VIA ELECTRONIC FILING. Xxxx X. Xxxxxxxx, Commission Clerk Florida Public Service Commission 0000 Xxxxxxx Xxx Boulevard Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0850 Re: Duke Energy Florida, LLC Agreement for purchase of as-available energy; Undocketed Dear Xx. Xxxxxxxx: Pursuant to Rule 25-17.0825(1)(b), F.A.C., Duke Energy Florida, LLC (“DEF”) hereby submits notice of a recently signed As-Available Energy Contract entered into with Citrus World Inc.
VIA ELECTRONIC FILING. Xx. Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxx, Secretary Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission Commonwealth Keystone Building 000 Xxxxx Xxxxxx Harrisburg, PA 17120 Dear Secretary Xxxxxxxxx: On behalf of Pennsylvania American Water, I am electronically filing with you, a copy of the above referenced agreement. Please note that Pennsylvania- American Water is filing this agreement under §507 and affirms that the agreement meets the exemption requirements under 66 Pa. C.S. §1102(a)(3)(ii)(A). If you should have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Xxxxxxxxx Xxxx Xxxxxxxx Enclosures cc: All Parties on the attached Certificate of Service (via electronic mail)
VIA ELECTRONIC FILING. Public Utility Commission of Oregon 000 Xxxxxxx Xxxxxx, Xxxxxxxxx, Xxxxx 000 P. O. Box 2148 Salem, Oregon 97308-2148 Attention: Filing Center Re: Schedule 60: Special Contracts Northwest Natural Gas Company, dba NW Natural (NW Natural or Company), files herewith, the following revisions and additions to its Tariff P.U.C. Or. 24, stated to become effective on and after February 8, 2006: First Revision of Sheet 60-A-1, Special Contracts Index; Third Revision of Sheet 60A-2, Special Contracts Index (continued); Original Sheet 60A-3, Special Contracts Index (continued); Original Sheets 60-18 through 60-18.10, Schedule 60, “Special Contracts (continued)”; and Original Sheets 60-19 through 60-19.8, Schedule 60, “Special Contracts (continued)”. As the Commission is aware from the investigation it opened on December 6, 2005, Investigation To Determine If Company Provided Adequate Customer Info, UM 1236, a disagreement had arisen over the terms of the service that applied to industrial customers who had recently elected to change from Transportation to Sales service. After negotiations, the Company has successfully concluded settlements with 18 customers, 14 of which are Oregon customers. For the Commission’s information, the WUTC approved on January 11, 2006, the other 4 settlement agreements in the exact same templates as submitted here. The Company was able to conclude these settlements with these 14 Oregon customers because of the relative size of their respective loads, changes in the natural gas commodity market, resolution of prospective tariff timing for sales service elections for all industrial customers, and the amounts of consideration the Company was able to negotiate as settlement in resolution of all related Claims. There are two forms of settlement that are being filed: the Sales Settlement Agreement and the Transportation Settlement Agreement. These are not typical settlements. Part of the monetary compensation in the settlements, which are referred to in the settlements as “credits,” is calculated by multiplying fractional dollar amounts by different natural gas volumes. In the case of the Transportation Settlement Agreement, part of the monetary compensation is calculated by multiplying a percentage by the Permanent Margin. Because this kind of mechanism is ordinarily used to determine and collect revenues for service performed by the Company and is within the jurisdiction of the Commission, the Company is seeking permission from the Commission t...
