Meeting Evaluation. It is requested for the GA meetings to be evaluated. The main objectives are: to assess how useful they have been, to improve their organisation and management if needed, to assess the understanding of the beneficiaries in the Project progress, their role and the role of the beneficiaries they work with, and to get some feedback on the Project Coordination. The PMT is responsible for organising the evaluation. The Coordinator is in charge of assessing the results, implementing the required actions and reporting them to the EC.
Meeting Evaluation. Thirteen participants completed the post-meeting evaluation questionnaire distributed at the end of the meeting. The assessment of the responses from these 13 respondents revealed a very positive evaluation of the Pre-MOP8 meeting. All respondents found the meeting very useful or useful in preparing them for the AEWA MOP8 (as shown in the chart below). Furthermore, the majority of respondents (77%) felt confident about their preparedness to participate at the AEWA MOP8, thanks to the Pre-MOP8 meeting, meanwhile a couple (two) felt only a little prepared and one person felt not really prepared. It is worth noting that the latter two assessments of preparedness were concurrent persons new to the AEWA processes (e.g., recently designated NFPs), with no past experience at AEWA MOPs, hence the potential hesitance relating to their preparedness. Usefulness of the Pre-MOP8 meeting towards preparing for the AEWA MOP8 14 8 6 0 12 1 0 Very useful Useful Quite useful Not useful All respondents appreciated the quality of the discussions relating to the AEWA MOP8 documents as well as the approach of the virtual meeting, including the presentation of information and interactive and inclusive nature of the meeting through exercises, group work and quizzes. The three topics/themes treated at the Pre-MOP8 which respondents found most useful in preparing them for the AEWA MOP8 included the coordination of the African region at the MOP (including sub-regional discussions), overview of the AEWA Strategic Plan and PoAA and the budget discussions (including budget scenarios and scale of contribution). Other topics considered useful were waterbird monitoring, overall introduction to AEWA, preparing and participating in the AEWA MOP (agenda, structure, timelines and rules of procedure) and negotiations. All respondents found the training components of the meeting to be very useful (9 persons) or useful (4 persons) 7 6 2 1 0 Usefulness of the training components of the meeting Very useful Useful Quite useful Not useful – (see the chart below), thereby emphasizing the importance of the Pre-MOP for enhancing capacity of NFPs. Three most prominent areas of AEWA implementation which respondents highlighted as being most important for future training at AEWA Pre-MOPs or other meetings included: waterbird survey and monitoring; implementation of the AEWA Strategic Plan and PoAA, and National Reporting. Many other areas of interest for future training were highlighted including species c...
Meeting Evaluation. The meeting evaluation of the 2nd SAFE project meeting shall give an overview of the feedback about the hybrid partner meeting, hosted by CEIP XXXXX XXXXXXXX. While CEIP; IK and ZEBRA met in Fuensalida, UPB had to participate online. This questionnaire will be handed out as an online survey after the meeting to evaluate the meetings content, the meetings design, the coordination and the results of the meeting. The Streaming Concept Meeting, although it was held in a hybrid format, the meeting went very well. The project team suggests to test the streaming approach one more time before applying it in the school classroom. Nevertheless, the workshops at the TPM days were very helpful and clarified many open questions. Moreover, all participants have already carried out dissemination activities such as writing social media posts, writing short articles on websites and talking to other institutions and staff about the project. Nevertheless, all partners wish to further develop their dissemination activities as well. Even so, each partner has a clear picture of the meeting objectives and next project steps. The next step is to test the implementation of the common streaming approach in schools and to design a first template for the outline of the books. Please find below the summarised evaluation data: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Question 1: How do you agree with the following statements? Totally agree Partly agree Partly disagree Totally disagree I don´t know Σ The conference lived up to my expectations. 5 (100%) n=5 The conference objectives were clear to me. 5 (100%) n=5 The difficulty level of this conference was appropriate. 4 (80%) 1 (20%) n=5 The conference contents were presented in an engaging way. 3 (75%) 1 (25%) n=4 The conference was interesting. 4 (100%) n=4 The coordination was well prepared. 4 (100%) n=4 The coordination was helpful. 4 (100%) n=4 Overall, I am happy with the conference results. 4 (100%) n=4 I have a clear picture now of the projects’ next steps. 4 (100%) n=4 I know what my tasks for the upcoming period are. 4 (100%) n=4 Question 2: Do you have any concerns regarding the development process in SAFE so far? (n=4) ⃝ Yes, please be specific: X No (n=4) Do you have any concerns with the quality of the management or collaboration of the project so far? (n=4) ⃝ Yes, please be specific: x No (n=4) Question 3: What would you like to suggest for the future cooperation / communication ...
