Budget Allocations c. The recommendations of the faculty representative organization, departments, or grade level group, within an instructional setting will become the accepted rules, regulations, and procedures for that building upon approval of the building principal/program manager.
Budget Allocations. In the event the Board allocates funds to a building budget for expenditures during the fiscal year, it is understood that such funds shall not be reduced during the fiscal year unless the Board determines, in its sole discretion, that the District is confronted with financial problems which dictate revision of the funds allocated.
Budget Allocations. Budget allocations and the totals committed for 2007-2010 have been presented in the respective Implementation Reports. These are as follows: Table 1.3 EIP Sums Committed -2007-2010 (€ million) 2007 2008 2009 2010 Total allocated 269.072 291.315 315.127 314.706 Total committed 266.984 288.864 312.111 311.194 % committed 99.22% 99.16% 99.04% 98.88% Financial Instruments 154.340 151.175 160.442 168.508 Enterprise Europe Network (Network grants+ NetworkAnimation) 86.863 82.755 18.951 68.209 Enterprise Europe Network (Environmental services forSMEs) 9.000 Europe Innova 6.987 2.4 28.6 3.011 Innovation analysis and promotion 4.528 PRO INNO 0.769 18.03 Eco-innovation projects - 27.85 32.15 35.020 Other 18.025 24.684 53.938 22. 918 Source : Annual Implementation Reports – 2007-2010. In all four years the amounts committed came very close to the budget allocated. The budget committed for supporting measures amounted to € 33.3 million (79% of the sum allocated).
Budget Allocations. Budget allocations will be subject to research funders’ conditions.
Budget Allocations. 11 Establish program priorities including program revisions within each school 12 or department shall be the responsibility of the Administrator in charge in 13 cooperation with, and under the direction of the Superintendent and 14 his/her designee and within financial resources as provided by the Board of 15 Education. 17 F. Discipline – Policy #3139
Budget Allocations. 16 Establish program priorities including program revisions within each 17 school or department shall be the responsibility of the Administrator in 18 charge in cooperation with, and under the direction of the Superintendent 19 and his/her designee and within financial resources as provided by the 20 Board of Education. 22 F. Discipline 24 1. Administrators have a high standard of duty, responsibility, and 25 performance. Also, they have an obligation to the full and proper 26 performance and conduct of their duties and functions. In the event 27 and administrator fails to maintain the necessary standard of such 28 performance or conduct, he/she may be subject to disciplinary action 29 by the Superintendent. No administrator shall be disciplined or 30 deprived of any professional advantage without just cause and due 31 process. Any such discipline, reprimand or reduction in rank, 32 compensation or advantage shall be subject to the professional 33 grievance procedure hereinafter set forth. When an administrator is 34 found to be in violation of this contract, discipline, when necessary, will 35 be applied according to a progressive scale of severity. Discipline may 36 me initiated at any place of the scale depending on the severity of the 37 offense and the employee’s previous record. 38
Budget Allocations. 8 Allocations per student and grade level shall be determined by the site level administrator and
Budget Allocations. A detailed breakdown of the budget for the project is provided in Appendix III (the final budget approved by Romanian National Agency) for the project.
Budget Allocations. A. Program priorities within each school or department varying educational needs shall be established by the Superintendent or his designee in cooperation with the building or program Administrator.
Budget Allocations. The allocations to be included in the Risk Share Agreement (RSA) 2017/18 as per the agreed five year RSA September 2015 is £35.6m. The council positively adjusted this by £0.860m to accommodate the results of the care homes judicial review part one resulting in a figure of £36.460m. In addition the council will pass over the Independent Living Fund (ILF) grant in full. The Council will honour its 9% share of any ICO deficit. This is full year so will be ¾ of those values if ASA/RSA is to end of December 2017 given the January 2017 serving of notice on the RSA by the ICO Financial Risk Share The Risk Share Agreement (RSA) developed as part of the transaction creating the ICO took effect from its inception on 1st October 2015. The share of financial risk going forward is a function of the wider performance of the Trust, rather than specifically in relation to ASC. The financial baseline from the Council and the CCG commissioners funding the ICO will appear in as the RSA appendix to the Operational plan.