VIA ELECTRONIC FILING. Xxxxx X. Xxxxxx Executive Director State Health Planning and Development Agency 000 Xxxxx Xxxxx Xxxxxx, Xxxxx 000 Montgomery, Alabama 36104 E-Mail: Xxxxx.xxxxxx@xxxxx.xxxxxxx.xxx OF COUNSEL xxxxxxxx@Xxxxxxx.xxx 205.521.8376 May 25, 2023 AL2023-018
VIA ELECTRONIC FILING. The Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxxx-Xxxx A. Reese, Acting Secretary Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 000 Xxxxx Xxxxxx, X.X. Washington, D.C. 20426 RE: ISO New England Inc. and Central Maine Power Company– Original Service Agreement No. LGIA-ISONE/CMP-24-01 under Schedule 22 of the ISO New England Inc.’s Open Access Transmission Tariff; Docket No. ER24- -000 Dear Acting Secretary Xxxxx: Pursuant to Section 205 of the Federal Power Act,5 Part 35 of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission’s (“Commission”) regulations,6 and Order No. 2003,7 ISO New England Inc.8 (“ISO-NE”) and Central Maine Power Company (“CMP”) (together, the “Filing Parties”)9 hereby submit for filing an executed non-conforming Standard Large Generator Interconnection Agreement (the “Interconnection Agreement”) by and among ISO-NE as System Operator, CMP 5 16 U.S.C. § 824d (2012). 6 18 C.F.R. Part 35 (2014). 7 Standardization of Generator Interconnection Agreements and Procedures, (“Order No. 2003”), FERC Stats. & Regs. ¶ 31,146 (2003), order on reh’g, (“Order No. 2003-A”), FERC Stats. & Regs. ¶ 31,160, order on reh’g, (“Order No. 2003-B”), FERC Stats. & Regs. ¶ 31,171 (2004), order on reh’g, (“Order No. 2003-C”), FERC Stats. & Regs. ¶ 31,190 (2005), aff’d sub nom. Nat’l Ass’n of Regulatory Util. Comm’rs v. FERC, 475 F.3d 1277 (D.C. Cir. 2007), cert. denied, 552 U.S. 1230, (Feb. 25, 2008). 8 Capitalized terms not defined herein have the meanings ascribed thereto in the ISO New England Inc. Transmission, Markets and Services Tariff (“Tariff”). Section II of the Tariff contains ISO-NE’s Open Access Transmission Tariff (“OATT”). Schedule 22 of the OATT contains the pro forma Large Generator Interconnection Procedures (“LGIP”) and Large Generator Interconnection Agreement (“LGIA”).
VIA ELECTRONIC FILING. Public Utility Commission of Oregon 000 Xxxxxxx Xxxxxx, Xxxxxxxxx, Xxxxx 000 P. O. Box 2148 Salem, Oregon 97308-2148 Attention: Filing Center Re: Schedule 60: Special Contracts Northwest Natural Gas Company, dba NW Natural (NW Natural or Company), files herewith, the following revisions and additions to its Tariff P.U.C. Or. 24, stated to become effective on and after February 8, 2006: First Revision of Sheet 60-A-1, Special Contracts Index; Third Revision of Sheet 60A-2, Special Contracts Index (continued); Original Sheet 60A-3, Special Contracts Index (continued); Original Sheets 60-18 through 60-18.10, Schedule 60, “Special Contracts (continued)”; and Original Sheets 60-19 through 60-19.8, Schedule 60, “Special Contracts (continued)”. As the Commission is aware from the investigation it opened on December 6, 2005, Investigation To Determine If Company Provided Adequate Customer Info, UM 1236, a disagreement had arisen over the terms of the service that applied to industrial customers who had recently elected to change from Transportation P.U.C. Or. 24 Original Sheet 60-19.8
VIA ELECTRONIC FILING. The Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxx X. Pritzker Secretary of Commerce Attention: Enforcement and Compliance Room 1870 U.S. Department of Commerce 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, N.W. Washington, DC 20230 DOC Case No.: A-201-845 Total No. of Pages: 30 Administrative Review of AD Susp. Agr. POR: 12/19/2014 – 11/30/2015 Office of Policy & Negotiations, Enforcement & Compliance
VIA ELECTRONIC FILING. Xx. Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxx, Secretary Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission Commonwealth Keystone Building, 2nd Floor 000 Xxxxx Xxxxxx Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17120 Dear Secretary Xxxxxxxxx: On September 8, 2022, Duquesne Light Company (“Duquesne Light” or “Company”) filed for approval of its Affiliate Services Agreement (“ASA”) between The Efficient Network (“TEN”) and the Company. Originally, the proposed Construction Master Service Agreement and Statement of Work were marked confidential. Duquesne Light hereby withdraws its request for confidential treatment of Appendices A and B. Updated Appendices are enclosed. If you have any questions regarding the information contained in this filing, please feel free to contact me at 000-000-0000. Respectfully Submitted, Xxxxxxxx X. Xxxxxxxx Managing Director, External Affairs and Regulatory Law cc: Office of Consumer Advocate Office of Small Business Advocate XxxxxxxxXxxxx.xxx 000 Xxxxxxx Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxx, XX 00000 Bureau of Investigation and Enforcement This Construction Services Master Agreement (this “Agreement”) is entered into by and between Duquesne Light Company, a Pennsylvania limited liability company doing business at 000 Xxxxxxx Xxxxxx, Xxxxxxxxxx, XX 00000 ("DLC"), and The Efficiency Networka Delaware corporationdoing business at _0000 Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxxx, Xxxxx 000, Xxxxxxxxxx, XX 00000 ("Contractor") and is effective as of the 31st day of May 2022. DLC and Contractor shall hereafter be referred to collectively as "the Parties".
