Classification Study Requests Sample Clauses

Classification Study Requests. In response to a written request from a department head, the Union, or an employee for a reclassification study, the Human Resources Department shall acknowledge receipt of said request and if possible indicate the general priority, if known, within thirty (30) calendar days of the date said request is received by the Human Resources Department. The Director of Human Resources or his designee will review the status of pending classification study requests with a staff member of Union upon request.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (14)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Classification Study Requests. The Human Resources Director or his/her designee will review the status of pending classification study requests with a staff member of the Union no more than once every ninety (90) calendar days. The decision of the Human Resources Director or his/her designee with respect to a classification study request shall not be subject to the grievance procedure. In response to a written request from the Union for a classification study on a form prescribed by the Human Resources Department, the Human Resources Department shall acknowledge receipt of said request within ten (10) working days, and if a study is justified, indicate the target date for completion of the study within thirty (30) working days of Human Resources acknowledgement notice. Class studies will be performed in a timely manner. If the request for a study is denied, the Personnel Analyst will provide justification for the denial. The Union may file a written appeal within ten (10) working days of receipt of denial with the assigned Personnel Analyst. If the request for a classification study was justified and the results of the study are not satisfactory to the Union, the Union may file a written appeal within ten (10) working days of receipt of results with the assigned Personnel Analyst. If the denial or results of a study are not satisfactorily resolved with the analyst, the Union may appeal, in writing, to the Department Human Resources Manager indicating the specific justification for appeal of the analyst’s decision, within ten (10) working days from receipt of the analyst’s decision. If the denial or results of a study are not satisfactorily resolved with the Department Human Resources Manager, the Union may appeal in writing to the Human Resources Director, or NMC CEO for employees of NMC, or his/her designee, within ten (10) working days from receipt of the Department Human Resources Manager decision, indicating the specific justification for appeal of the department’s decision. The decision of the Human Resources Director, or NMC CEO for employees of NMC, or his/her designee shall be final. At the request of the Union, the Human Resources Director, or NMC CEO for employees of NMC, or his/her designee will periodically review the status of pending classification studies requested by the Union, with a staff member of the Union. The results of classification studies requested by the Union will be sent to the Union prior to going to the Board. The provisions of this section shall not be su...
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (11)
Classification Study Requests. In response to a written request from the Union for a reclassification study on a form prescribed by the Human Resources Division, the Human Resources Division shall acknowledge receipt of said request, and if a study is justified, indicate the target date for completion of the study within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of said request. If the request for a study is denied or if the results of a completed study are not satisfactory to the Union, the Union may file a written appeal of the denial or the results with the assigned the Human Resources Division. Written appeals must be received by the Human Resources Division within ten (10) working days of receipt of the denial or results of the study. If the denial or results of a study are not satisfactorily resolved with the Human Resources Manager, the Union may appeal in writing to the CEO or designee indicating the specific justification for appeal of the Human Resources Manager's decision. Written appeals must be received by the CEO or designee within ten (10) working days of the Union's receipt of a response at the previous level. The decision of the CEO or designee shall be final. The CEO or designee will periodically review the status of pending classification studies requests with a staff member of the Union. This review will be scheduled to allow at least two (2) weeks between the time of review and the time of any action by the Executive Committee. The provisions of this section shall not be subject to the grievance procedure article of this MOU.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (6)
Classification Study Requests. ‌ In response to a written request from a Department Head, the Council, or an employee for a reclassification study, the Human Resources Department shall acknowledge receipt of said request, and if possible, indicate the general priority, if known, within thirty (30) calendar days of the date said request is received by the Human Resources Department. The Director of Human Resources or his/her designee will review the status of pending classification study requests with a staff member of Council upon request. Before the Board of Supervisors establishes the salary scale for any new class represented by the Council, the County shall meet and discuss the salary scale for the new classification with the Council.
