Criminal Records. Contractor or an agent of Contractor shall perform criminal background checks on all key personnel utilizing a national criminal database acceptable to the State. Before any Contractor Personnel begin work on the Services x) such background check shall have returned a “no record” result or, y) to the extent that the result revealed that a felony record or records exist for a given individual, the associated conviction(s) shall be unrelated to the work to be performed as specified under the Equal Employment Opportunities Commission’s EEOC Enforcement Guidance regarding the employment of convicted felons issued April 25, 2012. Contractor shall provide the State with notice of proposed Contractor Key Personnel with felony or misdemeanor convictions that involve a crime against a person; a crime involving the use or misuse of computer network; a crime involving weapons, explosives or arson; a crime involving trade secret/proprietary information; a crime involving theft, dishonesty, embezzlement, breach of fiduciary duty, identity theft, or other financial-related crimes; a felony conviction for drug possession; or a crime involving the distribution or trafficking of illegal drugs and/or controlled substances.
Criminal Records. With respect to all prospective Tenants, Manager shall inquire and verify whether a prospective Tenant has any criminal records. Any conviction involving behavior that could negatively affect other Tenants shall be cause for rejection.
Criminal Records. Contractor or an agent of Contractor shall perform criminal background checks on all prospective employees utilizing a national criminal database acceptable to the State. Before any Contractor Personnel begin work on the Services x) such background check shall have returned a “no record” result or, y) to the extent that the result revealed that a felony record or records exist for a given individual, the associated conviction(s) shall be unrelated to the work to be performed as specified under the Equal Employment Opportunities Commission’s EEOC Enforcement Guidance regarding the employment of convicted felons issued April 25, 2012. Contractor shall provide the State with notice of proposed Contractor Personnel with felony or misdemeanor convictions that involve a crime against a person; a crime involving the use or misuse of computer network; a crime involving weapons, explosives or arson; a crime involving trade secret/proprietary information; a crime involving theft, dishonesty, embezzlement, breach of fiduciary duty, identity theft, or other financial-related crimes; a felony conviction for drug possession; or a crime involving the distribution or trafficking of illegal drugs and/or controlled substances. All Contractor Personnel providing or assigned to provide Services or otherwise in a position to obtain or have access to State Information, shall execute a non-disclosure agreement in a form acceptable to the State. The timing for transfer, reassignment or replacement of Contractor Personnel will be coordinated with requirements for timing and other elements of the Services so as to maintain continuity in the performance of the Services and avoid interruption or disruption to the Services or any failures to maintain Service Levels. Contractor shall assign the following Contractor staff (“Key Project Staff”), to meet the Requirements of this Contract: [INSERT] Contractor will cause the Contractor Personnel filling the Key Project Staff positions to devote full time and dedicated effort to the provision of the Services and the achievement of Service Levels required for the Services, unless a lesser allocation during certain Project Phases may be agreed in writing.
Criminal Records. Applicants with a history of arrest or conviction must disclose this in the application process and be prepared to discuss this in the home study process. Even distant, juvenile, or expunged criminal records must be disclosed. Applicants with a criminal record must provide a copy of the court disposition of their case. In addition, they need to write a detailed letter of explanation both of the event and how rehabilitation has occurred. A letter from rehabilitative services is obtained if such services were used. This information must be shared with USCIS in order to obtain approval. A decision is made on an individual case basis. Some countries will not place with an applicant who has a criminal record. Applicants on parole or probation will not be accepted until they have completed probation and satisfied all requirements of the court. CAS cannot work with clients who have substantiated child abuse complaints filed against them or who are having continuing problems with drugs and/or alcohol. Clients with histories of felony convictions or multiple criminal charges will be considered on case-by-case basis during the application process.
Criminal Records. Bureau Checks
Criminal Records. Contractor or an agent of Contractor shall perform criminal background checks on all prospective employees utilizing a national criminal database acceptable to the State. Before any Contractor Personnel begin work on the Services x) such background check shall have returned a “no record” result or,
Criminal Records. The Teacher expressly promises that the Teacher has never been convicted under the Criminal Code of Canada, or similar legislation of any jurisdiction, of an offence relating to sexual misconduct, fraud, theft or physical violence.
