PARTNER CONTRIBUTION. Herefordshire Tertiary Education Trust (HTET) and New Model in Technology & Engineering (NMiTE) are the project co-owners and are the leading bodies. Summary Responsibilities: Ultimately responsible for the project; Report progress of project at strategic level; Report progress of any projects authorised by the board delivered by NMiTE or HTET; Securing public, private and third sector funding for the development of the university; Identifies areas of activity where council intervention or support would be beneficial and recommends future action to the delivery board; Ensures the identified objectives are achieved and benefits delivered. Herefordshire Council’s Summary Responsibilities Facilitate development of NMiTE in Hereford by supporting planning process, transport, property, economy, urban/city planning, ensuring the city is as fit as possible to support a university; Ensure that requests for drawdowns from the council’s loan facility meet the requirements of the loan agreement; Monitor the use of the loan facility from the council and any council funding for the project; Identifies areas of HTET/NMiTE activity or planning that may impact (positively or negatively) on the wider wellbeing of the county and recommends future action to the board; and Receive reports and feedback from the JUDB.
PARTNER CONTRIBUTION. All CareerSource FV Partners recognize that infrastructure costs are applicable to all required partners, whether they are physically located in the Career Center or not. Each partner's contributions to these costs, however, may vary, as these contributions are based on the proportionate use and relative benefit received, consistent with the Partner programs' authorizing laws and regulations and the Uniform Guidance. Below are the partner contribution costs:
PARTNER CONTRIBUTION. Below are the partner contribution costs: Remainder of page intentionally left blank Partner On-Site Representation Schedule CareerSource Pinellas Required Program Partner Governance Local Grantee # of Staff Total Weekly Staff Hours Total # of FTEs % of Total FTEs Partner Contribution Adult, Dislocated Worker and Youth Programs DOL CareerSource Pinellas 18 400.00 10.00 22.40% $85,566.85 Job Corps DOL Job Corps 1 40.00 1.00 2.24% $8,556.69 YouthBuild DOL CareerSource Pinellas 3 120.00 3.00 6.72% $25,670.06 Xxxxxx-Xxxxxx DOL CareerSource Pinellas 9.5 380.00 9.50 21.28% $81,288.51 Adult Education and Family Literacy and Xxxxxxx V† XXX, DOL Pinellas County School District 0 8.00 0.20 0.45% $1,711.34 State Unemployment Insurance (UI)** DOL CareerSource Pinellas 0 0.00 0.00 0.00% $0.00 Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) DOL CareerSource Pinellas 3 60.00 1.50 3.36% $12,835.03 Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) DOL CareerSource Pinellas 13 490.00 12.25 27.44% $104,819.40 Jobs for Veterans State Grants (Vets) DOL, JVSG CareerSource Pinellas 6 240.00 6.00 13.44% $51,340.11 Florida Department of Education, Division of Vocational Rehabilitation* DOE Vocational Rehabilitation 0 8.00 0.20 0.45% $1,711.34 Florida Department of Education, Division of Blind Services* DOE Blind Services 0 8.00 0.20 0.45% $1,711.34 Senior Community Service Employment Programs (SCSEP)* DOL American Association of Retired Persons 0 8.00 0.20 0.45% $1,711.34 Community Services Block Grants* DOL Pinellas Opportunity Council 0 8.00 0.20 0.45% $1,711.34 Housing and Urban Development - Employment and Training Programs* DOL St Petersburg Housing Authority 0 8.00 0.20 0.45% $1,711.34 Programs Authorized under Sec. 212 of the Second Chance Act of 2007* DOL People Empowering and Restoring Communities 0 8.00 0.20 0.45% $1,711.34 Totals 53.50 1,786.00 44.65 100.00% $382,056.00 Estimated Infrastructure Budget Total = $382,056.00 Total required to determine the Cost per FTE Infrastructure Contribution (Estimated) Estimated Cost per FTE = Estimated IFA Budget Total / Total FTEs Estimated Cost per FTE = $8,556.69 0 Direct Linkage is defined as a minimum of 8 hours / week (.2 FTE) of time for access through technology Direct Linkage = $1,711.34 †Pinellas County School District Calculation ***Market Lease = $23.66 sqft Estimated Partner Infrastructure Contribution Current Lease = $11.25 sqft Difference = $12.41 sqft Estimated Cost per FTE x Partner total FTEs Annual Lease Total = $124,031.25 Notes: ...
