Planning Policy Sample Clauses

Planning Policy. Table 4.2 – Planning Policy Ref. Description of Matter Applicant – Current Position SDC and NYCC – Current Position Position 4.2.1 NPS The relevant National Policy Statements (NPSs) for the Proposed Scheme include the Overarching National Policy Statement for Energy (EN-1) (Department for Energy and Climate Change, 2011) and the National Policy Statement for Renewable Energy and Infrastructure (EN-3) (Department of Energy and Climate Change, 2011), which represent the primary policy basis for the determination of the DCO Application as is set out in the Planning Statement (APP-032) and the National Policy Statement Compliance Tracker (REP-031). Draft revised NPSs were published for consultation from September to November 2021. As the DCO Application was accepted for examination before the designation of any amendments to the NPS, the original suite of NPSs represent the SDC/ NYCC agree with the applicant’s position. There are no outstanding matters to be agreed with regard to the status of the Proposed Scheme as a NSIP and the applicability of the NPSs. Agreed primary policy basis for the determination of the DCO Application. 4.2.2 NPPF The National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) was originally published in 2012 and last updated in July 2021. Whilst the NPSs are the primary consenting framework against which the DCO application will be assessed, the NPPF constitutes secondary planning policy framework, against which the proposals must also be assessed. The government’s ‘Planning Practice Guidance’ constitutes guidance to support the government's planning policies for England and how these are expected to be applied. The policies of relevance to the Application are set out in the Planning Statement (APP-032) and proposed updates to the NPPF are considered in the Planning Statement Addendum (REP2-019). SDC/ NYCC agree with the applicant’s position. Agreed 4.2.3 Development Plan Local planning policies from the relevant authorities can be ‘important and relevant’ considerations for the SDC/ NYCC agree with the applicant’s position in terms of the Development Plan of relevance to the proposals, and that the Agreed Secretary of State (SoS) in determining the DCO Application. The current adopted Development Plan of relevance to the proposals comprises: • ▇▇▇▇▇ District Core Strategy Local Plan (2013) (SDCSLP); • Saved Policies of ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ District Local Plan (2005) (SDLP); and • The North Yorkshire Minerals and Waste Joint Plan (2022) (NYMWJP). The policies o...

Planning Policy. 16.1 Canada and Manitoba will co-operate to provide the resources required to enable each of the five communities represented by the Committee to formulate a comprehensive Community Development Plan and to coordinate such Plan with government plans as provided for in Schedule "E" attached hereto and forming part of this Agreement. 16.2 Such Plan shall be prepared and coordinated with a view to enabling the communities to provide continued opportunity to carry on their traditional lifestyles to the maximum extent practical, to deal with social and economic problems that may be identified, to take advantage of opportunities that may be identified, and to recommend the practical means that may be available for implementation of the Plans formulated. 16.3 Canada agrees, within the limits of the community planning budget of the Manitoba Regional Office of Indian Affairs and Northern Development, to make professional assistance and services available to the five Bands for the objective of completing Community Development Plans for the Reserves by March 31, 1981. 16.4 Canada and Manitoba undertake to consider and implement any recommendation they jointly or severally deem to be practical by any means, including the use of the existing Northlands Agreement and/or future like agreements intended to contribute to the viability of a community. 16.5 The principles reflecting the objectives and the methods to be used in achieving those objectives as outlined in the following documents: 16.5.1 Manitoba Order-in-Council dated 5th day of February, 1975 signed by Premier ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, 16.5.2 The Canada-Manitoba Interim Subsidiary Agreement referred to therein and attached thereto, 16.5.3 The General Development Agreement between the said Governments dated 5th day of June, 1975, 16.5.4 The Strategy for Development of Northern Manitoba, all of which relate to the Canada-Manitoba Northlands Agreement, and shall be followed in the development, co-ordination and implementation of Community Development Plans affecting the subject Reserves.

