Project Narrative. (Unless specified in the "H. Other Information" section, maximum of 20 pages, single spaced, 12 point font, 1-inch margins, number all pages. This includes the work plan. Content beyond the specified page number will not be reviewed.) Applicants must submit a Project Narrative with the application forms. Applicants must name this file “Project Narrative” and upload it at xxx.xxxxxx.xxx. The Project Narrative must include all of the following headings (including subheadings): Background, Approach, Applicant Evaluation and Performance Measurement Plan, Organizational Capacity of Applicants to Implement the Approach, and Work Plan. The Project Narrative must be succinct, self-explanatory, and in the order outlined in this section. It must address outcomes and activities to be conducted over the entire period of performance as identified in the CDC Project Description section. Applicants should use the federal plain language guidelines and Clear Communication Index to respond to this Notice of Funding Opportunity. Note that recipients should also use these tools when creating public communication materials supported by this NOFO. Failure to follow the guidance and format may negatively impact scoring of the application.
Project Narrative. Apply electronically through xxxxxx.xxx. Questions are to be directed to Xxxxx Xxxxxx: xxxxxxx@xxxx.xxx
Project Narrative. Demonstration of Past Progress in Exchange Planning Core Areas
Project Narrative. The scope of work as originally planned was ….… The following changes were made to the scope of work…… The following amendments with dates and reason for amendment were made for this project…. The following is a brief description of the expenditures on this project …. The following explains the differences between originally planned costs and actual costs. .
Project Narrative. Each page must be numbered and have one-inch margins. The text of the project narrative must be single spaced and typed in a standard typeface (e.g., Times New Roman, Arial, Courier) with no smaller than 12-point font. The project narrative must not exceed 6 pages. This page limitation applies to the project narrative only.
Project Narrative. The project narrative should clearly identify what the applicant is proposing and how it will address a solution, the expected results and/or benefits once the solution is achieved, and how it will meet the RFA program scope and objectives. The proposed project methodology should describe the project design, address program specific methodology needs, procedures, timetables, monitoring/oversight, and the organization’s project staffing. The management plan should describe administrative procedures, staffing, quality assurance, and other activities as described below, including any additional specific RFA requirements. The project narrative should also clearly identify what the applicant is proposing for the competitive RFA process and how it will solicit, evaluate, and select subgrant proposals submitted by WIC State and local agencies and their community partners. The applicant should describe how selection priority will be given to projects sponsored by applicants that are part of or already serve historically underrepresented communities, take place in locations facing multiple structural and health-related inequities, and are designed in such a way that the key project activities can be adapted by other WIC agencies. The applicant will also describe its capacity to provide technical assistance to subgrant recipients, develop at least three model projects, develop a partner matching component, conduct an evaluation and report on KPIs related to subgrant projects, and develop resources based on lessons learned from the work completed under this RFA. The project narrative should also indicate plans for disseminating all project deliverables. In preparing the project narrative, provide the information requested below, in the order presented below.
Project Narrative. This section provides a comprehensive framework and description of all aspects of the proposed project. It should be succinct, self-explanatory and well organized so that reviewers can understand the proposed project. Successful applications will contain the information below. Please use the following section headers for the narrative:
Project Narrative. In writing the report keep in mind the goals of your project which can be realized through the development and implementation of this statewide business plan. Please include • Summary of project activities • Key accomplishments to date • How inclusive is your effort? What have you done to bring new stakeholder groups or organizations into statewide coordination? • Explain how statewide coordination has (or will) change as a result of this project. • What practices or activities led to success? What practices or activities have not? • Explain how your project has advanced the NSDI • Describe the next steps in your project • How will this project continue into the future and remain viable? • Where do you need assistance? • What type of assistance do you need? • As required • Completed materials • Completed business plan(s) • What are the CAP Program strengths and weaknesses? • Where did it make a difference to your State? • Was the assistance you received sufficient or effective? • What would you recommend that the FGDC do differently? • Are there factors that are missing or additional needs that should be considered? • Are there program management concerns that need to be addressed, such as the time frame? • If you were to do the project again, what would you do differently?
Project Narrative. Summarize the project activities. Include its accomplishments, successes, challenges, and collaboration activities, as appropriate. How were challenges identified and what steps were taken to overcome these challenges? - Indicate the number, duration, and venue of workshops conducted, as appropriate. - List organizations and organizational type (Federal, State, local, Tribal, academic, NGO, etc) for workshop participants. Names and email addresses for participants are optional, but desirable. - List number of individuals receiving metadata training, and outreach assistance. - Identify the level of proficiency or competency of the trainees or training: creators, administrators, managers/program implementers or introduction, advanced concepts, program implementation/business case. - Describe the means of instruction: lecture only, lecture and exercises, or lecture and computer assisted. - List new organizations engaged in this project. - Indicate how and where metadata is served: NSDI registered clearinghouse node, Geospatial One-Stop registered and harvested. - Approximately how many metadata files have resulted from this project, if any? - Will this project's activities continue after this? - What formal or informal organizational relationships established to sustain activities beyond performance period? - Describe the next phase in your project. - Are there issues in metadata management and service? Do you need FGDC assistance? - Requirements (more technical assistance, software, other?) - What other areas need work? - What do you anticipate future metadata training, outreach, creation and posting (to clearinghouse or other locations) after the project performance period ends? - What are the program strengths and weaknesses? - Where does the program make a difference? - Was the assistance you received sufficient or effective? - What would you recommend doing differently? - Are there factors that are missing or need to consider that were missed? - Are there program management concerns that need to be addressed? Time frame? - If you were to do this again, what would you do differently?
Project Narrative. Describe the relevance of this research to public health in, at most, three sentences.
