Preliminary Evaluation Test Plans Sample Clauses

Preliminary Evaluation Test Plans. Individual test plans will be developed and conducted to collect and analyze the data needed to assess the hypothesis in the 10 evaluation analyses presented in Section 4.1. The 10 test plans for the Seattle/LWC UPA are: • Traffic System Data Test Plan • Tolling Test Plan • Transit System Data Test Plan • Telecommuting Data Test Plan • Safety Test Plan • Surveys, Interviews and Workshops Test Plan • Environmental Test Plan • Content Analysis Test Plan • Cost Benefit Analysis Test Plan • Exogenous Factors Test Plan. Table 4-15 illustrates the relationship among the 10 test plans and the 11 evaluation analyses. The use of data from the various test plans in assessing the evaluation analyses – both as major input and as supporting input – is highlighted. Table 4-16 presents the more specific data need for each of the 11 evaluation analyses that will be included in the test plans. Figure 4-1 summarizes the schedule for data collection. The local partners have indicated that these major projects may be operational anytime between November 1, 2010 and June 30, 2011. The specific schedule for the projects is expected to be determined in late 2009 and will be reflected in the full test plan documents to be developed by the national evaluation team. The remainder of this section summarizes the key elements of each of the 10 test plans. Preliminary information on the data sources, data availability, data analysis, and the data collection schedule and responsibilities is presented. The more detailed test plans will be developed as the next step in the evaluation process. The latest Term Sheet between the local partners and U.S. DOT (September 30, 2009) shows that vehicles with 3 or more passengers will pay discounted tolls or no tolls. However, that issue in general as well as any specific approaches to high occupancy vehicles are still being considered by the local partners and U.S. DOT. Although this evaluation plan includes vehicle occupancy and other data collection relevant to HOV-related inquiries, it does not necessarily contain all of the HOV-related evaluation activities that may be needed, depending on the final approach taken by the local partners. When the local partners and U.S. DOT have resolved this issue the evaluation approach will be adjusted as necessary. Seattle/LWC Urban Partnership Agreement Final National Evaluation Plan Table 4-15. Relationships Among Test Plans and Evaluation Analyses Evaluation Analysis Seattle UPA Test Plans Congestion Anal...
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Preliminary Evaluation Test Plans. Individual test plans will be developed and conducted to collect and analyze the data needed to assess the hypothesis in the 10 evaluation analyses presented in Section 4.1. The 10 test plans for the San Francisco UPA are:  Traffic System Data Test Plan  Parking Data Test Plan  Transit System Data Test Plan  Telecommuting/TDM Data Test Plan  Traveler Information System Data Test Plan  Surveys and Interviews Test Plan  Environmental Data Test Plan  Content Analysis Test Plan  Cost Benefit Analysis Test Plan  Exogenous Factors Test Plan. Table 4-13 illustrates the relationship among the 10 test plans and the 10 evaluation analyses. The use of data from the various test plans in assessing the evaluation analyses – both as major input and as supporting input – is highlighted. Table 4-14 presents the more specific data needed for each of the 10 evaluation analyses that will be included in the test plans. Figure 4-1 summarizes the schedule for data collection. The remainder of this section summarizes the key elements of each of the 10 test plans. Preliminary information on the data sources, data availability, data analysis, and the data collection schedule and responsibilities is presented. The more detailed test plans will be developed as the next step in the evaluation process. San Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxx Partnership Agreement Final National Evaluation Plan Table 4-13. Relationships Among Test Plans and Evaluation Analyses San Francisco UPA Test Plans Congestion Analysis Pricing Analysis Telecommuting/ TDM Analysis Technology Analysis Equity Analysis Environmental Analysis Goods Movement Analysis Business Impact Analysis Non-Technical Success Factors Analysis Cost Benefit Analysis Traffic System Data Test Plan    Parking Data Test Plan       Transit System Data Test Plan     Telecommuting/TDM Data Test Plan  Traveler Information Data Test Plan  Surveys and Interviews Test Plan          Environmental Data Test Plan   Content Analysis Test Plan  Cost Benefit Analysis Test Plan   Exogenous Factors Test Plan    December 22, 2009  — Major Input  — Supporting Input Table 4-14. Data for the Evaluation Analyses Evaluation Data Congestion Pricing Telecommuting/ TDM Technology Equity Environmental Goods Movement Business Impacts Non-Technical Success Factors Cost Benefit Traffic Data Travel times X X X Travel speeds X X X Traffic volumes X X Vehicle occupancy X Parking Data Search time X X Duration X X X Turnover X X X X Price X Garag...
Sample 1

