Notice of Evaluation Sample Clauses

Notice of Evaluation. At least three (3) weeks prior to the commencement of observations, the evaluator shall meet with the teacher:
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (5)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Notice of Evaluation. Each certified staff member who is to be evaluated shall be provided written notification of the status of the evaluation and name of the evaluator no later than the end of September, except in the case of a new teacher starting after the beginning of the school year such notice shall be within thirty calendar days of the first day of work. The notice will include information for access to the rubrics upon which the evaluation will be based.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3
Notice of Evaluation. 9.2.1 Unit members scheduled for evaluation who are on active status as of the first day of school shall be notified not later than the end of the fourth (4th) full week of the school year in which they are to be evaluated. Unit members scheduled for evaluation who are hired or return from leave after the first day of school shall be notified within the first four (4) full weeks of their hire or return from leave date. The notification shall include a copy of Article 9 of this agreement, all relevant evaluation documents and forms, and the identity of their evaluator. The notification, documents, and forms shall be provided in digital format.
Sample 1Sample 2
Notice of Evaluation. All Unit Members except Adult Hourly
Sample 1
Notice of Evaluation. At the start of the school term (i.e., the first day students are required to be in attendance), the school district shall provide a written notice (either electronic or paper) that a performance evaluation will be conducted in that school term to each teacher affected or, if the affected teacher is hired after the start of the school term, then no later than 30 days after the contract is executed. The written notice shall include: • a copy of the rubric (i.e., The Framework for Teaching, Xxxxxxxxx, 2013) to be used to rate the teacher against identified standards and goals and other tools to be used to determine a performance evaluation rating; • a summary of the manner in which measures of student growth and professional practice to be used in the evaluation relate to the performance evaluation ratings of “excellent”, “proficient”, “needs improvement”, and “unsatisfactory” as set forth in Sections 24-5 e) and 34-85 c) of the School Code; and • a summary of the district’s procedures related to the provision of professional development or remediation in the event a teacher receives a “needs improvement” or “unsatisfactory” rating, respectively, to include evaluation tools to be used during the remediation period.
Sample 1
Notice of Evaluation. During the fall teacher orientation meeting, all teachers shall be thoroughly advised as to the evaluation procedures and instrument which are provided for by policy.
Sample 1

Related to Notice of Evaluation

  • Response to Evaluation The teacher shall have the right to make a written response to the evaluation and to have it attached to the evaluation report to be placed in the teacher's personnel file. A copy, signed by both parties, shall be provided to the teacher.

  • Final Evaluation IC must submit a final report and a project evaluation to the Arts Commission within thirty (30) days after the completion of the Services. Any and all unexpended funds from IC must be returned to City no later than sixty (60) days after the completion of the Services.

  • Annual Evaluation The Partnership will be evaluated on an annual basis through the use of the Strategic Partnership Annual Evaluation Format as specified in Appendix C of OSHA Instruction CSP 00-00-000, OSHA Strategic Partnership Program for Worker Safety and Health. The Choate Team will be responsible for gathering required participant data to evaluate and track the overall results and success of the Partnership. This data will be shared with OSHA. OSHA will be responsible for writing and submitting the annual evaluation.

  • Formal Evaluation All formal evaluations of personnel shall be conducted openly and with full knowledge of the employee concerned by an administrator or supervisor of the District.

  • BID EVALUATION The Commissioner reserves the right to accept or reject any and all Bids, or separable portions of Bids, and waive technicalities, irregularities, and omissions if the Commissioner determines the best interests of the State will be served. The Commissioner, in his/her sole discretion, may accept or reject illegible, incomplete or vague Bids and his/her decision shall be final. A conditional or revocable Bid which clearly communicates the terms or limitations of acceptance may be considered, and Contract award may be made in compliance with the Bidder’s conditional or revocable terms in the Bid.

  • TECHNICAL EVALUATION (a) Detailed technical evaluation shall be carried out by Purchase Committee pursuant to conditions in the tender document to determine the substantial responsiveness of each tender. For this clause, the substantially responsive bid is one that conforms to all the eligibility and terms and condition of the tender without any material deviation. The Institute’s determination of bid’s responsiveness is to be based on the contents of the bid itself without recourse to extrinsic evidence. The Institute shall evaluate the technical bids also to determine whether they are complete, whether required sureties have been furnished, whether the documents have been properly signed and whether the bids are in order.

  • Re-evaluation a) When a job has moved to a higher group as a result of re-evaluation, the resulting rate shall be retroactive from the date that Management or the employee has applied to the Plant Job Review Committee for re-evaluation.

  • Program Evaluation The School District and the College will develop a plan for the evaluation of the Dual Credit program to be completed each year. The evaluation will include, but is not limited to, disaggregated attendance and retention rates, GPA of high-school-credit-only courses and college courses, satisfactory progress in college courses, state assessment results, SAT/ACT, as applicable, TSIA readiness by grade level, and adequate progress toward the college-readiness of the students in the program. The School District commits to collecting longitudinal data as specified by the College, and making data and performance outcomes available to the College upon request. HB 1638 and SACSCOC require the collection of data points to be longitudinally captured by the School District, in collaboration with the College, will include, at minimum: student enrollment, GPA, retention, persistence, completion, transfer and scholarships. School District will provide parent contact and demographic information to the College upon request for targeted marketing of degree completion or workforce development information to parents of Students. School District agrees to obtain valid FERPA releases drafted to support the supply of such data if deemed required by counsel to either School District or the College. The College conducts and reports regular and ongoing evaluations of the Dual Credit program effectiveness and uses the results for continuous improvement.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!