KEY PLANNING ISSUES Sample Clauses

KEY PLANNING ISSUES. 7.1. The following key planning issues are identified. All are interrelated and should not be considered in isolation:
Sample 1Sample 2
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
KEY PLANNING ISSUES. The main determining issues with this application are compliance with Local Development Plan Policies and Supplementary Planning Guidance on development on allocated sites, traffic impacts, density, design, landscaping, flood risk, drainage and development contributions ASSESSMENT OF APPLICATION Planning Policy The site is allocated in the Local Development Plan 2016 for housing in two separate allocations – AY1A with an indicative site capacity of 24 units and AAYTO003 for 20 units. This reflects the SESPlan housing land requirements for periods to 2019 and a further five years beyond. The density of the site, and detailed LDP criteria are assessed further in this report. The allocation lists a number of site requirements including the need for Flood Risk Assessment, access from the existing access onto the Beanburn, utilisation of south-facing aspect, archaeological and biodiversity provision and pedestrian links to the school and Lawfield Drive. The allocation on the Proposals Maps also shows landscaping requirements to the north-east and north- west in the form of structure planting. Although there is no site specific requirement relating to transport listed in the Local Development Plan, Appendix A clearly states that a Transport Assessment will always be sought for any development above 50 units and that the developer would be expected to pay for any off-site roadworks required as a result of their development. A Transport Statement has been provided and some off-site works are proposed as part of the application. In terms of the principle of a housing development on this site, the Policy background is one of full support. The proposal is for housing development in compliance with the intended use in Policy PMD3. The site provides a contribution towards the housing land targets identified in SESPlan and in line with “Key Outcomes 1 and 2” in the Local Development Plan i.e. effective housing land supply and opportunities for affordable housing. The principle of the development should be assessed primarily against the provisions of the Development Plan in the first instance, as required by Section 25 of The Town and Country Planning (Scotland) Act 1997. It is only if there are material factors of sufficient significance that outweigh the provisions of the Development Plan, then determination could be against the provisions of the Plan. Much assessment from respondents and in this report will correctly focus on those material factors and, in particular,...
Sample 1
KEY PLANNING ISSUES. Siting, scale and design • Impact on the Conservation Area • Impact on residential amenities • Access and parking • Archaeology
Sample 1
KEY PLANNING ISSUES. The key determining issues are whether or not this repeat application has address the decision by the P&BS Committee to refuse application 18/01479/FUL and in particular when considered against the Councils development plan if the proposal; • represents an appropriate new tourism development which is of the highest quality and in keeping with the local environment • provides safe vehicular and pedestrian access • is free from flood risk • does not have a detrimental impact on local infrastructure • does not detract from the residential amenity of surrounding area • does not detract from the setting of any listed buildings or the Foulden Conservation Area • results in the detrimental loss of Prime Quality Agricultural land ASSESSMENT OF APPLICATION: PAC Report Members will be aware that prior to lodging a major planning application that it is incumbent on applicants and developers to engage with the local community under the Pre Application Consultation (PAC) process. The applicants have relied on the PAC which was undertaken for application 18/01479/FUL. On initial receipt of the application the Planning Authority did query whether it was suitable to rely on a previous PAC exercise. An instruction was provided from the Scottish Government on 23rd Dec 2019 clarified that provided a proposed development is materially the same as a previous development which PAC was undertaken then it would be acceptable to rely on the previous PAC/PAN process. On the basis that the development proposed is not materially different and a disproportionate period of time had not elapsed since the PAC process was originally undertaken, there is no need for the PAC process is not required to be repeated. However, as the spirit of the PAC process is to enable communities to be made aware and engage with development for major applications in their area therefore on agreeing that the repeat application could proceed with the previous PAC exercise, it was recommended that the applicants should notify the Community Council and xxxx Councillors of their intention to lodge a repeat application. It is understood that these notifications took place prior to submission. Third parties have repeated their concerns about that the original PAC process failed to account for concerns raised at public meetings and written representation have not been accurately recorded in the PAC report. This matter was addressed in the P&BS Committee Report for 18/01479/FUL. Members are reminded that where there...
Sample 1
KEY PLANNING ISSUES. Principle of development; • Layout, design and materials; • Residential amenity and privacy; • Road safety.
Sample 1
KEY PLANNING ISSUES. The key planning issues are: • Whether the principle of development would comply with Policies ED7 and ED8 of the Local Development Plan 2016 • Ecological impacts • Impacts on neighbouring amenity • Landscape and visual effects • Road safety impacts • Whether the development would be adequately serviced ASSESSMENT OF APPLICATION:
Sample 1
KEY PLANNING ISSUES. The key planning considerations are:  Impacts on the character and amenity of the surrounding area, including but not limited to residential amenity impacts, taking account of cumulative impacts in combination with existing poultry developments;  Landscape and visual impacts of the proposed poultry building and associated works, including cumulative impacts and impacts on trees;  Biodiversity impacts, including impacts to protected species and designated sites, and including cumulative impacts. ASSESSMENT OF APPLICATION:
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
KEY PLANNING ISSUES. The key considerations for this application are:  Whether the proposals would represent a suitable development on an allocated housing site within Reston settlement boundary;  Whether the proposals are acceptable in terms of parking, access and impacts on road safety;  Whether the proposals would harm the residential amenity of neighbouring dwellings; and  Whether adequate drainage and servicing can be achieved.
Sample 1