PARTNER CONTRIBUTION. COGTA Establishment of coordination structures (Stakeholder Councils, LED Stakeholder Forums) Other government departments Technical input to co-ordination structures including support to stakeholder forums and coordination of technical task teams e.g. for CRDP StatsSA Statistical information, i.e. Household survey PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: OUTPUT 5 - ENABLING INSTITUTIONAL ENVIRONMENT FOR SUSTAINABLE AND INCLUSIVE GROWTH Output Indicator/ Measure (National) Key Activities Baseline 5-yr Targets 2010/11 Targets MTEF Budget “R” (millions) 2010/11 Budget “R “ (millions) LEAD DEPT Key Partners Enabling institutional environment for sustainable and inclusive growth All rural local governments to have the top 6 posts (Section 57) filled with suitably qualified persons by 2011 Development of a plan to ensure that the top six critical posts (municipal manager, town planner, chief financial officer, engineering / technical services, HR manager, communications manager) are filled within 90 days 80% 100% 80% - - COGTA Municipalities
PARTNER CONTRIBUTION. Partners’ own contribution to the project is specified in Appendix 2 (Financial Model with budget) The Consortium’s funding will be realised primarily by Partners’ own funding through institutional fee, staff costs and travel costs. Costs cannot exceed the figures in the budget.
PARTNER CONTRIBUTION. The SMILE partners that have contributed to this document include: ● CES are WP2 package leader and are responsible for the overall project management and delivery of the Orkney demonstrator site. They have created and provided the overall and integrated architecture and diagrams, have been coordinating input from the other partners for this deliverable as well as the background information. ● VCharge (OVO) are a partner supplying DSM tools including the control systems, an aggregator platform and EV chargers to the project. They will gather signals from the local generation, along with other forecasting, to control local demand via the control systems connected to sources of heat and EV demand. VCharge (OVO) have been working in Orkney with CES and the local community generators since early 2014, looking at how local demand can be controlled to facilitate increased renewable energy generation in Orkney. VCharge (OVO) have provided detailed local system architecture diagrams, based on how they will control each source of demand with their platform. ● Sunamp are a partner supplying equipment (Phase Change Material (PCM) heat batteries for domestic heating and hot water) to the demonstrator site for the domestic heat installs. They have provided technical details of their systems and support in the system architecture diagrams. ● XxXxx are a partner supplying batteries and the battery management system to the project, being used for the domestic heat installs. They have provided technical details of their systems and support in the system architecture diagrams.
PARTNER CONTRIBUTION. The SMILE partners that have contributed to this document include: ● VCharge are task leader for this task, they have coordinated the writing of this report writing the Introduction/ Scope Objectives and the concluding comments. ○ Other sections written by VCharge include ■ Section 3 The Energy System and the increased need for Flexibility: Empowering the Consumer role thanks to DR. ■ Section 5 and 6 providing the contextual background to The Orkney and Samsø Demonstrators ■ Section 8 VNet's control approach with specific detail on their proposed for both Orkney and Samsø. ● AAU are WP5 leader. They provided a general overview on different types of Demand Response Methods and in turn related this to the different demonstration sites. This forms the beginning of Section 4. ● Route Monkey described their proposed control approach for EVs in all three demonstrator regions. This forms Section 9. ● CERTH provided an international view of different demand response applications this forms the latter part of Section 4. CERTH also provided input into the proposed Demand Response forming the later sections of 5, 6 and 7. ● PRSMA provided context on the Madeira pilot forming Section 7 and provided information on their proposed control approach forming Section 10. ● RINA Consulting are not in the core WP5 team but have been included in the deliverable as a reviewer for submission 3 The Energy System and the increased need for Flexibility: Empowering the Consumer role thanks to DR Flexibility in the Energy System can be defined as “modifying generation and/ or consumption patterns in reaction to an external signal to provide a service within the Energy system and maintain security in of supply”1. Historically this flexibility has been mainly on the ‘supply- side’. However, due to the changing nature of our energy system it is becoming less and less practical both in financial terms and for system stability to continue to rely on supply side solutions. Therefore, flexibility through ‘demand side response’ (DSR) will become increasingly important as the energy system undergoes significant changes in the coming years.
