Student Evaluation of Teaching Sample Clauses

Student Evaluation of Teaching. ‌ Student evaluation of teaching is designed to provide faculty with a basis for maintaining the quality of the courses and enhancing teaching effectiveness. The Federation accepts the administration's right to conduct student assessment of faculty using a campus-wide assessment instrument which will be mutually agreed upon in the Federation Administration Committee and voted on by the faculty. A college may not make additions or deletions to the institutional instrument. However, additional instruments may be administered by college faculty. (The agreed upon instrument which is included as Attachment A shall be used until replaced by a new mutually agreed upon instrument.)
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (5)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Student Evaluation of Teaching. ‌ Each appropriate unit of the faculty shall make provisions for student evaluation of faculty teaching through the use of a standard evaluation form established by the University. The unit may also include a form which has been developed for the specific use of that unit. Units that choose to include a supplemental form must develop and periodically review the evaluation form in coordination with the unit’s policy, executive, or other appropriate representative faculty body in the unit. The results of the evaluations, including from the unit’s unique evaluation form, shall be made available to the individual, to the unit committee(s) charged with making personnel decisions (to include, but not limited to, renewal, tenure, promotions, and salary adjustments), and to the chair and other appropriate administrative officers for the purpose of assessing the individual’s teaching performance and for the purpose of program review. However, data from student evaluations will not be the only basis for comparisons between units. Faculty may also submit supplementary teaching materials (up to seven [7] items), in addition to student evaluations of teaching to the unit committee(s) charged with making personnel decisions (to include, but not limited to, renewal, tenure, promotions, and salary adjustments). Faculty may also submit them to the chair and other appropriate administrative officers for the purpose of assessing the individual’s teaching performance and for the purpose of program review. The anonymity of the students shall be preserved. A committee composed of three (3) members appointed by the Association and three (3) members appointed by the University shall serve as an advisory board to the Xxxxxxx; and shall consider and make recommendations on revisions in the Student Evaluation of Teaching (SET). The University and the Association shall each appoint one (1) member of the committee to serve as co-chairs. The committee shall also consider requests for waivers from the use of the SET, or proposals for alterations in the SET. Each appointing entity should appoint, among its appointees, some person having expertise in evaluation. If the committee makes recommendations that the Xxxxxxx is not prepared to implement, these differences will be discussed with the committee. If there is not a satisfactory resolution to these differences, the current standard form shall remain in use.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3
Student Evaluation of Teaching. Each appropriate unit of the faculty shall make provisions for student evaluation of faculty teaching through the use of a standard evaluation form established by the University. The unit may also include a form which has been developed for the specific use of that unit. The results of the evaluations shall be made available to the individual, to the unit committee(s) charged with making personnel decisions (to include, but not limited to, renewal, tenure, promotions, and salary adjustments), and to the chair and other appropriate administrative officers for the purpose of assessing the individual’s teaching performance and for the purpose of program review. However, data from student evaluations will not be the only basis for comparisons between units. The anonymity of the students shall be preserved. A joint committee composed of three (3) members appointed by the Association and three (3) members appointed by the University shall serve as an advisory board to the Xxxxxxx in the development and use of standard forms and other instruments for student evaluation of teaching. The committee shall also consider requests for waivers from the use of the standard instrument, or proposals for alterations in the standard instrument. Each appointing entity should appoint, among its appointees, some person having expertise in evaluation. If the committee makes recommendations to the Xxxxxxx that s/he is not prepared to implement, s/he will first discuss these differences with the committee. If there is not a satisfactory resolution to the differences, the current standard form shall remain in use.
Sample 1Sample 2
Student Evaluation of Teaching. Student evaluations are done once per term to give instructors an idea of how they are being perceived by their students. Evaluations of part-time instructional faculty are conducted in an online format after the last day for students to withdraw from the course. Results of the student evaluations, including all comments, will be provided to faculty at the end of the term or after grades have been finalized by the registrar’s office for that course. The student evaluation criteria serve as a basis for evaluation, along with the administrative evaluator’s assessment of the presentation to the student during classroom visitation.
Sample 1
Student Evaluation of Teaching. All courses taught as part of the public health curriculum, as reviewed and approved by the UMN/SPH educational policy committee, require the completion of an end-of-semester/course evaluation by students (including  /CVM Students) according to UMN/SPH customs and University of Minnesota standards. Such evaluations are required to assess the performance of both regular and adjunct faculty and to improve the academic quality of the Program. Evaluations will be provided to the faculty member and to the PHP major chair, who may share them with executive faculty or other responsible parties.
Sample 1
Student Evaluation of Teaching. 9.1 All courses taught as part of the public health curriculum, as reviewed and approved by the UMN/SPH educational policy committee, require the completion of an end-of-semester/course evaluation by students (including /CVM Students) according to UMN/SPH customs and University of Minnesota standards. Such evaluations are required to assess the performance of both regular and adjunct faculty and to improve the academic quality of the Program. 9.2 Evaluations will be provided to the faculty member and to the PHP major chair, who may share them with executive faculty or other responsible parties.
Sample 1
Student Evaluation of Teaching. Each faculty member will be evaluated for each course each semester. Non-tenured faculty members shall be evaluated each semester. Tenured faculty members shall be evaluated according to the following schedule: Last names beginning with letters During academic years beginning with an even-numbered year During academic years beginning with an odd-numbered year A-M Fall Semester Spring Semester Tenured faculty may volunteer for evaluation in a semester during which they are not scheduled to be evaluated by notifying the Administration in writing no later than the end of the fourth week of the semester. Voluntary evaluations of tenured faculty will not be included in the Official Personnel File unless submitted by the faculty member with a written request for inclusion. All student evaluations of teaching shall be subject to the exclusions specified in 14.3. Faculty members who team-teach shall be evaluated individually on the same basis as a faculty member teaching a course individually.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Student Evaluation of Teaching. Student evaluation of teaching (SET) instrument shall be administered as recommended by the Joint AAUP- University Committee on Student Evaluation of Teaching and approved by the Association and the University. SET results are to be regarded as but one source of information about a faculty member’s teaching.
Sample 1

