Standards for Promotion Sample Clauses

Standards for Promotion. 7.4.1. Promotion in rank for tenure-track and tenured faculty members is based upon performance. Any faculty member may perform satisfactorily at a given academic rank without necessarily warranting promotion to a higher one. It also is recognized that a period of time shall elapse after a promotion, during which time further promotion is not normally to be expected. A faculty member may request a promotion review in accordance with established deadlines set by the ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇’▇ office. In addition, faculty members whose performance merits consideration for promotion may be invited by the Chair/Director to submit credentials for promotion review. 7.4.2. The criteria and standards for the ranks of Assistant Professor, Associate Professor, and Professor are set forth in Section 2. More precise statements of what is expected for promotion under teaching/librarian effectiveness, scholarly/creative activity, and service may be specified by the tenured faculty members in individual academic units (Section 5.1). All such statements must be approved by the ▇▇▇▇ and by the ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇. 7.4.3. At the initiation of the University or unit faculty, the unit faculty may amend the unit’s TTF promotion policy at any time, with the concurrence of the Chair/Director, ▇▇▇▇, and ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇. Changes in the criteria and standards for promotion may not be applied retroactively to TTF members unless requested in writing by the TTF member prior to the initiation of the review process. The ▇▇▇▇ and ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ (or their designees) shall work collaboratively with the unit faculty and the Chair/Director during the policy revision process. 7.4.3.1. Following the approval of new promotion standards in a new RTP policy, BUFMs applying for promotion from Associate Professor to Professor shall have the option to elect to apply for promotion under their department’s/school’s “Old RTP Policy” or “New RTP Policy.” 7.4.3.2. BUFMs currently holding the rank of Associate Professor and who intend to apply for promotion under their department’s/school’s New RTP Policy must elect whether the department’s/school’s Old RTP Policy or New RTP Policy shall govern their promotion application. Faculty applying for promotion must notify the Chair/Director of their election not later than September 30th following the implementation of a new RTP policy. If no timely election is made, then the faculty member’s promotion consideration shall be governed by the Old RTP Policy. 7.4.3.3. Once the election specified in Section 7...
View SourceView Similar (7)
Standards for Promotion. 7.4.1. Promotion in rank for tenure-track and tenured faculty members is based upon performance. Any faculty member may perform satisfactorily at a given academic rank without necessarily warranting promotion to a higher one. It also is recognized that a period of time shall elapse after a promotion, during which time further promotion is not normally to be expected. A faculty member may request a promotion review in accordance with established deadlines set by the ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇’▇ office. In addition, faculty members whose performance merits consideration for promotion may be invited by the Chair/Director to submit credentials for promotion review. 7.4.2. The criteria and standards for the ranks of Assistant Professor, Associate Professor, and Professor are set forth in Section 2. More precise statements of what is expected for promotion under teaching/librarian effectiveness, scholarly/creative activity, and service may be specified by the tenured faculty members in individual academic units. All such statements must be approved by the ▇▇▇▇ and by the ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇. 7.4.2.1. Regarding establishment, amendment, and applicability of unit policies for promotion to Associate Professor and promotion to Professor, see Section 5.1.
View SourceView Similar (3)
Standards for Promotion. 19.2.1 Standards for Promotion to Librarian III (a) full professional competence and expertise demonstrated by a record, over a number of years, of significant achievement in Professional Performance at the Librarian II level; and (b) regular and substantive involvement in Scholarship and Professional Activities and University Service.
View SourceView Similar (2)
Standards for Promotion. 6.4.1. Promotion in rank for tenure-track and tenured faculty members is based upon performance. Any faculty member may perform satisfactorily at a given academic rank without necessarily warranting promotion to a higher one. It also is recognized that a period of time will elapse after a promotion, during which time further promotion is not normally to be expected. A faculty member may request a promotion review in accordance with established deadlines set by the ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇/VPAA’s office. In addition, faculty members whose performance merits consideration for promotion may be invited by the Chair/Director to submit credentials for promotion review. 6.4.2. The criteria for the ranks of assistant professor, associate professor, and professor are set forth in Section 3. More precise statements of what is expected for promotion under teaching effectiveness, scholarly or creative activity, service, or librarian effectiveness (where applicable), may be specified by the tenured Bargaining Unit Faculty Members in individual academic units (Section 6.5.1). All such statements must be approved by the ▇▇▇▇ and by the ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇/VPAA.
View SourceView Similar (2)
Standards for Promotion. The standard for promotion shall be the individual’s quality of performance of professional responsibilities as provided in Article X, Section 1 of this Agreement and the individual’s job description. Consideration shall be given to all evaluative material in the applicant’s file generated since the applicant’s previous promotion or original appointment to the college, whichever is more recent. The major areas of emphasis shall be growth and demonstrated competence in performance of professional responsibilities.
View Source
Standards for Promotion 
View SourceView Similar (7)

