Annual Evaluation Process Clause Samples

Annual Evaluation Process. (a) The chair/supervisor shall provide to his/her department faculty the form or format for submission of a faculty member’s annual evaluation portfolio no later than April 1. The student evaluations of classroom instruction shall be provided to the faculty member no later than May 15. (b) Each faculty member shall submit to his/her chair/supervisor the faculty member’s annual evaluation portfolio no later than June 1. If a faculty member fails to provide his/her annual evaluation portfolio by this date, his/her chair shall proceed to complete the faculty member’s annual evaluation without that information, unless the chair has extended the deadline based on extenuating circumstances that justify the extension.

Annual Evaluation Process. The annual evaluation assesses an employee’s performance of assigned duties consistent with the criteria specified in Section 18.5 and in departmental by- laws. (a) The annual evaluation shall be conducted in the Spring semester, and shall include evaluation of assigned duties for the Fall and Spring semesters of the current academic year and the preceding Summer terms, if the faculty member had an appointment in a summer term. (b) The chair shall provide to his/her department faculty the form or format for submission of a faculty member’s annual report no later than January 15. (c) Each faculty member shall submit to the chair the faculty member’s annual report no later than April 15. (d) Faculty committees or other individuals submitting evaluative data that may be relevant to the annual evaluation shall report to the chair no later than May 15. (e) The chair’s evaluation shall identify any major performance deficiencies and, if any such deficiency has been identified, shall provide the faculty member with written feedback designed to assist the faculty member in improving his/her performance. (f) No later than July 15 the chair shall provide to the faculty member the written annual evaluation, and shall attach to the annual evaluation a copy of the faculty member’s annual report. A faculty member may grieve an annual evaluation under the auspices of ARTICLE 28 any time after the date of presentation but no later than August 31. (1) The faculty member shall be offered the opportunity to discuss the evaluation with the evaluator prior to its being finalized. (2) The evaluation shall be signed and dated by the person performing the 1736 1737 1738 1739 1740 1741 1742 1743 1744 1745 1746 1747 1748 1749 1750 1751 1752 1753 1754 1755 1756 1757 1758 1759 1760 1761 1762 1763 1764 1765 1766 1767 1768 1769 1770 1771 1772 1773 1774 1775 1776 1777 1778 1779 evaluation and by the faculty member being evaluated, who may attach a concise comment to the evaluation. (g) The above deadlines do not apply to P.

Annual Evaluation Process. All departments will follow the university procedures and timeline for annual evaluations. Faculty will submit evaluation materials to their department chair electronically (ACRES). Submissions in ACRES will detail the faculty member's performance over the annual evaluation period in relation to teaching, service, and scholarship (if applicable) and should provide compelling evidence of the quantity, quality and impact of the faculty member's performance and progress toward tenure and/or promotion (if applicable) and progress on established goals. Materials to be submitted include: (1) a statement of contributions with appendices detailing productivity in designated areas; (2) a current curriculum vitae with those items added since the last evaluation highlighted; and (3) accompanying materials supporting claims made in the statement of contributions (e.g., student assessment of instruction, published works). It is the responsibility of the faculty member to present supporting materials that provide compelling and convincing evidence of having met the specified criteria for the self-rating in each of the designated areas of responsibility for the respective faculty member (i.e., teaching, service, and scholarship when included in assignment). Note that the performance indicators listed below are intended to be illustrative and not exhaustive. The process of assessing productivity and the relative value of individual products should be attentive to discipline specifics, emerging trends, and new technologies. Instructors should reference the criteria for teaching and service found in the SOE Statement on Teaching and Statement on Service. Tenure-earning faculty should also reference the criteria for teaching, scholarship, and service found in the SOE Statement on Teaching, Creative and Scholarly Projects, and Service. It is the responsibility of the individual faculty member to provide sufficient data and/or explanation of qualitative and/or quantitative evidence to clarify and warrant the weight/impact that should be afforded to a particular piece of evidence. Faculty should refer to the key indicators for a performance rating of “Meets Expectations” listed below to determine evidence to present. The decision to recommend tenure/promotion is based upon a pattern of sustained performance of “Meets Expectations” as indicated by annual evaluations. Faculty are expected to provide evidence for a rating of “Meets Expectations” and only those with exemplary perfo...