Urban Design. 10.1.1 对“城市设计要点”的解读与调整建议
Urban Design. (a) The Owner agrees that the townhouse units will be subject to review and approval by the Town of Niagara-on-the-Lake Urban Design Committee.
Urban Design. The City of Nedlands has formed a partnership with UWA’s School of Architecture, Landscape and Visual Arts to undertake a program to design and construct a prototype bus shelter on Stirling Highway. It is intended that the City acts as a ‘client’, giving architecture students the opportunity to design and construct a functional piece of municipal infrastructure. If successful, there is potential to continue or expand the program into the future with additional shelters and other street furniture. Basically the current project involves 4th & 5th year architecture students designing a timber bus shelter to comply with a design brief and all required standards in a competitive process that will result in a ‘winning’ design. The students will then build the structure and install it on site. The whole process is overseen by a staff architect and a structural engineer to ensure a quality product. The City also has a number of opportunities to have input to ensure a favourable outcome.
Urban Design. In accordance with Section 27-515(b) of the Zoning Ordinance, the mixed-use development consisting of commercial/retail and residential uses is permitted in the M-X-T Zone and is subject to a detailed site plan approval in accordance with Section 27-546(a) of the Zoning Ordinance. This project will include rental units and is not intended for sale; therefore, no condition is recommended to require the establishment of a homeowner’s associations or a condominium regime. However, if this ownership were to change, any declaration of covenants would require the rights of M-NCPPC to ensure that the association does not annex or de-annex any lands from the limit of this application. One of the key purposes of the M-X-T Zone is to create a compact, mixed-use and walkable environment. Among eleven additional findings required for the Planning Board to approve a DSP is a requirement to ensure that the pedestrian system is convenient and comprehensively designed to encourage pedestrian activity within the development. Since the subject site is small, the applicant should strengthen the connectivity between different uses and internally for the residential component and further explore opportunities to create a comprehensive pedestrian network that would allow for physical integration of the development. Conformance with the 2010 Prince George’s County Landscape Manual In accordance with Section 27-544(a), this development in the M-X-T Zone is subject to the requirements of the 2010 Prince George’s County Landscape Manual (Landscape Manual) at the time of DSP. Specifically, the site is subject to Section 4.1, Residential Requirements;
Urban Design. The Urban Design theme must bridge the gap between building design and the City’s investments in the public realm. The form, location, and type of downtown development will be addressed. A Downtown urban design framework will be developed to xxxxxx pedestrian-friendly street-oriented and waterfront-oriented development that supports downtown retail, commercial, and waterfront uses. Existing, planned and future streetscape, plaza Xxxxxxxxx Downtown Plan Scope of Work | 3 EXHIBIT A- (Work Scope) and waterfront improvements will be defined that form a cohesive and interconnected set of public space destinations including the waterfront, Rock Cove and downtown. Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx will:
Urban Design. The City will provide an urban design consultant to develop urban design concepts for the replacement bridge. A minimum of two (2) urban design alternatives for the replacement bridge will be developed. These alternatives will utilize sound Context Sensitive Solution (CSS) principles of evoking the history, environment and culture of the community into the design. The design elements will address the visible bridge structure, railings, columns, abutment walls and adjacent sidewalk areas. Alternatives will illustrate families of materials and design features that would express a character unique to the bridge and its adjacent context within the neighborhood and the city KDG will meet with City staff and urban consultant to review the alternatives and assist in the selection of a preferred alternative. Once a preferred alternative is selected, the urban design consultant will refine the design according to comments from City staff and a presentation of that alternative will be made to the City of Fort Xxxxxxx. The urban design consultant will provide a color rendering and construction cost estimate of the each of the preferred alternatives. Two alternatives will be developed for the bridge. The alternatives will include illustrated cross-sections, and a conceptual perspective sketch of each option.
Urban Design. The City will select the final urban design concept. The urban design concept will be further developed for final design.
Urban Design. The development of 354 multifamily residential dwellings will be subject to DSP approval. There is no previously approved DSP governing this site. Conformance with the Zoning Ordinance and the D-D-O Zone of the 2013 Greenbelt Metro Area and MD 193 Corridor Sector Plan and SMA At the time of DSP, conformance with the applicable D-D-O Zone standards will be analyzed. The D-D-O Zone standards replace the standards and regulations required by the Zoning Ordinance. Wherever a conflict between the sector plan and the Zoning Ordinance or 2010 Prince Xxxxxx’s County Landscape Manual (Landscape Manual) occur, the D-D-O Zone shall prevail. For development standards not covered by the Sector Plan, the Zoning Ordinance or Landscape Manual requirements, govern the site, as stated in Section 27-548.04. This PPS approves one parcel for the multifamily dwelling units, which is a permitted use pursuant to the D-D-O Zone use table. Based on the preliminary design, as shown on the TCP1, the proposed multifamily residential buildings do not comply with the D-D-O design standards, which shall be further reviewed at the time of DSP and may require revisions to the proposed development or modifications to design standards pursuant to Section 27-548.25(c). Conformance with the 2010 Prince George’s County Landscape Manual Unless modified by the development district standards as stated on page 206 of the Greenbelt Metro Area and MD 193 Sector Plan and SMA, the proposed development is subject to the requirements of the Landscape Manual, including the following sections:
Urban Design