Related to KEY PLANNING ISSUES

  • Learning and Development (i) Managers and supervisors are responsible for promoting and supporting learning activities for employees in their area of responsibility.

  • Training and Development 14.1 The parties are committed to, and acknowledge the mutual benefit to the employer and employee of planned human resource development and the provision and participation in relevant development opportunities (including accredited training).

  • Exit Planning 6. The Grant Recipient will, in conjunction with the Authority, maintain, and as necessary update, the Exit Plan throughout the Funding Period so that it can be implemented immediately, if required. From time-to-time either the Authority or the Grant Recipient may instigate a review of the Exit Plan.

  • Procurement Planning Prior to the issuance of any invitations to bid for contracts, the proposed procurement plan for the Project shall be furnished to the Association for its review and approval, in accordance with the provisions of paragraph 1 of Appendix 1 to the Guidelines. Procurement of all goods and works shall be undertaken in accordance with such procurement plan as shall have been approved by the Association, and with the provisions of said paragraph 1.

  • Family Planning The MCO must ensure that its network includes sufficient family planning providers to ensure timely access to covered family planning services for enrollees. Although family planning services are included within the MCO’s list of covered benefits, Medicaid enrollees are entitled to obtain all Medicaid covered family planning services without prior authorization through any Medicaid provider, who will bill the MCO and be paid on a FFS basis.4 The MCO must give each enrollee, including adolescents, the opportunity to use his/her own primary care provider or go to any family planning center for family planning services without requiring a referral. The MCO must make a reasonable effort to Subcontract with all local family planning clinics and providers, including those funded by Title X of the Public Health Services Act, and must reimburse providers for all family planning services regardless of whether they are rendered by a participating or non-participating provider. Unless otherwise negotiated, the MCO must reimburse providers of family planning services at the Medicaid rate. The MCO may, however, at its discretion, impose a withhold on a contracted primary care provider for such family planning services. The MCO may require family planning providers to submit claims or reports in specified formats before reimbursing services. MCOs must provide their Medicaid enrollees with sufficient information to allow them to make an informed choice including: the types of family planning services available, their right to access these services in a timely and confidential manner, and their freedom to choose a qualified family planning provider both within and outside the MCO’s network of providers. In addition, MCOs must ensure that network procedures for accessing family planning services are convenient and easily comprehensible to enrollees. MCOs must also educate enrollees regarding the positive impact of coordinated care on their health outcomes, so enrollees will prefer to access in-network services or, if they should decide to see out-of-network providers, they will agree to the exchange of medical information between providers for better coordination of care. In addition, MCOs are required to provide timely reimbursement for out-of-network family planning and related STD services consistent with services covered in their contracts. The reimbursement must be provided at least at the applicable West Virginia Medicaid FFS rate 4 Access to family planning services without prior notification is a federal law. Under OBRA 1987 Section 4113(c)(1)(B), “enrollment of an individual eligible for medical assistance in a primary case management system, a health maintenance organization or a similar entity must not restrict the choice of the qualified person, from whom the individual may receive services under Section 1905(a)(4)(c).” Therefore, Medicaid enrollees must be allowed freedom of choice of family planning providers and may receive such services from any family planning provider, including those outside the MCO’s provider network, without prior authorization. appropriate to the provider type (current family planning services fee schedule available from BMS). The MCO, its staff, contracted providers and its contractors that are providing cost, quality, or medical appropriateness reviews or coordination of benefits or subrogation must keep family planning information and records confidential in favor of the individual patient, even if the patient is a minor. The MCO, its staff, contracted providers and its contractors that are providing cost, quality, or medical appropriateness reviews, or coordination of benefits or subrogation must also keep family planning information and records received from non-participating providers confidential in favor of the individual patient even if the patient is a minor. Maternity services, hysterectomies, and pregnancy terminations are not considered family planning services.