VIA ELECTRONIC FILING. Xx. Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxx, Secretary Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission Commonwealth Keystone Building, 2nd Floor 000 Xxxxx Xxxxxx Harrisburg, PA 17120 Dear Secretary Xxxxxxxxx: Enclosed for review and approval in accordance with 66 Pa.C.S. § 507 and 52 Pa. Code § 3.101, is an Easement Agreement dated June 26, 2024, between Duquesne Light Company (“Duquesne Light”) and the City of Pittsburgh. The City of Pittsburgh granted to Duquesne Light an easement on its property situated in the City of Pittsburgh, Allegheny County recorded as Lot and Block 34-D-20 for providing, transmitting and/or distributing electric and/or communications services current for any and all purposes, the right, privilege and authority to:
VIA ELECTRONIC FILING. The Honorable Chief Justice Xxxx Xxxxxx-Xxxxxxx and Associate Justices California Supreme Court 000 XxXxxxxxxx Xxxxxx San Francisco, CA 94102-4797 (Cal. Rules of Court, Rule 8.500(g)) Xxxxxx x. Uber Technologies, Inc. Supreme Court Case No. S274671 On behalf of the California Employment Lawyers Association (“CELA”), we respectfully request that the Court grant review of the Fourth District Court of Appeal’s decision in Xxxxxx x. Uber Technologies, Inc. on the limited issue whether an “aggrieved employee” who has been compelled to arbitrate the “individual” civil penalty component of their Private Attorneys General Act (“PAGA”) claim on behalf of the Labor and Workforce Development Agency (“LWDA”) thereby loses statutory standing to pursue the LWDA’s “non-individual,” representative claims for civil penalties. Uncertain language by the United States Supreme Court (“SCOTUS”) in Viking River Cruises, Inc. x. Xxxxxxx (2022) 596 U.S. , 142 S.Ct. 1906, 2022 U.S. LEXIS 2940 (“Viking”), provides a clear opening for clarification by this Court. After finding this Court’s ruling in Iskanian v. CLS Transp. Los Angeles, LLC (2014) 59 Cal.4th 348, 380 invalidating the waiver of PAGA claims is not preempted by the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”), SCOTUS nevertheless found “PAGA’s built-in mechanism of claim joinder” conflicts with the FAA and held “the FAA preempts the rule of Iskanian insofar as it precludes division of PAGA actions into individual and non-individual claims through an agreement to arbitrate.” Viking at 34-35. SCOTUS consequently ordered the non-individual claims dismissed based on a misapprehension of state law regarding standing: The Honorable Chief Justice Xxxx Xxxxxx Xxxxxxx and Associate Justices July 1, 2022 can maintain non-individual PAGA claims in an action only by virtue of also maintaining an individual claim in that action. See Cal. Lab. Code Xxx. §§2699(a), (c). … As a result, Xxxxxxx lacks statutory standing to continue to maintain her non-individual claims in court, and the correct course is to dismiss her remaining claims. Id. at 34-35, emphasis added.1 That ruling is inconsistent with this Court’s precedent that resolution of individual claims does not extinguish PAGA standing to bring non- individual claims. Xxx x. Xxxxx Int’l California, Inc. (2020) 9 Cal.5th 73, 80, 459 P. 3d 1123, 1130 (2020) (“Xxx”) [“Settlement of individual claims does not strip an aggrieved employee of standing, as the state's authorized representative, to pursu...
