BLENDING. If work is transferred to or integrated with work in another department or division, employees may follow the work by seniority choice and will have their ATU seniority blended with seniority in the department or division to which the work is transferred. The number of employees permitted to transfer will be the number required to perform the additional work in the department after the transfer or integration is completed.
BLENDING. The proper blend to meet specifications will be determined by the Department and, once established, not altered unless authorized by the Department.
i) Blending of local and imported sand shall be carried out by the use of cold feed blender and a conveyor belt system to take the material away from the blender. No blending can take place without personnel from the Highway Materials Lab Division of the Department of Transportation, Infrastructure and Energy on site. The testing (at the site and in the lab) and blending of materials will take place during non-holiday weekdays between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. unless an exception is made under Provision #6. All costs associated with the testing (at the site and in the lab) and blending of material outside of these hours will be deducted from the final payment if the requirements of Provision #6 are not met.
ii) Salt shall be blended with the winter sand during the blending process at a rate of 6% based on sand pile tonnage requirements. Should the Contractor choose to supply 100% imported material the blending of salt with the imported material shall remain a requirement and shall be blended by use of a cold feed blender and a conveyor belt system to take the material away from the blender.
iii) Dredged/beach sand shall not be permitted in the final blended product.
iv) Materials shall be subject to sampling and testing by the Engineer at all times and the Engineer shall be provided ample opportunity to sample material at any time.
v) Should the Contractor propose to change the source of materials during the work, the Contractor shall advise the Engineer sufficiently in advance of such change to allow samples to be taken and tests conducted.
vi) Prior approval to use the site(s) for stockpiling and blending purposes must be granted by the Department of Environment.
BLENDING. Because of impurities which may be present in sulphur produced from the Main Pass Mine, it may be necessary from time to time to blend higher quality sulphur with Felmont Main Pass Sulphur in order for Felmont Main Pass Sulphur to meet commercial specifications. Freeport agrees to use its best efforts, and in the order of priority provided in Sections 7.1 through 7.3 below (unless transportation charges can be reduced by altering the order of priority), to obtain recovered sulphur or other higher quality sulphur for purposes of such blending in a manner to minimize the cost thereof. The following provisions shall apply from time to time in determining Operating Cost Reimbursement under Article VI, the quality of Felmont Sulphur sold and the quantity of Felmont Tonnage for the purposes of Schedule C. Freeport agrees that in allocating blending sulphur Felmont Sulphur will be treated on a parity with Freeport Sulphur in priority of allocation of sulphur under Section 7.1 through 7.3.
BLENDING. The proper blend to meet specifications will be determined by the Department and, once established, not altered unless authorized by the Department.
i) Blending of local and imported sand shall be carried out by the use of cold feed blender and a conveyor belt system to take the material away from the blender. No blending can take place without personnel from the Highway Materials Lab Division of the Department of Transportation, Infrastructure and Energy on site. The testing (at the site and in the lab) and blending of materials will take place during non- holiday weekdays between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. unless an exception is made under Provision #5. All costs associated with the testing (at the site and in the lab) and blending of material outside of these hours will be deducted from the final payment if the requirements of Provision #5 are not met.
ii) Salt shall be blended with the winter sand during the blending process at a rate of 6% based on sand pile tonnage requirements. Should the Contractor choose to supply 100% imported material the blending of salt with the imported material shall remain a requirement and shall be blended by use of a cold feed blender and a conveyor belt system to take the material away from the blender.
BLENDING. In order to meet the requirements of BEG with regard to Fuel Assay, BNFL may have to undertake isotopic blending of uranium dioxide powder. This requirement may arise as a result of one of the following circumstances:
(i) BEG requires that its stocks of enriched material at Springfields (be it UF6, U02 or recovered U308) are utilised, to reduce in process stocks;
(ii) Insufficient UF6/U02 at the required Assay is available on site; In cases where a blending operation will result in a SWU loss of 0.5% or less then BNFL shall not be required to inform BEG in advance of blending taking place. Where a blending operation will result in a SWU loss of greater than 0.5% then BNFL shall be required to obtain the prior approval of BEG for the blending operation to be undertaken, such approval not being unreasonably withheld. Any such request by BNFL shall be in writing and BEG shall reply to it within seven days of receipt thereof. BNFL’s request shall be submitted not less than seven days before the intended commencement of blending operations. BNFL shall provide BEG with an Enriched Uranium Blend Statement at the frequency and within the timescales defined in Appendix 10 of this Agreement.
