FINANCIAL SUMMARY. The total maximum amount of disbursement pertinent to this contract is Contract Amount. Contract overruns will not be paid.
FINANCIAL SUMMARY. Tables 8 and 9 display aggregate financial information and define the first advanced payment.
FINANCIAL SUMMARY. Upon request of the Commission, the Sponsor shall provide to the Commission a financial summary of the total funds expended. The summary must show the source of funds and the specific items for which they were expended.
FINANCIAL SUMMARY. Total spend on DFG and HRA adaptations by district councils within the county has been of the order of an average of £6.2m per year in recent years. In addition, HCC funds minor works: £378k was budgeted for these in 2014/15. In the same year, District Council staffing costs totalled an estimated £624k, with HCC’s Housing Occupational Therapy service delivered via Serco costing £804k. A number of national developments created an opportunity to review the delivery of DFG within the county area and consider how to integrate provision of help with home adaptations across housing, health and social care system. Table 2 – 6 below provide a summary of the current cost and funding position, and proposed ongoing cost of the Shared Home Improvement Agency Service. Table 2: Existing Cost & Funding - District Average Annual Cost of Home Improvement Services Table 2 reflects the following Gross and net costs of running the Home Improvement service, and details how this is financed in each authority. Table 2: District Average Annual Cost of DFG and Home Improvement Related Spend The table below summarises the average annual cost of DFG and Home Improvement related services in all Hertfordshire district authorities. BBC DBC EHC HBC NHDC SADC SBC TRDC WBC WHBC Districts total £000s £000s £000s £000s £000s £000s £000s £000s £000s £000s £000s Running Costs 111 66 113 82 50 70 80 94 111 123 900 Disabled Facilities Spend 450 602 384 435 605 701 350 418 386 442 4,773 Gross cost of service 561 668 497 517 655 771 930 512 497 565 6,173 Net cost of service 561 634 497 517 605 771 930 512 497 565 6,088 Funded by Grant ( 314) ( 366) ( 293) ( 295) ( 360) ( 291) ( 305) ( 250) ( 279) ( 316) ( 3,070) Revenue resources ( 56) ( 32) ( 113) ( 82) ( 12) ( 70) ( 80) 0 ( 36) ( 123) ( 604) Other capital financing (usually capital receipts) ( 191) ( 236) ( 90) ( 140) ( 232) ( 409) ( 45) ( 262) ( 183) ( 126) ( 1,914) Total financing ( 561) ( 634) ( 497) ( 517) ( 605) ( 771) ( 930) ( 512) ( 497) ( 565) ( 6,088) Notes Baseline figures have been investigated thoroughly since the outline business case and updated where appropriate; the most significant changes are that running costs have been amended from £539k to an increased figure of £900k. This is following the verification of district information, and the inclusion in running costs of system costs, overheads, and travel costs, where previously only staffing costs were known. There is differing treatment among districts regarding whether ...
FINANCIAL SUMMARY. In order to follow the disbursement cycles, the columns are divided into biannual groups (two quarters), and the rows are grouped by the work packages. · First, choose the relevant year and quarter by clicking the + on top of the sheet · Second, choose the relevant work package(s) by clicking the + on the left-hand side Once every six months the projected expenditure for the upcoming period should be completed. Please note that the projected expenditure cannot exceed six months. Please fill in the actual expenditure for the relevant quarter and the relevant sub-work package. Please include only expenditure that has actually been incurred and reimbursed during the quarterly period.
