We use cookies on our site to analyze traffic, enhance your experience, and provide you with tailored content.

For more information visit our privacy policy.

Notice of Evaluation Sample Clauses

Notice of Evaluation. At least three (3) weeks prior to the commencement of observations, the evaluator shall meet with the teacher: i. to discuss the purpose of the evaluation, and ii. to determine the expected time span of the observations, and iii. to provide the teacher with a copy of "Criteria Critical to Teacher Competence".
Notice of Evaluation. Each certified staff member who is to be evaluated shall be provided written notification of the status of the evaluation and name of the evaluator no later than the end of September, except in the case of a new teacher starting after the beginning of the school year such notice shall be within thirty calendar days of the first day of work. The notice will include information for access to the rubrics upon which the evaluation will be based.
Notice of Evaluation. 9.2.1 Unit members scheduled for evaluation who are on active status as of the first day of school shall be notified not later than the end of the fourth (4th) full week of the school year in which they are to be evaluated. Unit members scheduled for evaluation who are hired or return from leave after the first day of school shall be notified within the first four (4) full weeks of their hire or return from leave date. The notification shall include a copy of Article 9 of this agreement, all relevant evaluation documents and forms, and the identity of their evaluator. The notification, documents, and forms shall be provided in digital format. 9.2.2 Should the administrator assigned to evaluate a unit member be unable to complete the evaluation due to the administrator’s illness, leave of absence, transfer, resignation, or other circumstance resulting in their inability to observe and evaluate the unit member: (a) Unit members with permanent status may be assigned a mutually agreed upon evaluator. Should the unit member and the District fail to agree upon an evaluator, the unit member shall be evaluated the following school year. (b) Unit members with probationary status shall be assigned an alternate evaluator by the District. 9.2.3 Should the administrator assigned to evaluate a unit member be unable to complete the evaluation due to the unit member being transferred to a different work site: (a) Unit members with permanent status may be assigned a mutually agreed upon evaluator. Should the unit member and the District fail to agree upon an evaluator, the unit member shall be evaluated the following school year. (b) Unit members with probationary status shall be assigned an alternate evaluator by the District.
Notice of EvaluationAll Unit Members except Adult Hourly 11.3.1 No later than the third Friday in September, the manager/designee shall inform those unit members who are to be evaluated and notify the unit member as to the identity of his/her evaluator. In the case of the unit member who works at more than one site he/she shall be evaluated at the site where he/she spends the majority of his/her time. If a unit member’s time is equally divided between sites, the District shall designate the evaluator and shall notify the unit member as to the identity of his/her evaluator. 11.3.2 Evaluation of unit members teaching at least twenty (20) hours per week and with less than three (3) years teaching in the hourly program shall be completed at least once a year. Unit members teaching at least twenty (20) hours per week and more than three (3) years teaching in the hourly program shall be evaluated every other year. The evaluation process shall be completed within a selected trimester. Those unit members who teach up to nineteen (19) hours per week shall be evaluated every other year upon request by the unit member. No later than the third Friday of September, the manager/designee shall inform those unit members who are to be evaluated.
Notice of Evaluation. During the fall teacher orientation meeting, all teachers shall be thoroughly advised as to the evaluation procedures and instrument which are provided for by policy.
Notice of Evaluation. At the start of the school term (i.e., the first day students are required to be in attendance), the school district shall provide a written notice (either electronic or paper) that a performance evaluation will be conducted in that school term to each teacher affected or, if the affected teacher is hired after the start of the school term, then no later than 30 days after the contract is executed. The written notice shall include: • a copy of the rubric (i.e., The Framework for Teaching, Xxxxxxxxx, 2013) to be used to rate the teacher against identified standards and goals and other tools to be used to determine a performance evaluation rating; • a summary of the manner in which measures of student growth and professional practice to be used in the evaluation relate to the performance evaluation ratings of “excellent”, “proficient”, “needs improvement”, and “unsatisfactory” as set forth in Sections 24-5 e) and 34-85 c) of the School Code; and • a summary of the district’s procedures related to the provision of professional development or remediation in the event a teacher receives a “needs improvement” or “unsatisfactory” rating, respectively, to include evaluation tools to be used during the remediation period.
Notice of Evaluation. The first annual formal evaluation may occur only after written notification from the Administrator to the teacher that the evaluation is to occur within two (2) school weeks of notification. Should there be no need for improvement in instructional or professional performance; the same procedure shall be utilized for the next evaluation. If the Evaluator notes a need for improvement in instructional or professional performance, the procedure in “Post Evaluation Conference (below) will be followed. The second annual formal evaluation may occur only after written notification from the Administration to the teacher that the evaluation is to occur within two (2) school weeks of notification.

Related to Notice of Evaluation

  • TECHNICAL EVALUATION (a) Detailed technical evaluation shall be carried out by Purchase Committee pursuant to conditions in the tender document to determine the substantial responsiveness of each tender. For this clause, the substantially responsive bid is one that conforms to all the eligibility and terms and condition of the tender without any material deviation. The Institute’s determination of bid’s responsiveness is to be based on the contents of the bid itself without recourse to extrinsic evidence. The Institute shall evaluate the technical bids also to determine whether they are complete, whether required sureties have been furnished, whether the documents have been properly signed and whether the bids are in order. (b) The technical evaluation committee may call the responsive bidders for discussion or presentation to facilitate and assess their understanding of the scope of work and its execution. However, the committee shall have sole discretion to call for discussion / presentation. (c) Financial bids of only those bidders who qualify the technical criteria will be opened provided all other requirements are fulfilled. (d) AIIMS Jodhpur shall have right to accept or reject any or all tenders without assigning any reasons thereof.

  • Frequency of Evaluation Short form employees shall be evaluated one (1) time per year, which evaluation shall be completed no later than June 1.

  • Purpose of Evaluation 10.1.1 It is recognized that a system of evaluation is essential to assist Unit Members in developing competency and realizing their potential. It is further recognized that information gathered through such a system will enable decisions that measure a Unit Member’s performance in a just and equitable manner. 10.1.2 The evaluation procedure is a cooperative process designed to: a. Promote the achievement of goals and objectives of the County Office and its programs through the assessment and evaluation of the staff that perform within that program; b. Provide a formal method of recognizing staff achievement and growth; c. Identify abilities and specific indicators most critical to support job performance; d. Develop suggestions and direction regarding desired performance and improvement based on standards for like positions; e. Increase the employee’s understanding of performance from the supervisor’s viewpoint; and f. Provide a process of two-way communication to evaluate job performance.