Summative Appraisal Sample Clauses

Summative Appraisal. Summative Appraisal has as its purpose the determination of the professional competence of a teacher in respect of the confirmation of appointment or for promotional purposes:
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Summative Appraisal. The process of appraisal to be used when the reasons relate to the teacher’s conduct or performance and where the result may be the termination of employment, shall be
Summative Appraisal. For probationary teachers, a Summative Appraisal Document will be completed annually. For tenured teachers, a Summative Appraisal Document will be completed at the end of a two-year cycle in which a PGP is first completed and followed by a formal observation. For probationary teachers, Summative Appraisals must be completed no later than 45 calendar days prior to the end of the school year. For tenured teachers, Summative Appraisals must be completed no later than one week prior to the end of the school year. For tenured teachers who will be released, Summative Appraisals must be completed no later than 60 calendar days prior to the end of the school year. Teachers who receive an overall “Unsatisfactory” on the Summative Appraisal Document must work with their administrator on a Remediation Plan. Such Plan is set forth in 6.11 of this Article. When the Summative Appraisal Conference is held, the teacher and administrator shall collaboratively complete a written Summative Appraisal document. The conference shall include a discussion of the teacher’s performance relative to the four Domains of the Xxxxxxxxx Evidence of Teaching Rubric and includes the teacher’s areas of strength and areas of further development. Following the discussion, both the administrator and teacher shall date and sign the Summative Appraisal document. The signature shall not necessarily indicate agreement with the Summative Appraisal document, rather shall indicate that the conference and discussion have been held and that the teacher is in receipt of a copy of the Summative Appraisal document.
Summative Appraisal. The method of summative appraisal agreed on by the College and staff will be used for positions noted at Clause 10(2) of this Agreement. Appraisal Judgements will be made according to the following principles:

Related to Summative Appraisal

  • Performance Appraisal The Executive’s performance may be evaluated by the Board of Directors or the Committee from time to time. The Executive shall be entitled to such additional remuneration, including but not limited to annual bonuses based on performance, as the Board of Directors or the Committee may, in its discretion, determine from time to time.

  • Performance Appraisals 3201 The Employer shall complete a written appraisal of a nurse's performance at least bi-annually. Upon request, the nurse shall be given an exact copy of the appraisal. 3202 The nurse shall have an opportunity to read such document. 3203 The nurse's signature on such document merely signifies that the contents of the document have been read. 3204 If the nurse disputes the appraisal, she/he may file a reply to the document in accordance with Article 29, and/or she/he may file a grievance under Article 12 of this Agreement.

  • Appraisal The Mortgage File contains an appraisal of the related Mortgaged Property with an appraisal date within 6 months of the Mortgage Loan origination date, and within 12 months of the Cut-off Date. The appraisal is signed by an appraiser that (i) was engaged directly by the originator of the Mortgage Loan or the Mortgage Loan Seller, or a correspondent or agent of the originator of the Mortgage Loan or the Mortgage Loan Seller, and (ii) to the Mortgage Loan Seller’s knowledge, had no interest, direct or indirect, in the Mortgaged Property or the Mortgagor or in any loan made on the security thereof, and whose compensation is not affected by the approval or disapproval of the Mortgage Loan. Each appraiser has represented in such appraisal or in a supplemental letter that the appraisal satisfies the requirements of the “Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice” as adopted by the Appraisal Standards Board of the Appraisal Foundation.

  • Appraisals An appraisal of the related Mortgaged Property was conducted in connection with the origination of the Mortgage Loan, which appraisal is signed by an appraiser, who, to the Mortgage Loan Seller's knowledge, had no interest, direct or indirect, in the Mortgaged Property or the Borrower or in any loan made on the security thereof, and whose compensation is not affected by the approval or disapproval of the Mortgage Loan; in connection with the origination of the Mortgage Loan, each appraiser has represented in such appraisal or in a supplemental letter that the appraisal satisfies the requirements of the "Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice" as adopted by the Appraisal Standards Board of the Appraisal Foundation.

  • Penalty Determination H&SC section 39619.7 requires CARB to provide information on the basis for the penalties it seeks. This Agreement includes this information, which is also summarized here. The provision of law the penalty is being assessed under and why that provision is most appropriate for that violation. The penalty provision being applied, in this case, is H&SC section 42402 et seq. because TJX sold, supplied, offered for sale, or manufactured for sale consumer products for commerce in California in violation of the Consumer Products Regulations (17 CCR section 94507 et seq.). The penalty provisions of H&SC section 42402 et seq. apply to violations of the Consumer Products Regulations because the regulations were adopted under authority of H&SC section 41712, which is in Part 4 of Division 26. The manner in which the penalty amount was determined, including aggravating and mitigating factors and per unit or per vehicle basis for the penalty. H&SC section 42402 et seq. provides strict liability penalties of up to $10,000 per day for violations of the Consumer Product Regulations with each day being a separate violation. In this case, the total penalty is $196,800 for 171 days of administrative and emission violations. The penalty, in this case, was reduced because TJX made diligent efforts to cooperate with the investigation and to comply, including developing new business practices to ensure future compliance. These business practices include modifying relevant purchasing practices, delivering staff training, and implementing a vendor certification program for the relevant vendor population. Final penalties were determined based on the unique circumstances of this matter, considered together with the need to remove any economic benefit from noncompliance, the goal of deterring future violations and obtaining swift compliance, the consideration of past penalties in similar negotiated cases, and the potential cost and risk associated with litigating these particular violations. The penalty reflects violations extending over a number of days resulting in quantifiable harm to the environment considered together with the complete circumstances of this case. Penalties in future cases might be smaller or larger on a per ton basis. The final penalty, in this case, was based in part on confidential financial information or confidential business information provided by TJX that is not retained by CARB in the ordinary course of business. The penalty, in this case, was also based on confidential settlement communications between CARB and TJX that CARB does not retain in the ordinary course of business. The penalty also reflects CARB's assessment of the relative strength of its case against TJX, Inc., the desire to avoid the uncertainty, burden and expense of litigation, obtain swift compliance with the law and remove any unfair advantage that TJX may have secured from its actions. ls the penalty being assessed under a provision of law that prohibits the emission of pollution at a specified level, and, if so a quantification of excess emissions, if it is practicable to do so. The Consumer Product Regulations do not prohibit emissions above a specified level, but they do limit the concentration of VOCs in regulated products. In this case, a quantification of the excess emissions attributable to the violations was not practicable.

  • Office of Inspector General Investigative Findings Expert Review In accordance with Senate Bill 799, Acts 2021, 87th Leg., R.S., if Texas Government Code, Section 531.102(m-1)(2) is applicable to this Contract, Contractor affirms that it possesses the necessary occupational licenses and experience.

  • IRS Plan Approval Articles I through VIII of the agreement used to establish this Xxxx XXX have been approved by the IRS. The IRS approval is a determination only as to form. It is not an endorsement of the plan in operation or of the investments offered.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.