FINANCIAL SUMMARY. Over the life of this contract, purchasing cards have replaced the use of purchase orders as the method to authorize and process eligible low-value transactions, consistent with the Auditor General’s recommendations made in 2017. To account for this increase in activity, a $7.368 million upset limit increase is required to address anticipated spending to the end of the contract term on March 31, 2023, inclusive of an additional $0.250 million provision for one- time emergency requirements related to the TTC’s COVID-19 response, as summarized in the table below. The contract upset limit was based on historical spending rates and a 25% growth contingency, with annual purchasing card spending anticipated to be $3.3 million annually. However, with the program’s expansion, spending activity has now reached approximately $6.1 million per year. This is broadly consistent with the decrease in non-stock purchase order spending which has declined from approximately $3.5 million annually at the start of the contract to approximately $0.75 million per year currently. Based on the projected spend rate for the period ending March 31, 2022, the requested amendment to the upset limit anticipates an average monthly spending rate of $0.533 million or $6.4 million for the last year of the contract term. There is no financial impact arising from this requested increase, as the upset limit increase is substantially a re-allocation from non-stock purchase orders to the purchasing card contract The financial impact is limited to an allowance of $0.250 million to address any emergency expenses that may arise as part of the TTC’s COVID-19 response that would be processed using a purchasing card. Funding for COVID-19 response expenses are incorporated in the total COVID impacts included in the 2022 Operating Budget approved by the Board on December 20, 2021, and to be considered by City Council on February 17, 2022. The shifting of small purchase requirements to purchasing cards has resulted in an increase in annual rebates received by the TTC, from approximately $33,000 in the first year of the contract to $60,000 per year currently. Given that the current contract was established as a joint purchasing venture with the City of Toronto (City) and its Agencies and Corporations, the annual rebate percentages offered by the PCard provider are based on the aggregate TTC and City expenditures. PCARD SPEND METRICS Year Actual Reporting Period Number of Cards in Circulation Y/Y Progress A...
FINANCIAL SUMMARY. The Financial Summary Report (FSR) displays financial details of the Occupancy Agreement (space and rates paid). An FSR is generated for a specified time period or entire OA Term. Each page of the report contains data for the sequential fiscal year or OA year or part of a FY or OA year. eOA features a search section to generate Financial Summary documents. This functionality is accessible from the Left Menu navigation.
FINANCIAL SUMMARY. The Grant amount is initially calculated based on Xxxxxxx’s estimate of the total Planning Costs. Agency will withhold the final payment of the estimated grant funds, up to 100 percent, until submission of the Final Report. Upon receipt of the Final Report, Agency will recalculate the Grant amount using actual Planning Costs, and Agency’s disbursement of the Grant Monies may be reduced as a result. So that Agency may calculate the disbursement, provide the following information: Actual Total Planning Cost: $ (replaces the “Estimated Planning Cost” from Xxxxxxx’s application) Other Government Incentives & Grants Available: $ (directly related to the Project; not including this Grant; identify source(s) and amount(s)) Prepared By: Name, Title Date Prepared: MM/DD/YYYY EXHIBIT D Financial Reporting Guidance Promptly following completion of the project planning, the Grantee must submit an account of total Planning Costs that identifies all funding sources and includes all receipts, paid invoices, cancelled checks (if applicable), and bank loan or promissory note documentation. It should also include an itemized list of equipment and incurred Planning Costs. If they pay property taxes, Grantee must also provide proof that Grantee or owner of the Project location, if other than Grantee, is current on the property taxes for the Project’s location. If the total Planning Costs are $50,000 or more, Grantee must include an independent Certified Public Accountant’s attestation to the validity and accuracy of the account. The following guidance is intended to help Grantee comply with these requirements.
FINANCIAL SUMMARY. Silvaco shall be compensated for its expenses for the efforts defined in this Statement of Work as outlined in Appendix E-2 at the rate of [*] USD per person hour
FINANCIAL SUMMARY. Silvaco shall be compensated for its expenses for the efforts described in this Statement of Work as outlined in Appendix E-2 at the rate of [*] USD per person hour. NXP Support may also be required during the execution of this project and NXP shall be compensated for its efforts according to terms outlined in Appendix B-2. Silvaco will deliver at the end of project, a report that sets forth the number of NXP engineering hours that were required.
