Outfall from a detention facility shall be discharged to a receiving channel, and energy dissipators shall be placed at the outfall of all detention facilities as necessary to provide a stabilized transition from the facility to the receiving channel.
Outfall sewer from the collection system to the wastewater treatment facilities;
Outfall sewers from the wastewater treatment facilities to the point of discharge or disposal, and related works;
Outfall. (Optional) We understand a 48-inch diameter outfall with a depth less that 10-ft be constructed at Fulshear Creek Tributary #2. According to the client, the construction of this outfall may be considered additional service; therefore, it is considered optional. This proposal is divided into three sections. Each section will be discussed and estimated separately. These sections are as follows: o Desktop Geologic Fault Study. o Geotechnical Exploration Study for the pavement and drainage improvements. o Geotechnical Exploration Study for the Outfall (Optional). The scope of our work will be in general accordance with Fort Bend County Geotechnical Guidelines Draft, May 2021. We understand that the scope of our work will not include review of plans and specifications prior to the final design. The project site is located in Fort Bend County, Texas. Geologic faults are scattered throughout Houston. In general, faults are caused by groundwater and oil removal from the underlying surface. Faults originate several thousand feet below the ground surface and can often cause displacement of the ground surface, causing broken pavement, water lines, and damage to residential and commercial structures. A Desktop Geologic Fault Study will be conducted. A desktop fault study will include a study of published data on surface faults in the area of the site from the Geotech Engineering and Testing Library. A report of our findings will be provided.
Outfall. Improvements (Outfalls 2 & 3) (Lumpsum $18,010): As per the updated drainage report, outfalls 2 & 3 are proposed to be improved outside ROW for approximate distances of 400’ & 700’ respectively. The fee is based upon the following: Outfalls 2 & 3 Improvements:
1. Design and Modeling for the improvements with contours
2. Prepare 1 sheet each for outfalls showing outfall grading, proposed contours, and cross sections
3. Perform coordination regarding these improvements with various stakeholders Per our discussion, we have already provided you with draft Pond 1B layout for your review for the purposes of ROW taking. The total fee for the above scope is a lumpsum amount of $66,885 and is detailed in the attachment. If you have any questions, please give me a call, or send me an email. Sincerely, Xxxxxx Xxxxx, PE, CFM President HJ Consulting, Inc. 5/10/2022 Employee Classification No. of Sheets Principal Sr Project Manager QA/QC Engineer Project Engineer Graduate Engineer CAD Technician Admin Subtotal Hours Total Labor Rate Per Hour $325.00 $275.00 $225.00 $175.00 $135.00 $105.00 $95.00 TASK TASK DESCRIPTION ESTIMATED HOURS
1 Design & Modeling
1.1 Pond & Pilot channel reshape 1 1 26 28 $ 5,050.00
1.2 Pond Modeling 1 8 9 $ 1,675.00
1.3 Evaluate Stage Storage Relationship 1 4 5 $ 975.00 1.4 Revise Geopak Drainage 2 16 18 $ 3,350.00 1.5 Revise Ditches 2 1 12 15 $ 2,875.00
2 Pond Sheets Revisions
2.1 Pond Layout 1 1 1 8 8 18 $ 2,740.00
2.2 Pond Grading 1 1 1 10 16 28 $ 3,930.00
Outfall. Grading Sheets (1 each) w/Prop Contours and Cross Sections (~4 Xsecs) 2 4 2 16 32 54 $ 7,710.00 6.3 Coordination 2 4 6 $ 1,750.00 SUBTOTAL 13 4 34 15 150 82 $ 66,885.00 ORIGINAL CONTRACT UPDATED CONTRACT TASK DESIGN FEE TASK DESIGN FEE DIFFERENCE IN DESIGN FEE/ SUPPLEMENTAL DESIGN FEE FC 102 - FEASIBILITY STUDIES - DATA COLLECTION $10,342.95 SAME AS ORIGINAL $10,342.95 $0.00 FC 102 - FEASIBILITY STUDIES - TRAFFIC & OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS $144,959.53 SAME AS ORIGINAL $144,959.53 $0.00 FC 162 - TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT STUDIES $27,697.52 SAME AS ORIGINAL $27,697.52 $0.00 ORIGINAL CONTRACT UPDATED CONTRACT TASK DESIGN FEE TASK DESIGN FEE DIFFERENCE IN DESIGN FEE/ SUPPLEMENTAL DESIGN FEE FC 102 - FEASIBILITY STUDIES - DATA COLLECTION Xxxxxxxxx added $2,088.00 $2,088.00 FC 162 - TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT STUDIES Xxxxxxxxx added $5,558.00 $5,558.00 FC 162 - TEMPORARY TRAFFIC SIGNAL DESIGN