Related to Student Evaluation of Teaching

  • Student Evaluation a. The President of the College or the President’s designee shall be responsible for administering the student evaluation process. b. Student evaluation packets for each class containing instruments and instructions shall be distributed to each faculty member by the first week of December during the fall semester and by the last week in April during the spring semester. c. It is expressly agreed that the faculty member being evaluated shall not be present in the classroom when the student evaluation is being administered and that all instruction to students with regard to such student evaluation shall be included in writing on the instrument, provided further that the designated unit or non-unit professional shall return the student evaluation directly to the President of the College or the President’s designee. The administering of the student evaluation shall be the responsibility of the President of the College or the President’s designee who shall determine who among unit or non-unit professionals shall administer such student evaluation. Student evaluations shall be valid only if signed by the student; provided, however, that faculty members shall not be entitled to the identity of the student responding unless such student evaluation is used as a basis for dismissal or other disciplinary action and such will be communicated to the students. d. The data from the student evaluation shall be tabulated and copies sent to the President of the College or the President’s designee. The raw data shall be retained by the College for a period of one (1) year during which time the faculty member shall have access thereto upon written request. e. The President of the College or the President’s designee shall review the tabulated data and shall forward a data summary to the faculty member by January 23 for the fall semester and by June 15 for the spring semester. f. The faculty member shall have seven (7) working days in which to respond to such data.

  • Student Evaluations Student evaluations shall be completed by the end of the 12th week of the Fall semester.

