IT Gap Analysis and Exchange IT Systems Sample Clauses

IT Gap Analysis and Exchange IT Systems. First Data developed an IT Integration Plan (See xxxx://xxx.xxxxxxxx.xxx/ITIntegrationPlan.pdf) after reviewing applicable state documents and websites and interviewing relevant staff. This work was completed when the state was still considering a State-Based Marketplace in 2011. As part of this Gap Assessment effort, meetings were held with key state stakeholders, including those that supervise the functions of DHS, OHIT, DIS, the Employee Benefits Division (which manages health insurance policies for state and public school employees and retirees), and AID, as well as external state stakeholders. The meetings were intended to provide detailed insight regarding the capabilities and functions of the current systems. The First Data team carefully evaluated the information in the documentation along with the findings of formal agency interviews, subsequent discussions with various stakeholders including those with the August 2011 IT Workgroup meeting, and other states’ research. One of the primary objectives of the interviews was to develop a comprehensive list of current systems and applications that could be used or reused to fulfill certain functional needs and integrate with the Health Benefits Marketplace, maximizing funding sources. The AHCD staff worked with the Information Technology Workgroup, the State Health Information Technology (HIT) Advisory Council and other stakeholders to collect this information. When planning for a State-Based Marketplace ended after the 2011 legislative session, AHCD set about identifying the IT support needed for the SPM model. A current Arkansas IT inventory was submitted to HHS/CMS/CCIIO on July 23, 2012. Arkansas DHS Office of Information Systems’ Director, Xxxx Xxxxx, was lead for this effort. Strategic decisions will continue to be required to shape the SPM architecture in Arkansas, especially in light of the new Private Option Medicaid-Marketplace integration policies. Our continued and strong commitment to state agency and federal collaboration is critical to the successful SPM. The Arkansas Navigator IT RFP (Level One A grant funds) was posted on March 8, 2012 with a submission due date of April 20. There were no responses to the RFP. The AHCD’s follow up with the vendor community and assessment by the Office of State Procurement (OSP) resulted in OSP issuing an Unsuccessful Bid Letter to AID. The Unsuccessful Bid Letter advised AID to issue a Request for Information (RFI) seeking recommended solutions within th...
Sample 1Sample 2
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
IT Gap Analysis and Exchange IT Systems. The Exchange IT Gap Analysis was presented in the initial Level I Establishment Grant submitted by the Commonwealth. In the second Level I Establishment Grant, the Commonwealth outlined activities that were conducted with the planning vendor, to evaluate and identify technical solution options for the KHBE. This work included Shared Functionality Analysis, Product Leverage Analysis, and Shared Service Analysis. The IT Gap Analysis that was previously conducted was an input to the system implementation RFP for KHBE’s Eligibly and Enrollment and a Plan Management and Billing Solutions (E&E and PBM).
Sample 1

Related to IT Gap Analysis and Exchange IT Systems

  • Development of Common Reporting and Exchange Model The Parties are committed to working with Partner Jurisdictions and the Organisation for Economic Co- operation and Development on adapting the terms of this Agreement and other agreements between the United States and Partner Jurisdictions to a common model for automatic exchange of information, including the development of reporting and due diligence standards for financial institutions.

  • Meteorological Data Reporting Requirement (Applicable to wind generation facilities only) The wind generation facility shall, at a minimum, be required to provide the Transmission Provider with site-specific meteorological data including: • Temperature (degrees Fahrenheit) • Wind speed (meters/second) • Wind direction (degrees from True North) • Atmosphere pressure (hectopascals) • Forced outage data (wind turbine and MW unavailability)

  • Disturbance Analysis Data Exchange The Parties will cooperate with one another and the NYISO in the analysis of disturbances to either the Large Generating Facility or the New York State Transmission System by gathering and providing access to any information relating to any disturbance, including information from disturbance recording equipment, protective relay targets, breaker operations and sequence of events records, and any disturbance information required by Good Utility Practice.

  • Loop Testing/Trouble Reporting 2.1.6.1 Think 12 will be responsible for testing and isolating troubles on the Loops. Think 12 must test and isolate trouble to the BellSouth portion of a designed/non- designed unbundled Loop (e.g., UVL-SL2, UCL-D, UVL-SL1, UCL-ND, etc.) before reporting repair to the UNE Customer Wholesale Interconnection Network Services (CWINS) Center. Upon request from BellSouth at the time of the trouble report, Think 12 will be required to provide the results of the Think 12 test which indicate a problem on the BellSouth provided Loop.

  • Exchange Control Information Exchange control reporting is required for cash transactions exceeding AUD10,000 and for international fund transfers. If an Australian bank is assisting with the transaction, the bank will file the report on your behalf.

  • Project Monitoring Reporting and Evaluation The Recipient shall furnish to the Association each Project Report not later than forty-five (45) days after the end of each calendar semester, covering the calendar semester.

  • Research Use Reporting To assure adherence to NIH GDS Policy, the PI agrees to provide annual Progress Updates as part of the annual Project Renewal or Project Close-out processes, prior to the expiration of the one (1) year data access period. The PI who is seeking Renewal or Close-out of a project agree to complete the appropriate online forms and provide specific information such as how the data have been used, including publications or presentations that resulted from the use of the requested dataset(s), a summary of any plans for future research use (if the PI is seeking renewal), any violations of the terms of access described within this Agreement and the implemented remediation, and information on any downstream intellectual property generated from the data. The PI also may include general comments regarding suggestions for improving the data access process in general. Information provided in the progress updates helps NIH evaluate program activities and may be considered by the NIH GDS governance committees as part of NIH’s effort to provide ongoing stewardship of data sharing activities subject to the NIH GDS Policy.

  • Project Monitoring Reporting Evaluation A. The Project Implementing Entity shall monitor and evaluate the progress of its activities under the Project and prepare Project Reports in accordance with the provisions of Section 5.08(b) of the General Conditions and on the basis of indicators agreed with the Bank. Each such report shall cover the period of one

  • Information Technology Accessibility Standards Any information technology related products or services purchased, used or maintained through this Grant must be compatible with the principles and goals contained in the Electronic and Information Technology Accessibility Standards adopted by the Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board under Section 508 of the federal Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. §794d), as amended. The federal Electronic and Information Technology Accessibility Standards can be found at: xxxx://xxx.xxxxxx-xxxxx.xxx/508.htm.

  • Requirement to Utilize HUB Compliance Reporting System Pursuant to Texas Administrative Code, Title 34, Part 1, Sections 20.285(f) and 20.287(b), TFC administers monthly administration HSP-PAR compliance monitoring through its HUB Compliance Reporting System commonly known as B2G. PSP and PSP’s subcontractors/subconsultants shall submit required PAR information into the B2G system. Any delay in the timely submission of PAR information into the B2G system will be treated as an invoicing error subject to dispute under Texas Government Code Section 2251.042.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.