Criminal Records. The criminal records of all the defendants were retrieved from the Dutch Crimi- nal records Office (Justitiële Dienst). The results varied considerably. Many of the 32 defendants who could be characterized as ‘Westerners’ had extensive records of minor and major offences. They had come into contact with the judicial authorities from an early age for offences such as destruction of property, break- ing and entering, theft or fraud. Three had been arrested in the past for violating the Opium Act. Two others had been suspected of membership of a criminal organization. In addition, they all had a record of traffic offences from excessive speeding to drunk driving, driving while disqualified and driving without insur- ance. The ethnic Chinese category and the category of ‘other Asians’ stand out for a different reason, namely their lack of criminal history (except for some speed- ing offenses). Of these 140 defendants, two men from China and one man from Hong Kong had been arrested in the past for violating the Opium Act. None of the defendants had ever been charged with membership of a criminal organiza- tion. There had also been very few cases of destruction of property, breaking and entering, theft or fraud (N=3). Eight individuals had been convicted of human smuggling before. In addition, there were several specific antecedents that proba- bly related to their employment history in Chinese catering establishments. These include 34 violations of the Commodities Act and 15 violations of the For- eign Nationals (Employment) Act. Therefore the data did not show the Asian group of defendants to be typical career criminals. However, one thing must be taken into account and that is that this conclusion is based on the antecedents that the Dutch authorities knew about. In one case, convictions in other European countries were discovered. At least four Chinese defendants had human smuggling convictions in France or Belgium. This does not mean that the other Asian defendants had no convictions outside the Netherlands, but rather that it is not standard practice for the JDS to receive information about foreign convictions. Furthermore, the Dutch authori- ties do not exchange information with China. Therefore, it was not known whether the individuals in the Asian group had criminal records in the respective countries where they were born.
Criminal Records. 1 No Record Found or clear record Meets Standards 22a Traffic or vehicle code violation More than one DUI/DWI within the past three years Meets Standards(refer to MVR if included)Does Not Meet Standards 3 Misdemeanor convictions;except for the following: crimes involving weapons, violence, theft, robbery, burglary, embezzlement, dishonesty, misappropriation, fraud, or sex crimes Meets Standards
Criminal Records. 5.3.1 Information extracted from the criminal record may be requested for a clear, defined purpose (e.g. in the context of a criminal proceeding or in order to have access to certain jobs or activities). There are two proposals from the Commission on organising exchanges of information between central authorities in charge of the criminal record. Access rights to information remain defined at national level.
5.3.2 The need to improve the quality of the information exchanged on criminal records5 has become a priority for the EU, and the Commission has undertaken to work swiftly and vigorously by putting forward proposals for legislation in the short and medium term. 5 Information on convictions handed down in other Member States is currently governed by the 1959 European Convention on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters (Council of Europe). • On 13 October 2004, the Commission adopted a proposal for a Council Decision on the exchange of information extracted from the criminal record.6 It aims at securing rapid improvements in the current mechanisms for exchanging information between Member States, mainly by providing: (i) time limits for the transmission of this information; and (ii) the use of a standard form for requests and for replies. It also provides that when the central authority of the criminal record is asked for information about a person’s criminal record, it is entitled, in accordance with national law, to complete the information in its possession by addressing a request for information to the corresponding authority in another Member State. Political agreement was reached by Member States on 24 February 2005, and it should be adopted shortly. • On 25 January 2005, the Commission presented a White Paper analysing the main difficulties in exchanging information on convictions and making proposals for a computerised information exchange system.7 The Justice and Home Affairs Council of 14 April 2005 agreed on a way forward. On this basis, the Commission will table by the end of 2005 a legislative proposal setting forth an in-depth reform of the existing exchange mechanisms.
