Managing poor performance Sample Clauses

Managing poor performance. 37.1 Without prejudice to the Council’s other rights and remedies under this Agreement, if, at any time the Council acting reasonably determines that the Trust has materially failed to perform any of its obligations under this Agreement, the Council shall give written notice of such breach to the Trust.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Managing poor performance. 7.3.1. Freeport delivery will be managed through the processes set out in the Freeports Framework. Should an issue arise, DLUHC will first attempt to resolve it in collaboration with the Governing Body and if applicable the Accountable Body. For persistent issues which are recorded at the annual review or are the result of other assurance activities DLUHC will seek to agree a tailored improvement plan with the Governing Body and the Accountable Body as outlined in the Freeports Framework. 7.3.2. DLUHC’s support for the Freeport is contingent on compliance with this MoU, Appendixes’, and Schedules. DLUHC support of the Freeport may be withdrawn where there are significant concerns with the Freeport, for example including but not limited to the following scenarios where there is: a) Consistently poor progress against agreed delivery commitments and/ or limited commitment to full and effective Freeport delivery; b) Evidence of the misuse of public funds; c) An inability to manage the governance of potential security risks and illicit activity associated with the Freeport; d) Non-compliance with commitments on retained business rates and/or tax site delivery; e) Failure to comply with the minimum requirements of a Freeport (for example, failing to establish an operational customs site), as set out in HMG Freeports policy documentation; f) Activity or negligence leading to the risk of exposure to the wider Freeports Programme to reputational risk (for example, through failures of governance). 7.3.3. The Governing Body, Accountable Body and Billing Authorities accept and agree to all the terms having made full and proper enquiry before agreeing to the statements contained in this MoU. 7.3.4. DLUHC will not resort to performance measures as a first response to address concerns relating to Freeport delivery, except in the high-risk areas of continued concern. Where appropriate, HMG will consider: a) Engagement with relevant government officials (for example, additional bespoke meeting to understand and rectify problems) b) Increased frequency and/or depth of assurance testing c) Delay or reduction of Seed Capital funding and/ or revenue capacity funding: to ensure probity of public funds, funding may be partially or fully withheld until improvements in the Freeport are made. The specific amount and type of funding withheld will depend on the circumstances of the Freeport and the specific concerns which need to be addressed. As part of this process, consideration w...
Sample 1
Managing poor performance. 24.1 It is agreed that when issues relating to poor performance do arise, they will be addressed promptly and fairly, irrespective of the point in the performance period that has been reached.
Sample 1
Managing poor performance. 6.1. Identification and management of poor performance will be assisted by ITSA’s Performance Feedback Scheme outlined in clause 3. It is agreed that when issues relating to poor performance do arise, they will be addressed promptly and fairly, irrespective of the point in the appraisal cycle that has been reached.
Sample 1
Managing poor performance. 7.3.1. Freeport delivery will be managed through the processes set out in the Freeports Framework. Should an issue arise, DLUHC will first attempt to resolve it in collaboration with the Governing Body and if applicable the Accountable Body. For persistent issues which are recorded at the annual review or are the result of other assurance activities DLUHC will seek to agree a tailored improvement plan with the Governing Body and the Accountable Body as outlined in the Freeports Framework.
Sample 1
Managing poor performance. D5.1 If at any time, poor performance is identified, the supervisor and the employee are to work together through performance counselling, guidance and regular feedback to bring performance back to the standard expected. Where despite such efforts performance continues to fall below the standard expected a formal performance assessment process will commence. This will be managed under Defence’s managing poor performance procedures and includes the requirement to formally notify the employee in writing of the following:
Sample 1

Related to Managing poor performance

  • Consideration for Performance The consideration to be paid to the Contractor under this Agreement will be compensation for all the Contractor’s expenses incurred in the performance of this Agreement, unless otherwise expressly provided.

  • Rating of Overall Educator Performance The Educator’s overall performance rating is based on the Evaluator’s professional judgment and examination of evidence of the Educator’s performance against the four Performance Standards and the Educator’s attainment of goals set forth in the Educator Plan, as follows:

  • CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE Work under the Contract shall be performed in a timely, professional and diligent matter by qualified and efficient personnel and in conformity with the strictest quality standards mandated or recommended by all generally-recognized organizations establishing quality standards for the work of the type specified in the Contract. The Contractor shall be solely responsible for controlling the manner and means by which it and its employees or its subcontractors perform the Services, and the Contractor shall observe, abide by, and perform all of its obligations in accordance with all legal and Contract requirements. Without limiting the foregoing, the Contractor shall control the manner and means of the Services so as to perform the work in a reasonably safe manner and comply fully with all applicable codes, regulations and requirements imposed or enforced by any government agencies. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any stricter standard provided in plans, specifications or other documents incorporated as part of the Contract shall govern. The Contractor shall provide the Services with all due skill, care, and diligence, in accordance with accepted industry practices and legal requirements, and to the Department’s satisfaction; the Department’s decision in that regard shall be final and conclusive. All Contractor’s Services under the Contract shall be performed in material compliance with the applicable federal and state laws and regulations in effect at the time of performance, except when imposition of a newly enacted or revised law or regulation would result in an unconstitutional impairment of the Contract. The Contractor will make commercially reasonable efforts to ensure that Contractor's professional and managerial staff maintain a working knowledge and understanding of all federal and state laws, regulations, and administrative code appropriate for the performance of their respective duties, as well as contemplated changes in such law which affect or may affect the Services delivered under the Contract. The Contractor shall maintain a written contingency plan describing in detail how it will continue operations and Services under the Contract in certain events including, but not limited to, strike and disaster, and shall submit it to the Department upon request.

  • Time for Performance 1.1. The term of this SOW Agreement shall begin on and end on (the “Initial Term”). The Initial Term may be extended as the parties may agree. The State may terminate this SOW for convenience upon thirty days prior written notice to the Contractor. If the Master Agreement should expire or otherwise terminate prior to the end of the term of this SOW Agreement, this SOW Agreement shall continue to the end of its existing term, unless or until terminated in accordance with the terms of this SOW Agreement, and the Parties acknowledge and agree that the terms of the Master Agreement shall survive and apply to this SOW Agreement.

  • Security for Performance In the event that Exhibit A Section 4 indicates the need for Consultant to provide additional security for performance of its duties under this Agreement, Consultant shall provide such additional security prior to commencement of its Required Services in the form and on the terms prescribed on Exhibit A, or as otherwise prescribed by the City Attorney.

  • Responsibility for Performance Participation in state Centralized Contracts by Authorized Users is permitted upon the following conditions: (i) the responsibility with regard to performance of any contractual obligation, covenant, condition or term thereunder by any Authorized User other than State Agencies shall be borne and is expressly assumed by such Authorized User and not by the State; (ii) a breach of the Contract by any particular Authorized User shall neither constitute nor be deemed a breach of the Contract as a whole which shall remain in full force and effect, and shall not affect the validity of the Contract nor the obligations of the Contractor thereunder respecting non-breaching Authorized Users, whether State or otherwise; (iii) for a breach by an Authorized User other than a State Agency, the State specifically and expressly disclaims any and all liability for such breach; and (iv) each non-state agency Authorized User and Contractor guarantees to save the State, its officers, agents and employees harmless from any liability that may be or is imposed by their failure to perform in accordance with its obligations under the Contract.

  • Performance Management 17.1 The Contractor will appoint a suitable Account Manager to liaise with the Authority’s Strategic Contract Manager. Any/all changes to the terms and conditions of the Agreement will be agreed in writing between the Authority’s Strategic Contract Manager and the Contractor’s appointed representative.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!