  • Evaluation of Tenders 33.1 The Procuring Entity shall use the criteria and methodologies listed in this ITT and Section III, Evaluation and Qualification criteria. No other evaluation criteria or methodologies shall be permitted. By applying the criteria and methodologies, the Procuring Entity shall determine the Lowest Evaluated Tender. This is the Tender of the Tenderer that meets the qualification criteria and whose Tender has been determined to be: a) substantially responsive to the tender documents; and b) the lowest evaluated price. 33.2 Price evaluation will be done for Items or Lots (contracts), as specified in the TDS; and the Tender Price as quoted in accordance with ITT 14. To evaluate a Tender, the Procuring Entity shall consider the following: a) price adjustment due to unconditional discounts offered in accordance with ITT 13.4; b) converting the amount resulting from applying (a) and (b) above, if relevant, to a single currency in accordance with ITT 31; c) price adjustment due to quantifiable nonmaterial non-conformities in accordance with ITT 29.3; and d) any additional evaluation factors specified in the TDS and Section III, Evaluation and Qualification Criteria. 33.3 The estimated effect of the price adjustment provisions of the Conditions of Contract, applied over the period of execution of the Contract, shall not be considered in Tender evaluation. 33.4 Where the tender involves multiple lots or contracts, the tenderer will be allowed to tender for one or more lots (contracts). Each lot or contract will be evaluated in accordance with ITT 33.

  • Independent Evaluation Buyer is experienced and knowledgeable in the oil and gas business. Buyer has been advised by and has relied solely on its own expertise and legal, tax, accounting, marketing, land, engineering, environmental and other professional counsel concerning this transaction, the Subject Property and value thereof.

  • TEACHER EVALUATION A. The administration will be evaluating the teacher’s performance within the time of formal responsibility. The evaluation process and form will be shared with the Association Building Representatives at the beginning of each school year. (a) Probationary teachers shall be evaluated at least two (2) times a year. The first evaluation will be completed prior to December 1st and the second prior to April 15th. Each evaluation will be based upon announced, unannounced, informal observations, on the performance of other duties and responsibilities and the goals developed in the Individualized Development Plan (IDP). The announced and unannounced observations should be a minimum of thirty (30) minutes in length. The observations may occur at anytime prior to the development of the written evaluation, but at least one of them must be planned in consultation with the probationary teacher. The results of formal observations will be discussed with the teacher in a timely manner. The information gathered during the observations will be used to write the evaluations. (b) Tenured teachers will be evaluated on a rotating schedule, but no less than once every three- (3) years. The administration reserves the right to evaluate a tenured teacher more often. The evaluation will be based upon announced, unannounced, informal observations and on the performance of other duties and responsibilities. The announced and unannounced observations should be a minimum of thirty (30) minutes in length. The observations may occur at any time prior to the development of the written evaluation, but at least one of them must be planned in consultation with the tenured teacher. The results of formal observations will be discussed with the teacher in a timely manner. The information gathered during the observations will be used to write the evaluations. 2. The administrator shall prepare and submit a written evaluation and recommendations to the teacher prior to May 30th of the year they are evaluated. The administrator shall hold a conference with the teacher to discuss the written evaluation and recommendations. 3. Upon receipt of the evaluation the teacher will sign the form indicating his/her receipt of the report. The signature on the form does not constitute his/her approval unless specifically noted. 4. Teachers involved with the instruction of Advanced Placement courses will be evaluated. This evaluation in the first year will be made part of the formal evaluation only at the request of the teacher. B. A teacher who disagrees with the content or procedure of evaluation may submit a written answer which shall be attached to the file copy of the evaluation in question and/or submit any complaints through Level 4 of the grievance procedure. C. If an administrator believes a teacher is doing unacceptable work, the reasons shall be set forth in specific terms. Included will be examples of specific ways in which the teacher is to improve and assistance may be given by the administrator and other staff members. In subsequent conferences it shall be the responsibility of the individual teacher to inquire whether adequate improvement has taken place. D. Monitoring and observation of the work performance of the teacher shall be conducted openly. The public address or audio system or similar types of communications will not be used for the purpose of evaluation. E. The Board and the Association recognize that the ability of pupils to progress and mature academically is a combined result of the school, home, economic and social environment and that teachers alone cannot be held accountable for all aspects of the academic achievement of the pupil in the classroom. Test results of academic progress of students shall not be used as the sole determinant or in isolated instances to evaluate the quality of a teacher's service or fitness for retention. F. All communications, including evaluations by Milan Administrators, commendations, and documented complaints directed toward the teacher which are to be included in the personnel file shall be made available for review of the teacher prior to placement in the file; a copy of any such communication will be provided to the teacher at this time. Pre-placement information such as confidential credentials, letters of reference from universities, individuals, or previous employers are exempt from such review. A written statement for inclusion in the personnel file may then be made by the teacher in regard to materials that were not signed by the teacher. A representative of the Association may accompany the teacher. G. Ordinarily, observations of teachers shall not be for less than a full class period or for the duration of a particular teaching lesson.

