Moderation. 1. The Parties agree to cooperate with a view to promoting moderation in dialogues when addressing issues of mutual concern.
2. The Parties shall agree, where applicable, to further the value of moderation in regional and international fora.
3. The Parties agree to cooperate on promoting moderation, including by facilitating and supporting relevant activities, as well as exchanging best practices, information and experience.
Moderation. External moderation is conducted by the district officials to ensure consistency among schools. Internal moderation is conducted at school level by the principal and the SMT.
Moderation. 14.1 In line with our quality assurance processes, we moderate assessments completed during Thrive training courses to ensure that the appropriate standards are maintained. It may be, as a result, that particular delegates are asked, over a reasonable period, to complete some blended learning, carry out an exercise on Thrive-Online or some other activity.
Moderation. Skeepers undertakes, when collecting reviews, not to make any selection of consumers based on their type or the frequency of their Purchases. All consumers will therefore be surveyed. The Client is informed of the collection and presence of negative reviews that may come from consumers. Under no circumstances shall Skeepers interfere in the relationship between the Client and the consumer. The Client shall be responsible for managing any difficulties encountered with the latter following the collection of a review. Skeepers shall not interfere in any way in the relationship between the Client and the consumer. In no way may it be held liable in the event that consumers do not respond to requests for reviews, in the event of a decrease in the number of visitors, a decrease in orders or the occurrence of a problem related to the publication of a negative review or the fulfilment of an Order. The moderation process is divided into two stages: automatic Moderation followed, where applicable, by manual moderation, according to the Transparency Charter, with which each Party undertakes to comply in all respects. Skeepers undertakes to comply with all of these provisions in order to maintain the reliability of published Customer reviews. Skeepers also offers a customized moderation model as an option available to the Client.
Moderation. The NRL will take no responsibility for any comments posted by users. Comments posted on the Site will not be pre-moderated (with the exception of some filtering for offensive terms). The NRL will endeavour to remove any offensive or inappropriate comments at the first available opportunity. As such, the NRL reserves the right to remove any comment or discussion thread deemed to be offensive or inappropriate.
Moderation. We do not undertake to review all Content, and we expressly disclaim any duty or obligation to undertake any monitoring or review of any Content. Although we have no obligation to screen, edit, or monitor Content, we may: ● delete or remove Content or refuse to communicate any Content at any time and for any reason with or without notice, including for any violations of applicable law or these Terms; ● terminate or suspend your access to all or part of the Services, temporarily or permanently, if the Content is reasonably likely, in our sole determination, to violate applicable law or these Terms; ● take any action with respect to the Content that is necessary or appropriate, in Viva’s sole discretion, to ensure compliance with applicable law and these Terms, or to protect Company’s rights, or to protect any third-party rights, including third-party intellectual property and privacy rights (e.g., providing information to copyright owners in furtherance of Digital Millennium Copyright Act takedown requests); and ● as permitted by law, cooperate fully with any law enforcement authorities or court order requesting or directing us to disclose the identity or other information of anyone communicating any Content on or through the Services.
Moderation. Did the process moderate the effect of the treatment on the outcome? • Moderation focused questions seek to establish whether the causal effect of the intervention varies amongst groups within the population (contextual variables). • These questions help to determine who is likely to benefit from the intervention and amongst those who benefit, which group of the population have the largest benefit. Processes of trial conduct and context could pose either questions related to mediation or moderation. Processes related to delivery of treatment could pose questions related to effect modification and processes related to mechanisms of action of the treatment could pose questions related to mediation. In essence, this grouping of processes not only maps out the different processes conceptually, but also provides guidance on the type of causal questions that could be asked and by extension the methods that could be deployed to study these processes. All of these would come into play if causal inference was an aim of conducting pe but the findings of the review seem to suggest that causal inference was of little interest. This was most evident in the heavy use of qualitative methods among the studies reviewed. Qualitative and quantitative methods differ starkly in their perspectives of reality where the former considers reality to be a social construct, shared by many individuals and the latter considers the existence of a single reality (Guba & Lincoln, 1981). This is an oversimplified characterisation of the perspective of reality of the two sets of methods. However, this was done to highlight how different each set of methods considers to be reality and by extension the means that each deploy to understand and find out about this reality. Qualitative studies typically following along one of the five approaches (narrative, phenomeno- logical, grounded theory, ethnographic and case study research) and each approach considers reality in different ways and holds different assumptions (Xxxxxxxx, 2007). The findings from qualitative studies can be considered as detailed accounts of this reality. For example, in the phenomenological approach, it considers reality to be informed by the collective experiences of many individuals as they go through certain phenomena or events. The aim of a study employing a phenomenological approach would then be to give a detailed account of this collective experi- ence that is unique to this phenomenon. Such an account is a subjective...
Moderation. All Orders and Information are subject to preliminary moderation by LawCoster. The decision on the possibility of posting of the Order, activation/continuation of Selection, is vested in LawCoster. Trustware Consulting LTD is entitled at any time at its sole discretion to amend the rules and procedure of using the Platform, to deny a Counterparty the right of using the service and Platform on the basis of any sensible reason or discontinue on a temporary or permanent basis the support of the service and Platform (in full or in part) with or without notification. FINANCIAL TERMS OF USING THE PLATFORM The service is provided to you free of charge. You pay the remuneration for the rendered Services to the Provider under the Contract that you conclude with them directly. CONFIDENTIALITY OBLIGATION Hereby you accept the obligation in respect of ensuring confidentiality of the Information obtained on the Platform, including, without limitation: any Information about the Candidates, their owners, employees, Representatives, pricing policy, financial and commercial information. You recognize as confidential any and all Information received on the Platform by you, your employees, officials, workers, or Representatives. Any Confidential Information obtained by you within the framework of this Agreement may be used only for the comprehensive assessment of Selection, as well as the implementation of future cooperation in respect of the Order. The information obtained on the Platform shall not be disclosed to third persons without obtaining the express prior written consent from the owner of such Information. Your obligations in respect of keeping secret the information obtained on the Platform are valid during 5 (five) years from the moment of receipt of such information. Upon request from LawCoster, you undertake to promptly return and/or destroy any Information obtained on the Platform, and to provide evidence of such return or destruction.
Moderation. 13.1. This Website is not moderated. We will not be responsible as author, editor or publisher of any uploaded content by anyone and we expressly exclude Our liability for any loss or damage arising from the use of the uploaded material by any person.
Moderation. A particular form of Centre Assessment Standards Scrutiny through which the marking of assessments by Centres is monitored to make sure it meets required standards and through which adjustments to a Centre’s marking are made, where required, to ensure that results are based on the required standard. Moderation takes place before final results are issued under Condition H6.1. Condition H2.2(a) allows us to specify requirements and guidance in relation to the Centre Assessment Standards Scrutiny undertaken by an awarding organisation. We set out below our requirements for the purposes of Condition H2.2(a). These requirements apply to arrangements for Centre Assessment Standards Scrutiny other than Moderation. An awarding organisation must ensure that, through its Centre Assessment Standards Scrutiny, it takes all reasonable steps effectively to determine whether or not –
