PROPOSED USE OF FUNDS Sample Clauses

PROPOSED USE OF FUNDS. Below we are asking each LEA to provide an explanation of how the LEA intends to use the ARP XXXXX funds in alignment with the allowable use cases described by the U.S. Department of Education. We encourage LEAs to prioritize evidence-based practices and call those out in their narrative.
Sample 1Sample 2
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
PROPOSED USE OF FUNDS. Allocation of funds A$ % Total $10,502,000 100%
Sample 1
PROPOSED USE OF FUNDS. In the 2023-2024 State Fiscal Year, the KCC IOG will plan to use the HB1451 monies to fund the following priorities: 1) ISST Coordinator: The Coordinator provides the leadership and administration of the Collaborative Management Program in Kit Carson County to assure that the mission, intent, objectives and purposes of HB1451 are effectively carried out. The Coordinator provides outreach to families in Kit Carson County involved in multi-systems in order to build family partnerships and increase family feedback for the purpose of informing the development of a comprehensive system of care. The Coordinator acts as the developer of family involvement and the liaison between families and the KCC IOG. Please see job description in the IOG Handbook. 2) Track outcomes and participate in data collection, reporting, and evaluation efforts. 3) Family Flex Funds: These funds are used to meet financial needs of multi-system youth and their families. Funding requests must support the family's integrated plan. Approval process is outlined in the Individualized Services and Support Team (ISST) Handbook. 4) Funding is also available to support other community outreach activities, training, marketing and staff education (CMP partner agencies) that is deemed appropriate and helpful to meet 1451 goals. 5) The IOG or executive committee may identify other needs throughout the year that meet the following guidelines. Priorities are subject to change if the IOG deems appropriate: a. Reduce duplication and eliminate fragmentation of services provided to children or families who would benefit from integrated multi-agency services; b. Increase the quality, appropriateness, and effectiveness of services delivered to children or families who would benefit from integrated multi-agency services to achieve better outcomes for these children and families; c. Encourage cost-sharing among service providers.
Sample 1
PROPOSED USE OF FUNDS. Please provide a detailed explanation of how the LEA intends to use the XXXX II funds in alignment with the allowable use cases described by the U.S. Department of Education. We encourage LEAs to prioritize evidence- based practices and call those out in their narrative. Please provide a narrative response that details your XXX XXXX XX plan in alignment with the allowable use cases. We recommend you call out the federal use case language and category number in your response, as well as including your budget narrative from the Utah Grants Management System. In compliance with acceptable use, Xxxx Xxxxxxx Charter School intends to use the XXXX II funding for the following:
Sample 1
PROPOSED USE OF FUNDS. Please provide a detailed explanation of how the LEA intends to use the XXXXX II funds in alignment with the allowable use cases described by the U.S. Department of Education and the new Utah state legislative intent language. We encourage LEAs to prioritize evidence-based practices and call those out in their narrative. Please provide a narrative response that details your XXX XXXXX XX plan in alignment with the allowable use cases. We recommend you call out the federal use case language and category number in your response, as well as including your budget narrative from the Utah Grants Management System. Please provide a narrative response for how your XXX XXXXX XX plan aligns with addressing student “learning loss” as referenced in Utah’s 2021 general session SB1 1st substitute (xxxxx://xx.xxxx.xxx/~2021/bills/static/SB0001.html). The LEA may also state the following if their submitted use case does not align with “learning loss” – We will be using our XXXXX II funds in alignment with federal guidance for activities that are not related