Impacts and Mitigation Measures Sample Clauses

Impacts and Mitigation Measures. Direct Negative Impacts
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Impacts and Mitigation Measures. Any negative impacts of a sub-project on female-headed households will be taken up on a case-to-case basis and assistance to these households will be treated on a priority basis. The RP will formulate measures to ensure that socio-economic conditions, needs and priorities of women are identified and the process of land acquisition and resettlement does not disadvantage women. The RP will ensure that gender impacts are adequately addressed and mitigated. Women’s focus groups discussions will be conducted to address specific women’s issues. During disbursement of compensation and provision of assistance, priority will be given to female-headed households. Joint ownership in the name of husband and wife will be provided in cases of non-female-headed households.
Sample 1
Impacts and Mitigation Measures. The EIR considered a range of potential noise effects including construction noise effects on nearby sensitive receptors, effects of commercial development and other stationary sources on nearby receptors, the effects of noise generated by project traffic increases on receptors adjacent to the affected roadways, and exposure of residences and other sensitive receptors to projected noise from I-5 operations and project-generated traffic on local streets. All of these effects were found to be significant or potentially significant. To address these potentially significant impacts, the EIR identified several mitigation measures. Mitigation Measure 4.6-a, addressing increases in short term construction-generated noise, limits construction activities to day time hours, and requires the use of mufflers and acoustical xxxxxxx during construction. Mitigation Measure 4.6-b, addressing onsite operation generation of noise, requires the consideration of dual-pane windows and sensitive siting of mechanical equipment, among other measures. Mitigation Measure 4.6-c, addressing increases in traffic- related noise, mandates a traffic noise study and the use of sound walls, vegetative screening, and dual-pane windows were necessary. Finally, Mitigation Measure 4.6-d, addressing land use compatibility, requires sound walls, vegetative screening, dual pane windows, and setbacks where needed to minimize exterior noise levels. All of these measures would continue to be applicable to CLSP development. While the EIR proposed that exposure of residences and other sensitive receptors to freeway and other noise be mitigated through noise barrier construction and other improvements, it nonetheless determined that potential effects may not be reduced to a less than significant level in all cases. Therefore, noise effects were identified as potentially significant and unavoidable in the EIR. No mitigation measures are available that would further reduce these effects. There are no airports or airstrips in the vicinity of the project, and the project would not be exposed to noise from these sources. The proposed amendments to the DA will not result in additional new or more severe impacts relating to noise than were previously identified in the EIR. This is because the amendments do not allow development in areas that were previously not analyzed in the EIR, nor do they increase the density, intensity, or location of the development within the CLSP. All the mitigation measures identifi...
Sample 1
Impacts and Mitigation Measures. These findings provide the written analysis and conclusions of the Board regarding the environmental impacts of the Project and the mitigation measures identified by the Final EIR and adopted by the Board as conditions of approval for the Project. In making these findings, the Board has considered the opinions of other agencies and members of the public, including opinions that disagree with some of the analysis and significance thresholds used in the EIR. The Board finds that the determination of significance thresholds is a judgment that is within the discretion of the Board; the significance thresholds used in the EIR are supported by substantial evidence in the record, including the expert opinion of the EIR preparers and MRWPCA staff; and the significance thresholds used in the EIR provide reasonable and appropriate means of assessing the significance of the adverse environmental effects of the Project. In particular, the EIR relied on significance criteria for evaluating impacts that are tailored to this type of project. The criteria used in this EIR to determine whether an impact is or is not “significant” are based on (a) CEQA-stipulated “mandatory findings of significance” listed in CEQA Guidelines section 15065; (b) the relationship of the project effect to the adopted policies, ordinances and standards of the MRWPCA and of responsible agencies; and (c) commonly accepted practice and the professional judgment of the EIR authors and MRWPCA staff.
Sample 1
Impacts and Mitigation Measures. This section analyzes the environmental effects that could result from implementing the Proposed SVIP Project, and identifies avoidance, minimization, and mitigation measures.
Sample 1
Impacts and Mitigation Measures. This section analyzes the environmental effects that could result from implementing the Proposed SVIP Project, and identifies avoidance, minimization, and mitigation measures. Graphic materials consisting of maps, drawings, and photographs will be provided in a consistent format throughout the EIR. They will clearly and accurately depict the project and present environmental data where such data is better understood through photographs and/ or maps.
Sample 1
Impacts and Mitigation Measures. Each environmental resource section will include a description of the environmental setting (i.e., the baseline environmental conditions), regulatory setting (i.e., federal, state, and local regulations), criteria used to determine the significance of impacts, analysis methodology and assumptions, and detailed discussion of the potential environmental effects of the project. Impact conclusions will be based on substantial evidence, and mitigation measures will be recommended for significant impacts. References will be provided as necessary to the supporting technical studies, which will be included as appendices to the EIR, as necessary. • Draft EIR project description in MS Word and PDF CONTRACTOR will prepare the existing aesthetics setting based on the site visit, photo- documentation, and other existing information. CONTRACTOR will evaluate potential environmental effects on visual and scenic resources from implementation of the proposed project. To accomplish this, the EIR section will identify up to three representative viewpoints on the project site and in adjacent areas (e.g., US Route 101, a County- designated scenic highway) to characterize the existing visual environment, including long- distance views and topography, and existing uses that could be sensitive to changes in the site’s visual character and the project’s compliance with General Plan Policies NCR-8.1 through NCR-8.7 and County Code Section 25.15.062. Existing light and glare in the area will also be discussed. Visual simulations are not anticipated to be required and are not included as part of this scope of work. It is assumed that the applicant’s architect would provide building renderings and visual simulations.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Impacts and Mitigation Measures. Xxxx & Peers will develop draft significance criteria for review and approval by City staff. Using the approved criteria, significant impacts of the project to the roadway, pedestrian, bicycle, and transit systems will be identified for existing, interim and cumulative conditions. Where significant impacts are identified, mitigation measures will be recommended to reduce the impact to a less-than-significant level. The residual significance of each impact will also be determined.
Sample 1

