Production Readiness Review Sample Clauses

Production Readiness Review. The production Readiness Review (PRR) shall be performed to formally evaluate the Contractor’s production readiness and identify existing or projected manufacturing problems and areas of risk. The Contractor shall demonstrate progress in the following areas: (1) attaining the program’s production goals, (2) resolving manufacturing problems (or that a plan for their resolution acceptable to the Government has been developed), and (3) mitigating all production risks. The Contractor shall show that the system design has included those key production factors necessary to ensure the system can be acquired on schedule. C.6.2.5.1 The initial production readiness review shall be conducted at the Contractor’s facility during the IPT meeting. At the Government’s discretion, follow-on production program reviews may be held quarterly at the Contractor’s facility. C.6.2.5.2 The review dates shall be Contractor-proposed, Government-approved, and incorporated into the program schedule. The agenda of the PRR shall include, as applicable, at least the following considerations: a. A Manufacturing Program Status to include the overall manufacturing system and detailed factors such as: manufacturing organization, responsibilities, facilities and equipment manufacturing methods, and production flow. b. A status review of all production efforts for schedule considerations. c. The identity of open production concerns which require additional direction/effort to minimize risk to the production program. d. A status review of production engineering efforts, tooling and test equipment demonstrations, and proofing of new materials, processes, methods, special tooling, and test equipment. e. A status of the hazard list from Environmental, Safety and Health (ESH) analysis. f. The status of long lead items for production, if any. g. The status of quality assurance/control measures.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Production Readiness Review. A Readiness Review is to be performed at key operations (determined by Xxxxxx Machine Company and the Supplier) if • Starting a new production run or • A lapse in production exceeds two years This may include a documentation review and/or process witness
Production Readiness Review. The Contractor shall host a Production Readiness Review (PRR) with the Government prior to commencement of the First Article / Production activities demonstrating readiness to commence (CDRL A022). The PRR shall demonstrate that the production design, planning, and the associated preparations for producing the system have progressed to the point where a manufacturing commitment can be made without incurring unacceptable risk of breaching the established thresholds of cost, schedule, performance, or other criteria. The Contractor shall notify the Government at least three weeks prior to the date the meeting will be held.
Production Readiness Review. (Applicable to CLIN 0009). The Contractor shall complete a successful Production Readiness Review (PRR) no later than four (4) months after contract award (see Defense Acquisition Guidebook 4.3.3.4.7, Production Readiness Review (PRR) xxxxx://xxx.xxx.xxx). The Contractor shall not proceed to production without successful completion of the PRR. The Contractor shall identify existing and projected manufacturing problems and areas of risk and shall assess the progress in the Contractor's planning to achieve production rates required under the delivery schedule. The following areas shall be addressed, at a minimum:  Industrial Resources o Plant Facilities, Production Equipment, Test Equipment, and Tooling  Plant capacity to meet production rate  Available Surge Capacity  GFE, special tooling, production equipment has been identified  Needed Plant modernization, productivity enhancements has been accomplished o Personnel  Available skilled production manpower available  Personnel training and certification available and completed  Production Engineering and Planning o Production Plan developed and in place o Production schedule developed and meets delivery requirements o Manufacturing methods and processes in place o Alternative production approaches available to contingency needs o Drawings and work instructions are in place and available o Configuration Management is adequate for production o Provisions have been made for determining producibility and cost impacts of engineering changes o Production Manager in place with authority and responsibility for manufacture and delivery o Management information system in place to provide production status o Plans to procure, assemble, test, properly handle, and protect fiber optic cables in accordance with drawing number 8479889 in the Technical Data Package  Materials and Purchased Parts o Complete an accurate Bill of Material in-place o Make or Buy decisions have been made o Long lead items identified o Sole source items identified o GFE/GFM identified o Material control/inventory system is adequate o Material procurement plan provides  Effective procedures to determine material needs, lead times, & delivery schedule  Criteria for selection of subcontractors and suppliers in place  Multi-sourcing of critical items  Economic lot size orders  Visibility and control of vendors and subcontractors  Quality Assurance Plans and Procedures o A Quality Assurance function in place o Quality Program in accordanc...
Production Readiness Review. The Contractor shall successfully complete a Production Readiness Review (PRR) prior to the authorization by the Contracting Officer for the Start of Construction (SOC). SOC is defined as the commencement of steel-cutting for the ship. The purpose of the PRR is to demonstrate to the Government that proper management, engineering, and production requirements are adequately defined and implemented and that design maturity supports initiation of the construction phase. The Contractor shall notify the Government of the PRR date forty-five (45) days prior to PRR. The PRR shall be held at least fifteen (15) days prior to SOC. The PRR may coincide with a DR. The PRR shall demonstrate the design is sufficiently mature to start construction, the flow of Production Information will support production, and the status of material ordering and delivery will support the proposed build schedule. Any potential risk areas shall be identified and mitigation plans discussed. The Government should be satisfied that all requirements specified in the System Specification, Attachment J-1, Scientific Mission Systems Specification, Attachment J-6, and references thereof have been incorporated into the design. Within seven (7) days from the PRR, the Contracting Officer will notify the Contractor whether or not SOC is authorized. The Contractor shall prepare Production Readiness Review Agenda, Presentation, and Minutes (DI-021). The following represents the minimal exit criteria, and forms the basis for the Government’s determination for “Start of Construction” authorization: 1. Regulatory Body Requirements: In accordance with the ABS rules for vessels built under survey, the Contractor shall present the status for submittal of Plans showing the arrangements, scantlings, details of principal parts of the hull structure and welding details prior to commencement of construction. The status of the Plans and all ABS comments shall be addressed by an ABS representative.
Production Readiness Review. The contractor shall schedule and conduct a Production Readiness Review in accordance with the PSS and Appendix D. Problems identified during the review shall be documented and corrected in accordance with the PSS and Appendix D.
Production Readiness Review. (PRR). The PRR affirms the design configuration, production, manufacturing processes, supplier base and facilities are ready to enter production. The contractor shall participate in a PRR with the Government at the contractors facility 60 calendar days after the Post-Test Configuration Design Review in E.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Production Readiness Review

