Work Plan; Budget Sample Clauses
Work Plan; Budget. (a) The Device Development Agreement, to be entered into by the Parties subject to Section 4.4, shall contain a work plan mutually agreed upon by the Parties to govern all activities to be conducted by the Parties leading up to initiation of Technology Transfer and through completion of Technology Transfer (the “Work Plan”), including agreed upon objectives, target timelines and a budget of estimated FTE Costs and Out-of-Pocket Costs (each as defined below) for the work needed to be done, supply forecast, pre-clinical and clinical development activities anticipated to be conducted by Novo Nordisk, and planned tasks and resource allocations (including establishing a joint core project team) by each Party with the goal of conducting the Licensed Product scale up and other mutually-agreed Technology Transfer activities until completion of Technology Transfer.
(b) Subject to a budget approved, in writing, by both Parties, Novo Nordisk will pay ▇▇▇▇▇▇ for all of ▇▇▇▇▇▇’s out of pocket costs and expenses (“Out-of-Pocket Costs”) and internal costs for personnel at the FTE rate set forth below (“FTE Costs”), incurred after the Effective Date associated with device development, formulation, scale up, manufacture, supply and Technology CONFIDENTIAL MATERIALS OMITTED AND FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION. DOUBLE ASTERISKS [**] DENOTE OMISSIONS. Page 18 of 52 Transfer activities under this Agreement or the Device Development Agreement until completion of the Technology Transfer. Zosano shall conduct development and transfer activities not covered under the Work Plan (or after the completion of Technology Transfer) reasonably requested by Novo Nordisk, to the extent that the conduct of such activities does not conflict with ▇▇▇▇▇▇’s internal operations and provided that Novo Nordisk reimburses Zosano for ▇▇▇▇▇▇’s FTE Costs and Out-of-Pocket Costs associated with the conduct of such activities, including technical support, manufacturing support, regulatory support and support of scale-up (and, for purposes of clarity, any reference to “at Novo Nordisk’s cost” in this Agreement shall mean ▇▇▇▇▇▇’s FTE Costs and Out-of-Pocket Costs). The initial FTE rate shall be at [**] (to be adjusted by ▇▇▇▇▇▇ on an annual basis based on changes in the Consumer Price Index (“CPI”), as quoted by the U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, where the index as of January 1, 2014 shall be 100.) The FTE rate will not be adjusted until January 1, 2015....
Work Plan; Budget. Each party’s percentage share of the Board’s work plan (non-operational) budget for which they are responsible shall be as follows: ((PA / WA) + (PV / WV)) / 2 = the party's percentage share of the organization's non-operating budget. PA = Party's area within the watershed organization area WA = Watershed organization area PV = Party's market valuation within the watershed organization area WV = Market valuation of the watershed organization area The Board will calculate updated percentage contributions Parties every fifth year.
Work Plan; Budget. Each party’s percentage share of the Board’s work plan (non-operational) budget for which they are responsible shall be as follows: Columbus 19% East Bethel 30% Ham Lake 4% Linwood 47%
Work Plan; Budget. MinnErgy, LLC formally organized on March 31, 2006 and began developing the work plan to construct and operate a 50 million gallon dry mill corn-processing ethanol plant utilizing natural gas-fired boilers. The budget for the project in it’s’ entirety is $133,000,000. The initial phase of the project was to identify local investors with an interest in creating an organization that would agree with the development objective. This accomplished, a Board of Governors was established and PRX Geographic was engaged to prepare a feasibility study concerning the viability of the project. Concurrently the legal firm of S▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ & M▇▇▇▇▇ was retained, as was the accounting firm of C▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ and Associates. An Operating Committee was developed to identify and initiate project tasks. This committee identified prospective building sites. Site evaluation criteria consisted of: fatal flaw assessment, infrastructure and other assets necessary for an ethanol plant including grain availability, road and rail access and transportation infrastructure at the site, utilities including electricity stores, natural gas, water and waste water disposal, ethanol and co-product market proximity, labor availability, community services such as welding, electrical shop, plumbing, schools, fire protection, hospital, airport, and location relative to communities and homes. Contracts were developed with the environmental firm of Natural Resource Group and the civil engineering firm of Y▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ Associates. Meetings were held with the DM&E Railroad to discuss the requirements necessary for access and service, and also with a variety of companies that were capable of supplying the engineering, procurement, and construction requirements of the project. Land option agreements were developed and committed to upon selection of prospective site locations. A Letter Of Intent was signed in March 2007 with the design-build firm of F▇▇▇▇, Inc. Engineering services are currently planned to proceed during October 2007 with plant construction to begin April 2008. A production well and observation well has been drilled by Thein Well Company and a seven day ground water pumping test was completed April 21, 2007. The firms of American Engineering Testing, Inc. and Brookfield Resources, Inc. have performed subsurface exploration and geotechnical review services for the plant site. The environmental permitting process is underway currently. The environmental permitting firm the Natural Resource Group has...
Work Plan; Budget. 1 Financing Contribution from MaGIC
