Competitive Landscape Sample Clauses

Competitive Landscape. Currently, the closest specialized pizza restaurant is one mile away from our intended location in the Local Bay area. Take-Out Pizza, Inc. will offer a better product, at a reasonable price, and will deliver it hot or refrigerated, always on time, to the customer's door. However, there are five fast-food restaurants, near our intended location, that also include pizza among other menu items. The quality of their products is no match for the New-York style pizza that we offer, but we may consider them as competitors because they offer better prices (for lower quality) and they are located within a one-mile radius from our pizzeria. Other main competitors that we have identified in Local Bay area are: Pizza Concepts. Pizza-For-You, and Xxxxxxxxx'x Foods. According to our own market survey (see Appendix M), we distinguish ourselves from them by providing better quality pizza at reasonable prices, and delivering both hot and special-package refrigerated pizza to the customer door. Other differences are included in the next table. Competitors We have, they don't They have, we don't Pizza Concepts better quality, specialized products, better equipment lower prices, table service, various other food items Pizza-For You better location, better quality, faster service lower prices, own delivery vehicles, traditional customers Xxxxxxxxx'x Foods skilled pizza staff, better recipes, lower prices luxury environment, high- end customers, music and color lighting Other
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Competitive Landscape. The competitive landscape of the industry has been analyzed along with detailed profiles of the key players operating in the market. Some of the leading players are:
Competitive Landscape. The Philippines competitive landscape is a mix of strong local and large multinational players. In Sparkling, Pepsi and Asia Refreshment Corporation (RC) are the primary competitors, while Nestle, Universal Robina (C2) and Asia Brewery Inc. (Cobra) are the major Stills players. (See Annex 1 for details) Shopping habits will continue to evolve with increasing focus on value and convenience. While Sari-Sari Stores (Traditional Trade) will remain important and will continue to be the largest segment in the next years, Convenience Stores, at Work and HORECA channels will grow faster than Sari-Sari Stores. (See Annex 2 for Channel Gross Profit Opportunity Map)
Competitive Landscape. The Philippines competitive landscape is a mix of strong local and large multinational players. In Sparkling, Pepsi and Asia Refreshment Corporation (RC) are the primary competitors, while Nestle, Universal Robina (C2) and Asia Brewery Inc. (Cobra) are the major Stills players. (See Annex 1 for details) Customer and channel evolution: Shopping habits will continue to evolve with increasing focus on value and convenience. While Sari-Sari Stores (Traditional Trade) will remain important and will continue to be the largest segment in the next years, Convenience Stores, at Work and HORECA channels will grow faster than Sari-Sari Stores. (See Annex 2 for Channel Gross Profit Opportunity Map) KO-KOF JOINT BUSINESS PLAN In Q1 2012, we started the joint system planning process between KO and KOF to establish a joint System Vision for 2020, align on the key strategic pillars and priorities for the next 3 years that will create the basis for a sustainable profitable system in the long term, and key actions and detailed plans for the next 18 months. The text below reflects the main conclusions of the joint process. 2020 VISION We have an aligned 2020 Vision that set the foundations for the Philippines to become a 1 Bn UCS market in the next 10 years while it becomes a profitable growth market. This implies a 6.2% (CAGR 2012-15) through relentless focus on our key strategic imperatives. STRATEGIC IMPERATIVES As a result of the highly iterative and collaborative process between KO and KOF, we have agreed on the following critical strategic areas and imperatives: Winning Brand Portfolio Over the next few years, focus is the name of the game. From 2012-2015, ~79% of RTD industry incremental volume and ~76% of the RTD industry gross profit pools are expected to be in Sparkling, Juice and Water. Therefore, we will focus efforts around three big bets:
Competitive Landscape. In addition to us, the Czech Republic currently has two other licensed mobile operators holding a total of six licenses: (1) Eurotel, a digital GSM 900/1800 MHz mobile telephone protocol and NMT (NMT450) operator and a holder of a UMTS license; and (2) Radiomobil, another digital GSM 900/1800 MHz operator, holder of a UMTS license and a license for 872 MHz frequency band. Eurotel acquired its NMT 450 license in November 1990 and launched commercial analog service operations in September 1991. The entry of GSM services reversed Eurotel's earlier NMT subscriber growth. Eurotel won its 900 XXx XXX license in March 1996 and launched commercial operations in July 1996. Eurotel Praha was allocated 1800 MHz frequencies in July 2001. Český Telecom, the national fixed line operator, became the sole shareholder of Eurotel in November 2003. In December 2004, the government initiated the sale process of its 51% stake in Český Telecom, the first attempt to do so since 2002, when a planned sale to Deutsche Bank and TDC failed. On April 12, 2005 the government signed the sale contract with Telefonica SA, the Spanish incumbent, which submitted the highest bid of CZK 82.6 billion for the controlling stake. Radiomobil acquired its 900 MHz license in March 1996 and began providing commercial service under the brand name Paegas in September 1996. Radiomobil was allocated 1800 MHz frequencies in July 2001. Radiomobil's majority shareholder is Deutsche Telekom AG. In April 2002 Radiomobil rebranded its services to the T-Mobile brand name, and has since changed its name to T-Mobile Czech Republic. On March 21, 2005 T-Mobile won the tender granting the frequencies in the 872 MHz band. T-Mobile and Eurotel were granted UMTS licenses in December 2001 for approximately CZK3.8 billion and CZK3.5 billion respectively. The recipients were required to pay CZK1 billion upon the issuance of the licenses and the balance of the purchase price in 2004. The operators were also required, as a unique deployment condition, to achieve 90% coverage of Prague, with their commercial UMTS services by January 1, 2007. The following table presents a summary of the relevant information for each wireless operator in the Czech Republic including estimated market share based on publicly released data of the operators as of December 31, 2004: Oskar Mobil/ Oskar GSM 900 1/1800 October 1999 March 2000 17.0%
Competitive Landscape. Primary competitors and/or industries being altered by GIPLs products are described below: Pricing: Breath analytics equipment prices have been too high a cost to justify a large number of the 30,000 veterinary practices to spend several hundreds of thousands of dollars needed for equipment. Our goal is to bring the price point to less than $25,000. Key Weakness Many medical people have expressed an opinion, that in spite of the difficulties of utilizing new equipment, it is inevitable that a user-friendly technology will arrive that eliminates most of their outsourcing of testing. It is our goal to initiate a conservative transition phase embracing our new technology. We believe there are differentiating Factors GIPL maintains a unique competitive advantage over other products in several categories. Our biggest differentiators include: Diverse Product Capabilities - GIPL intends to make it possible for Veterinarians to reduce laboratory charges while gaining a better across-the-board view of a number of conditions. User-Friendly - Our technology will be built to be easy to use and the user will only be required to have minimal technical savvy. Setup and configuration is expected to be simple. Affordability GIPLs gas chromatography units plan to be priced well below our competitors’ products with the goal of delivering superior functionality and value. This will be an essential factor in helping us continue to gain market share nationally. Team Strength Our team is comprised of industry veterans who bring decades of experience to the table across product launch, industrial design, medical testing, food and beverage and more. Our leadership team has a history starting and leading companies to successful exits and has established valuable relationships with industry leaders along the way that will help us strategically position Global Innovative Platforms as a market innovator in the days ahead. Investment Opportunity Global Innovative Platforms is currently seeking a total of $1M in equity financing to fuel the next stage of company growth. The use of proceeds includes manufacturing, pre-order fulfillment, ongoing development of our platform, and marketing efforts in order to continue expanding the GIPL brand. Any remaining funds will be allocated as operating capital. Why Invest in Global Innovative Platforms? Investors have the opportunity to get in on the ground floor with a company that is positioned to grow into a leading innovator in the veterinary sp...