Related to Impacts and Mitigation Measures

  • Mitigation Measures Company shall take commercially reasonable measures (except measures causing it to incur out-of-pocket expenses which BNYM does not agree in advance to reimburse) to mitigate losses or potential losses to BNYM, including taking verification, validation and reconciliation measures that are commercially reasonable or standard practice in the Company’s business.

  • Corrective Measures If the Participating Generator fails to meet or maintain the requirements set forth in this Agreement and/or the CAISO Tariff, the CAISO shall be permitted to take any of the measures, contained or referenced in the CAISO Tariff, which the CAISO deems to be necessary to correct the situation.

  • Safety Measures Awarded vendor shall take all reasonable precautions for the safety of employees on the worksite, and shall erect and properly maintain all necessary safeguards for protection of workers and the public. Awarded vendor shall post warning signs against all hazards created by the operation and work in progress. Proper precautions shall be taken pursuant to state law and standard practices to protect workers, general public and existing structures from injury or damage.

  • Non-tariff Measures 1. A Party shall not adopt or maintain any non-tariff measures on the importation of any good of the other Party or on the exportation of any good destined for the territory of the other Party except in accordance with its WTO rights and obligations or in accordance with other provisions of this Agreement. 2. Each Party shall ensure its non-tariff measures permitted in paragraph 1 are not prepared, adopted or applied with a view to, or with the effect of, creating unnecessary obstacles to trade between the Parties.

  • Interim Measures Notwithstanding any requirements for alternative dispute resolution procedures as set forth in Articles 18(B), any party to the Dispute may apply to a court for interim measures (i) prior to the constitution of the arbitral tribunal (and thereafter as necessary to enforce the arbitral tribunal’s rulings); or (ii) in the absence of the jurisdiction of the arbitral tribunal to rule on interim measures in a given jurisdiction. The Parties agree that seeking and obtaining such interim measures shall not waive the right to arbitration. The arbitrators (or in an emergency the presiding arbitrator acting alone in the event one or more of the other arbitrators is unable to be involved in a timely fashion) may grant interim measures including injunctions, attachments and conservation orders in appropriate circumstances, which measures may be immediately enforced by court order. Hearings on requests for interim measures may be held in person, by telephone, by video conference or by other means that permit the parties to the Dispute to present evidence and arguments.