to learning loss. We understand that this will reduce our state minimum school program (MSP) allocation dollar for dollar based as directed by the Utah state legislature. Please describe how the LEA will comply with the requirements of GEPA Section 427 (20 U.S.C. 1228a). Comprehensive GEPA requirements are listed on page 9-10 of this document. Your description must include information on the steps the LEA proposes to take to permit students, teachers, and other program beneficiaries to overcome barriers (including barriers based on gender, race, color, national origin, disability, and age) that impede access to, or participation in, the program. Rockwell Charter High School will administer all funds according to the guidelines and regulations given. The funds will be administered appropriately in regards to the populations it is intended for (low income, special populations, etc…) with the help and support of Rockwell Stakeholders in creating a plan to distribute the said monies. These Stakeholders are all privileged in knowing how this money will be spent and why. All reports that are requested in regards to how ESSERS-II is being spent, will be filled out and returned in a timely manner. No plans on constructions will be used for Xxxxxxxx’x XXXXX-II money. The superintendent or charter school director assures the following: ● The LEA will only use the XXXXX II xxxxx Coronavirus Relief Fund to cover costs that— o Are n...
Sample 1
PROPOSED USE OF FUNDS. Please provide a detailed explanation of how the LEA intends to use the XXXXX II funds in alignment with the allowable use cases described by the U.S. Department of Education. We encourage LEAs to prioritize evidence-based practices and call those out in their narrative. Please provide a narrative response for your XXX XXXXX XX plan for implementation of funding in alignment with allowable use cases:
Sample 1
PROPOSED USE OF FUNDS. The Company intends to use the funds raised from the Public Offer as follows: Item Minimum Subscription Full Subscription Establishment of Australian $1,750,000 50% $2,500,000 50% operations Marketing and advertising $525,000 15% $1,000,000 20% Expenses of the Offer $350,000 10% $500,000 10% ASX Fees and other miscellaneous $70,000 2% $75,000 1.5% General working capital $805,000 23% $925,000 18.5% Total $3,500,000 100% $5,000,000 100% These use of funds are indicative only and the Company reserves the right to vary budgeted expenses as a result of due diligence enquiries or if actual expenses exceed budgeted expenses. Prospectus lodged with ASIC 10 November 2017 Notice of Annual General Meeting sent to Shareholders 10 November 2017 Public Offer opens 17 November 2017 Annual General Meeting to approve the Resolutions 8 December 2017 Public Offer closes 15 December 2017 Completion of the Proposed Transaction Issue of Shares under the Public Offer Issue of Shares to Sellers Issue of Shares to Advisers Completion of the Share Purchase Agreement Proposed Directors appointed to the Board Securities registered on a post-Consolidation basis 22 December 2017 Expected date for Shares to be reinstated to trading on ASX 29 December 2017 The pro forma capital structure of the Company, assuming the Resolutions are passed and the Proposed Transaction completes, is as follows: Capital structure Existing1 Minimum Subscription Full Subscription Existing Shares (pre-Consolidation) 249,705,637 249,705,637 249,705,637 Existing Shares (post-Consolidation) 72,000,000 72,000,000 72,000,000 Consideration Shares to Sellers2 - 532,852,564 532,852,564 Shares to Advisers3 - 37,299,679 37,299,679 Shares under Public Offer - 175,000,000 250,000,000 Class A Performance Shares4 - 18,500,000 18,500,000 Class B Performance Shares5 - 21,500,000 21,500,000
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
PROPOSED USE OF FUNDS. The Statement of Work is attached as Exhibit "A" hereto and made a part of this contract. Subrecipient agrees to perform the work described in Exhibit "A" in compliance with all provisions of this contract. Subrecipient warrants and represents that it has the requisite authority and capacity to perform all terms and conditions on Subrecipient's part to be performed hereunder.
Sample 1

