Evaluation Overview Sample Clauses

Evaluation Overview. This part of the study will involve research and presentation of basic information for the economic evaluation work. Topics include selection of the appropriate discount rate to use, price adjustment over time (inflation), format and procedures for evaluating benefits and costs, and related topics. [1.25 PD] Advisory assistance will be conducted throughout the study process, for 4 projects. From past experience, this varies by project, usually with more extensive work on the first project, less for the rest. The average, including ongoing coordination review and assistance, is estimated to be about 1 PD per project for the 4 projects. Meetings and coordination will consist of communication by phone, email, and possibly also in-person meetings throughout the project.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Evaluation Overview. Saugus Union School District has developed an evaluation system which meets requirements specified in the legislation and follows standards which constitute a legal system of employee evaluation. • The evaluation system contains the components mandated by the Legislature and is in harmony with statutory procedural standards. • Standards for satisfactory performance are available to employees and are applied equally to all. • Notices of deficiencies are provided to employees in written form along with specific directions and assistance to improve unsatisfactory performance. The present instrument for the improvement of instruction is based on The California Standards for the Teaching Profession which are organized around the following six categories: • Engaging and Supporting All Students in Learning • Creating and Maintaining Effective Environments for Student Learning • Understanding and Organizing Subject Matter for Student Learning • Planning Instruction and Designing Learning Experiences for All Students • Assessing Students for Learning • Developing as a Professional Educator The purpose of evaluation is to improve the quality of education provided to students. It is an ongoing process focused on the means by which each individual can more effectively contribute to the educational effort of the District. It is based upon a fair and objective assessment of performance. Site Administrators are responsible for completing all evaluation documents. Teacher support programs which assist in the development of good teaching skills include: Beginning Teacher Support and Assessment (BTSA), Pre-intern, Intern, and Peer Assistance and Review (PAR). If the teacher has received a "competent or proficient" rating on the summative, she/he may be evaluated every other year. If a teacher receives an "unsatisfactory" or two or more "needs to improve" on the summative, she/he will be evaluated yearly. If a teacher receives a single "needs to improve" she/he may be evaluated yearly. If the teacher is permanent in the district, but new to the school, and has been evaluated the previous year as "competent or proficient", the principal may choose to evaluate the teacher. If the teacher receives an "unsatisfactory" or two consecutive "needs to improve" ratings on the summative, participation in Peer Assistance and Review (PAR) will be mandatory. The following steps are to be completed: STEPS TO BE COMPLETED
Sample 1
Evaluation Overview. The Government intends to award a contract to the Offeror whose proposal represents the best overall value and is determined to be the most beneficial to the Government, with the requisite consideration discussed below using the four (4) evaluation factors: Technical, Small Business Subcontracting, Past Performance, and Cost/Price. The Technical Factor will be adjectively rated. The Past Performance and Small Business Factor will be rated on an Acceptable/Unacceptable basis. The Cost factor will not be rated, but will be evaluated for completeness, reasonableness and for realism as specified below. The relative order of importance of all factors will be in the following order the Technical Factor is significantly more important than the Small Business, Past Performance and Cost/Price Factors when combined. The Small Business, Past Performance and Cost/Price are of all equal importance to each other. In order for an Offeror to be considered for award, the proposal must receive at least an “Acceptable” rating in every non- price Factor and Sub-factor. A proposal receiving a rating of “Unacceptable” in any non-price Factor or Sub-factor will not be eligible for award. In a trade-off evaluation, Offerors are cautioned that an award may not necessarily be made to the Offeror who submitted the lowest priced offer. Evaluation and award of this contract will be made in accordance with the Best Value Continuum Tradeoff procedures described in FAR Part 15.101-1 Tradeoff Process for a Best Value Decision. For purposes of performing the best value tradeoff, all non-cost factors when combined are significantly more important than the Cost/Price factor. The Government intends to hold discussions; however reserves the right to award without discussions; therefore, Offerors are cautioned to ensure that their proposals contain all necessary information and are complete in ALL respects. The non-cost factors for evaluation are: Technical, Small Business Subcontracting, and Past Performance. The Technical Factor is comprised of six (6) Sub-factors: 1a) Technical Experience; 1b) Facilities/Software Infrastructure; 1c) Contract Administration and Management; 1d) Earned Value Management (EVM); 1e) Transition Plan; and 1f) Performance Work Statement Compliance Matrix. Sub-factor 1a is significantly more important than Sub-factor 1b. Technical Sub-factor 1c through Technical Sub-factor 1f are rated as “acceptable” or ‘unacceptable” so the relative importance of these sub-factors a...
Sample 1

Related to Evaluation Overview

  • Project Overview Project Title [Drafting note: ARENA to complete. Insert full long name in accordance with ARENA’s naming convention] i.e. [GMS Number] [Powerworks, voltage control on the Pacific Islands Study] [GMS Number] [study/ project/ fellowship/ scholarship/ R&D Project] Contract Number [Drafting note: ARENA to complete – to be obtained from ARENA’s GMS] Recipient [Drafting note: Recipient to insert full legal name and ABN] Guidelines and policies Advancing Renewables Program – Program Guidelines, 2020 (xxxxx://xxxxx.xxx.xx/xxxxxx/0000/00/XXXXX_XXX_Xxxxxxxxxx_XX_Xxxxxx_Xxxxx_XXXXX.xxx) ARENA Variation Policy (xxxxx://xxxxx.xxx.xx/xxxxxx/0000/00/xxxxx-xxxxxxx-xxxxxxxxx-xxxxxxxxx-xxxxxx.xxx) ARENA Report Writing Guidelines (xxxxx://xxxxx.xxx.xx/xxxxxx/0000/00/xxxxx-xxxxxx-xxxxxxx-xxxxxxxxxx.xxx)

  • Program Overview Microsoft extends to eligible partners the opportunity to participate in the Program referenced above subject to these Program Terms & Conditions (“Program Terms”). Each entity participating in the Program is hereinafter referred to as a “Participant.” Participation in the Program is voluntary. The Program is governed by the Program Terms, which incorporate by reference the Microsoft Partner Network Agreement (as in effect between Microsoft and Participant, the “MPN Agreement”). Capitalized terms used but not defined in these Program Terms have the meanings assigned to them in the MPN Agreement. These Program Terms are subject to local requirements and may vary by jurisdiction, and Participant retains sole discretion to set pricing for sales of applicable products.

