Classification Process Sample Clauses

Classification Process. In designing a matrix for prioritisation of calls we take this from the ITIL framework describing the rules for priorities for incidents. This allows us to define a Prioritisation Matrix for dealing with support requests and incidents. Xxxxx’x ITIL approach scores incidents against two matrices, the urgency and impact of the incident. This in turn allows us to consider not only the no of users affected but also metrics such as the status of a user of subset of users into consideration.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Classification Process. The Classification Specialist shall prepare a report and impartial analysis on each request for classification or reclassification. It is also the Classification Specialist’s responsibility to determine whether there is currently an appropriate classification within the District, to recommend addition or deletion of duties and to prepare new or amended job descriptions. The report will be completed within thirty (30) working days and sent to all interested parties prior to the meeting provided for in Section 13.4 below. The Classification Specialist's review will be based upon the following: 13.3.1 The completed application and all appended material; 13.3.2 An interview with the employee’s appropriate administrator and/or supervisor; 13.3.3 A field audit; 13.3.4 Internal or external audits of other similar or related positions as necessary; 13.3.5 Any other relevant information; and 13.3.6 An interview with any additional staff who have reason to know about the duties being performed, if necessary.
Classification Process. 72.2.1. Positions will be subject to classification review when: a) a new position is created; b) a vacant position is reviewed and redesigned prior to recruitment; and, c) the responsibilities of the position have changed to the extent that it is agreed that the position may no longer be appropriately classified. Should the Supervisor and the General Staff member not agree, either party may refer the matter to the People and Culture Unit to assist the parties in reaching an agreement. 72.2.2. To facilitate the classification review, Position Descriptions and classification documentation will be prepared by either: a) the Supervisor and/or General Staff member in consultation with each other, where the position is currently occupied; or, b) the Supervisor, where the position is new or unoccupied. The relevant Divisional Director or their delegate will approve the Position Description and other classification documentation. 72.2.3. A Classification Review Panel will conduct classification reviews as required. a) The Classification Review Panel shall comprise a People and Culture Representative and a General Staff member/s of the Company from a pool of General Staff members who have been trained in job evaluation procedures relevant to the General Staff classification system as provided for in clause 72.2.6 (who is not from the same work area as the position which is subject of review). An external expert may be included as an additional member of the panel where appropriate. b) The relevant Supervisor and/or the incumbent General Staff member may be requested to clarify aspects of the role of the position being evaluated. An application for a review of the classification level of a position will be dealt with expeditiously and preferably within one (1) month of lodgement with the People and Culture Unit. 72.2.4. All classification determinations are subject to final approval by the Relevant Divisional Director or their delegate and where the position is not vacant, will be confirmed to the incumbent General Staff member in writing. 72.2.5. Where, as a result of a classification review, a position is to be classified to a higher category, the date of effect of the reclassification and resulting salary increase will be the first pay period beginning on or after the date the reclassification is confirmed. 72.2.6. For the purposes of clause 72.2.3 the Company will invite expressions of interest from interested General Staff members who wish to be trained to par...
Classification Process. ‌ (a) A school shall determine the classification of a position through the following process: (i) An analysis is to be undertaken to establish the skills and responsibilities required for each identified position and a position description written for each position; (ii) Each position is classified by reference to the classification criteria set out in this Schedule; (iii) Employees are appointed to a position at the appropriate level within the structure and to a step in the level according to experience based on years of service as defined in the School Officer Career Path clause.
Classification Process. 13.12.1 The Principal or their delegate shall determine the classification of a position through: (a) Reviewing or creating a position description for the position; (b) An analysis of the skills and responsibilities required for each position consistent with the position description; (c) Reference to the classification criteria set out in Clause 13.12.4 against the position description; (d) Assigning the appropriate level within the structure to the position. Appointment will be made at the appropriate level, with the step determined according to experience based on years of service or recognition of prior service as deemed relevant to the position. 13.12.2 If at any time an employee or the College considers that the skills and responsibilities of the position, as required by the College, have altered or do not reflect the classification assigned to the position, a review of the classification level of the position is to be undertaken. However, except in exceptional circumstances, such as a change in the skill and/or responsibilities required, or a change in the conditions under which the work is performed, an employee may only request a reclassification of their position once in a 12 month period. 13.12.3 Where a disagreement arises as to the outcome of a classification review, it will be dealt with under the Procedure for Settling Disputes contained in Clause 4 of this Agreement. At any meeting specified in Clause 4, the person who made the decision about the classification review shall, wherever possible, participate. 13.12.4 Classification criteria (a) Classification criteria are guidelines to determine the appropriate classification level and consist of characteristics and typical activities and skills. (b) The characteristics are the principal guide to classification as they are designed to indicate the level of basic knowledge, comprehension of issues, problem and procedures required and the level of autonomy, accountability, supervision and training involved with the position. The characteristics of a level must be read as a whole to gain an understanding of the position and the performance requirements. Isolated characteristics should not be used to justify the classification of a position. (c) The typical activities/skills are a non-exhaustive list of activities/skills that may be comprehended within the particular level. They reflect the competencies of a particular level. They are an indicative guide only and at any particular level employees m...
Classification Process. The parties agreed to amend the job evaluation classification process. The new article outlines the process for when a new position is created, when a significant change in an existing position has occurred or when an employee/union reclassification request is advanced.
Classification Process. 2.1. New and changed positions will be classified by a panel consisting of one nominee of the CEO of SSAA and one nominee of the Employees, provided that nominees of the parties for classification purposes should be SSAA staff. The process used by the panel will be as follows: 2.1.1. the position description will be drafted, examined and updated as necessary; 2. 1.2. evaluation against the classification descriptors in Schedule B will be carried out on a case by- case basis; and
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Classification Process 