  • Protective Measures We have implemented and will maintain appropriate technical and organisational measures in relation to the Services taking into account the state of the art, the costs of implementation, and the nature, scope, context and purposes of Processing, as well as the likelihood and severity of risk to the rights and freedoms of data subjects. This includes measures relating to the physical security of Our facilities used to deliver them, measures to control access rights to Our assets and relevant networks, and processes for testing these measures. In accordance with Our obligations under applicable law, We may undertake digital forensic investigations in relation to the use of the Services and Subscriptions. You are responsible for using, and ensuring that your Users use, the controls and advice provided by the Services correctly and consistently.

  • Rights Protection Mechanisms and Abuse Mitigation ­‐ Registry Operator commits to implementing and performing the following protections for the TLD: i. In order to help registrars and registrants identify inaccurate data in the Whois database, Registry Operator will audit Whois data for accuracy on a statistically significant basis (this commitment will be considered satisfied by virtue of and for so long as ICANN conducts such audits). ii. Work with registrars and registrants to remediate inaccurate Whois data to help ensure a more accurate Whois database. Registry Operator reserves the right to cancel a domain name registration on the basis of inaccurate data, if necessary. iii. Establish and maintain a Domains Protected Marks List (DPML), a trademark protection service that allows rights holders to reserve registration of exact match trademark terms and terms that contain their trademarks across all gTLDs administered by Registry Operator under certain terms and conditions. iv. At no cost to trademark holders, establish and maintain a Claims Plus service, which is a notice protection mechanism that begins at the end of ICANN’s mandated Trademark Claims period. v. Bind registrants to terms of use that define and prohibit illegal or abusive activity. vi. Limit the use of proxy and privacy registration services in cases of malfeasance. vii. Consistent with the terms of this Registry Agreement, reserve the right to exclude from distribution any registrars with a history of non-­‐compliance with the terms of the Registrar Accreditation Agreement. viii. Registry Operator will be properly resourced to perform these protections.

  • Taxation Measures 1. Except as provided in this Article nothing in this Agreement shall apply to taxation measures. 2. Nothing in this Agreement shall affect the rights and obligations of the Parties under any tax convention. In the event of any inconsistency between the provision of this Agreement and any such convention, the provisions of that convention shall apply to the extent of the inconsistency. 3. Without prejudice to the application of paragraph 2, the disciplines referred to hereinafter shall apply to taxation measures: (a) Article 7 (National Treatment) of Chapter 2 (National Treatment and Market Access for Goods) and such other provisions of this Agreement as are necessary to give effect to that Article to the same extent as does Article III of the GATT 1994; and (b) Article 106 (National Treatment) of Chapter 8 (Trade in Services), subject to the exceptions provided for in Article XIV letters (d) and (e) of the GATS, which are hereby incorporated. 4. The provisions of Article 133 (Expropriation) and Annex 9 (Expropriation) of this Chapter shall apply to taxation measures alleged to be expropriatory. 5. The provisions of Article 139 (Investor-State Dispute Settlement) apply with respect to paragraph 4 of this Article. 6. If an investor invokes Article 133 (Expropriation) and Annex 9 (Expropriation) of this Chapter as the basis of a claim to arbitration according to Article 139 (Investor-State Dispute Settlement), the following procedure shall apply: The investor must first refer to the competent tax authorities described in subparagraph 7(c), at the time that it gives written notice of intent under Article 139 (Investor-State Dispute Settlement), the issue of whether the tax measure concerned involves an expropriation. In case of such referral, the competent tax authorities shall consult. Only if, within 6 months of the referral, they do not reach an agreement that the measure does not involve an expropriation, or in case the competent tax authorities of the Parties fail to consult with each other, the investor may submit its claim to arbitration under Article 139 (Investor-State Dispute Settlement).