  • Political dialogue Article 3

  • Business Continuity Planning Supplier shall prepare and maintain at no additional cost to Buyer a Business Continuity Plan (“BCP”). Upon written request of Buyer, Supplier shall provide a copy of Supplier’s BCP. The BCP shall be designed to ensure that Supplier can continue to provide the goods and/or services in accordance with this Order in the event of a disaster or other BCP-triggering event (as such events are defined in the applicable BCP). Supplier’s BCP shall, at a minimum, provide for: (a) the retention and retrieval of data and files; (b) obtaining resources necessary for recovery, (c) appropriate continuity plans to maintain adequate levels of staffing required to provide the goods and services during a disruptive event; (d) procedures to activate an immediate, orderly response to emergency situations; (e) procedures to address potential disruptions to Supplier’s supply chain; (f) a defined escalation process for notification of Buyer, within two (2) business days, in the event of a BCP-triggering event; and (g) training for key Supplier Personnel who are responsible for monitoring and maintaining Supplier’s continuity plans and records. Supplier shall maintain the BCP and test it at least annually or whenever there are material changes in Supplier’s operations, risks or business practices. Upon Xxxxx’s written and reasonable request, Supplier shall provide Buyer an executive summary of test results and a report of corrective actions (including the timing for implementation) to be taken to remedy any deficiencies identified by such testing. Upon Xxxxx’s request and with reasonable advance notice and conducted in such a manner as not to unduly interfere with Supplier’s operations, Supplier shall give Buyer and its designated agents access to Supplier’s designated representative(s) with detailed functional knowledge of Supplier’s BCP and relevant subject matter.

  • PLANNING ACT This Agreement shall be effective to create an interest in the property only if Seller complies with the subdivision control provisions of the Planning Act by completion and Seller covenants to proceed diligently at Seller’s expense to obtain any necessary consent by completion.

  • Occupational Health & Safety Committee The parties agree to comply with the Occupational Health and Safety Act and any other federal, provincial or municipal health and safety legislation and regulations. Recognizing its responsibilities under the applicable legislation, the Employer agrees to accept as a member of its Occupational Health and Safety Committee, one representative selected or appointed by the Association from the bargaining unit. Such committee shall identify potential dangers and hazards, institute means of improving health and safety programs and recommend actions to be taken to improve conditions relating to occupational health and safety. Meetings shall be held every third month or more frequently if mutually agreed. The Committee shall maintain minutes of all meetings and make the same available for review.

  • Project Planning GOVERNMENTAL APPROVALS; ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE; PUBLIC INFORMATION 30 4.1 Planning and Engineering Activities 30 4.2 Site Conditions 30 4.3 Governmental Approvals 30 4.4 Environmental Compliance 34 4.5 Community Outreach and Public Information 35

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!