BLENDING. In the sketched setting, the blend depends on the portion of the original theories that are covered by the analogy. There are two extreme cases: The first one, shown in the left diagram of Figure 5, occurs when the two input spaces are isomorphic, meaning that there is a bijective morphism that amounts to a simple renaming of signature symbols from the language of L onto the symbols of R. In that case, all formulae of the theories can be generalized and are completely covered by the analogy found by HDTP, and the resulting blend will be isomorphic to both of them. The other extreme (depicted in the right diagram of Figure 5) is an analogy where no formulae are aligned and therefore the generalized theory is empty, hence, no formulae of the domain theories are covered by the analogy. In this case, a blend can always be obtained by taking the disjoint union of the two input theories (this disjoint union may be inconsistent, however). In practice, neither of these two cases is of real interest (provided there is no interest in knowing whether the disjoint union of two input spaces is consistent). The interesting blends will be cases where only parts of the input theories are covered by the analogy. In fact, one can adjust the blend by changing the generalization, either by removing formulae and thereby reducing the number of mappings and the coverage of the analogy, or by choosing another analogy which associates different formulae. Due to the fact that HDTP outputs a ranked list of different candidates for analogical relations in any case, using another generalization is rather straightforward. The left theory L and the right theory R can be split into (non-empty) covered parts L+ and R+ and uncovered parts L− and R−. The covered parts are fully analogical, i.e. basically isomorphic, and make up the core of the blend, which we will call B. The uncovered parts L− and R− reflect the idiosyncratic aspects of the domains, which we would ideally want to integrate into the blend
BLENDING. 11.4.1 The Customer may request GasNet to blend the Gas to be accepted by GasNet provided that:
11.4.1.1 the Customer has obtained the prior written agreement of all other System User(s) utilising the Distribution System; and
11.4.1.2 the resulting blended Gas will conform to the Gas Specification; and
11.4.1.3 the Distribution System can account for the changed energy value of the resulting blended Gas.
11.4.2 The Customer shall pay all costs incurred by GasNet in carrying out the blending of Gas requested by the Customer.
11.4.3 GasNet shall make available to the Customer any records and information with regard to Gas blending carried out by GasNet which directly affects the Customer.
BLENDING. Change to blending premium gasoline instead of reformate to make the higher octane products. Total Estimated Costs: $25,000 Estimated Costs Remaining To Be Paid: $25,000
5. CONVERTING TO ELECTRIC BLEND METERS. Convert bay III of the loading rack to electronic blend meters. Total Estimated Costs: $50,000 Estimated Costs Remaining To Be Paid: $50,000 SCHEDULE 3.01(K) COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AGREEMENTS Collective Bargaining Agreement, dated effective June 1, 1993, between Bloomfield Refining Company and its refinery employees represented by the Oil, Chemical and Atomic Workers International Union, AFL-CIO and its Local Union 2-972. SCHEDULE 3.01(L) WATER AND WATER RIGHTS BRC uses approximately 417 acre feet of water per year in its refining operations. Of such amount, 340 acre feet per year have been purchased from the Bureau of Reclamation (the "BUREAU") out of the Navajo Reservoir and 77.838 acre feet are owned by BRC. A. PURCHASED RIGHTS. Prior to 1990, BRC regularly obtained one year water service contacts from the Bureau. Since 1990, however, the Bureau has been required by the Endangered Species Act to consult with the Fish and Wildlife Service ("FWS") prior to entering into each new water service contract with BRC (and other water users). As a result, BRC has had only one water contract since April of 1990. The term of the last water contract ran from October 21, 1992 through October 20, 1993. The Bureau and the FWS have been conducting an informal consultation for close to a year in connection with BRC's proposed water contract. In late 1994, the FWS notified the Bureau that FWS would require formal consultation because of the likely effect of BRC's water contract on the critical habitat of the Colorado squawfish and the razorback sucker, which have been listed by the EPA as endangered. The Bureau has prepared a biological assessment of the effects of the proposed contract on the endangered species, and has concluded that there will be no adverse effects on the various species or their designated critical habitat. The biological assessment prepared by the Bureau reviewed and analyzed all relevant data from water quality testing which was done in the area surrounding the Refinery, and found no indications of pollutants emanating from the Refinery. This biological assessment has been sent to the FWS for its use in preparing its official biological opinion. FWS has a statutory time period of 90 days (which may be extended for an additional 60 days) within ...
BLENDING. The Joint Venturers may blend iron ore mined from the mining lease with iron ore mined pursuant to the Hamersley Range 1963 Agreement."
BLENDING. Maintaining a daily flow through the Dort Highway Main is necessary to meet water quality regulatory standards in the event emergency backup services are required. Unless otherwise agreed by the Parties and approved by any necessary state and/or federal regulatory body, GLWA may supply to Customer from the Dort Highway Main approximately 5% of Customer’s daily flow of potable water produced by GCDC (estimated at 0.5 MGD) in compliance with the requirements of any law, regulation, permit or order of any state and/or federal agency. Customer shall be responsible for installing, operating, maintaining, controlling and monitoring the necessary infrastructure and appurtenances, including but not limited to flow control devices, to ensure compliance with this limit. The remainder of Customer’s daily flow of potable water produced by GLWA will be received through the 72 Inch Main. Customer will blend the water received through the Dort Highway Main with that water received through the 72 Inch Main at Customer’s water treatment plant prior to its distribution and any required additional treatment as may be required of Customer by state and/or federal law, regulation, permit or order. The provisions on blending in this Section 17.02 are not considered a co-mingling of water sources and do not invoke the provisions of Section 17.03, below.
