Evaluation of Services Sample Clauses
Evaluation of Services. A. PROGRAM RESPONSIBILITY
B. PROGRAM EVALUATION
Evaluation of Services. 13.1. ACC has the right to evaluate any Service under this Contract, so that we can check compliance with organisational and Service quality requirements.
13.2. Such evaluations can consider any and all aspects of this Contract.
13.3. ACC will use any method of evaluation that we determine is appropriate based on the perceived level of risk.
13.4. ACC can perform such evaluations itself or by using an appropriate subcontractor or other government agency.
13.5. ACC will give you at least 10 business days’ notice of our intention to conduct an evaluation. If we believe that delay will unnecessarily prejudice the interests of any person, we may give you notice of our intention to carry out an evaluation within such other time ACC considers appropriate, but on no less than 24 hours’ notice.
13.6. If ACC considers an evaluation is necessary, then subject to the requirements of relevant law, you will allow ACC access to the information necessary for that process. This includes your records and premises and the records and premises of any relevant subcontractor. You, and any relevant subcontractors will provide ACC with every reasonable facility for and assistance in obtaining access to undertake the evaluation. The person conducting the evaluation may (subject to the rights of Clients or other people receiving the Services) attend Services being provided, and talk with Clients and other providers or users of Services.
13.7. We will not charge you and you will not charge us for any initial evaluation process. You will pay for any further evaluations about the same performance issues if you have not improved your Service standards to the level required by ACC within an agreed length of time.
Evaluation of Services. 2.1 HCC shall have the right to determine, in its sole discretion, whether the Services rendered by the Contractor under this Contract are satisfactory and meet the standards expected by HCC. In the event that HCC is not satisfied that the Contractor has performed the Services in an acceptable manner and/or that such Services do not meet the standards required by HCC for the Project and/or that the Work Product (as hereinafter defined) does not meet the expectations of HCC, HCC shall have the right to reject such Services or such Work Product, in which case, either of the following shall occur: (a) the Contractor shall re-perform any unsatisfactory or non- conforming Services or redesign or reconstruct such Work Product at no cost to HCC; or (b) HCC shall terminate the Contract and shall not be obligated to pay any Fees (as hereinafter defined) attributable to the unsatisfactory or non-conforming Services or Work Product.
2.2 The Parties agree that the HCC shall have the right to have access to the area where and equipment on which Contractor is performing Services and to any Work Product resulting from the Services to evaluate Contractor's Services under this Contract, to ensure compliance with all Applicable Law (as hereinafter defined), to review documentation, and/or to obtain other pertinent information.
Evaluation of Services. The planning council may choose to evaluate how well services funded by RWHAP Part A are meeting identified community needs, or it can pay someone else to do such an evaluation. The Part A recipient’s CQM program can provide information on clinical outcomes that informs the planning council about the impact of services. The recipient may include planning council members on its CQM committee. In addition, most planning councils regularly review EMA/TGA performance along the HIV care continuum. The planning council uses evaluation findings in considering ways to improve the system of care, including changing service priorities and allocations and developing directives. To carry out the array of planning tasks described above the planning council meets regularly throughout the year, as a whole and in committees. See Appendix II for a sample calendar describing the approximate timing of various planning council activities by months of the year.
Evaluation of Services. 2.4.1 BSQUARE understands and agrees that it is obligated under this Agreement to provide MICROSOFT with high quality Work Product and Services at all times during the term of this Agreement. In addition, and as further detailed in Section 2.4.3 below, BSQUARE shall be responsible for initiating prompt and detailed communications with the appropriate MICROSOFT project leaders regarding any Errors discovered during the course of development of software code Deliverables. In the event that any such Errors are caused by a failure of BSQUARE to provide a high quality Work Product, then Microsoft shall be entitled (in addition to any other remedies it may have under this Agreement, at law or in equity) to an appropriate credit for Service time associated with such Error.
2.4.2 For documentation or report Deliverables, MICROSOFT shall evaluate each version of such Deliverable. In the event that it requires corrections, MICROSOFT shall specify the corrections needed and BSQUARE shall deliver an amended version of such documentation within five (5) working days.
Evaluation of Services. 2.4.1 SNAP2 understands and agrees that it is obligated under this Agreement to use all reasonable efforts to provide MICROSOFT with high quality Work Product and Services which conform to the standards set forth on the applicable Work Plan, at all times during the Term (defined below) of this Agreement. In addition, and as further detailed in Section 2.4.3 below, SNAP2 shall be responsible for initiating prompt and detailed communications with the appropriate MICROSOFT project leaders regarding any Errors discovered during the course of development of software code Deliverables. In the event that any such Errors are caused by a failure of SNAP2 to provide a high quality Work Product and Services which conform to the standards set forth on the applicable Work Plan, then MICROSOFT shall be entitled (in addition to any other remedies it may have under this Agreement, at law or in equity) to an appropriate credit for Service time associated with such Error (including without limitation, for any Errors contained in any amended or corrected versions of Work Product or Deliverables). MICROSOFT acknowledges that in some instances, as further set forth in specific Work Plans, MICROSOFT may deliver incomplete or preliminary code and other materials to SNAP2, and that the quality of SNAP2' resulting Work Product and Services must be determined taking into account the quality of deliverables provided by MICROSOFT.