Related to Preliminary Evaluation Test Plans

  • Preliminary Evaluation Site evaluation and planning functions should proceed concurrently with the accomplishment of Schematic Design, Design Development, and Construction Documents. The Design Professional shall conduct a preliminary review of the site based on information furnished by the Owner. The Design Professional will advise the Owner of potential site-related problems that the Design Professional notes from such review.

  • Preliminary Engineering In order to receive City review and approval of the Extensions, Developer shall furnish two (2) copies of the plat map, topographic map and proposed roads profile sheets in electronic format prior to the City’s ordering of the engineering plans from its Engineer. The contour elevation and road profile elevations shall be referenced to NAVD ‘88 datum. In the event Developer’s engineer prepares the construction plans and specifications, the above information shall be a part of the extension construction plans to be reviewed and approved by the City’s Engineer. The final plat map shall be to the scale of 1-inch = 20 feet. The contour map shall have a scale of 1-inch = 20 feet and contour intervals of two (2) feet or less. The road profile sheets shall be to the scale of 1-inch = 20 feet. Developer shall provide a minimum of one benchmark, datum being NAVD ‘88, on the project site; and the elevation and location of the benchmark shall be indicated on the maps furnished by Developer.

  • Implementation Schedule TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE with regard to all dates and time periods set forth and/or incorporated herein. Any material modification or deviation from an approved schedule described in this Agreement shall occur only upon approval of the City and RDA, with any such approvals required to be in writing as an amendment to this Agreement, and which approvals shall not be unreasonably withheld. City shall cooperate and act promptly with respect to any and all permits or approvals necessary for completion of the Project. Notwithstanding the above, this Agreement shall not limit the discretion of the City, or any of its duly appointed and authorized governing bodies, boards or entities, in approving or rejecting any aspect of the Project or improvements contemplated on or about the Property.

  • Program Evaluation The School District and the College will develop a plan for the evaluation of the Dual Credit program to be completed each year. The evaluation will include, but is not limited to, disaggregated attendance and retention rates, GPA of high-school-credit-only courses and college courses, satisfactory progress in college courses, state assessment results, SAT/ACT, as applicable, TSIA readiness by grade level, and adequate progress toward the college-readiness of the students in the program. The School District commits to collecting longitudinal data as specified by the College, and making data and performance outcomes available to the College upon request. HB 1638 and SACSCOC require the collection of data points to be longitudinally captured by the School District, in collaboration with the College, will include, at minimum: student enrollment, GPA, retention, persistence, completion, transfer and scholarships. School District will provide parent contact and demographic information to the College upon request for targeted marketing of degree completion or workforce development information to parents of Students. School District agrees to obtain valid FERPA releases drafted to support the supply of such data if deemed required by counsel to either School District or the College. The College conducts and reports regular and ongoing evaluations of the Dual Credit program effectiveness and uses the results for continuous improvement.

  • PROGRESS EVALUATION Engineer shall, from time to time during the progress of the Engineering Services, confer with County at County’s election. Engineer shall prepare and present such information as may be pertinent and necessary, or as may be reasonably requested by County, in order for County to evaluate features of the Engineering Services. At the request of County or Engineer, conferences shall be provided at Engineer's office, the offices of County, or at other locations designated by County. When requested by County, such conferences shall also include evaluation of the Engineering Services. County may, from time to time, require Engineer to appear and provide information to the Xxxxxxxxxx County Commissioners Court. Should County determine that the progress in Engineering Services does not satisfy an applicable Work Authorization or any Supplemental Work Authorization related thereto, then County shall review same with Engineer to determine corrective action required. Engineer shall promptly advise County in writing of events which have or may have a significant impact upon the progress of the Engineering Services, including but not limited to the following:

  • Evaluation Schedule CLIENT REFERENCES The Tenderer shall provide details of his performance on each of the previous projects listed in the “Relevant Experience” returnable schedule. “Client Reference Scorecards” will be completed by each of the respective Clients for the projects listed in the “Relevant Experience” returnable schedule. The following are to be completed by the Client and Principal Agent and is to be supported in each case by a letter of award and the works completion certificate. Both Client and Principal Agent must sign and stamp the documents, failure to obtain both signatures and stamps will result in no allocation of points. PROJECT NAME and SCOPE OF WORK: Principal agent: ................................................................................................................................. Client: .. ..............................................................................................................................................

  • Completion of Evaluation Cycle 1. The summative evaluation rating shall be based upon a preponderance of the evidence, assessed in a holistic manner, that is aligned to the Ohio Educator Standards. Only evidence gathered during the walkthroughs and formal observations that are conducted for the current school year may be used.

  • Construction Progress Schedule A schedule indicating proposed activity sequences and durations, milestone dates for receipt and approval of pertinent information, preparation, submittal, and processing of Shop Drawings and Samples, delivery of materials or equipment requiring long-lead time procurement, and proposed date(s) of Material Completion and Occupancy and Final Completion. The schedule will be developed to represent the sixteen or seventeen CSI Specification Divisions. It shall have a minimum number of activities as required to adequately represent to Owner the complete scope of work and define the Project’s critical path and associated activities. If the Project is to be phased, then each individual Phase should be identified from start through completion of the overall Project and should be individually scheduled and described, including any Owner’s occupancy requirements and showing portions of the Project having occupancy priority. The format of the schedule will have dependencies indicated on a monthly grid identifying milestone dates such as construction start, phase construction, structural top out, dry-in, rough-in completion, metal stud and drywall completion, equipment installation, systems operational, Material Completion and Occupancy Date, final inspection dates, Punchlist, and Final Completion date.

  • Project Monitoring Reporting Evaluation A. The Project Implementing Entity shall monitor and evaluate the progress of its activities under the Project and prepare Project Reports in accordance with the provisions of Section 5.08(b) of the General Conditions and on the basis of indicators agreed with the Bank. Each such report shall cover the period of one

  • Long Term Cost Evaluation Criterion # 4 READ CAREFULLY and see in the RFP document under "Proposal Scoring and Evaluation". Points will be assigned to this criterion based on your answer to this Attribute. Points are awarded if you agree not i ncrease your catalog prices (as defined herein) more than X% annually over the previous year for years two and thr ee and potentially year four, unless an exigent circumstance exists in the marketplace and the excess price increase which exceeds X% annually is supported by documentation provided by you and your suppliers and shared with TIP S, if requested. If you agree NOT to increase prices more than 5%, except when justified by supporting documentati on, you are awarded 10 points; if 6% to 14%, except when justified by supporting documentation, you receive 1 to 9 points incrementally. Price increases 14% or greater, except when justified by supporting documentation, receive 0 points. increases will be 5% or less annually per question Required Confidentiality Claim Form Required Confidentiality Claim Form This completed form is required by TIPS. By submitting a response to this solicitation you agree to download from th e “Attachments” section, complete according to the instructions on the form, then uploading the completed form, wit h any confidential attachments, if applicable, to the “Response Attachments” section titled “Confidentiality Form” in order to provide to TIPS the completed form titled, “CONFIDENTIALITY CLAIM FORM”. By completing this process, you provide us with the information we require to comply with the open record laws of the State of Texas as they ma y apply to your proposal submission. If you do not provide the form with your proposal, an award will not be made if your proposal is qualified for an award, until TIPS has an accurate, completed form from you. Read the form carefully before completing and if you have any questions, email Xxxx Xxxxxx at TIPS at xxxx.xxxxxx@t xxx-xxx.xxx

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!