  • Evaluation Cycle Goal Setting and Development of the Educator Plan A) Every Educator has an Educator Plan that includes, but is not limited to, one goal related to the improvement of practice; one goal for the improvement of student learning. The Plan also outlines actions the Educator must take to attain the goals established in the Plan and benchmarks to assess progress. Goals may be developed by individual Educators, by the Evaluator, or by teams, departments, or groups of Educators who have the similar roles and/or responsibilities. See Sections 15-19 for more on Educator Plans. B) To determine the goals to be included in the Educator Plan, the Evaluator reviews the goals the Educator has proposed in the Self-Assessment, using evidence of Educator performance and impact on student learning, growth and achievement based on the Educator’s self-assessment and other sources that Evaluator shares with the Educator. The process for determining the Educator’s impact on student learning, growth and achievement will be determined after ESE issues guidance on this matter. See #22, below. C) Educator Plan Development Meetings shall be conducted as follows: i) Educators in the same school may meet with the Evaluator in teams and/or individually at the end of the previous evaluation cycle or by October 15th of the next academic year to develop their Educator Plan. Educators shall not be expected to meet during the summer hiatus. ii) For those Educators new to the school, the meeting with the Evaluator to establish the Educator Plan must occur by October 15th or within six weeks of the start of their assignment in that school iii) The Evaluator shall meet individually with Educators with PTS and ratings of needs improvement or unsatisfactory to develop professional practice goal(s) that must address specific standards and indicators identified for improvement. In addition, the goals may address shared grade level or subject matter goals. D) The Evaluator completes the Educator Plan by November 1st. The Educator shall sign the Educator Plan within 5 school days of its receipt and may include a written response. The Educator’s signature indicates that the Educator received the plan in a timely fashion. The signature does not indicate agreement or disagreement with its contents. The Evaluator retains final authority over the content of the Educator’s Plan.

  • Evaluation Report The state must provide a narrative summary of the evaluation design, status (including evaluation activities and findings to date), and plans for evaluation activities during the extension period. The narrative is to include, but not be limited to, describing the hypotheses being tested and any results available.

  • Evaluation Reports Where a formal evaluation of an employee's performance is carried out, the employee shall be provided with a copy to read and review. Provision shall be made on the evaluation form for an employee to sign it. The form shall provide for the employee's signature in two (2) places, one indicating that the employee has read and accepts the evaluation, and the other indicating that the employee disagrees with the evaluation. The employee shall sign in one of the places provided within seven (7) calendar days. No employee may initiate a grievance regarding the contents of an evaluation report unless the signature indicates disagreement with the evaluation. The employee shall receive a copy of the evaluation report at the time of signing. An evaluation report shall not be changed after an employee has signed it, without the knowledge of the employee, and any such changes shall be subject to the grievance procedure.

  • Overview (a) The Employer is committed to maintaining a stable and skilled workforce, recognising its contribution to the operation of the Employer. As such, full time direct and ongoing employment is a guiding principle of this Agreement. (b) The Employer will take all measures to achieve employment security for the direct permanent employees of the Employer. The Parties agree upon the measures in this Clause to protect and enhance the employment security, health and safety, terms and conditions of employment and career development of the employees. (c) The employer agrees that it is highly important to ensure that work is performed effectively, efficiently and without undue pressure or bullying, and in a way that promotes OHS and EO principles and practices in the workplace and appropriate representation of employees should they so request. The employer will ensure that its employment practices are consistent with the above principles and practices.

  • Constructability Review Prepare detailed interdisciplinary constructability review within Fourteen (14) days of receipt of the plans from the District that: 10.1.2.1.6.1 Ensures construction documents are well coordinated and reviewed for errors; 10.1.2.1.6.2 Identifies to the extent known, construction deficiencies and areas of concern; 10.1.2.1.6.3 Back-checks design drawings for inclusion of modifications; and 10.1.2.1.6.4 Provides the District with written confirmation that: 10.1.2.1.6.4.1 Requirements noted in the design documents prepared for the Project are consistent with and conform to the District's Project requirements and design standards. 10.1.2.1.6.4.2 Various components have been coordinated and are consistent with each other so as to minimize conflicts within or between components of the design documents.

  • Evaluation Criteria 5.2.1. The responses will be evaluated based on the following: (edit evaluation criteria below as appropriate for your project)

  • Evaluation 1. The purposes of evaluation provisions include providing employees with feedback, and employers and employees with the opportunity and responsibility to address concerns. Where a grievance proceeds to arbitration, the arbitrator must consider these purposes, and may relieve on just and reasonable terms against breaches of time limits or other procedural requirements.

  • Agreement Overview This SLA operates in conjunction with, and does not supersede or replace any part of, the Agreement. It outlines the information technology service levels that we will provide to you to ensure the availability of the application services that you have requested us to provide. All other support services are documented in the Support Call Process.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!