Post Tenure Review Process. The PTR process will be conducted in two (2) steps. Faculty will be notified by the Xxxxxxx/VPAA by May 15 that they have been scheduled for review. The VPAA/Xxxxxxx will make the final selections in consultation with the Xxxx of the Faculty and based on selection guidelines in this document. A letter will be sent to each selected faculty member with copies to the Xxxx, Department Chair and the PTR committee. The names of affected faculty members will be included in the October biannual report to the Contract Administrator of XXX- XXXX.
1. The materials described below* will be submitted by the Faculty Member to the Department Chair by October 31. Upon review of the portfolio, the Department Chair will forward the portfolio along with an evaluative report to the Xxxx of the Faculty by November 7. If the Xxxx of the Faculty decides, following review of the portfolio and Department Chair's report, with a preponderance of the evidence that further review is needed, the previously submitted materials accompanied by the Xxxx'x assessment, will be referred to the PTR Committee no later than January 15.
2. The PTR Committee will then review/evaluate all aforementioned materials and submit its findings to the VPAA/Xxxxxxx by March 15. The VPAA/Xxxxxxx will send a letter to each faculty member, the Department Chair, the Xxxx of the Faculty, and the Chair of the PTR Committee advising them of the outcome of their review. This letter will be sent no later than April 30.
(a) The assessment rubric to be used by the Xxxx of the Faculty and PTR Committee was developed jointly by the Deans, the Faculty Committee on Assessment and the Faculty PTR Committee, in 2017. An alternate rubric may be created at the same time for library faculty. The Faculty Committee on Assessment will review the rubric at least once every three years, and more frequently, if necessary, based on recommendations in the PTR Committee's annual report. Any changes to the rubric will be brought before the faculty for approval in accordance with the Faculty By-Laws prior to its implementation.
(b) The PTR Committee will review the submitted materials and may request additional documentation including a response by the faculty member to the Xxxx'x assessment. The Faculty Member will always be afforded an opportunity to respond to the Xxxx'x assessment. The PTR Committee will issue a recommendation to the Xxxxxxx/Vice President of Academic Affairs, Xxxx of the Faculty and XXX-XXXX administrator with a cop...
Post Tenure Review Process. 1. The first post-tenure review will take place in the third year after the granting of tenure, and every fifth year thereafter. Adjustments to this schedule may be arranged by mutual agreement between the faculty member and the appropriate xxxx.
2. The faculty member will form a committee during the first thirty (30) days of the review year. This committee will consist of at least three (3) members, including the appropriate xxxx or designee and at least one tenured faculty member within the division. The third member can be an additional faculty member, a staff member who works closely with the faculty member, a tenured faculty member outside the district with a similar disciplinary focus, or a professional working in a related field. The committee will convene for at least one quarter of the review year.
3. The faculty member will develop a plan for the proposed review schedule within thirty (30) days of the start of the review year and share the plan with the committee. This plan will include a variety of means of assessment including a concise narrative on the following:
a. The faculty member’s impact on student learning and success.
b. The faculty member’s contribution to their discipline.
c. The District’s mission, goals and strategic plans.
d. The faculty member will also solicit input from students. The nature of this input shall be determined by the faculty member.
4. The faculty member and committee will prepare and sign a brief written report summarizing the review process and submit this to the appropriate xxxx no later than one year from the start of the review process. The faculty member will be given a written confirmation upon receipt of this document.
5. The District President will notify the Board of Trustees of the completion of the review at a regularly scheduled Board meeting not more than two (2) months after the review has been completed.
