Risk Evaluation Sample Clauses

Risk Evaluation a. Prohibited/High Risk Merchants and Activities. Entities classified in certain industries or accepting Transactions for certain prohibited activities do not qualify for the American Express OnePoint Program, but may qualify for our standard American Express Card acceptance program. Please contact our agent with any questions about those risk evaluation procedures under the program.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (6)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Risk Evaluation. The Offeror’s proposal submitted in response to Technical Factor 1 will be assigned a risk rating based on the proposal risks associated with:  Meeting proposed technical metrics and performance criteria  Probability that the product delivery schedule meets the proposed timeline  Manufacturing approach is sufficient to meet the delivery timelines defined in Section F of the solicitation and submitted IMS, while producing components that meet the SOW and Performance Specification requirements. The assigned Overall Technical Risk will be based on the definitions in Table M2 (above).
Sample 1Sample 2
Risk Evaluation. On the basis of the review of the information described above, and relying solely thereon and upon the knowledge and experience of the Holder in business and financial matters, the Holder has evaluated the merits and risks of investment in the Note and/or the Shares and has determined that he is both willing and able to undertake the economic risk of this investment.
Sample 1Sample 2
Risk Evaluation. The CYCLADES project will develop the service component of an open virtual archive environment. Such component will be built on top of an archive component. The archive component is being developed by the US Open Archive initiative. Therefore, the two activities are complementary in that they address two different but interacting aspects of an open archives environment: the archive environment and the service environment. Obviously, there exists a dependency of the CYCLADES project on the achievements and results of the OAi. We want, here, to evaluate the risk which is inherent in this dependency relationship between the two activities and to identify effective recovery actions. In order to make more tight the collaboration between CYCLADES and OAi we have agreed with one of the principal investigators of OAi, Cornell University (Dr Xxxx Xxxxxx), that a US proposal for funding had to be submitted to NSF (in response to the Cultural Heritage Applications Unit of the EC DG Information Society invitation for EU-US multi-partner, multi-national project proposals). The objectives of this twin proposal (see Annex 1) are to: Support the evolution and organisational stabilisation of the Open Archives initiative (OAi). Evaluate the effectiveness and cross-domain applicability of OAi conventions. Investigate and develop collection and service meta-data standards. Due to a lack of synchronization between the NSF and IST Calls this proposal has not yet been submitted. To face this lack of synchronization between the starting dates of the two projects the following recovery action is underway. Cornell University will submit a small “unsolicited” proposal to NSF as an extension of an ongoing DL project run by Cornell and funded by NSF. NSF has guaranteed that the evaluation and approval of this proposal will be done by October 2000. This means that Cornell could be able to collaborate with the CYCLADES project since its initial phases and thus guarantee coherence between the two projects. However, even in the worst case that the US proposal is not approved for funding CYCLADES can be equally carried out efficiently. Indeed, since the service environment will run on top of the archive environment this latter must be operational in order to be able to conduct a meaningful experimentation of the proposed service environment. The OAi has already defined agreements (technical mechanisms and organizational structures) to support interoperability of e-print archives. These agr...
Sample 1
Risk Evaluation. The SUPPLIER shall carry out a risk evaluation of the product to be delivered and of the manufacturing process. The risk evaluation is a part of the documentation the SUPPLIER is obliged to maintain; for archiving and retention, the defined retention periods apply. Both Design- and Process FMEA shall be required as risk analysis where a SUPPLIER delivers products manufactured in accordance with his own construction drawings. Otherwise, a process FMEA shall be undertaken. The SUPPLIER shall maintain a procedure to identify the hazards and evaluate the risks associated with its delivered products throughout their entire lifecycle. Compliance with this procedure shall be regularly monitored and adjusted if necessary. Where the SUPPPLIER identifies risks that are likely to affect the CUSTOMER’s product, it shall inform the CUSTOMER promptly and in writing. This shall also apply to risks which have been identified or which have arisen in similar or similarly constructed products. Decisions on any necessary corrective actions and information related to products in the field / recalls / notification of authorities shall rest with the CUSTOMER. The SUPPLIER shall maintain a system capturing failures / non-conformities as a means to ascertain weaknesses of products or processes. The system shall be used to define all necessary corrective and preventive actions (CAPA=Corrective and Preventive Action).
Sample 1
Risk Evaluation. The contractor shall state responsibility and procedures to determine the significance, intrinsic worth, and critically of the contractor operations in a manner that proper risk management techniques can be applied and notable safety risk reported to the JSC Health, Safety, and Environmental Compliance Office. The contractor will discuss ranking the risk in a severity classification. Risk evaluation tasks, managing the risks, and documenting the results will be discussed.
Sample 1
Risk Evaluation. Include an evaluation of the risk of hydraulic fracturing, erosion, contamination of drainage features, heave, or any other damage. This should include:
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Risk Evaluation. Article 57 The employer shall issue a general regulation evaluating the risks associated with possible types of dangers and damages for all jobs at the work place and in the working environment, and shall establish manner and measures for removing them. In the case of any new danger and damage, and change in the level of risk in the working process, the employer shall make amendments to the general regulation referred to in paragraph 1 above and remove such risks.
Sample 1
Risk Evaluation 
Sample 1