  • Project Review A. Programmatic Allowances 1. If FEMA determines that the entire scope of an Undertaking conforms to one or more allowances in Appendix B of this Agreement, with determinations for Tier II Allowances being made by SOI-qualified staff, FEMA shall complete the Section 106 review process by documenting this determination in the project file, without SHPO review or notification. 2. If the Undertaking involves a National Historic Landmark (NHL), FEMA shall notify the SHPO, participating Tribe(s), and the NPS NHL Program Manager of the NPS Midwest Regional Office that the Undertaking conforms to one or more allowances. FEMA shall provide information about the proposed scope of work for the Undertaking and the allowance(s) enabling FEMA’s determination. 3. If FEMA determines any portion of an Undertaking’s scope of work does not conform to one or more allowances listed in Appendix B, FEMA shall conduct expedited or standard Section 106 review, as appropriate, for the entire Undertaking in accordance with Stipulation II.B, Expedited Review for Emergency Undertakings, or Stipulation II.C, Standard Project Review. 4. Allowances may be revised and new allowances may be added to this Agreement in accordance with Stipulation IV.A.3, Amendments. B. Expedited Review for Emergency Undertakings

  • BUSINESS REVIEWS Supplier must perform a minimum of one business review with Sourcewell per contract year. The business review will cover sales to Participating Entities, pricing and contract terms, administrative fees, sales data reports, performance issues, supply issues, customer issues, and any other necessary information.

  • Log Reviews All systems processing and/or storing PHI COUNTY discloses to 11 CONTRACTOR or CONTRACTOR creates, receives, maintains, or transmits on behalf of COUNTY 12 must have a routine procedure in place to review system logs for unauthorized access.

  • Contract Review Agent shall have reviewed all material contracts of Borrowers including, without limitation, leases, union contracts, labor contracts, vendor supply contracts, license agreements and distributorship agreements and such contracts and agreements shall be satisfactory in all respects to Agent;

  • Design Review ‌ (a) Where so specified in Schedule A (Scope of Goods and Services) or as otherwise instructed by the City, the Supplier shall submit design-related Documentation for review by the City, and shall not proceed with work on the basis of such design Documentation until the City’s approval of such Documentation has been received in writing. (b) None of: (i) the submission of Documentation to the City by the Supplier; (ii) its examination by or on behalf of the City; or (iii) the making of any comment thereon (including any approval thereof) shall in any way relieve the Supplier of any of its obligations under this Agreement or of its duty to take reasonable steps to ensure the accuracy and correctness of such Documentation, and its suitability to the matter to which it relates.

  • Business Review Meetings In order to maintain the relationship between the Department and the Contractor, each quarter the Department may request a business review meeting. The business review meeting may include, but is not limited to, the following: • Successful completion of deliverables • Review of the Contractor’s performance • Review of minimum required reports • Addressing of any elevated Customer issues • Review of continuous improvement ideas that may help lower total costs and improve business efficiencies.

  • Utilization Review NOTE: The Utilization Review process does not apply to Services that are not covered by Blue Shield because of a coverage determination made by Medicare. State law requires that health plans disclose to Subscribers and health plan providers the process used to authorize or deny health care services un- der the plan. Blue Shield has completed documen- tation of this process ("Utilization Review"), as required under Section 1363.5 of the California Health and Safety Code. To request a copy of the document describing this Utilization Review pro- cess, call the Customer Service Department at the telephone number indicated on your Identification Card.

  • REVIEW OF WORK The Consultant shall permit the City, its agents and/or employees to review, at any time, all work performed pursuant to the terms of this Agreement at any stage of the work;

  • Calibration The comparison of a measurement system or device of unverified accuracy with a measurement system of known and greater accuracy to detect deviation of the unverified measurement system from required performance specifications (of the unverified measurement system or device) and to quantify all measured values to applicable units of the international system of units.

  • Post Review With respect to each contract not governed by paragraph 2 of this Part, the procedures set forth in paragraph 4 of Appendix 1 to the Guidelines shall apply.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!