Post Tenure Review Process. At least every three years a tenured unit member’s xxxx, director or designee shall provide written evaluations to tenured unit members. A tenured unit member’s department head/chair shall also provide an evaluation at the request of the xxxx, director or designee. Tenured unit members shall be evaluated comprehensively every six years by peer unit members and administrators. These evaluations shall be conducted in accordance with the procedures set forth in Article 9.2.5, except that unit member will submit only a complete CV and cumulative Annual Activity Reports. The review will consider the CV, Annual Activity Reports, interim evaluations and other appropriate information, and will proceed to the xxxxxxx. The review may proceed to the chancellor only at the request of the unit member. At any time prior to a scheduled evaluation, the unit member's xxxx or director may, as a result of other evaluations, initiate the post-tenure review process. In addition, a post tenure review shall be conducted upon the request of a unit member. For purposes of transition, the initial comprehensive review during the term of this Agreement shall be as currently scheduled unless that would result in a lapse of more than three years between reviews. In that case the unit member will be evaluated through the process set out in paragraph 1 of this section. A scheduled review will in any event occur at least three years from the date of the unit member’s most recent promotion, tenure or scheduled comprehensive post tenure review. Where a xxxx or director initiates an early comprehensive review, a unit member shall be notified no later than the end of the appointment period.
Post Tenure Review Process. At least every three years a tenured unit member’s xxxx, director or designee shall provide written evaluations to tenured unit members. The unit member will submit a self-evaluation covering the period of review (recommended length: 3 pages). A tenured unit member’s tenured department head/chair shall also provide an evaluation at the request of the xxxx, director or designee. Tenured unit members shall be evaluated comprehensively every six years by peer unit members and administrators. These evaluations shall be conducted in accordance with the procedures set forth in Article 9.2.5, except that unit members will submit a file consisting of only a complete CV, a self-evaluation covering the period of review (recommended length: 6 pages), and cumulative Annual Activity Reports for the period under review. The review will consider the CV, the self-evaluation, Annual Activity Reports, interim evaluations and other appropriate information, and will proceed to the xxxxxxx. The review may proceed to the chancellor only at the request of the unit member. A comprehensive post tenure review will be considered satisfactory if it concludes that during the period under review the unit member’s performance has met expectations appropriate to his or her current rank as defined by the evaluation criteria in place for the unit member’s MAU, college and discipline. Unit members who receive an unsatisfactory comprehensive post tenure review shall be ineligible for market and merit salary adjustments until they receive a satisfactory outcome in a subsequent post tenure review. At any time prior to a scheduled evaluation, the unit member's xxxx or director may, as a result of other evaluations, initiate the post-tenure review process. In addition, a post tenure review shall be conducted upon the request of a unit member. For purposes of transition, the initial comprehensive review during the term of this Agreement shall be as currently scheduled unless that would result in a lapse of more than three years between reviews. In that case the unit member will be evaluated through the process set out in paragraph 1 of this section. A scheduled review will in any event occur at least three years from the date of the unit member’s most recent promotion, tenure or scheduled comprehensive post tenure review. Where a xxxx or director initiates an early comprehensive review, a unit member shall be notified no later than the end of the appointment period.
Post Tenure Review Process. The PTR process will be conducted in two (2) steps.
a. Faculty will be notified by the Xxxxxxx/VPAA by September 15 that they have been scheduled for review. The VPAA/Xxxxxxx will make the final selections in consultation with the Deans and based on selection guidelines in this document. A letter will be sent to each selected faculty member with copies to his/her Xxxx, Department Chair and the PTR committee. The names of affected faculty members will be included in the October biannual report to the Contract Administrator of LUC-AAUP. The materials described below* will be submitted by the Faculty Member to the Department Chair by October 31. Upon review of the portfolio, the Department Chair will forward the portfolio along with an evaluative report to the Xxxx by November 7. If the Xxxx decides, following review of the portfolio and Department Chair’s report, with a preponderance of the evidence that further review is needed, the previously submitted materials accompanied by the Xxxx’x assessment, will be referred to the PTR Committee no later than January 15.
b. The PTR Committee will then review/evaluate all aforementioned materials and submit its findings to the VPAA/Xxxxxxx by March 15. The VPAA/Xxxxxxx will send a letter to each faculty member, the Department Chair, the Xxxx, and the Chair of the PTR Committee advising them of the outcome of his/her review. This letter will be sent no later than April