Related to Standards for Promotion

  • Information Technology Accessibility Standards Any information technology related products or services purchased, used or maintained through this Grant must be compatible with the principles and goals contained in the Electronic and Information Technology Accessibility Standards adopted by the Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board under Section 508 of the federal Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. §794d), as amended. The federal Electronic and Information Technology Accessibility Standards can be found at: ▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇-▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇/508.htm.

  • Standards for Determining Commercial Reasonableness Borrower and Silicon agree that a sale or other disposition (collectively, "sale") of any Collateral which complies with the following standards will conclusively be deemed to be commercially reasonable: (i) Notice of the sale is given to Borrower at least seven days prior to the sale, and, in the case of a public sale, notice of the sale is published at least seven days before the sale in a newspaper of general circulation in the county where the sale is to be conducted; (ii) Notice of the sale describes the collateral in general, non-specific terms; (iii) The sale is conducted at a place designated by Silicon, with or without the Collateral being present; (iv) The sale commences at any time between 8:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m; (v) Payment of the purchase price in cash or by cashier's check or wire transfer is required; (vi) With respect to any sale of any of the Collateral, Silicon may (but is not obligated to) direct any prospective purchaser to ascertain directly from Borrower any and all information concerning the same. Silicon shall be free to employ other methods of noticing and selling the Collateral, in its discretion, if they are commercially reasonable.

  • Standards Compliance Registry Operator shall comply with relevant existing RFCs and those published in the future by the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), including all successor standards, modifications or additions thereto relating to the DNS and name server operations including without limitation RFCs 1034, 1035, 1123, 1982, 2181, 2182, 2671, 3226, 3596, 3597, 4343, and 5966. DNS labels may only include hyphens in the third and fourth position if they represent valid IDNs (as specified above) in their ASCII encoding (e.g., “xn--ndk061n”).

  • Standards of Conduct Whenever the Member is required or permitted to make a decision, take or approve an action, or omit to do any of the foregoing, then the Member shall be entitled to consider only such interests and factors, including its own, as it desires, and shall have no duty or obligation to consider any other interests or factors whatsoever. To the extent that the Member has, at law or in equity, duties (including, without limitation, fiduciary duties) to the Company or other person bound by the terms of this Agreement, the Member acting in accordance with the Agreement shall not be liable to the Company or any such other person for its good faith reliance on the provisions of this Agreement. The provisions of this Agreement, to the extent that they restrict the duties of the Member otherwise existing at law or in equity, replace such other duties to the greatest extent permitted under applicable law.

  • PROCUREMENT ETHICS Contractor understands that a person who is interested in any way in the sale of any supplies, services, construction, or insurance to the State of Utah is violating the law if the person gives or offers to give any compensation, gratuity, contribution, loan, reward, or any promise thereof to any person acting as a procurement officer on behalf of the State of Utah, or who in any official capacity participates in the procurement of such supplies, services, construction, or insurance, whether it is given for their own use or for the use or benefit of any other person or organization.