Related to Competitive Landscape

  • Landscaping 3.9.1 All plant material shall conform to the Canadian Nursery Landscape Association’s Canadian Nursery Stock Standard (ninth edition or newer). 3.9.2 There shall be an opaque wood fence or masonry wall at least 1.8 metres tall along the eastern property line extending the length of the surface parking area and access to the underground parking area as generally shown on Schedule B. 3.9.3 Prior to the issuance of a Development Permit, the Developer agrees to provide Landscape Plan that comply with the provisions of this section. The Landscape Plan shall be prepared by a Landscape Architect (a full member, in good standing with Canadian Society of Landscape Architects) and comply with all provisions of this section. 3.9.4 Prior to issuance of the first Occupancy Permit the Developer shall submit to the Development Officer a letter prepared by a member in good standing of the Canadian Society of Landscape Architects certifying that all landscaping has been completed according to the terms of this Development Agreement. 3.9.5 Notwithstanding Section 3.9.4, where the weather and time of year do not allow the completion of the outstanding landscape works prior to the issuance of the Occupancy Permit, the Developer may supply a security deposit in the amount of 110 percent of the estimated cost to complete the landscaping. The cost estimate is to be prepared by a member in good standing of the Canadian Society of Landscape Architects. The security shall be in favour of the Municipality and shall be in the form of a certified cheque or automatically renewing, irrevocable letter of credit issued by a chartered bank. The security shall be returned to the Developer only upon completion of the work as described herein and illustrated on the Schedules, and as approved by the Development Officer. Should the Developer not complete the landscaping within twelve months of issuance of the Occupancy Permit, the Municipality may use the deposit to complete the landscaping as set out in this section of the Agreement. The Developer shall be responsible for all costs in this regard exceeding the deposit. The security deposit or unused portion of the security deposit shall be returned to the Developer upon completion of the work and its certification. 3.9.6 All landscape areas designed to be installed upon any portion of the building must be supported by documentation from a Structural Engineer indicating that the building design is able to support any required drainage or additional weight caused by the landscaped area.