Related to Classification Process

  • Sick Leave Verification Process a. The new school district shall provide the employee with the necessary verification form at the time the employee receives confirmation of employment in the school district. b. An employee must initiate the sick leave verification process and forward the necessary verification forms to the previous school district(s) within ninety (90) days of commencing employment with the new school district. c. The previous school district(s) shall make every reasonable effort to retrieve and verify the sick leave credits which the employee seeks to port.

  • Client Classification 7.1. We shall not have an obligation to treat our clients in different classes depending on their knowledge and expertise.

  • Escalation Process If Customer believes in good faith that Customer has not received quality or timely assistance in response to a support request or that Customer urgently need to communicate important support related business issues to Service Provider’s management, Customer may escalate the support request by contacting Service Provider and requesting that the support request be escalated to work with Customer to develop an action plan.

  • Selection Process The Mortgage Loans were selected from among the outstanding one- to four-family mortgage loans in the Seller's portfolio at the related Closing Date as to which the representations and warranties set forth in Subsection 9.02 could be made and such selection was not made in a manner so as to affect adversely the interests of the Purchaser;

  • Classification Plan The Classification Plan prepared by the provincial negotiating employer group after consultation with the provincial negotiating union group for the categories of technical and paratechnical support, administrative support and labour support positions, February 7, 2011 edition, including any change made or new class added during the term of the agreement.

  • Classification For the purposes of Rules 43.3(a) and 70.5(b), the Authority shall indicate the classification of the subject matter according to the International Patent Classification. The Authority may, in addition, in accordance with Rules 43.3 and 70.5, indicate the classification of the subject matter according to any other patent classification specified in Annex E to this Agreement to the extent decided by it as set out in that Annex.

  • Application Process The employees wishing to enter into a job share arrangement will apply in writing to the Employer and forward a copy to the Union outlining the proposed commencement date of the job share, how the hours and days of work will be shared and how communication and continuity of work will be maintained. The Employer shall communicate a decision on a job share request in writing to the applicants. Applications to Job Sharing shall not be unreasonably denied.

  • Classification of Goods The classification of goods in trade between the Parties shall be in conformity with the Harmonized System.

  • Seniority Verification Process i. The new school district shall provide the employee with the necessary verification form at the time the employee achieves continuing contract status. ii. The employee must initiate the seniority verification process and forward the necessary verification forms to the previous school district(s) within ninety (90) days of receiving a continuing appointment in the new school district. iii. The previous school district(s) shall make every reasonable effort to retrieve and verify the seniority credits which the employee seeks to port.

  • Classification Review Grand Valley State University and APSS shall jointly determine the review assessment survey instrument to be used at Grand Valley State University. The parties shall maintain a Joint Review Committee, composed of three members appointed by the Human Resources Office and three members appointed by the Alliance. Bargaining unit members questioning the assigned classification of their position may do so by using the following procedure: A. Meet with the Employment Manager in the Human Resources Office to discuss the review process, changes in their job responsibilities, duties and any other process questions they may have. B. PSS member will fill out the assessment survey and email to the Employment Manager along with any other documentation that supports the request. The survey instrument will be jointly administered/reviewed by the Assessment Team (consisting of the Employment Manager and an Alliance member of the Joint Review Committee). A meeting with the PSS is scheduled for a verbal review of the documentation and to answer any questions the Assessment Team may have. The supervisor or appointing officer is encouraged to attend. If the Assessment Team believes a job site visit is warranted as a result of the survey information, they will schedule a time for a joint visit. C. The completed survey instrument shall be coded. The survey results, as determined by the Assessment Team, shall be shared with the survey participant. D. After receiving the survey results, the survey participant, if they so choose shall have the opportunity to meet with the Joint Review Committee for additional input and appeal. Any additional information shall be reviewed by the Committee, and where the Committee feels it is necessary, the survey will be recoded, in a manner mutually agreeable. E. The Joint Review Committee shall then deliberate as to the merit of the upgrade requested by the participant. If the Committee is not able to reach a consensus, the University will decide on the classification. The Alliance may appeal that decision through the arbitration procedure of the collective bargaining agreement. Professional Support Staff members may engage in the review process no more than once per year. Supervisors questioning the assigned classification of a staff member’s position shall provide supporting rationale, complete an assessment survey instrument and discuss with Manager of Employment. The Manager of Employment shall notify an Alliance Representative that a Supervisor is reviewing a staff member’s classification. The review and outcome shall be completed within 45 working days unless the Alliance Representative and Manager of Employment mutually agreed to an extension. The Alliance will be provided with the scored instrument and any supporting rationale.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!