NONE $0.00 3 INTERSECTIONS $37,582.58 $37,582.58 FC 162 - PERMANENT TRAFFIC SIGNAL DESIGN 5 INTERSECTIONS $136,570.03 7 INTERSECTIONS $201,603.95 $65,033.92 FC 163- ILLUMINATION (CONTINUOUS LIGHTING) ALONG THE SEGMENT $77,762.50 TASK REMOVED $0.00 ‐$77,762.50 FC 165 - TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS (PERMANENT) ALL ITS COMPONENTS $70,213.69 SAME AS ORIGINAL $70,213.69 $0.00 DIRECT EXPENSES $1,453.78 SAME AS ORIGINAL $1,453.78 $0.00 TASK DESIGN FEE TASK DESIGN FEE DIFFERENCE IN DESIGN FEE FC 309 - CONSTRUCTION PHASE SERVICES $36,000.00 SAME AS ORIGINAL $36,000.00 $0.00 Proj Number: CSJ : 0000-00-000 PM: Xxxxxxx Roku Date: 8/2/2021 Principal Project Manager Sr. Project Engineer Project Engineer CADD Technician Admin Assist. Sub-total Man-hours Subtotal (cost $) Billing Rate per Hour $189.75 $179.63 $131.56 $125.24 $84.76 $65.78 PHASE 3 - CONSTRUCTION PHASE SERVICES 1 Review and Respond to Submittals / RFI's / RFP's / etc 2 2 8 12 $ 1,161.60 PHASE 3 EXPENSES 2 Site Visit $ - 3 Postage / Courier $ - 4 Printing / Copies $ - SUBTOTAL PHASE 3 EXPENSES $ - TOTAL PHASE 3 CONSTRUCTION PHASE SERVICES 2 2 8 12 $ 1,161.60 June 23, 2022 Mr. Xxxxxxxx Xxxx, PE Proposal No.: P-EE 2218606-G Project Manager Sent Via Email: Xxxxx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx Xxxxxxx and Xxxxxxxx 0000 Xxxxxxx Xxxxx Xxxxxxx, XX 000-000-0000 Dear Xx. Xxxxx: Earth Engineering, Inc. is pleased to present this proposal to perform a geotechnical evaluation for the above project in Sienna plantation, Texas. THIS PROPOSAL IS AN EXTENSION TO THE ORIGINAL PROPOSAL P-EE1925811- G DATED 11/22/2019. The scope of our services is presented below: • D...
Outfall. The point where water flows from a man-made conduit, channel, or drain into a water body or other natural drainage feature.
Outfall a. Approximately 306 lineal feet of 54-inch-diameter high density polyethylene
Outfall. 01B Treatment System Used intermittently to treat oily waters from plant sites The 01B ultrafiltration/carbon effluent is routed through two mixed media filters and two 10,000 pound granular, activated carbon absorbers for final polishing prior to discharge to the Grasse River via Outfall 001. Outfall 004 Treatment System Treats the storm water collected by the roof drains and catch basins in Area I plus water from the 005 Impoundment. The system consists of an oil/water separator preceding five dual media filters and four granular activated carbon units. The effluent from this system is discharged to the Grasse River via Outfall 004. Massena has developed an Outfalls 004 and 005 Treatment System Operations and Maintenance Manual that includes the information necessary to operate and maintain the system. Ingot Treatment System Collects and treats direct chill casting process waters from ingot casting and continuous casting operations. The system consists of two settling tanks, two API oil/water separators, chemical feed systems and a clarifier. Effluent from this system discharges to Outfall 001 (Grasse River). Central Impoundment Treatment System Collects and treats Non-contact cooling waters, storm water runoff, boiler blowdown, demineralized regeneration, ground water, and internal outfalls 01G and 01H. The system consists of settling basins, Dual media sand filtration and carbon adsorption. Provided by: Alcoa Frequency Provided: As requested Cost: Arconic to pay a fixed use rate of $100/mile/car to travel over Alcoa rails to get to Arconic rails. Measurement method: Car per mile from end of MTRR to start of Arconic managed rail – see attached sketch. Billing method: Manual invoice Alcoa owns, operates and maintains the plant rail system, except they will not maintain the section serving B79c shown on the attached sketch. In the rare case that Arconic desires access to 79C, or any other Arconic facility, they will need to cross rails that Alcoa owns and maintains. To ensure arm’s length dealings, Arconic will pay industry rate for travel over Alcoa rail on a $/car/mile basis from the end of MTRR rails to the start of rails that Arconic desires use of. Should Arconic travel over rails that Alcoa has abandoned or not maintained, or that Arconic must hire a third party to fix or maintain, then the $/car/mile fee is not applicable for that section. Fee is only applicable for operational rails that Alcoa is actively using and maintaining. Location of Service...