2.4.2 For documentation or report Deliverables, MICROSOFT shall evaluate each version of such Deliverable within a commercially reasonable period of time, not to exceed thirty (30) days or any alternative limitation set forth in a Work Plan after receipt of such materials. In the event that the Deliverable requires corrections, MICROSOFT shall specify the corrections needed and SNAP2 shall deliver an amended version of such documentation within five (5) working days. SNAP2 shall prepare and deliver such documentation corrections to MICROSOFT at no charge if such corrections are necessary in order for the documentation to be clear or accurate, or to conform to specifications. MICROSOFT shall pay SNAP2 for other types of corrections or modifications to the documentation requested by MICROSOFT.
2.4.3 SNAP2 shall use all reasonable efforts to complete and deliver the Deliverables appropriate for each Work Plan, or as requested by MICROSOFT from time to time, to MICROSOFT according to the applicable Schedule and in accordance with the terms and conditions of thi...
Evaluation of Services. The manner in which the Xxxxx Xxxxxx Board subcontracts the services of the Atlantic Highlands SBA/BA shall be evaluated by the Xxxxx Xxxxxx Board at the conclusion of the 2011-2012 school year. This evaluation shall assess the level and quality of the services provided by the Atlantic Highlands SBA/BS to the Xxxxx Xxxxxx Board and shall include any concerns that the Xxxxx Xxxxxx Board may have regarding the delivery of services. A copy of the evaluation by the Xxxxx Xxxxxx Board shall be furnished to the Atlantic Highlands Board on or before May 1, 2012 so that the Atlantic Highlands Board may consider the Xxxxx Xxxxxx Board evaluation. This evaluation shall be utilized by both the Atlantic Highlands Board and the Xxxxx Xxxxxx Board to determine whether this Agreement shall be renewed at the conclusion of this Agreement and, if so, whether there should be any modifications to the Agreement. The manner and format of the evaluation will be determined by the Liaison Committee as set forth in Paragraph 5. The performance of the Atlantic Highlands SBA/BS shall be evaluated both by the Superintendent of the Atlantic Highlands Board and the Superintendent of the Xxxxx Xxxxxx Board on an annual basis. However, nothing herein shall be intended or understood to interfere with the right of the Atlantic Highlands Board, as the primary employer, to renew or non-renew the employment of the individual employed in the capacity of SBA/BS upon recommendation of its Superintendent. In the event that the employment of the individual currently serving in the capacity of Atlantic Highlands SBA/BS is non-renewed or terminated for any reason, the terms of this Agreement shall apply to the successor employee in that position. This agreement may be renewed at the end of its term but only upon formal action by both Boards.
Evaluation of Services. PHS shall monitor and inspect the implementation and progress of the Services to confirm that, to the extent completed, the Service Provider’s performance and the Deliverables (defined below) conform to the terms of the SOW.
Evaluation of Services. The Parties are dedicated to their respective missions, levels of excellence and commitment to rural healthcare, and recognize the importance of maintaining their existing level of hospital and other health care services to the extent feasible under evolving standards of quality, cost, effectiveness and reimbursement. D-HH GO will support the continued availability of services necessary and appropriate for the communities served by CMC, HH and MCH and, with respect to HH and MCH, as both necessary to maintain CAH status and appropriate for a comparable rural hospital (collectively the “Core Services”), subject to the following evaluation process. The Regional Presidents, in consultation with the Member CEOs and their respective clinical leaders, will evaluate regularly the effectiveness and efficiency of clinical services provided by the Members in addressing the health needs of the communities they serve. The evaluation will include consideration of the following: (i) the synergies created by the Combination and the goals of the Parties stated in Article 1 above; (ii) quality; (iii) cost; (iv) reimbursement; (v) profitability; (vi) outcomes; (vii) access; (viii) provider retention and recruitment needs and challenges; and (ix) community needs. If the evaluation pertains to any clinical services or operations in Region II that are not consistent with Catholic moral teaching, the ERDs or Canon Law and Section 4.2.2(d) remains applicable, then the evaluation of such services or operations and the process under Section 5.3.3(b) below will be the responsibility of the D-HH GO Chief Clinical Officer or Chief Operating Officer. No Core Service will be terminated, however, for the sole reason that the Core Service is not profitable.
Evaluation of Services. The manner in which Gibbsboro subcontracts the services of its Learning Disabilities Teacher Consultant shall be evaluated by Berlin at the conclusion of the 2017-2018 school year. This evaluation shall assess the level and quality of the services provided by Gibbsboro and shall include any concerns that either Berlin or Gibbsboro may have in accordance with Berlin and Gibbsboro Board policies, respectively. A copy of the evaluation shall be furnished to Gibbsboro by April 30 of the respective years. These evaluations shall be utilized by both Berlin and Gibbsboro to determine whether this Agreement should be renewed at the conclusion of this Agreement and/or, whether there should be any modifications to the Agreement.