Design Objectives. The WSLA language is designed to capture service level agreements in a formal way to enable automatic configuration of both the service implementing system of the service providing organization as well as the system that is used to supervise the agreed quality of service. To facilitate automatic configuration the WSLA comprises: A description of the parties , their roles (provider, customer, third parties) and the action interfaces they expose to the other parties of the contract. A detailed specification of the service level parameters (SLA parameters) guarantees are applied to. SLA parameters are specified by metrics. Metrics define how to measure an item, in the case of Resource metrics, or how to aggregate metrics to composite metrics. A metric description also includes which party is in charge of measuring and aggregating and how the metrics can be retrieved. A representation of the parties obligations. Service level objectives contain a formal expres- sion of the guaranteed condition of a service in a given period. Action guarantees represent promises of parties to do something, for example, to send a notification in case the guarantees are not met. The specification of the service level parameters and metrics represents the common understanding of the parties. The implementation of the service within the service provider can be more complex in a way that the view in the WSLA is an abstraction of the real underlying system. The language must be extensible to capture services from particular domains using specific types of service parameters. The WSLA language uses the mechanism of type derivation by XML schema to introduce new types (i.e. syntactical elements with semantics derived from the high- level type) to describe domain specific concepts. The language should be immediately useful to SLA authors. The standard extensions are part of the WSLA specification. While the core syntax is deliberately kept slim, the standard extensions provide a set of type definitions that cover many usual concepts related to a Web Service SLA. In order to protect the confidentiality of the service customer, an SLA must be decomposable into the configuration information that is needed for third parties to perform their role in the SLA supervision without having access to the complete SLA.
Design Objectives. Under the above threat model, the proposed key agreement protocols are expected to achieve the following objectives: • xXX security which guarantees mutual authentication and agreement of secure session keys between two parties against attackers with above powers excluding side- channel attacks. • CAFL-xXX security which guarantees mutual authenti- cation and agreement of secure session keys between two parties against attackers with above powers including side-channel attacks. • Affordable computing burden for IoT devices.
Design Objectives. Client Goals, Vision & Intentions: Design a single prototype building that communicates the vision of 5 existing schools, merging into the 2 new buildings. Design to be as efficient as possible to maximize the project budgets. Site Goals: Separate bus, car and pedestrian traffic to the greatest extent possible. Image Goals: None specifically stated. Performance Goals: Meet minimum IECC code requirements; some District standards exceed 2009 IECC (which is required) Main Project Challenges: Design of single prototype building for 2 new elementary schools on 2 different sites; merging 5 schools into 2 buildings Third Party Certification (i.e. LEED Platinum): None
Design Objectives. The property is zoned as commercial with an auto dealership being allowed as a conditional use permit. The developer will be held to the highest standards per the City general plan, planning and zoning ordinances, and other applicable building codes and ordinances of the City. As a new auto dealership they will be subject to each manufacturer’s own guidelines and building standards. In most instances these standards are as high if not higher than Lehi City standards. All development will be submitted to the City via the normal development approval process, which includes site plans to include development data and any other appropriate material describing the development, land coverage, setbacks, heights, off-street parking to be provided, and any other information as deemed appropriate by the City. Approvals The agency may have the right to approve any and all design and construction plans for any development within the Project Area to ensure any and all development within the Project Area is consistent with the Project Area Plan.
Design Objectives. The AMENCA2 Program Design, Concept Paper and Guidelines document presents a comprehensive approach to the development of the design of the AMENCA Phase 2 Cooperation Agreement, as prescribed in the Terms of Reference (TORs) presented in Attachment 1. The design process builds on the AMENCA Review (April 2007) and has included further consultations with staff in AusAID IMEA Section; Community and Business Partnerships (CBP) Section; staff at the Australian representative Office in Ramallah; and the Australian Council for International Development (ACFID). The objective of the AMENCA Program design process is to assist AusAID to establish the AMENCA 2 NGO Cooperation Agreement by undertaking two main tasks. ▪ Developing AMENCA2 Concept Paper/ Guidelines for NGOs, including a management framework of the AMENCA2 suitable for the request to Australian NGOs to submit a capacity statement for the AMENCA2; and ▪ Provide input into the assessment of the NGO design documents and subsequently prepare a program implementation description, including a synthesis of the NGO design documents (submitted through the above tender process) under the agreed management framework and suitable for AusAID peer review. This document represents the completion of Task 1. The document is structured to reflect a program design approach to the CA and therefore includes the following key sections: o Section 2: Situation Analysis and Rationale o Section 3: AMENCA2 Program Description: Goal, Objectives and Components o Section 4: Program Management: Management Structure and Timeframes, Capacity Statement Process, Design Process, Resources, Program Performance (including proformas for design and reporting) o Section 5: Risk, Sustainability and Feasibility Attachment 2 provides the overall timeline for the AMENCA2 Program from Draft document stage through to AMENCA2 project implementation.
