Cost Analysis. Perform cost analyses for various responses, service and support activities.
Cost Analysis. The Contractor shall submit a completed DOEA Cost Analysis for Non-Competitively Procured Contracts in Excess of Category II to the Department’s Contract Manager by June 30th of each year.
Cost Analysis. 14.1 For all proposals of Modifications, or repair of equipment submitted by SSTL and in case of termination of this Contract according respectively to the provisions of Clause 13 : Change, Clause 12.5 Repair and Clause 24 Termination, DBSI will be allowed to carry out detailed cost analysis at SSTL's facilities. For this purpose, SSTL will put at DBSI's specialists disposal : production drawings production process sheets provisioning order Hourly rates parts and process list or any other elements reasonably required for the verification of SSTL's prices.
Cost Analysis. The recipient must conduct and document a cost analysis for all negotiated contracts over the simplified acquisition threshold and for all change orders regardless of price. A cost analysis is not required when adequate price competition exists and the recipient can establish price reasonableness. The recipient must base its determination of price reasonableness on a catalog or market price of a commercial product sold in substantial quantities to the general public, or on prices set by law or regulation.
Cost Analysis. A cost analysis (“Cost Analysis”) setting forth all expenses and costs which either have been incurred or Borrowers reasonably estimate will be incurred, and all reserves, if any, to be established and maintained in connection with the construction of the improvements.
Cost Analysis. No cost analysis of the cost of manufacturing the equipment sold shall be supplied, and no examination or audit of the seller’s books and records shall be permitted for any reason whatsoever.
Cost Analysis. Tustin Library To be used for comparison of bids and evaluation of bids with expected service levels. General Janitorial Window Washing Crew 225.00 hours/month $ 0.50 hours/month $ 1,199.37 40.00 /month /month Special Floor Crew 12.13 hours/month $ 210.60 /month Supervision 20.58 hours/month $ 442.33 /month Insurance/Benefits for above $ Supplies, Tools, and Equipment $ Indirect Expenses & Profits $ Dishonesty Employee Coverage $ 211.01 580.34 1,263.49 1.86 /month /month /month /month TOTAL MONTHLY BID PRICE.............................................. $ 3,949.00 /month NOTE: Total cost should equal monthly bid price.
Cost Analysis. The CCWTP 14.5 MGD expansion project currently in design is anticipated to cost $125 million. For comparison, construction of the Bear Creek Reservoir and a new treatment facility was estimated to cost approximately $125 million in 2014. Assuming 3.3% inflation, in 2024 dollars, this estimate is adjusted to approximately $173 million. In 2035 dollars, the estimate is increased to approximately $250 million. Regarding IPR, cost sharing between entities will be an important discussion and should consider immediate and potential future benefits to each entity. While the NCWR may have a more immediate need for IPR, WRF owners will likely have a future need for additional discharge locations as wasteload allocations (WLA) are depleted.
Cost Analysis. Costs of potential improvements were estimated at milestone years for each entity. Cost analyses focus on the major improvements evaluated and discussed during stakeholder meetings and do not represent all possible alternatives. However, regardless of the improvements which will eventually occur, these costs analyses are believed to represent useful budgetary planning estimates. For improvements projected to occur by 2035, cost estimates included 20-year life cycle cost analyses. These analyses provide an estimate of capital expenditures (i.e., design and construction), periodic costs (i.e., equipment replacement), and annual costs (i.e., operations and maintenance) over a 20-year period. For improvements projected to occur after 2035, cost evaluations were limited to capital expenditures. Life cycle cost evaluations made this far in advance are not likely to be a useful planning tool. Additionally, potential advancements in technology and industry practice could significantly impact the accuracy of such life cycle costs. Capital costs, more easily and accurately estimated, provide entities with benchmark projections. Assumptions were made based on current industry metrics for wastewater improvements and operations. The following assumptions were used in generating life cycle costs: • $20/gallon for wastewater treatment facility construction and expansion • 3.3% annual inflation – (average from 1914-2023) • Periodic equipment replacements/upgrades every 15 years based on data from similarly sized facilities in Georgia • Annual costs, including operation and maintenance based on data from similarly sized facilities in Georgia Wastewater improvement cost evaluations are summarized in the tables below for each entity by the following milestone years: 2035, 2050, 2075. Table 15: City of Xxxxxxxxx Cost Evaluations Year Improvement Capital Cost Life Cycle Cost 0000 Xxxxxxxx XXX 2.0 MGD Construction $56,000,000 $76,000,000 IPR from WRF to Lake Varner1 $24,000,000 $30,000,000 20502 Eastside WRF 4.0 MGD Expansion $181,000,000 20752 Eastside WRF 4.0 MGD Expansion $406,000,000 1Potential option for IPR at Lake Xxxxxx . Costs may be shared by NCWR. 2Cost estimates at this time horizon are subject to significant variability. However, these estimates suggest continued infrastructure expansions may be cost prohibitive, further illustrating the importance of reuse water and other more sustainable solutions. Table 16: Newton County Water & Sewerage Authority Cost Evaluatio...
Cost Analysis. (1 trip)