  • Restrooms The restrooms, toilets, urinals, vanities and the other apparatus shall not be used for any purpose other than that for which they were constructed, and no foreign substance of any kind whatsoever shall be thrown therein. The expense of any breakage, stoppage or damage resulting from the violation of this rule shall be borne by the Tenant whom, or whose employees or invitees, shall have caused it.

  • Building Systems The term "Building Systems" means all systems serving the Building in general, including, but not limited to, the fire/life safety, electrical, plumbing, HVAC, including all components thereof and related equipment, including any distribution systems or equipment existing within the Premises.

  • Common Areas Tenant shall have the non-exclusive right to use in common with other tenants in the Project, and subject to the Rules and Regulations referred to in Article 5 of this Lease, those portions of the Project which are provided, from time to time, for use in common by Landlord, Tenant and any other tenants of the Project (such areas, together with such other portions of the Project designated by Landlord, in its discretion, including certain areas designated for the exclusive use of certain tenants, or to be shared by Landlord and certain tenants, are collectively referred to herein as the “Common Areas”). The Common Areas shall consist of the “Project Common Areas” and the “Building Common Areas.” The term “Project Common Areas,” as used in this Lease, shall mean the portion of the Project designated as such by Landlord or areas within the Project that the occupants of the Building are permitted to utilize pursuant to a recorded declaration and which areas shall be maintained in accordance with the declaration. The term “Building Common Areas,” as used in this Lease, shall mean the portions of the Common Areas located within the Building reasonably designated as such by Landlord. The manner in which the Common Areas are maintained and operated shall be at the reasonable discretion of Landlord and the use thereof shall be subject to the Rules and Regulations as Landlord may make from time to time. Landlord reserves the right to close temporarily, make alterations or additions to, or change the location of elements of the Project and the Common Areas, provided that, in connection therewith, Landlord shall perform such closures, alterations, additions or changes in a commercially reasonable manner and, in connection therewith, shall use commercially reasonable efforts to minimize any material interference with Tenant’s use of and access to the Premises.

  • Buildings The Employer will provide and maintain all state-owned buildings, facilities, and equipment in accordance with the specific written order(s) of the Michigan (MIOSHA) Departments of Licensing and Regulatory Affairs and/or Health and Human Services. Where facilities are leased by the Employer, the Employer shall make a reasonable attempt to assure that such facilities comply with the order(s) of the Michigan Departments of Licensing and Regulatory Affairs and/or Health and Human Services.

  • Shopping Goods and works estimated to cost less than $100,000 equivalent per contract may be procured under contracts awarded on the basis of Shopping.

  • Building and Improvements Lessor shall obtain and keep in force during the term of this Lease a policy or policies in the name of Lessor, with loss payable to Lessor and to any Lender(s), insuring against loss or damage to the Premises. Such insurance shall be for full replacement cost, as the same shall exist from time to time, or the amount required by any Lender(s), but in no event more than the commercially reasonable and available insurable value thereof if, by reason of the unique nature or age of the improvements involved, such latter amount is less than full replacement cost. Lessee-Owned Alterations and Utility Installations, Trade Fixtures and Lessee's personal property shall be insured by Lessee pursuant to Paragraph 8.

  • Projects There shall be a thirty (30) km free zone around the projects excluding the Metro Vancouver Area. For local residents, kilometers shall be paid from the boundary of the free zone around the project. Workers employed by any contractor within an identified free zone who resides outside of that same free zone will be paid according to the Kilometer Chart from the project to their residence less thirty

  • Amenities Amenities shall be prescribed as provided in Appendix F of this Agreement.

  • Building Use Agency facilities may be used for Union activities according to current building use policies, so long as the facility is available and proper scheduling has been arranged.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!