  • Bilateral Safeguard Measures 1. Where, as a result of the reduction or elimination of a customs duty under this Agreement, any product originating in a Party is being imported into the territory of another Party in such increased quantities, in absolute terms or relative to domestic production, and under such conditions as to constitute a substantial cause of serious injury or threat thereof to the domestic industry of like or directly competitive products in the territory of the importing Party, the importing Party may take bilateral safeguard measures to the minimum extent necessary to remedy or prevent the injury, subject to the provisions of paragraphs 2 to 10. 2. Bilateral safeguard measures shall only be taken upon clear evidence that increased imports have caused or are threatening to cause serious injury pursuant to an investigation in accordance with the procedures laid down in the WTO Agreement on Safeguards. 3. The Party intending to take a bilateral safeguard measure under this Article shall immediately, and in any case before taking a measure, make notification to the other Parties and the Joint Committee. The notification shall contain all pertinent information, which shall include evidence of serious injury or threat thereof caused by increased imports, a precise description of the product involved and the proposed measure, as well as the proposed date of introduction, expected duration and timetable for the progressive removal of the measure. A Party that may be affected by the measure shall be offered compensation in the form of substantially equivalent trade liberalisation in relation to the imports from any such Party. 4. If the conditions set out in paragraph 1 are met, the importing Party may take measures consisting in increasing the rate of customs duty for the product to a level not to exceed the lesser of: (a) the MFN rate of duty applied at the time the action is taken; or (b) the MFN rate of duty applied on the day immediately preceding the date of the entry into force of this Agreement. 5. Bilateral safeguard measures shall be taken for a period not exceeding one year. In very exceptional circumstances, after review by the Joint Committee, measures may be taken up to a total maximum period of three years. No measure shall be applied to the import of a product which has previously been subject to such a measure. 6. The Joint Committee shall within 30 days from the date of notification examine the information provided under paragraph 3 in order to facilitate a mutually acceptable resolution of the matter. In the absence of such resolution, the importing Party may adopt a measure pursuant to paragraph 4 to remedy the problem, and, in the absence of mutually agreed compensation, the Party against whose product the measure is taken may take compensatory action. The bilateral safeguard measure and the compensatory action shall be immediately notified to the other Parties and the Joint Committee. In the selection of the bilateral safeguard measure and the compensatory action, priority must be given to the measure which least disturbs the functioning of this Agreement. The compensatory action shall normally consist of suspension of concessions having substantially equivalent trade effects or concessions substantially equivalent to the value of the additional duties expected to result from the bilateral safeguard measure. The Party taking compensatory action shall apply the action only for the minimum period necessary to achieve the substantially equivalent trade effects and in any event, only while the measure under paragraph 4 is being applied. 7. Upon the termination of the measure, the rate of customs duty shall be the rate which would have been in effect but for the measure. 8. In critical circumstances, where delay would cause damage which would be difficult to repair, a Party may take a provisional emergency measure pursuant to a preliminary determination that there is clear evidence that increased imports constitute a substantial cause of serious injury, or threat thereof, to the domestic industry. The Party intending to take such a measure shall immediately notify the other Parties and the Joint Committee thereof. Within 30 days of the date of the notification, the procedures set out in paragraphs 2 to 6, including for compensatory action, shall be initiated. Any compensation shall be based on the total period of application of the provisional emergency measure and of the emergency measure. 9. Any provisional measure shall be terminated within 200 days at the latest. The period of application of any such provisional measure shall be counted as part of the duration of the measure set out in paragraph 5 and any extension thereof. Any tariff increases shall be promptly refunded if the investigation described in paragraph 2 does not result in a finding that the conditions of paragraph 1 are met. 10. Five years after the date of entry into force of this Agreement, the Parties shall review in the Joint Committee whether there is need to maintain the possibility to take safeguard measures between them. If the Parties decide, after the first review, to maintain such possibility, they shall thereafter conduct biennial reviews of this matter in the Joint Committee.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!