Sample 1Sample 2See All (4)
Classification Study Requests. The Director of Human Resources or his/her designee will review the status of pending classification studies with the Union during the Classification/Compensation and Compaction Committee meeting as stipulated in Article 7 Committees of this agreement. The decision of the Director of Human Resources or his/her designee with respect to a classification study request shall not be subject to the grievance procedure. In response to a written request from the Union for a classification and/or compensation study on a form prescribed by the Human Resources Department, the Human Resources Department shall acknowledge receipt of said request within ten (10) working days, and if a study is justified, indicate the target date for completion of the study within thirty
Sample 1
Classification Study Requests. The Assistant CAO - Human Resources or his/her designee will review the status of pending classification studies requests with a staff member of the Union no more than once every ninety (90) calendar days. The decision of the Assistant CAO - Human Resources or his/her designee with respect to the request shall not be subject to the grievance procedure. In response to a written request from the Union for a classification study on a form prescribed by the Human Resources Division, the Human Resources Division shall acknowledge receipt of said request within ten (10) working days, and i f a study is justified, mdicate the target date for completion of the study within thirty (30) working 11/10/2011 days of Human Resources acknowledgement notice. Class studies will be performed in a timely manner. I f the request for a study is denied, the Personnel Analyst will provide justification for the denial. The Union may file a written appeal within ten (10) working days of receipt of denial with the assigned Personnel Analyst.
Sample 1
Classification Study Requests. In response to a written request from MCPA for a reclassification study on a form prescribed by the Human Resources Department, the Human Resources Department shall acknowledge receipt of said request, and if a study is justified, indicate the target date for completion of the study, within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of said request. If the request for a study is denied or if the results of a completed study are not satisfactory to MCPA, MCPA may file a written appeal of the denial or the results with the assigned personnel analyst. The personnel analyst must receive written appeals within ten (10) working days of receipt of the denial or results of the study. If the denial or results of a study are not satisfactorily resolved with the analyst, MCPA may appeal in writing to the Human Resources Director indicating the specific justification for appeal. The Human Resources Director must receive written appeals within ten (10) working days of MCPA receipt of a response at the previous level. The decision of the Human Resources Director shall be final. The Human Resources Director or his/her designee will periodically review the status of pending classification studies requests with a staff member of MCPA. This review will be scheduled to allow at least two (2) weeks between the time of review and the time of any action by the Board of Supervisors. The provisions of this Article shall not be subject to the grievance procedure article of this Agreement.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Classification Study Requests. ‌ In response to a written request from a Department Head, the Union, or an employee for a reclassification study, the Human Resources Department shall acknowledge receipt of the request within fifteen (15) calendar days. The Human Resources Department shall provide notification to the requesting party within sixty (60) calendar days of receipt of the request if the request is accepted, rejected, or if more information is needed. When accepted, and if possible, Human Resources will indicate the general priority, if known, when notifying the requesting party of acceptance. The Human Resources Director, or designee, will review the status of pending classification study requests with a staff member of the Union upon request, but not more frequently than every three months.
Sample 1
Classification Study Requests. The Human Resources Director or his/her designee will review the status o f pending classification studies requests with a staff member of the Union no more than once every ninety (90) calendar days. The decision of the Human Resources Director or his/her designee with respect to the request shall not be subject to the grievance procedure. In response to a written request from the Union for a classification study on a form prescribed by the Human Resources Department, the Human Resources Department shall acknowledge receipt of said request within ten (10) working days, and i f a study is justified, indicate the target date for completion of the study within thirty (30) working days of Human Resources acknowledgement notice. Class studies will be performed in a timely manner. I f the request for a study is denied, the Personnel Analyst will provide justification for the denial. The Union may file a written appeal within ten (10) working days of receipt of denial with the assigned Personnel Analyst.
Sample 1