Related to Risk Evaluation

  • Trust Evaluation As of the Evaluation Time (a) on the last Business Day of each year, (b) on the day on which any Unit is tendered for redemption and (c) on any other day desired by the Trustee or requested by the Depositor, the Trustee shall: Add (i) all moneys on deposit in a Trust (excluding (1) cash, cash equivalents or Letters of Credit deposited pursuant to Section 2.01 hereof for the purchase of Contract Securities, unless such cash or Letters of Credit have been deposited in the Interest and Principal Accounts because of failure to apply such moneys to the purchase of Contract Securities pursuant to the provisions of Sections 2.01, 3.03 and 3.04 hereof and (2) moneys credited to the Reserve Account pursuant to Section 3.05 hereof), plus (ii) the aggregate Evaluation of all Securities (including Contract Securities and Reinvestment Securities) on deposit in such Trust as is determined by the Evaluator (such evaluations shall take into account and itemize separately (i) the cash on hand in the Trust or moneys in the process of being collected from matured interest coupons or bonds matured or called for redemption prior to maturity, (ii) the value of each issue of the Securities in the Trust on the bid side of the market as determined by the Evaluator pursuant to Section 4.01, and (iii) interest accrued thereon not subject to collection and distribution). For each such Evaluation there shall be deducted from the sum of the above (i) amounts representing any applicable taxes or governmental charges payable out of the respective Trust and for which no deductions shall have previously been made for the purpose of addition to the Reserve Account, (ii) amounts representing estimated accrued fees of the Trust and expenses of such Trust including but not limited to unpaid fees and expenses of the Trustee, the Evaluator, the Supervisor, the Depositor and bond counsel, in each case as reported by the Trustee to the Evaluator on or prior to the date of evaluation, (iii) any moneys identified by the Trustee, as of the date of the Evaluation, as held for distribution to Unitholders of record as of a Record Date or for payment of the Redemption Value of Units tendered prior to such date and (iv) unpaid organization costs in the estimated amount per Unit set forth in the Prospectus. The resulting figure is herein called a "Trust Fund Evaluation." The value of the pro rata share of each Unit of the respective Trust determined on the basis of any such evaluation shall be referred to herein as the "Unit Value."

  • Risk Analysis The Custodian will provide the Fund with a Risk Analysis with respect to Securities Depositories operating in the countries listed in Appendix B. If the Custodian is unable to provide a Risk Analysis with respect to a particular Securities Depository, it will notify the Fund. If a new Securities Depository commences operation in one of the Appendix B countries, the Custodian will provide the Fund with a Risk Analysis in a reasonably practicable time after such Securities Depository becomes operational. If a new country is added to Appendix B, the Custodian will provide the Fund with a Risk Analysis with respect to each Securities Depository in that country within a reasonably practicable time after the addition of the country to Appendix B.

  • Evaluation 1. The purposes of evaluation provisions include providing employees with feedback, and employers and employees with the opportunity and responsibility to address concerns. Where a grievance proceeds to arbitration, the arbitrator must consider these purposes, and may relieve on just and reasonable terms against breaches of time limits or other procedural requirements.

  • Risk Mitigation Transfer Agent shall use commercially reasonable efforts to manage, control and remediate any threats identified in the Risk Assessments that it believes are likely to result in material unauthorized access, copying, use, processing, disclosure, alteration, transfer, loss or destruction of Fund Data, consistent with the Objective, and commensurate with the sensitivity of the Fund Data and the complexity and scope of the activities of Transfer Agent pursuant to the Agreement.

  • Independent Evaluation Buyer is an experienced and knowledgeable investor in the oil and gas business. Buyer has been advised by and has relied solely on its own expertise and legal, tax, title, reservoir engineering, environmental and other professional counsel concerning this transaction, the Properties, the value thereof and title thereto.

  • Risk Management Except as required by applicable law or regulation, (i) implement or adopt any material change in its interest rate and other risk management policies, procedures or practices; (ii) fail to follow its existing policies or practices with respect to managing its exposure to interest rate and other risk; or (iii) fail to use commercially reasonable means to avoid any material increase in its aggregate exposure to interest rate risk.

  • Quantitative Analysis Quantitative analysts develop and apply financial models designed to enable equity portfolio managers and fundamental analysts to screen potential and current investments, assess relative risk and enhance performance relative to benchmarks and peers. To the extent that such services are to be provided with respect to any Account which is a registered investment company, Categories 3, 4 and 5 above shall be treated as “investment advisory services” for purposes of Section 5(b) of the Agreement.”

  • Risk Assessments a. Risk Assessment - Transfer Agent shall, at least annually, perform risk assessments that are designed to identify material threats (both internal and external) against Fund Data, the likelihood of those threats occurring and the impact of those threats upon the Transfer Agent organization to evaluate and analyze the appropriate level of information security safeguards (“Risk Assessments”).

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.