Planning Policy. CBC’s vision for the site is established by reference to the current policy document framework for the site, namely:

Planning Policy. The Role of

Planning Policy. No objection, application is consistent with the Development Plan and emerging policies. Highway Authority: No objection, subject to planning conditions. Transport for London: No objection, initial concerns raised regarding servicing have been resolved. Roxborough Residents Association: Objects to some, but not all of the proposal. Notes that the site is adjacent to the old post office site (know as the ‘Dandara’ site), and considers that the two sites should be treated as a whole for the future of Harrow town centre. Objects to the use of the retail as a Tesco Express, given that there are already a number of Tesco stores within Harrow. Also objects to the proposed 24 hour gym, querying whether it is required in Harrow where there are already a number of gyms operating, and a new 24 hour gym has recently opened in North Harrow, commenting that it would sensible to monitor this one before giving permission to another gym. Finally, support the use of the building for educational purposes.

Planning Policy. 6.1 The adopted Development Plans that are of relevance to the 4 schemes include the following documents: • South Cambridgeshire Local Plan adopted 2018; • Cambridge City Council Local Plan adopted 2018; • Cambridgeshire Minerals and Waste Core Strategy (2011); • Cambridgeshire & Peterborough Minerals and Waste Site Specific Proposals Plan (2012); and • NW Cambridge Area Action Plan.

Planning Policy. The site is within the development boundary for Melrose and so the proposal must be assessed principally against policy PMD5. Within Development Boundaries development on non-allocated, infill or windfall sites will be approved if certain criteria are met. These criteria will be assessed within this report. One criterion is that the proposal should not conflict with the established land use of the area. The surrounding area is predominantly residential in character and so the proposal to build residential apartments on the site would be in keeping with this part of Melrose. The Planning Statement advises that the development would provide apartments for retired/older residents. The agent advises that people downsizing into a retirement flats frees up larger family houses, increasing the housing land supply and creating a chain of movements which ultimately means dwellings become available to a first time buyers, thereby slowing the rise of house prices. This site would be an ideal location for apartments of this nature, being close to the town centre, health centre and public transport. The proposal would increase the variety of accommodation types available in Melrose and provide accommodation for those of, or close to, retirement age not readily available at the moment. Policy PMD2 of the LDP requires all development to be of high quality in accordance with sustainability principles, designed to fit in with Borders townscapes and to integrate with its landscape surroundings. The policy contains a number of standards that would apply to all development. Policy PMD5 requires that the development respects the scale, form, design, materials and density of its surroundings; the individual and cumulative effects of the development should not lead to over- development or town cramming; the proposal should not detract from the character and amenity of the surrounding area. The proposal is to demolish the existing buildings on the site, which are out with the Conservation Area and are not listed, therefore consent is not required for their demolition. The photograph in the Design Statement shows a handsome church of historic merit but the church and manse have been significantly altered and extended over time, although elements of the historic fabric remain. They now have a low heritage value and so there are no objections to their demolition The proposal is to erect a replacement building accommodating 14 apartments, four on each floor and two in the attic. An u...

Planning Policy. In keeping with the purpose of this Agreement, the Parties hereby authorize and direct the Board to undertake and/or participate in such analysis and planning as necessary to provide for the control of waters of or potentially within the boundaries of the Parties. The specific objective thereof shall be to obtain a regional solution to the Water Control problems. To achieve this objective, the studies and planning may include, but are not limited to, proposals for the construction of an upstream storage; the rehabilitation or elevation of levees, and assumption and/or maintenance of Water Control Works of any of the Parties of the Agency. The studies and planning shall also concentrate on the financing methods for such proposals, as well as the allocation of costs among the Parties. Consideration shall be given to the value to the Agency of acquiring and/or operating Facilities presently owned by Parties and the allocation of the maintenance and operating costs to the Parties.

Planning Policy. 4.1 In considering the request, Members need to be aware of why the Section 106 Agreement was imposed in the first instance. The site is located outside the village environmental limits in the open countryside where development plan policy, in the past as it does today, restricts non-essential residential development. 4.2 The following current Policies in the Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Structure Plan are relevant: • P1/1 - sets out where new development should be located • P1/2 - sets out environmental restrictions on development indicating that in the countryside development is to be restricted to that which is essential in a particular rural location. 4.3 The following Policies in the Huntingdonshire Local Plan are relevant: • En17 - restricts development in the countryside to that which is essential to the effective operation of local agriculture, horticulture, forestry, permitted mineral extraction, outdoor recreation or public utility services. • H23 – indicates that there is a general presumption against housing outside village environmental limits with the exception of dwellings required for the efficient management of agriculture, forestry or horticulture.