Evaluation (Formal) Sample Clauses

Evaluation (Formal). 1. Prior to the completion of any formal evaluation, the teacher shall be apprised of the instrument which is to be utilized as part of such evaluation. The applicable instrument shall be placed in the teachers’ handbook. The teacher shall also be apprised of any criteria which is atypical with respect to the evaluation of teachers. Any evaluator undertaking an evaluation of a teacher must successfully complete a pre-qualification program provided or approved by the State Board of Education in accordance with Section 24A-3 of the School Code.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Evaluation (Formal). Teacher Evaluations for all teachers shall utilize the evaluation tool mutually agreed upon by the Union and the Board. The evaluation committee shall meet as necessary, but not less than once per year. Representatives of the Union shall be involved in the development of the District evaluation plan. Changes to the evaluation tool and associated procedures shall be mutually agreed upon by both parties. Further, the parties agree that should the law regarding teacher evaluation change, the parties will meet to make the necessary modifications to comply with any changes to the law. Process: Within ten (10) calendar days from the beginning of the school year, the building principal will meet with all certified staff members who are scheduled to be evaluated for the current school year. At this meeting, all appendices associated with this document pertaining to the evaluation process will be shared and discussed. Formal teacher observation shall be preceded by a conference between the evaluator and the teacher to review the pertinent factors anticipated to be involved in the evaluation process. If the teacher feels that his/her performance is atypical during a formal observation, the teacher may request a second formal observation. Such written request, which shall include a description of the atypical factors, may be granted at the Administrator’s discretion. Within ten (10) teacher employment days following the formal observation(s), the evaluator shall meet with the teacher to review the conclusions of the evaluator. The responsibility of the evaluator is to offer multiple options for meeting times to conduct the post-observation conference within the ten (10) day timeframe. The responsibility of the teacher is to schedule the meeting with the evaluator within the time frame allotted. At least twenty-four (24) hours prior to the post-conference, the evaluator shall present his/her observation feedback in writing. A copy of the written evaluation shall be given to the teacher following the post- conference. Both the evaluator and the teacher shall date and sign all copies. The signature of the teacher shall not necessarily indicate agreement with the written observation but rather shall indicate that the conference and discussion have been held and that the teacher is in receipt of the copy of the observation. The parties acknowledge that an effective observation would include a listing of the teacher’s strengths and areas of concern, with supporting reasons...
Sample 1
Evaluation (Formal) evaluations of the trainee will occur at the conclusion of the rotation, and/or more frequently if requested by either the UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY or FACILITY program director. Evaluations will be completed on forms provided by the FACILITY program director or his/her designee.
Sample 1

Related to Evaluation (Formal)

  • Evaluation Forms a. Performance evaluation forms will at a minimum have:

  • Evaluation Form The Union agrees that the Management Rights provision of this Agreement and Section 3-302 of the State Personnel and Pension Article confers upon the State the authority to make changes to the forms used to evaluate employees. Such changes may be implemented after notification to the Union.

  • Evaluation Plan The systematic blueprint detailing the evaluation aspects of the project.

  • Evaluation Cycle Goal Setting and Development of the Educator Plan

  • Evaluation Committee A The Association and the Board agree to establish a standing joint Evaluation Development Committee for the purpose of establishing the procedure and process, including the evaluation instrument, for the evaluation of teachers in the District and to regularly review the effectiveness of the procedure and process, including the evaluation instrument, for the evaluation of teachers in the District.

  • Evaluation Criteria 5.2.1. The responses will be evaluated based on the following: (edit evaluation criteria below as appropriate for your project)

  • Evaluation Procedure The procedural requirements set forth in this agreement to provide specificity to the statutory obligations established under sections 3319.111 and 3319.112 of the Ohio Revised Code and to conform to the framework for the evaluation of teachers developed under section 3319.112 of the Ohio Revised Code.

  • Evaluation Period Customer’s right to use the Services on a Trial Basis are time-limited and will terminate immediately upon the earlier of (i) the trial end date as specified in an Order Form or other document executed by the parties regarding such trial, or (ii) the start date of when Customer purchases a right to use such Services on a non-Trial Basis, or (iii) the date when QuoVadis terminates Customer’s right to use the Services on a Trial Basis (which QuoVadis may do at any time in its sole discretion). Customer must cease using the Services on a Trial Basis upon any such termination.

  • Evaluation Process A. The immediate supervisor will meet with an employee at the start of the employee’s probationary, trial services, transition, and annual review period to discuss performance expectations. The employee will receive copies of their performance expectations as well as notification of any modifications made during the review period. Employee work performance will be evaluated during probationary, trial service and transition review periods and at least annually thereafter. Notification will be given to a probationary or trial service employee whose work performance is determined to be unsatisfactory.

  • Joint Job Evaluation Committee The parties entered into agreement December 17, 1992, to ensure the Joint Gender- Neutral Job Evaluation Plan remains current and operational and to that end endorsed the Joint Gender-Neutral Job Evaluation Maintenance Agreement. The parties agree that a guiding principle for the Committee is that there shall be no discrimination between male and female employees wherein a person of one sex is paid more than a person of the other sex for similar or substantially similar work.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.