Quality Assurance Review. The Contractor is required to make their case records available for quality assurance review at any time at the request of the ESS Unit. ESS TA’s are required to conduct Quality Assurance Reviews to evaluate contract compliance and identify training need(s) related to case documentation and/or contract requirements. DRS Counselor(s) may be included in the quality assurance review process.
Quality Assurance Review. Subrecipient shall be responsible for quality assurance review of their fiscal and program operations (including all special projects) which includes, but is not limited to, a quality assurance system to review case files, including CalJOBS electronic files, client’s WIOA eligibility determination and documentation, IEP’s, reports (issued by CalJOBS, State, and/or local agencies), gaps in service delivery, provision and documentation of substantial services, timely client exit, performance outcomes, follow-up activities, property management (including maintenance of up-to-date equipment inventory lists in each service location, purchases, expenditures and invoices, Federal and State requirements for universal programmatic, and physical access to services and activities (including access for individuals with disabilities). Quality and consistency of services among One-Stop Center locations, programs, and staff is essential. The WIOA Title I Career Services Service Provider shall be responsible for leading the quality assurance review on a quarterly basis.
1. Subrecipient shall establish and follow a standardized review methodology that:
a. Includes procedures for conducting a quality assurance review on all contracted programs and fiscal activities. Methodology is to include review of expenditures against budget to ensure compliance of OMB requirements and WIOA.
b. Must develop a written report to include recorded findings, any needed corrective action, and due dates for the accomplishment of corrective actions;
c. Requires systematic follow-up to ensure that necessary corrective action has been taken and outstanding issues are addressed and resolved; and
d. Requires that following the completion of each internal monitoring, completed reviews are verified and a list of files reviewed is maintained.
2. In addition to Item #1 above, the Subrecipient shall follow their regular (day-to-day) internal review processes to support high standards of service provision and documentation. This shall include periodic file review and immediate correction of issues noted.
3. Subrecipient shall conduct a baseline analysis of client flow, program delivery, career planning strategies and tools, business process, and service improvement once per program year. Subrecipient must develop a policy and procedures to ensure client flow and program delivery are in place. Subrecipient shall provide a copy of their program delivery policy, procedures and all other documentation of the...
Quality Assurance Review. Vendor shall establish Quality Assurance processes to ensure that Services are provided consistent with Citizens Best Claims Practices. The processes must include Vendor Staff whose primary responsibilities relate to Quality Assurance and management. For residential claims the processes must also include a Team Lead(s) for all Desk Adjusters, with a ratio of not more than fifteen (15) Desk Adjusters per Team Lead, unless otherwise approved by Citizens. Team Leads must have a minimum of two (2) years of experience adjusting first-party property claims. As part of these processes, the Team Lead shall review and approve all estimates, letters, and payments prior to submission to Citizens unless it is within the Adjusters authority. Vendor shall also designate personnel that Citizens may contact as needed to address concerns with any Claims Workflow or specific Claim Assignment.
Quality Assurance Review. Subrecipient shall be responsible for quality assurance review of their fiscal and program operations which includes, but is not limited to, a quality assurance system to review case files, including CalJOBS electronic files, participants WIOA eligibility determination and documentation, ISPs, reports (issued by CalJOBS, State, and/or Local agencies), gaps in service delivery, provision and documentation of substantial services, timely client exit, performance outcomes, follow-up activities, property management (including maintenance of up-to-date equipment inventory lists in each service location, purchases, expenditures and invoices, federal and state requirements for universal programmatic and physical access to services and activities (including access for individuals with disabilities).
Quality Assurance Review. The Department and FHWA (as appropriate) will perform a QA review of the plans, specifications, and calculations to confirm that the Department's approved design criteria are being followed.
Quality Assurance Review. Licensor may at any time review all ------------------------ aspects of Licensee's operation of the eSylvan Internet Business ("Quality Assurance Review") to determine the extent to which Licensee's operations are or are not in compliance with the standards, methods and procedures Licensor establishes with respect to the Marks. At Licensee's request, Licensor will provide Licensee with the materials and forms used in the Quality Assurance Review process for Licensee's use in reviewing Licensee's operations.
Quality Assurance Review a review of a designated sample of the state agency’s disability determinations to assure decisional accuracy and case processing in accordance with Social Security regulations and other adjudicative criteria.
Quality Assurance Review. An internal quality assurance review of the bridge plans, specifications, and estimate will be conducted concurrently with review of the 65% design submittal by the City and other agencies. Because of this, the 65% design submittal is noted as “unchecked” and the 95% and Final design submittals as “checked”. The Consultant’s quality assurance program provides for independent checking of individual structural design tasks, as well as an independent review by experienced senior staff. The purpose of this review is to provide oversight to specific bridge design details by professionals who are not closely involved in the design, and to review the constructability, cost-effectiveness and completeness of design features relative to the normal standard of professional care
Quality Assurance Review. As noted above, an internal quality assurance review of the bridge plans, specifications, and estimate will be conducted concurrently with review of the 65% Submittal by the City and other agencies. This quality assurance review includes independent checking of individual design calculations and details, as well as an independent review by experienced senior staff. The purpose of this review is to provide oversight to specific project details by professionals who are not closely involved in the design, and to review the constructability, cost-effectiveness and completeness of design features relative to the normal standard of professional care. This independent check will include a red, green and yellow check of the structural calculations and plans.
Quality Assurance Review. ITI will maintain a procedure and checklist for the Quality Assurance Review of all aspects of Licensee's operation of its Institute whereby ITI can determine the extent to which Licensee's operations are or are not in compliance with the ITI System. Approximately ninety (90) days after Licensee first opens its Institute, ITI will send an ITI representative to Licensee's Institute to conduct a Quality Assurance Review. At Licensee's request, ITI will have an ITI representative conduct a Quality Assurance Review at Licensee's Institute once each calendar year if ITI has not itself initiated such action. ITI has the right to conduct additional Quality Assurance Reviews from time to time in its discretion. At Licensee's request, ITI will provide Licensee with the materials and forms used in the Quality Assurance Review process for Licensee's use in reviewing Licensee's operations.