  • TECHNICAL EVALUATION (a) Detailed technical evaluation shall be carried out by Purchase Committee pursuant to conditions in the tender document to determine the substantial responsiveness of each tender. For this clause, the substantially responsive bid is one that conforms to all the eligibility and terms and condition of the tender without any material deviation. The Institute’s determination of bid’s responsiveness is to be based on the contents of the bid itself without recourse to extrinsic evidence. The Institute shall evaluate the technical bids also to determine whether they are complete, whether required sureties have been furnished, whether the documents have been properly signed and whether the bids are in order. (b) The technical evaluation committee may call the responsive bidders for discussion or presentation to facilitate and assess their understanding of the scope of work and its execution. However, the committee shall have sole discretion to call for discussion / presentation. (c) Financial bids of only those bidders who qualify the technical criteria will be opened provided all other requirements are fulfilled. (d) AIIMS Jodhpur shall have right to accept or reject any or all tenders without assigning any reasons thereof.

  • MANAGEMENT OF EVALUATION OUTCOMES 12.1 Where the Employer is, any time during the Employee’s employment, not satisfied with the Employee’s performance with respect to any matter dealt with in this Agreement, the Employer will give notice to the Employee to attend a meeting; 12.2 The Employee will have the opportunity at the meeting to satisfy the Employer of the measures being taken to ensure that his performance becomes satisfactory and any programme, including any dates, for implementing these measures; 12.3 Where there is a dispute or difference as to the performance of the Employee under this Agreement, the Parties will confer with a view to resolving the dispute or difference; and 12.4 In the case of unacceptable performance, the Employer shall – 12.4.1 Provide systematic remedial or developmental support to assist the Employee to improve his performance; and 12.4.2 After appropriate performance counselling and having provided the necessary guidance and/or support as well as reasonable time for improvement in performance, the Employer may consider steps to terminate the contract of employment of the Employee on grounds of unfitness or incapacity to carry out his or her duties.

  • Program Monitoring and Evaluation The Recipient shall prepare, or cause to be prepared, and furnish to the Association not later than six months after the Closing Date, a report of such scope and in such detail as the Association shall reasonably request, on the execution of the Program, the performance by the Recipient and the Association of their respective obligations under the Legal Agreements and the accomplishment of the purposes of the Financing.”

  • DEVELOPMENT OR ASSISTANCE IN DEVELOPMENT OF SPECIFICATIONS REQUIREMENTS/ STATEMENTS OF WORK

  • Evaluation, Testing, and Monitoring 1. The System Agency may review, test, evaluate and monitor Grantee’s Products and services, as well as associated documentation and technical support for compliance with the Accessibility Standards. Review, testing, evaluation and monitoring may be conducted before and after the award of a contract. Testing and monitoring may include user acceptance testing. Neither the review, testing (including acceptance testing), evaluation or monitoring of any Product or service, nor the absence of review, testing, evaluation or monitoring, will result in a waiver of the State’s right to contest the Grantee’s assertion of compliance with the Accessibility Standards. 2. Grantee agrees to cooperate fully and provide the System Agency and its representatives timely access to Products, records, and other items and information needed to conduct such review, evaluation, testing, and monitoring.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!