Related to Classification Study Requests

  • Clinical 2.1 Provides comprehensive evidence based nursing care to patients including assessment, intervention and evaluation.

  • How to File an Appeal of a Prescription Drug Denial For denials of a prescription drug claim based on our determination that the service was not medically necessary or appropriate, or that the service was experimental or investigational, you may request an appeal without first submitting a request for reconsideration. You or your physician may file a written or verbal prescription drug appeal with our pharmacy benefits manager (PBM). The prescription drug appeal must be submitted to us within one hundred and eighty (180) calendar days of the initial determination letter. You will receive written notification of our determination within thirty (30) calendar days from the receipt of your appeal. How to File an Expedited Appeal Your appeal may require immediate action if a delay in treatment could seriously jeopardize your health or your ability to regain maximum function, or would cause you severe pain. To request an expedited appeal of a denial related to services that have not yet been rendered (a preauthorization review) or for on-going services (a concurrent review), you or your healthcare provider should call: • our Grievance and Appeals Unit; or • our pharmacy benefits manager for a prescription drug appeal. Please see Section 9 for contact information. You will be notified of our decision no later than seventy-two (72) hours after our receipt of the request. You may not request an expedited review of covered healthcare services already received.

  • Office of Inspector General Investigative Findings Expert Review In accordance with Senate Bill 799, Acts 2021, 87th Leg., R.S., if Texas Government Code, Section 531.102(m-1)(2) is applicable to this Contract, Contractor affirms that it possesses the necessary occupational licenses and experience.

  • Clinical Trials The studies, tests and preclinical and clinical trials conducted by or on behalf of, or sponsored by, the Company, or in which the Company has participated, that are described in the Registration Statement, the Time of Sale Disclosure Package or the Prospectus, or the results of which are referred to in the Registration Statement, the Time of Sale Disclosure Package or the Prospectus, were and, if still pending, are being conducted in all material respects in accordance with protocols, procedures and controls pursuant to, where applicable, accepted professional and scientific standards for products or product candidates comparable to those being developed by the Company and all applicable statutes, rules and regulations of the FDA, the EMEA, Health Canada and other comparable drug and medical device (including diagnostic product) regulatory agencies outside of the United States to which they are subject; the descriptions of the results of such studies, tests and trials contained in the Registration Statement, the Time of Sale Disclosure Package or the Prospectus do not contain any misstatement of a material fact or omit a material fact necessary to make such statements not misleading; the Company has no knowledge of any studies, tests or trials not described in the Disclosure Package and the Prospectus the results of which reasonably call into question in any material respect the results of the studies, tests and trials described in the Registration Statement, the Time of Sale Disclosure Package or Prospectus; and the Company has not received any notices or other correspondence from the FDA, EMEA, Health Canada or any other foreign, state or local governmental body exercising comparable authority or any Institutional Review Board or comparable authority requiring or threatening the termination, suspension or material modification of any studies, tests or preclinical or clinical trials conducted by or on behalf of, or sponsored by, the Company or in which the Company has participated, and, to the Company’s knowledge, there are no reasonable grounds for the same. Except as disclosed in the Registration Statement, the Time of Sale Disclosure Package and the Prospectus, there has not been any violation of law or regulation by the Company in its respective product development efforts, submissions or reports to any regulatory authority that could reasonably be expected to require investigation, corrective action or enforcement action.

  • State Approval of Replacement Personnel The Engineer may not replace the project manager or key personnel without prior consent of the State. The State must be satisfied that the new project manager or other key personnel is qualified to provide the authorized services. If the State determines that the new project manager or key personnel is not acceptable, the Engineer may not use that person in that capacity and shall replace him or her with one satisfactory to the State within forty-five (45) days.

  • PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND EDUCATIONAL IMPROVEMENT A. The Board agrees to implement the following:

  • Proposing Integration Activities in the Planning Submission No integration activity described in section 6.3 may be proposed in a CAPS unless the LHIN has consented, in writing, to its inclusion pursuant to the process set out in section 6.3(b).

  • Human Leukocyte Antigen Testing This plan covers human leukocyte antigen testing for A, B, and DR antigens once per member per lifetime to establish a member’s bone marrow transplantation donor suitability in accordance with R.I. General Law §27-20-36. The testing must be performed in a facility that is: • accredited by the American Association of Blood Banks or its successors; and • licensed under the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Act as it may be amended from time to time. At the time of testing, the person being tested must complete and sign an informed consent form that also authorizes the results of the test to be used for participation in the National Marrow Donor program.

  • Development Plan document specifying the work program, schedule, and relevant investments required for the Development and the Production of a Discovery or set of Discoveries of Oil and Gas in the Contract Area, including its abandonment.

  • Trials The Ship shall run the following test and trials:

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!