan Parties. The foregoing additional compensation shall not be considered DRO Claim proceeds for purposes of this Agreement.”
Stakeholder Support. The Andersen CAC has been established and has functioned as the primary contact with the local community and other stakeholder groups. It is important to the success of the XL project that their role continues throughout the life of Project XL at Andersen. The CAC is guided by the Stakeholder Involvement Plan attached to the FPA. Stakeholder support has been built through 12 meetings of the CAC held from December 1997 through September 1998. CAC meetings initially covered detailed briefings on all aspects of the Andersen Project XL proposal. CAC involvement evolved into active questioning, comments, and participation by CAC members in FPA negotiations, and in the work groups established to address specific FPA issues. The individual members of the CAC represent the full spectrum of stakeholders affected by the Andersen Project XL program. Committee members and their affiliations are: Xxxxx Xxxxxxxxxx Washington County Commissioner Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxx Baytown Township Board Member Dr. Xxx Xxxxxxx University of Minnesota School of Public Health Baytown Township Resident Xxx Xxxxxxxx Stillwater Area Chamber of Commerce Xxxxxxx Xxxxx Baytown Township Resident Xxx Xxxxxx Bayport City Council Member Xxxxx Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx Employee Xxx Xxx Xxx Bayport Resident Xxxxx Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx Bayport Resident Employee Xxxxx Xxxxxxxx Minnesota Center for Environmental Advocacy
Stakeholder Support. For the last two years, DEP has worked to actively ensure the involvement of key stakeholders and the general public in ERP development. In addition, DEP will continue to ensure a high level of public involvement in the development of this agreement and sector-specific addenda to it.
Stakeholder Support. The utility industry in New York State and EPA- Region II have been involved in the development of this project through a two-stage review of draft proposals and both support this project. XXXXX acted as lead for the telephone industry. Consolidated Xxxxxx acted as lead for the electric power industry, with assistance from the New York State Power Pool. Brooklyn Union Gas acted as lead for the oil and gas pipeline industry (intrastate and interstate). Consolidated Edison and the New York State Power Pool solicited comments from other electric power companies in New York State which were then funneled through Consolidated Edison. Brooklyn Union Gas provided the same service to other intrastate and interstate oil and gas pipelines. The development of the Final Project Agreement was accomplished through implementation of the Public Participation and Outreach Plan, contained in Appendix C. This Plan provided opportunity for participation by potential industrial participants, environmental organizations, the general public and other interested parties. The Plan also provides for public participation in the designation and approval of UCCFs by participating utilities, subsequent to the signing of the Final Project Agreement. The Plan also provides for the availability of each participant's Annual Project XL Progress Report to interested parties.
Stakeholder Support. During Year 3 of LIFE2, MCDC and The Center at Xxxxxxxx will implement a K – 12 Survey to gather feedback. Grant managers will engage stakeholders in independent assessment of project quality to identify meaningful components across diverse stakeholder perspectives. Data will be aggregated to generate districtwide results and disaggregated by stakeholders (teachers, non-classroom instructional professionals, assistant principals, principals, central district administrators, etc.) to compare feedback across groups. Results will be shared with district administrators and will be used in the identification of sustainable services and practices suitable for replication in other settings. Survey results will help inform sustainability planning, Advisory Board Sustainability sub-Committee efforts and influence long-term Financial Plans designed to institutionalize impactful LIFE2 strategies worthy of continuation.
Stakeholder Support. More people will be affected by a partnership than just the public officials and the private sector partner. Affected employees, the portions of the public receiving the service, the press, appropriate labor unions and relevant interest groups will all have opinions, and may have misconceptions about a partnership and its value to all the public. It is important to communicate openly and candidly with these stakeholders to minimize potential resistance to establishing a partnership.