Related to PROPOSED USE OF FUNDS

  • Use of Funds Grantee shall expend funds under this Grant Agreement only for approved services and for reasonable and allowable expenses directly related to those services.

  • Source of Funds Each Purchaser severally represents that at least one of the following statements is an accurate representation as to each source of funds (a “Source”) to be used by such Purchaser to pay the purchase price of the Notes to be purchased by such Purchaser hereunder: (a) the Source is an “insurance company general account” (as the term is defined in the United States Department of Labor’s Prohibited Transaction Exemption (“PTE”) 95-60) in respect of which the reserves and liabilities (as defined by the annual statement for life insurance companies approved by the NAIC (the “NAIC Annual Statement”)) for the general account contract(s) held by or on behalf of any employee benefit plan together with the amount of the reserves and liabilities for the general account contract(s) held by or on behalf of any other employee benefit plans maintained by the same employer (or affiliate thereof as defined in PTE 95-60) or by the same employee organization in the general account do not exceed 10% of the total reserves and liabilities of the general account (exclusive of separate account liabilities) plus surplus as set forth in the NAIC Annual Statement filed with such Purchaser’s state of domicile; or (b) the Source is a separate account that is maintained solely in connection with such Purchaser’s fixed contractual obligations under which the amounts payable, or credited, to any employee benefit plan (or its related trust) that has any interest in such separate account (or to any participant or beneficiary of such plan (including any annuitant)) are not affected in any manner by the investment performance of the separate account; or (c) the Source is either (i) an insurance company pooled separate account, within the meaning of PTE 90-1 or (ii) a bank collective investment fund, within the meaning of the PTE 91-38 and, except as disclosed by such Purchaser to the Company in writing pursuant to this clause (c), no employee benefit plan or group of plans maintained by the same employer or employee organization beneficially owns more than 10% of all assets allocated to such pooled separate account or collective investment fund; or (d) the Source constitutes assets of an “investment fund” (within the meaning of Part VI of PTE 84-14 (the “QPAM Exemption”)) managed by a “qualified professional asset manager” or “QPAM” (within the meaning of Part VI of the QPAM Exemption), no employee benefit plan’s assets that are managed by the QPAM in such investment fund, when combined with the assets of all other employee benefit plans established or maintained by the same employer or by an affiliate (within the meaning of Part VI(c)(1) of the QPAM Exemption) of such employer or by the same employee organization and managed by such QPAM, represent more than 20% of the total client assets managed by such QPAM, the conditions of Part I(c) and (g) of the QPAM Exemption are satisfied, neither the QPAM nor a person controlling or controlled by the QPAM maintains an ownership interest in the Company that would cause the QPAM and the Company to be “related” within the meaning of Part VI(h) of the QPAM Exemption and (i) the identity of such QPAM and (ii) the names of any employee benefit plans whose assets in the investment fund, when combined with the assets of all other employee benefit plans established or maintained by the same employer or by an affiliate (within the meaning of Part VI(c)(1) of the QPAM Exemption) of such employer or by the same employee organization, represent 10% or more of the assets of such investment fund, have been disclosed to the Company in writing pursuant to this clause (d); or (e) the Source constitutes assets of a “plan(s)” (within the meaning of Part IV(h) of PTE 96-23 (the “INHAM Exemption”)) managed by an “in-house asset manager” or “INHAM” (within the meaning of Part IV(a) of the INHAM Exemption), the conditions of Part I(a), (g) and (h) of the INHAM Exemption are satisfied, neither the INHAM nor a person controlling or controlled by the INHAM (applying the definition of “control” in Part IV(d)(3) of the INHAM Exemption) owns a 10% or more interest in the Company and (i) the identity of such INHAM and (ii) the name(s) of the employee benefit plan(s) whose assets constitute the Source have been disclosed to the Company in writing pursuant to this clause (e); or (f) the Source is a governmental plan; or (g) the Source is one or more employee benefit plans, or a separate account or trust fund comprised of one or more employee benefit plans, each of which has been identified to the Company in writing pursuant to this clause (g); or (h) the Source does not include assets of any employee benefit plan, other than a plan exempt from the coverage of ERISA. As used in this Section 6.2, the terms “employee benefit plan,” “governmental plan,” and “separate account” shall have the respective meanings assigned to such terms in section 3 of ERISA.

  • Allocation of Funds A. The Faculty Development Committee shall approve all applications for reassignment of duties that do not require additional funding and have been endorsed by the applicant’s Division. B. The Faculty Development Committee shall follow the guidelines established in consultation between the parties in deciding which applications for faculty development funding will be approved.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!